Exactly. The Moon-photo material probably was totally unusable, because they showed alien craft, ruins and bodies. Therefore those photos needed heavy editing via photoshop, etc... That might be why the AI marked them as fake. Same reason, why a Hollywood studio had to be used to make a fake film: to create a heroic movie material to prove the world, how neat and clever NASA was, what a great job they made with the taxpayers money.
I had similar thoughts that the moon landing indeed happened, but perhaps the astronauts arrived there by means that had to do with alien technology. Or something similar. And the inconsistencies had to do with the fact that some other means were used.
Perhaps "there was no moon landing" is a red herring. Similar to all kind of conspiracies in Russia that Soviets also didn't have a space program as described. Entire articles or books were written about "problems" with various earlier missions. There is no doubt that there were problems and much more failures than advertised. So it's quite possible that NASA couldn't put the man on the Moon unaided.
But all the "no moon landing" people are concentrating on the doubts if the landing happened at all, and these are also the questions that the C's were asked about. But there is another factor that has to be considered.
US had a "treaty" with aliens in the early 70's. But I wonder when collecting and reverse engineering of alien technology started? Did they have access to it already in the late 60's? Or maybe it's not thanks to an alien technology, but knowledge supplied by aliens? Or knowledge obtained from aliens?
There is the following excerpt. If we consider it and what it means, then going to the Moon isn't that spectacular. Especially if we take into account the underground civilization that retained advanced knowledge during all this time. Just some thoughts. Heck, who knows, if indeed there will be a "reveal" of the underground civilization and presenting them as saviors, maybe they will take credit for the moon landing.
www.howandwhys.com
Space is not what we see at night or what NASA has shown us for years. In the midst of stars, planets, and other celestial bodies, there are much more vivid, bizarre, and strange things hidden from our eyes. There are several astronauts who strongly believe in the existence of extraterrestrial civilizations including Gordon Cooper, Buzz Aldrin, and Story Musgrave.
Many conspiracy theorists believe that NASA knew that Buzz Aldrin and Neil Armstrong had an encounter with aliens, that is why they erased 40 rolls of film from the Apollo 11 mission. It was claimed by Bob Dean, a United States Army Command Sergeant Major.
The crew Of Sts-80, Seated (From Left-to-right) Kent V. Rominger, Pilot; Kenneth D. Cockrell, Commander. Standing (Left To Right) Mission Specialists Tamara E. Jernigan, F. Story Musgrave, And Thomas D. Jones. Photo Credit: Nasa
According to a report shared by Gaia, there is a transcript between Aldrin and Armstrong where the two had witnessed extraterrestrial activities on Moon during the Apollo 11 mission.
Apollo 11: “Those are giant things. No, no, no, this is not an optical illusion. No one is going to believe this.”
NASA: “What… what…. what? What the hell is happening What’s wrong with you?”
Apollo 11: “They’re here, under the surface.”
That piece of Apollo 11 communication transcript doesn't appear in the Nasa version of the Apollo 11 transcript, which can be found here: https://history.nasa.gov/alsj/a11/AS11_TEC.PDFThere are also some questionable transcripts, allegedly between Aldrin and Armstrong, that put out the idea that maybe they saw something alien out there:
Ret. NASA Astronaut Claimed To Have Seen Snake-Shaped UFOs During Two Missions In Space
Former NASA astronaut Franklin Story Musgrave claimed to had seen an 8 foot-long snake, white in color, floating through space. It is hard to explain how a snake could reach space, but Musgrave has never denied it.
More from Gaia:
I don't know what to make of it in terms of veracity, but it points again the possibility that the Apollo moon landing did involve some kind of overt hyperdimensional activity... not in terms of assistance in getting there, but in terms of showing up and getting a cosmic surprise!
I've read Christopher Knowles' blog The Secret Sun, quite extensively. He did a series on this topic few years ago, which he called Lucifer's Technologies, where he theorised, IIRC, that the "Roswell incident" was the first of many technological gifts from someone/something Luciferian, and a result of megaritual, in which Jack Parsons partook, among others.
If I had to bet I would point to that scenario, or something similar.
I hadn’t considered that before, but sounds pretty plausible- in fact very much in keeping with America does it best ideology. I rather like this perspective. Could be way off.
The first US lunar lander in more than 50 years rocketed toward the moon Monday, launching private companies on a space race to make deliveries for NASA and other customers.
Astrobotic Technology’s lander caught a ride on a brand new rocket, United Launch Alliance’s Vulcan.
The Vulcan streaked through the Florida predawn sky, putting the spacecraft on a roundabout route to the moon that should culminate with an attempted landing on Feb. 23.
...
Besides flying experiments for NASA, Astrobotic drummed up its own freight business, packing the 6-foot-tall (1.9-meter-tall) Peregrine lander with everything from a chip of rock from Mount Everest and toy-size cars from Mexico that will catapult to the lunar surface and cruise around, to the ashes and DNA of deceased space enthusiasts, including “Star Trek” creator Gene Roddenberry and science fiction writer Arthur C. Clarke.
First US lunar lander in more than 50 years rockets toward moon with commercial deliveries
The first U.S. lunar lander in more than 50 years rocketed toward the moon Monday, launching private companies on a space race to make deliveries for NASA and other customers.nypost.com
Companies, governments, universities, non-profits, and individuals can send payloads to the Moon at $300K, $1.2M, or $4.5M per kilogram of payload delivered to lunar orbit, to the lunar surface, or on a rover, respectively.
Standard payload delivery options include lunar orbit and the lunar surface where payloads may remain attached to the lander, deploy from the lander for an independent mission, or hitch a ride on an Astrobotic lunar rover.
Payloads less than 1 kg may be subject to integration fees. DHL MoonBox offers an affordable alternative to send small items to the Moon. Prices start at $460.
Check it out at astrobotic.com.
Looks like its not going far. Don't know why, passed all its vacuum thermal testing.
Nor is Artemis! Like a Christmas toy the batteries need replacing! Among other things.
SpaceX is way behind, 2 billion per annum well spent!
Not to worry NASA will have another junket in some exotic location on the GLOBE and issue another power point presentation.
www.space.com
