Moon Landings: Did They Happen or Not?

[T.C.]

So are we positively sure they actually went to the moon, as the official story says?

On 23rd of Sept, 2023, the C’s said Neil Armstrong took man’s first steps on the moon.

Q: (Perlou) Did Neil Armstrong take man's first steps on the Moon on July 16, 1969?

A: Yes

 

[Mrs. Peel]

On 23rd of Sept, 2023, the C’s said Neil Armstrong took man’s first steps on the moon.

Q: (Perlou) Did Neil Armstrong take man's first steps on the Moon on July 16, 1969?

A: Yes

From AI:

"Neil Armstrong landed on the moon on July 20, 1969, as part of the Apollo 11 mission. He became the first person to walk on the moon about six and a half hours later, famously stating, "That's one small step for man, one giant leap for mankind".

• Landing date: July 20, 1969
• Mission: Apollo 11
• First step: Armstrong took his first step on the lunar surface on July 20, 1969, though the actual time of touchdown was earlier in the day."

 

[T.C.]

From AI:

"Neil Armstrong landed on the moon on July 20, 1969, as part of the Apollo 11 mission. He became the first person to walk on the moon about six and a half hours later, famously stating, "That's one small step for man, one giant leap for mankind".

• Landing date: July 20, 1969
• Mission: Apollo 11
• First step: Armstrong took his first step on the lunar surface on July 20, 1969, though the actual time of touchdown was earlier in the day."

Yeah, this was already mentioned in the thread, too.

Overall, my reason for quoting that session is because if we want to use the C’s to discuss the moon landings, then they’ve already said Armstrong “took man’s first steps on the moon”, whatever that means.

Problem is, they said the Atlanteans built things on the moon - pyramids or energy collectors or something. So either the Atlanteans weren’t ‘men’, or they built them here and transported them to the moon unmanned…

I was surprised at Gaby’s post, asking if we are going to take it as a given that Armstrong went to the moon, because as someone who has believed the Apollo 11 mission was fake since I was little, I’ve always felt it’s something of a sacred cow here in our group.

I was present at the session I quoted. I saw how the question was asked and how the response came through. It didn’t feel right to me. But reading between the lines, the message I get is to make up your own mind about it. Trying to get the truth about the moon landings in a C’s session seems to me like trying to define what Piety is by referencing the Greek Gods - who all disagree with each other.

Over the course of this discussion, I’ve leaned more towards the idea that maybe they did go, and things got so weird that images and stories had to be created. If it comes down to deciding whether they went or not, personally at this point, I’m honestly not bothered about dying on either hill.

 

[axj]

July 17, 2022:

(vulcan59) Have humans flown past the Van Allen radiation belts?

A: Yes. More than once too!

September 9, 2000:

Q: (L) Okay, moving right along here. We have here a guy who has written a paper that says: "To make interstellar travel believable, NASA was created. The Apollo space program foisted the idea that man could travel to and walk upon the moon. Every Apollo mission was carefully rehearsed and then filmed in the large sound stages at the Atomic Energy Commission's Top Secret test site in the Nevada Desert and in the secured and guarded sound stage at the Walt Disney studios within which was a huge, full scale mock-up of the Moon." Is it true that the Apollo missions were films as described here?

A: No.

Q: (L) Did the Apollo missions actually go into space as we think they did?

A: Yes.

Q: (L) This guy further writes that "All names, missions, landing sites and events in the Apollo space program echo the occult metaphors, rituals and symbology of the Illuminati secret religion. The most transparent was the fakes explosion on the spacecraft Apollo 13 named 'Aquarius' at 1:13 on April 13, 1970, which was a metaphor for the initiation ceremony involving the death, placement of the coffin, communion with the spiritual world, and the imparting of esoteric knowledge to the candidate, rebirth of the initiate, and the raising up of Phoenix, the new age of Aquarius by the group of the Lion's Paw..." and so on and on. Was this occult significance applied to these events, either deliberately or accidentally?

A: Maybe coincidentally.

Q: (L) If there was any coincidence of application of these principles, did it bespeak an underlying synchronous or nonlocal reality of oneness?

A: These ideas being put forth this evening are entertaining if nothing else!

Q: (L) Well, I always said that you could derive occult significance from where the paper man tosses the paper on the lawn if you try hard enough! Nevertheless, this guy further writes that "The tremendous radiation encountered in the Van Allen belt, solar radiation, cosmic radiation, solar flares, temperature control and many other problems connected with space travel, prevent living organisms from leaving our atmosphere with our known level of technology. Any intelligent high school student with a basic physics book can prove NASA faked the Apollo moon landings. If you doubt this, please explain how the astronauts walked upon the moon surface enclosed in a space suit, in full sunlight, absorbing a minimum of 265 degrees of heat, surrounded by a vacuum. And that is not even taking into consideration any of the effects of the cosmic radiation, solar flares, micro-meteorites, etc." Comment please?

A: No comment!

Maybe a quick question for a future session:

Did the Apollo missions land on the Moon with the help of secret technology such as anti-gravity devices?

This is based on Joseph Farrell's research:

In my view, the landings on and liftoffs from the lunar surface were enabled by the use of some variation of the Bell technology, and that this would explain why Dr. Kurt Debus, the former Nazi actually in charge of the Cape Canaveral launch site and Apollo schedule, was in the position he was in, for he was not a rocket scientist at all, but a plasma and high voltage physicist, and in fact had been a member of the team working on the Nazi Bell.

INDIA SNAPS SOME INTERESTING PHOTOS OF THE LUNAR SURFACE

Well whaddaya know? When K.M. sent along this story, I was stunned, both for the self-explanatory nature of the story, but - I must…

gizadeathstar.com

 

[Ursus Minor]

According to RA the deep state were in possession of 573 UAP type craft in 1981 already.

Their production should at least have started in 1978 with their development and experimentation probably starting in the Apollo time range. I wonder if some spin-off from the new technology was used for the Moon missions to make Apollo more dependable.

Any devices should have been small and inconspicuous and could have been removed before putting the Apollo capsules on exhibition.

The thought of returning to the moon using a 60 year old technology doesn't make sense other than trying to hide new existing forms of transport from the public.

 

[Wandering Star]

In 1492 a man made those voyages across unexplored waters in the Atlantic Ocean and he did it in this way:

20 meters by 6 meters wide, without cabins and sleeping on the floor.

I've been on a life-size replica of one of Columbus's caravels, and it's a disorienting experience. It seems impossible that anyone could sail that nutshell anywhere.

What is known about radiation in space and the technology used in trips to the moon seems to make no sense.

Perhaps they were lucky until reality forced them to stop doing it due to multiple problems.

What is very strange is the perfection of how everything went on the first trip and the absence of any health problems in the astronauts.

They looked as if they had returned from a walk in the park.

There's definitely something strange about this.