Guardian said:Some days I just want to say "Dear Mother, please bring a virus that only kills humans" ....oh, wait
"Dear Mother, please bring a virus that kills only...psychopaths!"
Guardian said:Some days I just want to say "Dear Mother, please bring a virus that only kills humans" ....oh, wait
1984 said:anart said:The earth benefits from a periodic cleansing.
And an Amen to that, sister! Where are those comets?
LQB said:1984 said:anart said:The earth benefits from a periodic cleansing.
And an Amen to that, sister! Where are those comets?
I agree ... and here's one:
103P/Hartley 2 Closest approach .12 AU on Oct 20. Not very close but we are in its tail from Nov through Jan. Strangely enough this time frame corresponds to Clif's tipping point and months-long emotional release. Check out the trajectory:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Oqa6aQGLjvo&feature=player_embedded
I can't tell from the JPL site what's in it, but the video makes you wonder what might be in it's tail. Watch how long we (earth) fly through it's tail.
Earth Angel said:I did not watch the videoand I will not. I do not want to support them in any way. However, I am wondering when these comets going to come and hit these psychopaths who treats our 2D and 3D friends badly?
Some days you just want to say "Bring on the comets!"
Bluestar said:Gandalf said:Laura said:Some days you just want to say "Bring on the comets!"
So true.
ditto
anart said:Well, just for the record, no video was posted! I wouldn't even look at still excerpts - the link posted was to an article that describes the legislation and the videos themselves, which is horrific enough.
SAO said:Also, I'm confused - why aren't existing animal cruelty laws applicable to these things?
Isn't this blatant animal cruelty?
I don't understand the need of any additional laws specifically for "crush videos".
Also, how would they even enforce this?
If you can't identify who is responsible by the video, how can they catch and stop them?
I'd say they need to target the distribution channels - make it illegal to distribute or host such content, that might curb the incentive of making them?
Also, you can trace just about anything that's posted online - someone had to upload it, and that IP is always logged and the ISP can tell you who it was, if you're the police.
Also, if they really wanted to catch these people,
the best way is to infiltrate.
truth seeker said:Who in the world could even think up such a thing!Seamas said:NormaRegula said:article said:The videos mostly depict women -- with their faces unseen -- stomping helpless animals such as rabbits to death with spiked-heel shoes or with their bare feet. The videos apparently satisfy a sexual fetish for those who produce and watch them, said animal rights activists who supported the new bill.
The perversion and depravity involved in such a video is mind-boggling to anyone with an ounce of empathy for living creatures. It makes me sick to my stomach to know that there are people who produce and enjoy such cruelty. Positively sickening...to say the least.
I was unaware that this sort of thing was made as well. I'm speechless.
Ah, now I get it, thanks.Guardian said:It's currently illegal to do these horrible things to animals in the US BUT it is NOT currently illegal to distribute and possess crush porn in the US. Thus far, the only video's, mags, etc. which are illegal in the US are child porn.
Good point, although it's not a myth if the person doesn't know how to use proxies, or doesn't bother, or maybe simply forgets. I'm betting that the psychopaths in question will sometimes slip up for one of those 3 reasons - after all, psychopaths aren't known for being terribly intelligent or having too much foresight or long-term thinking. Their absolute certainty in getting away with it and arrogance makes them not take all the precautions they otherwise would. That whole wishful thinking thing, you know..Guardian said:SAO said:Also, you can trace just about anything that's posted online - someone had to upload it, and that IP is always logged and the ISP can tell you who it was, if you're the police.
This is a common myth. The truth is that content can easily be uploaded to the Internet completely anonymously if a person knows what s/he is doing. Worthy proxy servers simply do not keep logs...nothing to give the cops if they come knocking.
What you can follow is the MONEY...but to do that (legally) the product has to be illegal. It's not... YET.
US officials like bribes too! But yeah I mean you can't stop someone from filming something in the privacy of their own home, you only find out about this stuff once they try spreading it around. Killing the money part of it will definitely stop some of them, but not the ones who do it for pure sadistic pleasure - those would require another approach, which is where the infiltration thing may work.Guardian said:The officials in countries where CV's are created don't want to "catch them," they want to be bribed...and they are.
I was thinking every country would use its own local law enforcement to do their own infiltration, they just need to agree on a couple things first - like what should or shouldn't be "obviously illegal". But the fact that any country even exists where creating and distributing such things is legal is.. well it's not even shocking, I guess it's just par for the course on this planet.Guardian said:Not a bad idea...are you volunteering, and do you speak Chinese? ;)