Crystla24 said:
I don't know that I could really give much advice because I seem to struggle with the excact issues. I read through one of your other threads and there was a lot in common between you and I, from my perception. It started happening when I was still a teenager and had gone "beyond depressed". Like life finally did me in. To where, ultimately, I quit hurting and feeling sorry for myself, but I really could not feel any happiness or interests. For a long time I just considered myself a Nihilist- Wikipedia definition- a person who believes human existence has no objective meaning, purpose, or intrinsic value. I had pulled out of this at one point in time, but I find myself falling back to it from time to time.
In my case I never became quite at "peace" because strong, neurotic issues also entered - these have since been struggled with quite successfully. As for the emotional deadness, as is more or less suggested by
the last update made in that thread, I've started to come out on the other side - much left before that sinkhole has been fully left behind, but something has changed.
It seems that on this "other side", life again (for me as yet in slow, gradual steps) begins to pick up, but with considerably less illusions held and considerably less attachment - I think the seeds of a
bankruptcy (in Mouravieff's sense) were sown back then (as he notes in Gnosis, strong negative emotions are almost always needed to bring this about - I think because it is the only thing capable of fully "punching through" the crust, smashing a false personality at the core) - so once all the garbage (lies and identifications) gathered by the false self in order to "patch up" on top of this is ripped away, maybe such a bankruptcy can finally, uninterrupted, unfold in full - if so, something to look forward to.
Crystla24 said:
When one has life goals, how do they know their life will take them to meet their ends, or will it just be another broken hope. Why not quit all the "wishful thinking" and just have fun in seeing where life takes you next. If it is not taking you anywhere, maybe a new environment could help.
Or a new inner environment. Because wherever one goes, one carries it along; the lessons one has to face can never be escaped, and if learning is the goal, neither should they.
luke wilson said:
My personal thoughts are that exterior life does matter, after all that is how you express yourself, that is how you interact with the world out there, by the decisions and choices you make.
And Learn - yes; that's the whole point of struggling with all this.
luke wilson said:
I think a good place to start is to figure out what interests you. How do you spend your days? What do you do? What kind of stuff do you read or watch? what about the world out there captivates your mind, arouses interest? Then you can try and connect that with something out there that will give you an opportunity to potentially make a living along the same routes... I think it is atleast useful if you start engaging yourself in this way, at the very least you're bound to learn something new about yourself.
Mentioned in my post was that these things - mainly software programming - that have been done as a hobby were confused for general interests - and that that was a lie I told myself in identifying with, in this case, the role of "programmer" as well as with the projects themselves.
It's "empty". So I have no general interests - and honestly I'm fine with that (to make it otherwise, I think, would require lying very deeply to myself); what matters is having or gathering the strength and understanding to struggle successfully regardless - any fool can go along with something identified with (ie. something "liked"), but - or so I think - really going along without identification would be an actual and worthwhile struggle.
Megan said:
You might want to pay special attention to that "deep and lasting disillusionment." It could well work in your favor, and I don't know but once you SEE on an even larger scale, you may not feel that way any longer. In the mean time, unfailing perseverance can be helpful. It can help find a job, too.
While the following is nothing new, I've "figured out" that there are two ways to "succeed" in life: Either one believes all the lies, or one sees through it all - if one is somewhere in-between, things go badly.
I think this "SEEing on an even larger scale" is what is slowly beginning to happen - hence further disillusionment (in this case beginning with myself) noted in the post, and the idea, which is looking ever-more reasonable and attractive, of the solution of picking something that works for a usefully free life and outwardly faking interest.
RyanX said:
Well, there are jobs/careers people take because they want to work up the ladder or hierarchy and then there are jobs people take because they may not be interested in a lot of work-related responsibilities and would rather have greater freedom to pursue their own interests. Financially, it can be a trade-off, but if you're content living a modest lifestyle and would rather have a greater range of freedom on the job, it might be worthwhile looking into a job that offers more of a range of freedoms. As far as "pretending to be interested" in a job, I don't know many co-workers that don't do this, aside from those who are pathologically driven in some way. :D
[...] After seeing this kind of job, I realized that this was the sort of job that I wanted, it didn't matter what I was actually doing (within reason, of course), as long as I had the time and freedom to pursue my own interests.
I'm not sure if this helps you or not, but had I known that these jobs were out there, I probably would have worked harder to get into one from the beginning instead of wasting so much time doing jobs that required my full attention for the entire time at work. That might be something to consider in your job search. It's obviously something that is not discussed among employers, head-hunters, etc., but it can make a big difference in the life of an individual when working a job.
That is helpful - it merges beautifully with the option of "picking something" that works and outwardly faking interest - as a practical idea of what to look for.
The question remaining is what jobs to look for in this light, and in considering the likelihood of actually getting them. And what skills are presently acquired vs. which would be required. More on that further down.
Mrs. Peel said:
Worrying about one's "mission" really doesn't accomplish anything. Providing you are open to the Universe, all that will sort itself out eventually. :)
Thanks for something both practical and common-sensible.
Palinurus said:
Nevertheless, rather soon I found out how much ones social standing and societal involvement in general is inextricably linked to the job you cater for and the payment you receive for it. So the inevitable outcome was a gradually downgrading in status and a growing isolation socially just because I willy-nilly was blatantly different from my initial peergroup. I also found out pretty soon that one is discriminated against when you try to get another job coming from a lower ranked position or from a longer time jobless situation, just because there are insufficient references in your resume. It's almost as if you had been 'doing time' (in the slammer) if you know what I mean. So ultimately this strategy works against you socially in the long run, I've found. There is no turning back. You have to realise this up front. It also may hamper you considerably would you intend to get married.
1. Apart from purely practical concerns, I don't care what "standing" I have in what groups. (with the exception, of course, of this network - because here this is actually based on something objective - on what one really is) In society, all of that is empty, vapid, stupid nonsense anyway. And if one seeks genuine social ties, I think one can find that in whatever "class" one ends up - and if they are genuine, it is irrelevant what standing one's peers have.
2. With the way the world is very rapidly going, all of that should be the least concern to any sane person.
3. I think only a moron would knowingly seek to marry (or have a relationship with) a person who cares about such things. And in any case, marriage - which is unrelated to the health and genuine seriousness of a relationship - is no more than a tradition bundled with a psychopathic religion.
Palinurus said:
The other side of the coin is the freedom you can enjoy.
[...]
So, to conclude I would say you have to have a very strong character to 'go it alone' and accomplish anything worthwhile for others from a position on the fringe. At least, I couldn't pull it off - which doesn't have to signify anything about your predicament I wouldn't think.
Hope this helps a bit in finding a solution.
I'm already on the fringe - I neither have a good nor bad social standing - since I'm not even really "out there" in life yet. I wonder what concretely you have in mind regarding "accomplishing anything worthwhile for others" - if you mean for people in general around you in life, then perhaps that is so; if you mean for the network, I'd think time and energy is what matters.
Omega said:
From what I understand though, its not the job finding part that seems to be the genuine problem, its more your lack of appetite for various day-to-day matter. Having gone through a lot of the work and learning in the past years, I think you are now seeing the outside world (meaning outside of your house) as futile.
However, the experiences are out there and people to network with also. Like Ryan said, you could find a job that would allow you to pursue your learning while filling the necessity to bring some money home.
More to the point, it is the self-importance that would have me tied to "likes" and "dislikes" - this inner slavery.
Yes, futile in any ordinary measure - though I fully recognize that it is there that the biggest and most significant classroom is found for learning Life's lessons. In theory - has to be put into practice.
parallel said:
Perhaps you could expand on the few bits that you know you do like, like a study of interest which could be translated with some correction to an everyday profession.
The point is that there are none in ordinary life except for specialized obsessions which do not "scale" into general interests.
parallel said:
So that your knowledge, continued search and wish to be expansive (if that is so) could be tuned into mundane life. I'll bet the mundane still hides rich gems for you if travelled with an interest of yours and you allow your eyes and ears to see and hear in that direction, which would probably mean to lay some prejudices to rest.
Well, once fully disillusioned with these former "special interests", the knowledge and understanding in the area could perhaps, in a wholly disinterested manner, be expanded to turn them into more general skills. It'd be a relatively easy way to arrive at a competence for some kind of work in general.
Oxajil said:
When you already anticipate in how it's going to be, then perhaps you're blocking yourself of opportunities in work environments to be beneficial to you. All of your likes/dislikes don't necessarily have to be Yours, perhaps they're (dis)likes based on programs, that of fear of interacting with others or something like that.
Perhaps the key is not to 'like' a job per se, not many people like their jobs, perhaps it's more about the things you can learn in your work environment and what you can learn from the interaction with different kinds of people. Learning how to listen, how to talk, how to act in certain situations. Observing yourself while doing your job etc.
That the likes and dislikes are programs is known - to my knowledge, when it comes to all that has formed in the personality, there is and can be no other kind. The difficulty is in overcoming the self-importance and inner resistance and disregarding all this - struggling with sufficient strength.
Those expectations that are emotionally based are an issue (and such lie thickly when it comes to social issues - there I must come out of my shell) - those merely in the intellect come and go like the wind. The things you bolded were mostly based on past experience - at the same time, I'm aware that something is changing as of late, something of feeling - so new experience may well change that.
As for the last thing bolded, about a job taken up just to get money being empty, that - in itself, and assuming self-importance is overcome - is not about dislikes, but simply the absence of likes - a complete neutrality, in other words, if I get over myself to that point.
Oxajil said:
Right now your basing your decisions on your likes and dislikes, which is okay,
Actually not - it means a lack of following (in genuine practice) a real Aim in life, and in consequence drifting - exactly the thing that must change.
Oxajil said:
but if you would base them on your desire to learn too, then it won't be that hard anymore to find a job like-able. The school is out there, too, in the real world.
Given sufficient death of self-importance, yes - then it will work. And some of that is proceeding along with the realizations before and after posting this thread. Before, I could not have considered seriously the idea of picking something and just faking an interest - now it looks like the way to go, and as a journey of learning.
Oxajil said:
For the average man, the world is weird because if he's not
bored with it, he's at odds with it. For a warrior, the world is
weird because it is stupendous, awesome, mysterious, unfathomable.
Feeling must enter - that has proved to be a new possibility - then this can be put into practice. Such feeling is there, but only comes from time to time, with so much else "in there". If this changes, then it will all be easier.
anart said:
I've never actually been 'interested' in my work - ever. I worked because I had to support myself, because it's what is necessary to live in this world and put a roof over my head (later, not at 14, things weren't that bad ;) ). I think it's fantastic when people work in areas that fulfill them in some way and I know that it's possible, it just hasn't been the case for me in this lifetime. I've worked so that I am able to have time and money to do what actually does interest me. Work is a means to an end - that's it - my Real life occurs in the time I have for myself, but even that would not be possible if I didn't work for it.
So, perhaps it's time to realize that work is usually a means to an end - it's not the goal and if you go through life expecting to be fulfilled by (or even interested in) every aspect of it, then you're not really giving yourself many opportunities to consciously suffer. Sometimes you just have to push yourself to do something in order to realize what action is and appreciate time at all. fwiw.
That's what had begun to sink in - thanks for confirming it. It is sinking in further, and it is killing part of my self-importance.
hallowed said:
I read a study recently that the most satisfying jobs are where you are helping other people.
This article could be of some help to you Psalehesost - in finding a job that is satisfying? read this:
http://www.livescience.com/1431-survey-reveals-satisfying-jobs.html
[...]
I didnt like this attitude inside so i got employment helping people with extreme disabilities part time, so that i can help people in real need and develop my STO attitude and keep my arrogance and selfishness in check. developing appreciation for what you have. (ie. if you want, check out that article!)
Though most jobs "helping people" are all about being a cog in a machine that does not objectively help people, in other words a job of helping to keep the machine (ie. human factory farm) running smoothly. In these cases, I would not be fooled into thinking it a great "service", and therefore would not take any special pleasure in or feel myself great for it - it would simply, as any other ordinary job, be something to do to get money.
Your particular example might be an exception - but then, perhaps that is something, again, for "people persons". Something more crafts-oriented might suit me, though again I wouldn't feel special about it if it were "useful".
Odyssey said:
You may want to consider jobs not so much based on what you "like" as to whether it suits your temperament and your level of stress tolerance. Meaning, a job that will provide you with the means to support yourself without driving you nuts with stress and worry. Something that won't exhaust you mentally or physically, thereby leaving you with enough energy to pursue your real interests. FWIW
That seems to sum it up, pretty much. At present (I may yet significantly change for all I know) that would mean: Probably technically oriented, with reasonable workload, where the skills needed are either such already had or ones quickly acquired. I don't think there is time for further (non-self) education, unless it is a fairly quick course in something - unless as part of something leading up to future jobs of a different kind, in parallel with finding and getting a job at present - I think I'll have to begin with something I know enough or nearly enough right now to do. More on that further down.
luke wilson said:
Reading through all this is really tough, to see why people work which I think is representative of the majority. [...] Very disheartening but am sure a lesson that is awaiting anyone going to join the workforce.
Amazing the lies we were told about finding "the job you like" and so on. But now we have the chance to learn this lesson beforehand instead of staggering on for years trying to cling to illusions.
RedFox said:
I've struggled with this (despite having a job)....I also understand the social awkwardness.
Anart's and other points are totally valid, and I've understood them for years....trouble is I couldn't put them into action. Something always stopped me....I felt immobilised by life.
What has become clear recently is (at least in my case) it may have another underlying cause that is 'blocking' all aspects of my life - it has a nullifying effect in all areas of my life, lack of interest in things, finding things overly traumatic (before it would be 'null', now as I've stripped away layers small traumas are blown out of proportion)....
I've been reading - not yet finished - In An Unspoken Voice. (there is considerable resistance to reading it from some "I", which suggests that reading it is a great idea) I can recognize that the sympathetic nervous system was in overdrive throughout much of my childhood, until gradually immobilization took over as I approached my teens, and then strengthened further until it became quite entrenched. The two used to alternate, with the balance slowly tipping over the years.
This is loosening up little by little, I feel - the balance now tipping back - though there has not been much in the way of shaking and trembling and such - probably because there are not a few, strongly traumatizing events but a long stretch of a slow inner grinding-up of myself.
It is the gradual coming loose - or somewhat looser - that makes it possible to really recognize what I have to do, why, and now taking steps in this direction. I guess there's more to come, and definitely more to read and explore on this topic.
Now, what was referred to further above - alternatives - which I'll get to here. Firstly, in terms of long-term planning, there's one definite thing - I'm not going to stay up here in Scandinavia longer than I have to, so I hope that whatever steps are taken and whatever genuine progress is had will lead me to this. This means not really looking for a long-term job right now - rather something... "for now". Staying as open as possible.
In the long term, I guess any of a number of things would do as a job - in the short term, it is likely best to go for that for which I have relevant skills as of now.
If a relevant job is found, the skills that may be more or less immediately capitalized on (and the hard part is finding a first job, in not having much in the way of academic credentials) are:
1. Programming, particularly being rather used to development done in the old-fashioned UNIX-style. Also to a very limited extent web programming - limited because much is typically but not always used that I have no experience whatever with.
2. Knowing Linux (some less user-friendly-oriented distros) as well as several BSD systems, having been installing, using, messing around with and maintaining my installations, though as yet only as a "user".
3. Applying digital audio processing and having a good "ear" for this - could perhaps, if I'd get far in this direction, eventually become an audio or "mastering" engineer at some company dealing with trashy pop media. Big con in that case: Perpetually jellified brain from constant listening to such.
#1 is most likely (would work perfectly straightaway if a suitable niche job is found that accepts self-taught programmers without previous work experience - not so likely, but not impossible); #2 would most likely need more development to become applicable to a job. #3 is both unlikely (no credentials) and due to the big con in the common case of such work, also likely out - though exceptions in the realm of professional work are conceivable.
In the somewhat longer term, could also "branch out" a bit from these - from #2, become familiar with server administration, perhaps? Or going from #1, proficiently learn the Microsoft way of doing things - since this is very, very big in the industry; or alternatively become a learned web developer although without much design skills, if such have much opportunity for work - perhaps, even likely, in bigger teams where tasks are divided.
In the longer term, I guess there's any number of possibilities I can't presently think of.
At present, as of some weeks back I've been going along with attempts at finding work related to #1. It might help in this regard, perhaps, to - in a ruthlessly pragmatic fashion - dust off some the free time projects, get them working well enough, and release the source on the 'net so as to become more visible and more easily have something to refer to. That would be one use of those former obsessions.