Ongoing Events in China

There is indeed misinformation about it and it is also still in development to a large degree.


Keep in mind that about half of all surveillance cameras in the world are in China, which indicates a large desire by the CCP to have an extensive digital control system in place.

Needless to say, just because the CCP and Western pathocrats seem to be opposed to each other in some areas, it does not mean that one side is better than the other.

I'm not so sure about that. It all depends on the data and the reality on the ground, and the extent to which we can see that reality. Which is difficult in the case of China, for sure. That said, if one brings a kinda relativistic 'no side is better than the other' lens to the situation, I think that this only increases the chance of not actually seeing the situation clearly due to preconceived notions.

Comparative politics as an approach is a pretty useful tool. But it only makes sense insofar as we make a value judgment about this or that nation's policy in contrast to another. As a basic example, I think Sweden's lockdown policy was better than Italy's. The Swedish government was not perfect, or 'the good guys' or whatever, but they chose a policy (for whatever reason) that was less harmful.

As I mentioned in the post I wrote above, I have been pretty surprised to find myself preferring China's internal economic domestic policy, which to my eye is better than America's financial oligarchy and de-industrialization option. I also find that China's geopolitical strategy of a pretty peaceful call to increase of trade and investment via the BRI to be way better than that of America's network of overseas military bases and colour-revolution petrodollar extortion game.

The Chinese government is not perfect, but they have chosen some policy options (for whatever reason) that look way less harmful than that of the USA.

In my own view, I think jumping to the conclusion that China is under the control of pathocrats isn't doing us any favours, either. After all, Lobaczewski wrote that the process of ponerization moves in pretty distinct stages which are characterized by a complex struggle in the elite classes between a number of organizations that are populated by a spectrum of beings ranging from honest patriots to full-blown psychopaths. Personally, I get the sense that this is where China is at currently.

In comparison, in America, maybe the process of ponerization could be said to have gone through a full maturation process, with various timeline points as evidence, like the creation of the Fed just prior to WW1, not-so-secret Nazi collaboration in WW2, JFK's assassination, and pathocracy coming fully online with 9/11.
 
That said, if one brings a kinda relativistic 'no side is better than the other' lens to the situation, I think that this only increases the chance of not actually seeing the situation clearly due to preconceived notions.
I did not say that 'no side is better than the other'. I pointed out that it is a common preconceived notion to think that one side must be "good" and the other "bad" when two sides are in conflict.

My view is that Russia definitely has a better chance of offering a non-totalitarian alternative for humanity than either the current West or China. There are also countries like Japan, India and others that may not want to take the dystopian road and may some day form a closer alliance with Russia against the totalitarian powers.

In my own view, I think jumping to the conclusion that China is under the control of pathocrats isn't doing us any favours, either. After all, Lobaczewski wrote that the process of ponerization moves in pretty distinct stages which are characterized by a complex struggle in the elite classes between a number of organizations that are populated by a spectrum of beings ranging from honest patriots to full-blown psychopaths. Personally, I get the sense that this is where China is at currently.

In comparison, in America, maybe the process of ponerization could be said to have gone through a full maturation process, with various timeline points as evidence, like the creation of the Fed just prior to WW1, not-so-secret Nazi collaboration in WW2, JFK's assassination, and pathocracy coming fully online with 9/11.
The CCP has been in full control of China for over 70 years now. I agree that some of their policies have been better or less harmful than those of the US in the recent past. Yet my point is that the CCP does appear to want totalitarian domestic control with mass surveillance and digital control systems, and actually appears to be further ahead in this compared to the West.

I think that the CCP was fully on board all the Western globalist plans until recently. Now it looks like the CCP wants China to become the "top dog" itself and no longer wants to be subservient to Western pathocrats. This seems to be a struggle regarding who will be on top in a totalitarian world that both the CCP and Western pathocrats seem to want.

I do not see the CCP standing up for more freedom and against totalitarian control, quite the opposite.
 
Now it looks like the CCP wants China to become the "top dog" itself and no longer wants to be subservient to Western pathocrats.
I sometimes wonder about how much national sovereignty really exists. I believe that, just like among the secret societies, among think tanks, among corporations, some limited competition seems to be allowed. But I always remember this excerpt from Session January 25, 1991:
Q: (T) ... How many other governments have craft?
A: All is one.
Q: (L) We already have a one-world government is what they’re saying. (T) Yes, they’re just waiting to make it official somehow. (L) Let me ask. What is…
A: Has been so for long time, as you measure time.
 
I think you transposed a couple of numbers PopHistorian. The session is January 21, 1995.
Q: (T) Very true. Question: The government, our government, the U.S. government, is holding 36 craft of one kind or another that they gotten in one way or another. How many other governments have craft?

A: All is one.

Q: (L) We already have a one-world government is what they're saying. (T) Yes, they're just waiting to make it official somehow. (L) Let me ask. What is...

A: Has been so for long time, as you measure time.
Just in case anyone wanted to find the session.
 
I sometimes wonder about how much national sovereignty really exists. I believe that, just like among the secret societies, among think tanks, among corporations, some limited competition seems to be allowed. But I always remember this excerpt from Session January 25, 1991:

An important update from the more recent session is that perhaps the one world government isn't so unified now in this time of really significant geopolitical shifts.

Q: (T.C.) The C's once said that 'all is one' regarding world governments. Is this still the case?

A: Less now than then. Recall the control that the USA had over Russia until Putin began to make moves to change this.

So one world government is lessening in its reach.

If we were to transpose this quote to China's case, perhaps we could say something like, "recall the control that the USA/UK had over China during the Century of Humiliation until Mao began to make moves to change this."

The question would be whether or not Mao was a member of the secret world government. I don't know if we will ever know. Maybe more to the point is Xi's participation in one world government.

In the above C's quote, it seems like one way to approach this question is to ask if the country in question is still subject to control by the US unipolar order. In that sense, it could be that Xi and the seven-man Standing Committee are as independent from US control as they seem.

As I was reading this article on SOTT, this section stood out as apropos:

II. Seven Mouths, Eight Tongues

China has been suspicious of Western liberal capitalism since the 1800s, when the country's initial openness led to the Western powers flooding China with opium. The epidemic of addiction, combined with the ensuing Opium Wars, accelerated the fall of the Qing Dynasty and led to the Century of Humiliation in which China was subject to harsh and unequal terms by Britain and the US.

Mao is credited with eventually crushing the opium epidemic, and since then the view among many in China has been that Western liberalism leads to decadence and that authoritarianism is the cure. But one man has done more than anyone to turn this thesis into policy.

His name is Wang Huning, and, despite not being well known outside China, he has been China's top ideological theorist for three decades, and he is now member number 4 of the seven-man Standing Committee — China's most powerful body. He advised China's former leaders Jiang Zemin and Hu Jintao, and now he advises Xi Jinping, authoring many of his policies. In China he is called "guoshi" (国师: literally, "teacher of the nation").

Wang Huning

Wang Huning

Wang refuses to do press or to even speak with foreigners, but his worldview can be surmised from the books he wrote earlier in his life. In August 1988, Wang accepted an invitation to spend six months in the US, and traveled from state to state noting the way American society operates, examining its strengths and weaknesses. He recorded his findings in the 1991 book, America Against America, which has since become a key CCP text for understanding the US.

The premise of the book is simple: the US is a paradox composed of contradictions: its two primary values — freedom and equality — are mutually exclusive. It has many different cultures, and therefore no overall culture. And its market-driven society has given it economic riches but spiritual poverty. As he writes in the book, "American institutions, culture and values oppose the United States itself."

For Wang, the US's contradictions stem from one source: nihilism. The country has become severed from its traditions and is so individualistic it can't make up its mind what it as a nation believes. Without an overarching culture maintaining its values, the government's regulatory powers are weak, easily corrupted by lobbying or paralyzed by partisan bickering. As such, the nation's progress is directed mostly by blind market forces; it obeys not a single command but a cacophony of three hundred million demands that lead it everywhere and nowhere.

In Wang's view, the lack of a unifying culture puts a hard limit on the US's progress. The country is constantly producing wondrous new technologies, but these technologies have no guiding purpose other than their own proliferation. The result is that all technological advancement leads the US along one unfortunate trajectory: toward more and more commodification. Wang writes:

"Human flesh, sex, knowledge, politics, power, and law can all become the target of commodification... Commodification, in many ways, corrupts society and leads to a number of serious social problems. These problems, in turn, can increase the pressure on the political and administrative system."

Thus, by turning everything into a product, Western capitalism devours every aspect of American culture, including the traditions that bind it together as a nation, leading to atomization and polarization. The commodification also devours meaning and purpose, and to plug the expanding spiritual hole that this leaves, Americans turn to momentary pleasures — drugs, fast food, and amusements — driving the nation further into decadence and decay.

For Wang, then, the US's unprecedented technological progress is leading it into a chasm. Every new microchip, TV, and automobile only distracts and sedates Americans further. As Wang writes in his book, "it is not the people who master the technology, but the technology that masters the people." Though these words are 30 years old, they could easily have been talking about social media addiction.

Wang theorized that the conflict between the US's economic system and its value system made it fundamentally unstable and destined for ever more commodification, nihilism, and decadence, until it finally collapses under the weight of its own contradictions. To prevent China's own technological advancement leading it down the same perilous path, Wang proposed an extreme solution: neo-authoritarianism. In his 1988 essay, "The Structure of China's Changing Political Culture," Wang wrote that the only way a nation can avoid the US's problems is by instilling "core values" — a national consensus of beliefs and principles rooted in the traditions of the past and directed toward a clear goal in the future. Such a consensus could eventually ward off nihilism and decadence, but cultivating it would in turn require the elimination of nihilism and decadence. This idea has been central to President Xi's governance strategy, which has emphasized "core socialist values" like civility, patriotism, and integrity.

Putin has said straight out that Satanism runs rampant in the West as one of the main reasons for his opposition. That's the metaphysical substrate for the SMO - good vs. evil. This snippet above might as well be the Chinese version of that in different terms, stating their refusal of Western nihilism and decadence, and charting their own path forward based on core values.
 

Chinese State Media has just released a document that states the USA is engaging in biological warfare and other transgressions against China, is this a declaration of War? Here's the Communist State Media document: 每个人都能感受到,一场深刻的变革正在进行!-新华网
About 3 minutes into the video he shows a statement by the Chinese that they believe that the Corona virus came from Fort Derrick in the U.S.. Then he says "Is the United States waging biological war against China. Obviously not."

Well, who is waging war against whom?

This maybe the only place I have heard Fort Derrick to be the source of the Corona virus epidemic except for Cs statement.

Session 21 March 2020:
Q: (L) Okay, so...

(Joe) The most obvious effect of these measures that they're putting in place is a kind of pseudo-totalitarian lock down essentially. Can we assume that that was one of the agendas: to impose those lock downs on people?

A: Yes, total control. But it was not necessarily envisioned as lock down in this way.

Q: (Joe) It kinda got beyond their...

(L) What changed their...

(Andromeda) Approach?

(Joe) "But it was not necessarily envisioned as lock down in this way."

(Pierre) How was it envisioned initially?

A: Control. But a special factor entered. We are aware of your earlier discussions and questions, so perhaps we can explain.

Q: (L) I think this is gonna be a long one... Okay, let me light a cigarette before this starts.

(Scottie) Do special arm stretches. We need squirty water bottles for you three.

(L) We need trainers to come put towels around us and spray us with water bottles. [laughter]

(Scottie) Jack your chairs up, replace the tires, and then... VROOM!

(L) Alright, here we go. We're ready!

A: The virus did not appear first in China. There were experiments at Fort Detrick regarding the creation of a vaccine that would make humans more controllable. This vaccine had unexpected effects and in some cases did the opposite of what was intended. The strain escaped into a population and further mutated. Indeed it was carried to China by US soldiers. China soon knew the type and origin and launched a massive campaign to control the situation. This was seen by Western powers as a good model to follow with additional add-on factors. In the meantime further mutations have occurred, some engineered via STO forces by virtue of the virus taking hold in certain persons whose spiritual force was able to direct the progression. At this point, there are two major strains. The elite need to stop the spread of that which they "created".

[The above answer took 12 minutes and 38 seconds with 2 short arm-resting breaks!]

Q: (L) So they need to stop that which they have created because in some cases, it does the opposite of what they wanted it to do?

A: Yes and this is the interesting factor: The virus can change DNA making individuals more susceptible to cosmic information of the STO variety. It can also enhance and activate long suppressed codons of a beneficial nature. So you can see why they are so desperate to halt the spread.

I can not say I blame China for seeing this as an act of war.
 

Chinese State Media has just released a document that states the USA is engaging in biological warfare and other transgressions against China, is this a declaration of War? Here's the Communist State Media document: 每个人都能感受到,一场深刻的变革正在进行!-新华网

I don't know much about this guy Winston Sterzel or 'serpentza' as his handle goes, but he sure doesn't seem like a very good source of analysis about events in China.

Once upon a time, he moved to China, got married, and owned a custom motorbike store there and made his living as a happy Western vlogger. Then, after a bad run-in with the Chinese police, he fled the country.

In 2019, Sterzel moved to Los Angeles because he felt that he would lose his life or be incarcerated in China following threats by ultranationalist Internet users and the government, who accused Sterzel's wife of being a spy and a threat to national security.[17]

Following his departure from China, Sterzel's YouTube channel took a sharp turn into criticism of the Chinese government, using hyperbolic video titles such as "How China is slowly KILLING us all."[11]

For look at his level of geopolitical understanding, here's him speaking about a hypothetical situation in which the USA needed to engage in a 'police action' overseas - in Chile. He says that the Americans would be very respectful of the local laws and customs of Chile while engaged in such an action, and would be sure to ask the government before doing anything.


I can see how his channel would be popular in the West, helping fan the flames of anti-Chinese sentiment. If only he could do a better job, the poor guy... he seems a bit ridiculous to me.
 

A bird's-eye-view of the long and pretty complex story of Sino-Russian relations, with Brian Berletic, Marc Sleboda, and Carl Zha, who provides most of the commentary. It gave me some good context for the current Russia-China partnership, and shows how the two nations have supported each other - or haven't - starting with their shared history of Mongol influence, and moving onwards from there through the centuries.
 

A documentary recently released by Matthew Ehret and Cynthia Chung. It is a brief overview of the rise of George Soros, and his ban from China, going into the evolution of the NED and how the CIA went under cover as NGOs, and global psyops, CIA ops like Yellowbird and Mockingbird. Not much new here, and not in depth, but a good basic overview.

It mentions his early days helping rob fellow Jews during the Nazi occupation (I'd heard of that, but never heard him actually say it); how he got his first loan from a Rothschild in order to build his Empire; moved on to work under Karl Popper where he developed his Open Society concept; graduating to his role in color revolutions worldwide, including Tiananmen Square in 1989.

After this event, his puppet and the chairman at the time, Zhao Ziyang, was placed under house arrest by the Chinese state, and Soros was banned from China, and how this was of benefit to the locals.

Trump is mentioned, too, as one of Soros' sworn enemies.

There's a plea at the end to conservatives to check their China-fear, when it's dudes like Soros that are the actual perps destroying their country, and then using public rage and desperation as a weapon directed at Putin and Xi.
 
I watched this video with Arnaud Bertrand of Me & Qi, and Adrian Zenz of the Victims of Communism Memorial Foundation. They debated which system is better - the Chinese or the American? The three metrics of measurement are stability, prosperity and freedom.

The understanding of China in the West seems to be framed in a 'good or bad?' kinda way. This debate reflects that. I haven't yet really found anyone who talks about China's vices and virtues.


I've summarized the main points from their presentations.

Bertrand, on the pro-China side:

-Which system is better? And better for whom? He says that the proper framing is which system has been (or is) better for its own people.

FREEDOM

-Western freedom is understood as individual freedom. With a broader view of freedom, the assumption that China is unfree is called into question.

-Extreme poverty eradicated – China’s economy grew 1000% since the 70’s, and this prosperity came at the cost of individual freedom. Were they freer when they were poor? Poverty as antithesis of freedom where one is a slave to their condition. He can count on the fingers of one hand in his travels across China where he’s seen a homeless person. In US, 6% in deep poverty, 25% food insecure.

-Roosevelt’s four freedoms ideal for America – freedom from want and freedom from fear. Do people feel free to walk alone at night? 70x more likely to be victim of violent crime in America than China. A very safe country.

-Freedom from drugs – overdose leading cause of death in adults 18-45 in US, while China has one of the lowest drug abuse rates in the world. What could be a bigger restriction to freedom than addiction to drugs?

-Education as a form of freedom by increasing possibilities – China generally tops the charts.

-In terms of physical freedom, USA has an incarceration rate 6-7x higher than China.

-General de Gaulle spoke of one freedom as the precondition for all other freedoms, which is your independence as a country. When one is a vassal state or in the sphere of influence of a larger state, actions are constricted. America is not a vassal state, but its system of military alliances such as NATO and AUKUS, Five Eyes, etc., can be constraining. China cannot be considered a vassal state, but also has no military alliances, and has a high level of sovereignty.

STABILITY

-13 year long American study found that CCP is not loosing legitimacy in the eyes of its people. 93% of people express satisfaction. In US, satisfaction rate in public institutions if closer to 20%. 43% believe there may be a civil war in the next 10 years.

-general characteristics of Chinese society have been maintained for many generations.

-Matteo Ricci in 1600’s attempted to preach the Christian faith, and found a general wariness towards religion amongst the Chinese elite… even though he pretended to be a Buddhist monk, and claimed Christianity was an offshoot of Buddhism. When he dressed as a Confucian philosopher did he manage to get inroads to his ideas. Today secularism is blamed on communism, but it has been there for many generations. An enduring system.

-Many enlightenment ideas proposed by Voltaire were likely a result from Ricci’s translations.

PROSPERITY

-Chinese are less prosperous than Americans, but their approach lends itself to greater prosperity in the long run: between 2014 and 2021, funding directly related to lifting people out of poverty amounted to $14 trillion yuan or $2 trillion, which is roughly the amount of America’s forever wars in the middle East. Much different priorities.

-China wins at infrastructure, high speed rail, energy projects like the 3 Gorgers dam, new nuclear reactors, China will meet its solar and wind goals 5 years before 2030. Energy is the most important input for prosperity, and China consumes 50% more than the USA. The more you invest in yourself, the better your chances at making it.

Zenz, who tows the usual Western line:

-China has developed well, but this is due to the hard work of the Chinese people and not the CCP, important to separate characteristics of culture and population from the government

-CCP provides less individual freedoms than democracy, lacks free press, free civil society, and division of powers

-After disaster of Mao, CCP has provided stability, which it uses to justify its absolute rule

-Like China, post communist nations have also grown since the mid 20th Cent, but with much greater emphasis on Western values of human freedom and less cost to human life;

-factors behind success on China’s growth model; Chinese people lifted themselves out of poverty due to response to economic crisis caused by Mao; urban industrial growth was encouraged at the expense of exploited rural peasants (creating 85% available labour pool with little to no voice or rights)

-with Deng Xiaoping, there was a shift to an export strategy, which lead to increased inequality, and actively suppressed labour rights

-in 2022, China’s debt to GDP ratio exceeded that of the US at over 40%. Growth through debt model is difficult to change as it has established a caste of kleptocratic elites. Relies on investment and trade, and households only retain a small share of what is produced.

-improvements in rural Chinese livelihood, while present, is not impressive. Approximately 500 million or 70% of labour force did not have a high school education. Chinese households have subsidized trade surplus with low wages.

-the only way to fix China’s model is to consumption, and someone has to bear the cost, either businesses or local governments which often took land from peasants for a pittance to sell to developers.

-China’s property market is as inflated as Japan’s 20 years ago, likely leading to a period of low economic growth, Chinese growth model is running out of steam.

-China’s economic growth miracle resulted from releasing a peasantry trapped in an unequal Stalinist rural-urban transfer model into a system of export-driven labour exploitation coupled with trickle-down effects. The CCP provided a measure of stable governance and instated an impressive reversal of Mao’s failed policies. This was aided by the state-sponsored theft of foreign intellectual property. However, since the late 2000’s this approach has relied on inflated, unsustainable supply-side driven growth.

-China’s definition of absolute poverty is $1.60 per day, less than the World Bank’s line of $1.90

-CCP model is built on a Leninist model of party organization which heavily relies on mobilizational campaigns to achieve policy implementation. This pressures the populace into desired political action. This is the precursor for forced labour, as in Xinjiang. The anti-poverty campaign is not always welcome and can destroy traditional cultures.

-alongside material poverty elimination, there was a spiritual poverty elimination targeting lack of motivation, backward thinking, outdated social customs

-zero covid implemented at unnecessary cost of lives, and is an example as how the Leninist party state works, not Confucian care for the collective good

-Western countries also imposed lockdowns, but without the CCP-style attack on vigorous public debate and individual freedoms in the process!

-high tech digital surveillance in China leads to lower crime rates, but comes at the expense of individual freedoms, in particular freedom of speech, mostly imposed by low-level local elites. Lack of internal debate means problems are projected outwards.

-Lack of dissent gives the image of stability to authoritarian systems, who don’t suffer right wing mobs like Jan 6. For him, Jan 6. Is a symbol of strength and resilience of liberal democracies. CCP is fragile because it doesn’t allow internal dissent.

-China seeks to undermine the current order to create a system that is more friendly to authoritarianism.

-China’s growth would never have happened without the Western consumer markets. US security system in East Asia provided the stability that allowed China to grow. China’s development is thus an example of Westernization!
 

Lately is seems all roads lead to China...​

Macron wants China’s help in brokering peace in Ukraine – Bloomberg​

'The French President has reportedly ordered his foreign policy adviser to work with Beijing’s top diplomat to establish a framework for negotiations"


Lula’s China trip proves Latin America is no longer the ‘backyard’ of the US​


"The conflict in Ukraine was also on the agenda, and Lula made it clear that the US funneling billions of dollars worth of weapons to the Kiev regime was escalating, rather than calming, the conflict."


Spurned by Biden, Israel Asks China to Help Contain Iran Threat​


"Qin reportedly spoke to both Cohen and Palestinian Authority diplomat Riyad al-Maliki on Monday, apparently seeking a mediation role for China in the ongoing conflict"


Clare Daly (MEP) interviewed in Bejing:

 

A study recommends that China watch Big Tech closely as companies, including TikTok, have targeted Russia with cognitive warfare tactics.

A new study by Chinese military scientists named TikTok as one of several hi-tech companies involved in propaganda campaigns against Russia.

TikTok stands out as the only Chinese-owned business on the list, which contains nearly 40 private entities from the internet, space, finance and AI sectors.

According to the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) investigation, TikTok has joined Facebook, Twitter, Google and other Western tech giants in offering a platform for cognitive war on Russia that has “greatly undermined Russian military morale” and eroded its international image.

“Combat in the cognitive domain is a new, advanced form of warfare. It is also the highest level of human [war] games,” the authors said.

The paper was published in the Chinese-language journal Modern Defence Technology on April 3.

The study was led by Ling Haifeng, professor with the Army Engineering University of the PLA in Nanjing, Jiangsu province. Ling is a top information science expert who has overseen the data security of large-scale military operations, according to a People’s Daily report in 2019.


With a billion users around the world, TikTok has dual headquarters in Los Angeles and Singapore, a US ally.

But the app is also a wholly owned subsidiary of ByteDance, a tech giant based in Beijing that must comply with Chinese laws and regulations.
TikTok has faced criticism from both sides since the war broke out in Ukraine more than a year ago.


The platform suspended new video uploads and live streams from Russia. More than 1,000 accounts affiliated with the Russian government have also been removed, according to the company.

‘I think there might be a bias’: Young Americans address China fears amid potential TikTok ban​

But some critics said TikTok was not doing enough to counter Russian influence compared to other social media platforms.

The Alliance for Securing Democracy, a US-based national security advocacy group, noted in a report last month that Russian state-controlled broadcaster RT had more TikTok followers than The New York Times. It also found that Russian news agency RIA Novosti’s top TikTok post this year gained more than 5.6 million views while its top Twitter post had fewer than 20,000 views.


Speaking before the US Congress, TikTok CEO Shou Zi Chew, a Singaporean citizen, denied claims by US government officials and lawmakers that the company had spied for China.

“ByteDance is not an agent of China or any other country. We do not promote or remove content at the request of the Chinese government,” he said during the landmark hearing on March 23.

The Post contacted TikTok about the results of the Chinese military’s study, but the company did not respond by the publication deadline.

TikTok influencers rally against potential US ban​

Ling and her colleagues define cognitive warfare as an organised campaign aimed at manipulating the perceptions of targeted audiences and changing their decisions or behaviours.

“This is the first time civilian hi-tech companies have carried out cognitive warfare during a large-scale war. Media-driven cognitive warfare based on the mobile internet has had huge repercussions in this conflict,” the study said.

According to Ling’s team, the US government and its allies have used social media platforms to promote content highlighting Russian cruelty while giving Ukrainian politicians and forces more friendly exposure.
These companies had also offered a platform for government agents to employ AI to create fake texts, images and videos that had “pushed the Russian army up against the gunpoint of public opinion”, they added.
https://www.scmp.com/tech/big-tech/...se-government?module=hard_link&pgtype=article

The Chinese researchers noted that Russia also used private companies for similar tasks but did not elaborate.

They said the war in Ukraine had taught China a valuable lesson.

On the one hand, China has learned it must strengthen support for its private hi-tech companies and enable them to deal with strategic challenges such as the trade and chip wars, according to the researchers.

“On the other hand, as the control and influence of civilian hi-tech companies has become more prominent, the differences in their ideas and interests and those of the state have become more explicit,” the study said.

“To respond to their challenge to traditional state power, stronger supervision should be implemented. With risk awareness and bottom-line thinking, effective measures should be taken to prevent the risks civilian hi-tech companies might bring in politics, economy, culture, communications networks and military security.”
 
Thus, by turning everything into a product, Western capitalism devours every aspect of American culture, including the traditions that bind it together as a nation, leading to atomization and polarization. The commodification also devours meaning and purpose, and to plug the expanding spiritual hole that this leaves, Americans turn to momentary pleasures — drugs, fast food, and amusements — driving the nation further into decadence and decay.
Wang theorized that the conflict between the US's economic system and its value system made it fundamentally unstable and destined for ever more commodification, nihilism, and decadence, until it finally collapses under the weight of its own contradictions.
A lot of truth spoken by Wang Huning here which gives some background to the lead up to what we see now in the USA. What he says isn't new as the observation that Americans are overly obsessed with consumerism has been a major criticism for many years.

Americans turn to momentary pleasures — drugs, fast food, and amusements — driving the nation further into decadence and decay.

The life of the average American has been fairly comfortable and without threat allowing them to become more superficial in how they spend their time and real values are there but in a subliminal state. From what I see, this is all changing now for a growing number of people since that way of life is being destroyed. The evil overtaking the country is having the effect of bringing those important values right to the surface and making people defend and fight for those values of family, faith and freedom. These things never went away but where just taken for granted in a significant way.

The majority of MAGA people are Christian conservatives and the convictions that faith entails are obvious to anyone following that movement. The country was founded upon these principles at its best and is another "subliminal" current rising to the surface. The USA was invaded long ago and as is the practice of the dark ones, the people where kept in the dark of that take over. The USA hasn't been a Constitutional Republic for a very long time and the purposeful decay has been growing all the while.

The C's say the USA is to far gone to be saved. Looking at that in a more hopeful way, perhaps the seriously corrupted state its become will be destroyed and a new US will be built upon the values of its original intentions. We don't know but I do know there's a lot of praying going on and asking for help.

I will ALWAYS defend my people from any source that belittles them. As I've said here in the past, there are a lot of good people in the US and they aren't the enemy, we all share that enemy in common, world wide.

But, its going to take a more substantial shock to kick all these people into action....its coming.
 
Back
Top Bottom