As many of you know, I've been working regularly on getting all the sessions annotated and filling in the background information. I've mentioned a few times what an extraordinary thing this project is turning out to be since so many connections are being made and many things are noticed that went under the radar back then. What makes the project so dynamic is the fact that I am going through all my emails of the time and the interplay between them and the sessions is sometimes just stunning.
Right now, I've just finished working on the 19 July 1997 session and, once again, strange things emerge. I can't put all the background information here, you'll have to read the print version for that, but some of it seems to be important enough to bring it forward now.
For the early part of the week in advance of this session Ark and I were talking about the "flood of the century" in Poland. Ark was in Florence at the time and had to return to rather uncertain conditions on the 22nd. It is interesting to me now how the news of this disaster somehow didn't get reported in the USA media. I note in the text that the rains that caused the flood began on the 5th of July and include the following:
Further on in an exchange:
Later he wrote:
We had been going over a lot of clues and digging into various topics all sort of circling around the Rennes le Chateau/ Holy Blood, Holy Grail topic. So, at this point, I had a dream on the 16th of July and wrote to Ark:
I then assembled all I had found out about the RLC business and wrote a long "Devil's Advocate" text about it that I'm not going to include here; but here is some discussion that followed:
Then I wrote:
Next, in the early hours of the 18th, I wrote:
Ark had sent me a book, Umberto Eco's "The Search for The Perfect Language". I started reading it immediately and after a bit I wrote:
Then there was a long discussion about belief and reality and some other things and finally we come to the session and I'm just going to include the important excerpt here:
Now, here is my annotation about this:
Right now, I've just finished working on the 19 July 1997 session and, once again, strange things emerge. I can't put all the background information here, you'll have to read the print version for that, but some of it seems to be important enough to bring it forward now.
For the early part of the week in advance of this session Ark and I were talking about the "flood of the century" in Poland. Ark was in Florence at the time and had to return to rather uncertain conditions on the 22nd. It is interesting to me now how the news of this disaster somehow didn't get reported in the USA media. I note in the text that the rains that caused the flood began on the 5th of July and include the following:
Now, recall what the Cs said about Ark in the session we held on the 5th, the day the rains began:
> Arkadiusz, or as we like to call him, Arkady, is the primary target of your trio, for now. Great potential dangers lurk... Imagine how much your cause would be damaged without him? Where would your ambition for the quest go? You must be extremely vigilant when it comes to him and his safety. He still does not completely fathom the depths of the situation. Until he is here, thus more protected, and it will not be easy to get him here, danger awaits the greeting of each new day. Vigilance! Vigilance! Vigilance!!!!!
This warning carried an all new significance in view of the flood. I was worried that Ark had to return to Wroclaw; we had no idea what the state of things would be in a week's time, but certainly not much better.
Further on in an exchange:
{Laura} Those Lizzies are rather creative, yes?
{Ark}
> Well, do you think they did it for us? Probably they have many other
> good reasons - hopefully. I do not like to feel responsible for these
> 36 people dead. But even if I am .... I would say it was the Lizzies
> and not me. Well, we were told that many strange things are gonna
> happen ... weather changes, earthquakes etc. etc. So this is not
> a surprise. We will manage.
Later he wrote:
>The story is this:
> There were people (military generals and others which were
> trained in USA in 1993 for such disasters). They were NOT
> hired by the government. The government was playing the old
> game of communist incompetence AND arrogance. Error after
> error. The catastrophe was not necessary if the proper action
> had been taken when the water was still in Czech Republic.
> So I think altogether it will have long range positive consequences.
> But I stop now to be interested in the subject. Since again we were
> approaching a solution of some important mystery and .... look
> what happens.....
We had been going over a lot of clues and digging into various topics all sort of circling around the Rennes le Chateau/ Holy Blood, Holy Grail topic. So, at this point, I had a dream on the 16th of July and wrote to Ark:
> This came to me as I was somewhat sleeping...
>
> ET IN ARCADIA EGO
>
> ARAIGNEE AT ICOD
>
> (Araignee = spider)
>
> > "The old Guanches themselves say that they have an immemorial
> > tradition that sixty people came to this island, but they know not
> > whence they came. They united and formed their settlement near ICOD,
> > which is a place on this island, and they gave it the name, which is
> > a word in their language. Alzanxiquian abcanabac xerax, which means
> > 'The place of union of the son of the great one.'
> >
> > "There is another special thing connected with the island. It is
> > that no poisonous animal whatever is bred in it, such as snakes,
> > lizards, scorpions, but *only certain spiders* which do harm when they
> > bite.
> >
> > "The form of the island is triangular, with 3 capes on points: Naga,
> > Teno, and Roxa. It has a circumference of 31 leagues, and a width of
> > 8 leagues at the narrowest part. It is at 28'30" latitude."
> > (Friar Alonso de Espinosa of the Order of Preachers, Seville, 1594)
> >
> > "The spider taketh hold with her hands, and is in kings palaces."
> > (Proverbs 30:28, KJV)
>
> The actual Hebrew text reads: The lizard you can seize with your
> hands, yet it is in kings' palaces.
>
> Then: "There be three things which go well, yea, four are comely in
> going: A lion which is strongest among beasts, and turneth not away
> for any; a greyhound; an he-goat also; and a king, against whom there
> is no rising up." (Proverbs 30: 29-31)
>
> But, in the original Hebrew text, it does NOT say greyhound. It says
> "The war horse - well knit in the loins."
>
> Greyhound -> Canis -> Canaris -> Canary Islands.
>
> And more:
>
> > "Jupiter was called Dodonean after the city of Dodona in Epirus.
> > Near this city was a hill thickly covered with oak trees which from
> > the most ancient times had been sacred to Jupiter. The grove was
> > further venerated because dryads, fauns, satyrs, and nymph were
> > believed to dwell in its depths. From the ancient oaks and beeches
> > were hung many chains of tiny bronze bells which tinkled day and
> > night as the wind swayed the branches. Some assert that the
> > celebrated talking dove of Dodona was in reality a woman, because in
> > Thessaly both prophetesses and doves were called PELEIADAS. It is
> > supposed that the first temple of Dodona was erected by Deucalion and
> > those who survived the great flood with him. For this reason, the
> > oracle at Dodona was considered the oldest in Greece.
> >
> > "The oracle of Dodona was presided over by Jupiter, who uttered
> > prophecies through oak trees, birds, and vases of brass. Many
> > writers have noted the similarities between the rituals of Dodona and
> > those of the Druid priests of Britain and Gaul. The famous oracular
> > dove of Dodona, alighting upon the branches of the sacred oaks, not
> > only discoursed at length in the Greek tongue upon philosophy and
> > religion, but also answered the queries of those who came from
> > distant places to consult it.
> >
> > "Some assert that there was but one tree which spoke - an oak or a
> > beech standing in the very heart of the ancient grove. Because
> > Jupiter was believed to inhabit this tree he was sometimes called
> > PHEGONAEUS, or one who lives in a beech tree.
> >
> > "Most curious of the oracles of Dodona were the 'talking vases,' or
> > kettles. These were made of brass and so carefully fashioned that
> > when struck they gave off sound for hours. Some writers have
> > described a row of these vases and have declared that if one of them
> > was struck its vibrations would be communicated to all the others and
> > a terrifying din ensue. (three dominoes?)
> >
> > "When the original priests of Dodona - the SELLOI - mysteriously
> > vanished, the oracle was served for many centuries by three
> > priestesses who interpreted the vases and at midnight interrogated
> > the sacred trees."
>
> Selloi -> selas, light, gleam: from its phosphorescent appearance ->
> IE base, swel, to burn -> selene, the moon, -> selenium, a GRAY,
> nonmetallic chemical element of the sulfur group, existing in many
> allotropic forms; used in photoelectric devices because its
> electrical conductivity varies with the intensity of light. Symbol
> Se, wt. 78.96 At no 34; sp gr 4.81, melt 217 C; boil 684.8 C.
>
> Peleiadas - Selloi
>
> A VERY ANCIENT and VERY SECRET and MYSTERIOUSLY VANISHED group!!!
> With jugs, oaks and beeches, doves, tinkling sounds, resonance, light
> and stars! And some Guanches have a story of appearing on an island,
> but they know not how nor from whence they came... but that it is a
> "place of union."
Exchange:
> > > ARAIGNEE AT ICOD
{ARK}
> > (but "AT" is English....)
>
> Not originally! It is Old Norse! And anyway, there are other ways
> the A and T could be disposed.
I then assembled all I had found out about the RLC business and wrote a long "Devil's Advocate" text about it that I'm not going to include here; but here is some discussion that followed:
> I noticed in a painting by Titian of Bacchus and Ariadne, that there are 8
> stars in a sort of formation in the sky. And this is the crown of Ariadne.
>
> This story is VERY important, I think. Because Ariadne is the one who gave the
> thread to Theseus to find his way out of the labyrinth - she was sort of a
> representation of Arachnea. And Arachnea was rather combined with Semele, the
> Moon Goddess. But, Ariadne was clearly human and NOT a goddess, though she was
> loved by Bacchus, who was half human.
> I found that "at" is the article in the Guanche language as well as some usage
> in other ways that I will write up for you later. I am sure that my
> transposition of the anagram is correct because it all fits, especially since
> the pieces that make it make sense are all gathered from separate sources, and
> they all point in the same direction. And the paintings are important because
> of the unusual events in Rome surrounding Poussin. And the important St.
> Anthony picture IS the one by Teniers because of its relationship to the
> Poussin painting, the jug in the window and the bird drinking out of it.
> Especially after finding the piece about the Solloi and the Peleiades Priests
> and Priestesses. There is a relationship between them and Bacchus and Ariadne
> as well. (The other name for Bacchus is Dionysus) At another level, there is
> the related story of Apollo and Diana, twins... and we know that Apollo loved
> Daphne who was turned into the Laurel tree, and the Laurel was apparently
> connected in some way to the Cathars.
>
> The thing about the "candles" becomes important also, because of some very
> funny things found in Rome at about the time Pouisson was there and may relate
> to the mysterious letter written about him to the finance minister of the king
> of France. So, I think I have solved that little mystery also.
>
> And, the birds and tinkling brass vases...? What did the C's call the
> Etruscans? "Penitent Avian Lords??" Well, Avian has to do with Birds. And
> the Etruscans were "shepherds." And they KNEW something.
Ark responded but this is the only item of interest in a longer email:
> You know what? Lawra is close to
> Polish "Lawirowac" which means "navigate between obstacles
> to find a way..." which cannot be done without Ariadne's web/thread...
>
> Adding to the arguments:
>
> as indicated by Ted Cranshaw (where did you get this paper from?)
> the "decripting" of the parchment is a part of the plot too.
> Means Baigent and Lincoln perhaps are part of the team.
>
> However the plot is really Devil's plot. Because our Mann pointed
> to Winter and Cs confirmed that it IS related to Denver airport....
> somehow. So it means our Bill is an innocent part of the plot.
> As there has been no reason he voluntered this piece....
> It means some people know something and the plot is
> construed in order to render all this fragmentary knowledge
> useless UNLESS ARIADNE CAN SEE THROUGH THE
> PLOTS....
I replied:
> Well, that would fit altogether, because of what the Cs said about the "Thor's
> Pantheon." It is similar to that excerpt you found, about "psychic projectors"
> with the "key" of Alton Towers. Apparently there is this "army" of psychic
> projectors who sort of "beam" things out there... and, depending on the
> configuration of the receptor, it can be more or less "corrupted." Those who
> are subject to being "deceived and obfuscated" ARE, and those who are not, are
> enabled to pick through the weeds and find the true herb.
>
> SEEing is hopefully what we are doing... but it requires a love of truth
> that goes beyond personal comfort as we both WELL know!
Then I wrote:
> Having disposed of most of the elements of the Rennes-le-Chateau
> story, particularly Plantard and his "club" Le Prieure de Sion, what did we
> have left?
>
> We had Cathars and Templars who were destroyed.
> We had Grail stories that emerged at the approximate same time...
> We had an icon that appeared on a beach in the Canary Islands,
> accompanied by lights and chanting processions...
> We had a pit dug at Oak Island and something buried that was NOT
> meant to be dug up.
>
> Meanwhile, we have this bunch of guys following all these false
> leads... Exerting themselves all over the place to find what is NOT hidden,
> though they think it is because their understanding is darkened.
>
> And we come back to Arcadia.
>
> There is NOTHING hidden in the picture. It is clear and plain.
>
> And what does it tell us?
>
> Well, let's think about Nicolas Poussin and recap what we know about
> him.
>
> What is important is this: Nicolas Poussin spent most of his
> adult life in Rome. Arriving there in 1624, he suffered a
> serious breakdown in 1629 either just after or just before
> painting the first version of the Arcadian Shepherds. One
> cannot help but wonder about this breakdown.
>
> He returned to Paris for little more than a year in 1640.
> But, what was he doing there?
>
> In regard to this, I was reading Josephson's paper on the theory of
> music, and he has an interesting idea there, though it is not new:
> Gurdjieff talked about "objective" music.
>
> So, I thought about this and decided that the "emotional" state
> evoked by art is a VERY important part of the message. Not that this
> is necessarily emotional in the usual sense of the word, but that it
> is an "exciting" of some essential nature. And, depending on the
> essential nature, the results of this excitation can be varied.
>
> For example, Mr. Mann sees the pregnant Shepherdess as representative
> of a "hidden fifth" element.
>
> The fifth house of the zodiac is the house of love and creativity and
> children and physical creation in general, including physical sex.
>
> So, I asked myself why he would perceive it this way?
>
> And why do I NOT perceive it this way? What is the difference?
>
> Well, perhaps it is because he sees it all as some power OUTSIDE of
> himself that must be sought and obtained and controlled.
>
> I see it as simply who and what I am.
>
> But, getting back to the painter of this picture.
>
> Anyway, his first few years in Rome coincided with a great
> deal of ancient site excavation activity that was going on.
>
> During this period of history, patronage of the arts on a lavish and
> international scale was quite common. This was the period of Rubens
> (who I like because his women look like ME!) and he painted in a rich
> and lavish style which transformed the lives of the royalty into
> dramatic Olympian statements! This, naturally, increased their egos
> so that they actually attempted to lead such lives, and led
> ultimately to the Revolution because of their excesses. They
> completely missed the point of the imagery and attempted to express
> all of it materially.
>
> Well, it seems that while Rubens was painting grandiose semi-mythical
> murals incorporating his royal patrons into the scenery, Poussin was
> working on minor decorations. He left for Rome. Why? Because there
> was something in the Parisian atmosphere that offended him, I expect.
>
> But, he had a solid reputation and a patron: Cardinal Richelieu. It
> was because of the Cardinal (notice the C+R) that Poussin came back
> to Paris to decorate the grand gallery of the Louvre. He received a
> shower of favors and the title "First Painter to the King." But, he
> was shortly made so miserable by the intrigues that grew up around
> him, that he left for Rome again. He became the "artistic
> ambassador" from France, and all the French artists were sent to him
> for supervision under government subsidy.
>
> He was a student of the classics, and needed the freedom to work out
> his own ideas and principles. His main themes were myth, religion,
> history and architecture. All of these are part of the "clues," so
> it seems that our Poussin may have been privy to certain "inside
> circles," even if only through inspiration, or "channeling," of an
> artistic sort.
>
> But, nevertheless, he had suffered a breakdown. WHY?
> During his illness he was nursed by, and then married, the
> daughter of Jean Dughet, the cook to the Cavaliere del Pozzo,
> who was in charge of the excavations.(!)
>
> Of this Dughet, it was recorded: "Near Capo di Bove was found buried
> a most curious treasure, including a room much decorated with silver;
> but by the intervention of a spy, those that found it gained little
> by it, for the great part of them were thrown into prison.
> Only the father-in-law of Monsieur Poussin was exempted, on
> account that he was cook to the senator."
>
> Now, I think that Capo di Bove means "head of the cow." So, we have
> a head and a cow. Remembering the cattle image and that the goddess
> Hera was often called "cow faced," and there were a lot of other cow
> images relating to creation and the goddess aspect.
>
> Anyway, what was dug up? What did they find? No one in this book on
> art history seems to know or care. Which is fine, because they are
> just talking about art and trying to interpret it aesthetically.
> But I sure wish somebody knew something about this mysterious episode.
>
> They say that Poussin spent a lot of time in the Roman museums,
> studying the figures there and modeling many of his figures on them.
> His "judicious use of opposites" is commented upon. And, it is
> further commented that Poussin had a "constant preoccupation with
> antique sculpture" which is shown by his clearly defined figures who
> look as though they have been chiseled out of stone, and that certain
> groups are DIRECTLY derived from some of these sculptures. In his
> "Rape of the Sabine Women," he clearly represents the Sabines in the
> poses of the statues of Gauls. His buildings are painted to exact
> descriptions by ancient writers. In his desire for accuracy of
> detail, he left nothing to chance.
>
> His "Et in Arcadia Ego," is described as a pastoral poem out of
> Vergil. They are described as being "pensive" and "melancholy" that
> it is a "meditative study."
>
> But, interestingly, the "art experts" also say that the Shepherdess
> is the continuation of the "vertical axis" of the tree while the
> shepherd on the left, with his resting arm, provides the horizontal
> axis, and that every gesture and line follows this initial "cross,"
> with "all the cool logic of a geometrical theorem."
>
> Well, I wonder if art critics REALLY see all this sort of thing in a
> painting, or if they just want to sound clever. I do notice that the
> shepherdess' head is right in the middle of a tree branch, almost as
> if it were a halo. But, I don't know what kind of tree it is.
>
> Well, nevertheless, the figure is pointing to the RhoChi of the
> Rosicrucians, shepherds are depicted, a woman as a type of a tree,
> and we get ARAIGNEE AT ICOD, out of the words also. And, this is
> most important, even if the hoaxers made the parchments and stone
> images, because of the spider image on the painting of Christ at the
> church of Rennes-les-Bains. There, the spider is depicted as the
> crown of thorns on Jesus head. And, we know that the Arachnea, the
> spinner, was transformed into a spider by a Jealous Hera, the "cow
> faced." But was THEN represented as the "menstruating Moon Goddess."
> And, Ariadne gave the clues to Theseus, but was THEN loved by
> Dionysus.
>
> Well, if the shepherdess in this painting is pregnant, then she is
> NOT menstruating!
>
> It goes on: "The current rumour in Rome was that some of the
> diggers were Goths, who had come from the north on the faith
> of ancient tradition to seek for treasure."
>
> Well, the only thing we know of these Gothic traditions is that I
> think they were what became the Grail stories.[^55788]
>
> But, the most interesting thing is where it is said:
> In 1656 Nicolas Fouquet, finance minister to Louis XIV, sent
> his brother, Louis, to Rome and suggested he see Poussin.
> Shortly after arriving, Fouquet wrote to his brother:
>
> > "I delivered to M. Poussin the letter that you did him the
> > honour to write to him; he evinced all the joy imaginable.
> > You would not believe, Monsieur, either the pains that he
> > takes in your service, or the affection with which he takes
> > them, nor the worth and integrity that he brings to all
> > things. He and I, we have planned certain matters that I
> > could, in a little undertake to the end for you, by which M.
> > Poussin could provide you with advantages that kings would
> > have great pains to get from him, and that, after him,
> > perhaps no one in the world could recover in the centuries to
> > come; and, what is more, this could be done without much
> > expense and could even turn to profit, and these are things
> > so hard to discover that no one, no matter who, upon this
> > earth today could have better fortune or even so much..."
>
> Well, we know that Poussin was supervising government subsidized
> artists, so this could be the "pains taken in your service." Rather
> simple and not at all mysterious! "Worth and integrity" are
> certainly important in regards to seeing that the government's money
> is not being wasted!!!
>
> But, the things that are "hard to discover," and would provide
> advantages that Kings would like to have, and which no one could
> recover for centuries????? What in the WORLD???
>
> But, it is OBVIOUSLY NOT alchemy, in the "metaphysical" sense, or
> "transmutation," nor can it be uncovered treasure! Because, it is
> mentioned that it would involve a little expense to DO it, and that
> it MIGHT turn to profit! So, it seems that Poussin has a little
> discovery that could be like an "invention." Something useful.
>
> And, I think that I have found what this is.
>
> > "It was a common practice among the early Egyptians, Greeks, and
> > Romans to seal lighted lamps in the sepulchers of their dead as
> > offerings. Later, as the custom became generally established, not
> > only actual lamps but miniatures of them in terra cotta were buried
> > with the dead. Some of the lamps were enclosed in circular vessels
> > for protection; and instances have been recorded where the original
> > oil was found in them, in a perfect state of preservation after more
> > than 2,000 years. There is ample proof that many of these lamps were
> > burning when the sepulchers were sealed, and it has been claimed that
> > they were STILL BURNING when the vaults were opened hundreds of years
> > later. The possibility of preparing a fuel which would renew itself
> > as rapidly as it was consumed has been a source of considerable
> > controversy among medieval authors. After due consideration of the
> > evidence at hand, it seems well within the range of possibility that
> > the ancient priest-chemists DID manufacture lamps that burned, if not
> > indefinitely, as least for a considerable period of time.
> >
> > "While conclusions reached by different authors are at variance, a
> > majority admit the existence of these phenomenal lamps. Only a few
> > maintained that the lamps would burn forever, but many were willing
> > to concede that they might remain alight for several centuries.
> > [...]
> > "In a tomb on the Appian Way which was opened during the papacy of
> > Paul III[^88241] was found a burning lamp which had remained alight in a
> > hermetically sealed vault for nearly 1,600 years. According to an
> > account written by a contemporary, a body of a young and beautiful
> > girl with long golden hair was found floating in an unknown
> > transparent liquid as well preserved as though death had occurred but
> > a few hours before. Those entering the sepulcher said that the draft
> > caused by the opening of the door blew out the light and it could not
> > be relighted. Kircher reproduces the epitaph supposedly found in the
> > tomb: TULLIOLAE FILIAE MEAE, but Mountfaoucon says this never
> > existed. The body was believed to be that of Tulliola, the daughter
> > of Cicero.
> > [...]
> > "St. Augustine described a perpetual lamp, guarded in a temple in
> > Egypt sacred to Venus, which neither wind nor water could extinguish.
> > He believed it to be the work of the Devil. (Why are we NOT
> > surprised!)
> > [...]
> > "During the early Middle Ages, a lamp was found in England which had
> > burned since the third century after Christ. The monument containing
> > it was believed to be the tomb of the father of Constantine the Great.
> > [...]
> > "In England a curious tomb was found containing an automaton which
> > moved when certain stones in the floor of the vault were stepped upon
> > by an intruder. At that time the Rosicrucian controversy was at its
> > height, so it was decided that the tomb was that of a Rosicrucian
> > initiate. A peasant discovered the tomb and entering, found the
> > interior brilliantly lighted by a lamp hanging from the ceiling. As
> > he walked, his weight depressed some of the floor stones. At once a
> > seated figure in heavy armor began to move. Mechanically it rose to
> > its feet ans struck the lamp with an iron baton, completely
> > destroying it, and thus preventing the discovery of the secret
> > substance which maintained the flame.
> >
> > "It is now believed that the wicks of these perpetual lamps were made
> > of braided or woven asbestos, called by the alchemists 'salamandar's
> > wool,' and that the fuel was one of the products of alchemical
> > research."
>
> So, this is what I think that Poussin discovered - light.
> He was "illumened," as the C's said!!!
>
> But, the most curious thing about this is that there is a funny
> reference in the Canary book to "strange wicks," too!!!
> Our Friar Alonso, of the Order of Preachers writes:
>
> > "While the holy image of Candelaria was at Chinguaro, or in the small
> > cave near it, where it remained for many years, the native Guanches
> > often heard celestial sounds and saw many burning lights in form of a
> > procession. They were not so frequent at first as they became when
> > the holy image was removed to the cave of San Blas.
> > [...]
> > "The processions formed by the angels, as well on the beach where the
> > holy image was, as on that of Socorro where she first appeared,
> > became very frequent, both by night and day, with solemnity and
> > harmony, music from softest voices, a great company in perfect order
> > with lighted candles. So, they made their processions from the
> > hermitage they now call Santiago to the cave of San Blas, there being
> > a wide beach all the way. These processions were so frequent that
> > the natives ceased to be surprised. This is so perfectly true, that
> > now, in these times, persons who have seen it go to the beach and
> > find candles with the wax burnt out. They have even found some
> > lighted and fixed to rocks. ...great quantities of drops of wax are
> > found...
> > [...]
> > "I speak of what I have seen and heard, and keep the wax in my power.
> > I have heard the same from many others. The candles they find are
> > not very white, and it is not known of what the wicks consist. They
> > are not cotton nor tow, but look more like twisted white silk.
> > [...]
> > "There also appeared on this island, twenty years before it was
> > conquered, a great quantity of white wax in loaves, in an adjacent
> > port, which for this reason was called the Port of Wax. ... some of
> > the loaves of wax appeared to weigh ten or twelve pounds and even
> > fifteen to twenty pounds; in this present year, there appeared loaves
> > of 20 pounds and more. In this present year, at the time when the
> > said wax appeared, there were no candles for saying Mass, nor for the
> > Benediction on the day of the Purification of Our Lady. For in this
> > island, there are no bee-hives for the supply of wax, nor is it
> > brought from Gran Canaria.
> > [...]
> > "For this wax always appeared four or five days before the feast of
> > Candelaria, that these might be the means of making candles for its
> > celebration."
>
> So, we have connected some tombs in Italy to some tombs in England,
> to our Poussin and his funny tomb... to the Canaries!!! All by a
> thread, literally! A candle wick!!!
>
> So, this is a VERY funny thing. What did the C's say? "Look for the
> frequency of light."
Next, in the early hours of the 18th, I wrote:
> It is thundering and lightning out over the Gulf a LOT, and I don't
> know if it is gonna move this way... all afternoon it was in the
> East... but never quite got here, though it was VERY loud and close
> and black in the sky. Now it is on the other side.
>
> But, during my nap today, I had a dream!
>
> Such a dream!
>
> In my dream I had decided to paint some lamps and vases I
> discovered I had. These were all made out of black onyx and I
> noticed that there were cracks and crevices. These had dust
> in them, so I was patiently cleaning the cracks with cotton
> swabs and water, and a small paintbrush and water. Everybody was
> criticizing me for being so meticulous, and telling me that I was
> wasting my time, because the lamps were worthless. Then, I
> was painting one of them. It had a beautiful palm tree on it
> and some other figures - somewhat stylized - and I was
> painting a LOT of green, and then touching the edges with
> gilding, and I said: Everyone thinks that these were always
> black, or were supposed to be black. I want them to see them
> the way they were originally intended! And, they were
> gorgeous!
>
> And the scene on one had something to do with a "black
> madonna" and it was Hagar, the Egyptian, the mother of
> Ishmael, the halfbrother of Isaac.
>
> Then, I was working on another, and it had been turned into a
> lamp, and I took the shade off to be better able to work on
> it. On this one, I was painting the cracks, and not the big
> spaces or flat surfaces of the images. This was because the image was
> so complex that I could not tell what colors to use until I had
> picked out the design by gilding the lines and grooves. And, I was
> amazed because, the figure of a man emerged with seven rows of
> figures on his robe. And I said: "The Greeks did not HAVE
> astrology, the stories about them WERE astrology!" And it
> was amazing to see the panorama of past, present and future
> unfold in this astrological drama as well as the ability to
> figure out who was who! But, it was in SEVEN layers - one on top of
> the other. Each layer of stories could be arranged on a circle. The
> top ones were shorter and less involved, clean and simple truths.
> The bottom ones were complex with many additional players and
> elements and confusing factors. But, by assembling them on this
> figure, they could be rotated until the right match was found for
> each layer.
>
> Then: you and I were going to a big park or some sort of
> place like the place we went to in Gainesville... and instead
> of a big hole in the ground,[^57271] there was a big rock or mountain
> of rock. I stepped into the bushes to hide from you and tease you,
> and you kept going around, and didn't miss me right away. By the
> time you had missed me, it was like I had taken a short-cut
> and come out right beside you. You asked me how I did it,
> and I said I wasn't sure - I took a step and came out HERE, I said.
> And, I was as puzzled as you were!! So, you said: "show me." So, we
> went into the place I had come OUT of, this wedge shaped opening in
> the side of the rock, like a narrow "chimney." And, at the end
> was a "cleft" in the rock - very narrow. I said something
> about how we would have to stop eating to get through THAT
> narrow a place, and I was surprised that I had come through a
> place that was hardly more than a few inches wide. But, you
> said you were going to figure it out... there had to be some
> secret. So, I was there cleaning all the dust out of this
> crevice in the side of this mountain, and using water
> to clean even the very last bit of dirt, and suddenly you
> came to me with tears streaming down your cheeks and said "I
> know the answer! I have seen it with my own eyes! I never
> thought I would see it with my own eyes!" and you were crying
> tears of joy, and not sadness... and your tears were like a
> river flowing out of this crevice and we realized that a spring had
> been opened somehow. So, you took my hand and said: "Let's go home
> now, we have work to do. We can always come back again." And, I was
> hearing music: the song "He Hideth my soul in the Cleft of the
> rock..." And the music was swirling around almost like something
> tangible, with color, like the drapery on the figures in the Arcadia
> painting.
>
> And, as we were leaving, I saw a big mosaic on the side of
> the mountain - and it was several sharks, one on top of the
> other, and each one was more pale and faded that the one
> above it, and up in the upper left side was a HUGE sperm
> whale that was going to eat ALL of the sharks!
>
> And I said: "Yes, let's go. We can get cable now that you
> are home. The picture will be much clearer."
>
> And I woke up!
>
> So, it was a VERY vivid and INTENSE dream!!!
Ark had sent me a book, Umberto Eco's "The Search for The Perfect Language". I started reading it immediately and after a bit I wrote:
> You know, it is VERY strange that this book should come today...[^70550]
>
> There is a chapter entitled: The Ars Magna of Raymond Lull.
>
> And, there is a diagram that is almost identical to the seven tiered
> skirt of the robe on the man in my dream!!! And, the tiers rotate,
> as they did in my dream. And, by rotating them, one can work out
> problems in logic...[^70780]
>
> So, this is a VERY interesting development. It also helps me to
> understand HOW I am going to set up these stories and clues in order
> to be able to follow the thread!!!
>
> And, he also developed some funny matrix diagrams.
Then there was a long discussion about belief and reality and some other things and finally we come to the session and I'm just going to include the important excerpt here:
> Q: (L) As you know, there is a flood in Poland, and Ark has to go back, there is so much that must be done, but the government offices may be closed, the court session may be delayed indefinitely, God knows what is going to happen. What is the source of this dreadful disaster in Poland?
>
> A: Sopophoric[^78758] screen alterations of the magnetic belt overlay.
>
....
>
> Q: (L) Does that mean soporific screen alteration?
>
> A: Soporific/phosphorous.
>
> Q: (L) What is the purpose of this screen alteration?
>
> A: Deterrence of colinear wave reading consciousness units.
>
> Q: (L) What is a 'colinear wave reading consciousness unit?'[^80617]
>
> A: Suggest you "look in the mirror."
...
> Q: (L) Okay. That is understood. I want to ask about what, precisely, this soporific/phosphorous screen of the magnetic belt overlay is.
>
> A: And have you communicate it thus? No.[^84321]
Now, here is my annotation about this:
This very strange term: "soporific/phosphorous screen of the magnetic belt overlay" seems to collect within itself a whole lot of strange connections about "light" from before and during this session. For example, notice that in our email exchange before the session I wrote about the Selloi priesthood and noted that this word was derived from "selas, light, gleam from its phosphorescent appearance..." And then Semele, the Moon goddess came into the picture in a couple of places. Then there were candles with unusual wicks, a Virgin of Candelaria, wax for candles, eternal flames, renewable fuel, and connections all over the place. I commented on the Cs having said that I should "look for the frequency of light" in relation to a tomb and it looked like I had definitely found some clues. Of course, this was long before I lived in a house in France located in a region called by the Romans "Lampe Adagio" or "slow light", on which property there is a prehistoric mound that may very well be covering a tomb! Then, after reading about the Solloi priesthood and the Peleiades Priests and Priestesses connected to Bacchus and Ariadne, birds, tinkling brass vases and sound, I had the dream of the lamps and vases that needed to be cleaned. Then we discussed beliefs and reality creation. All of this was against the background of the flood and issues of daily life. So then, we come to this odd remark about "soporific/phosphorous screen of the magnetic belt overlay" and my curiosity is really piqued. So, I started to search.
The word "sopophoric" is an odd neologism of the Cs'. It is composed of the combination of soporific, meaning: "tending to induce drowsiness or sleep" and, one might assume, a form of "phoria" meaning: 1.suffix meaning "(condition of the) visual axes of the eye": anophoria, esophoria, exophoria. 2. suffix meaning an "emotional state": adiaphoria, euphoria, ideaphoria. However, a question or so later, the Cs relate this "phoric" to phosphorous which the dictionary tells us is a "substance or organism that shines of itself," 1640s, from Latin phosphorus "light-bringing," also "the morning star" (a sense attested in English from 1620), from Greek Phosphoros "morning star," literally "torchbearer," from phos "light," contraction of phaos "light, daylight" (related to phainein "to show, to bring to light;" see phantasm) + phoros "bearer," from pherein "to carry" (see infer).
I assumed initially that the "magnetic belt" was a reference to the Van Allen belts which are located in the inner region of the Earth's magnetosphere. The belts contain energetic electrons and protons. What is meant by "screen alteration" I'm not entirely sure. But, I notice a report that tells us that in 2013, NASA announced that the Van Allen Probes had discovered a transient, third radiation belt, which was observed for four weeks until it was destroyed by a powerful, interplanetary shock wave from the Sun. There is also evidence that changes in the magnetic field of the earth allow more cosmic rays in can contribute to cloud formation and thus precipitation. If this is the case, it seems that we are now in an almost permanent state of this "screen alteration of the magnetic belt". When you connect this to what the Cs have had to say about global "warming" and then cooling, it begins to fit together.
However, there is more. I decided to do a little digging on the element phosphorus. It turns out that phosphorus is one of the essential elements for life. Its chemical symbol is P and its atomic number 15. Elemental phosphorus emits a faint glow when exposed to oxygen. Phosphates (compounds containing the phosphate ion, PO43−) are a component of DNA, RNA, ATP, and the phospholipids, which form all cell membranes. In 2013, astronomers detected phosphorus in Cassiopeia A, which confirmed that this element is produced in supernovae as a byproduct of supernova nucleosynthesis. So that is certainly curious.
Returning to the necessity of phosphorus in living beings, we learn "Phosphorus plays a major role in the structural framework of DNA and RNA. Living cells use phosphate to transport cellular energy with adenosine triphosphate (ATP), necessary for every cellular process that uses energy. ATP is also important for phosphorylation, a key regulatory event in cells. What catches my eye is the role of phosphorus in the "framework of DNA and RNA" as well as its crucial role in energy production. It turns out that a phosphate group forms the backbone of the DNA/RNA molecule. Without going into a lot of detail, "the two DNA strands are termed polynucleotides since they are composed of simpler monomer units called nucleotides. Each nucleotide is composed of one of four nitrogen-containing nucleobases—either cytosine (C), guanine (G), adenine (A), or thymine (T)—and a sugar called deoxyribose and a phosphate group. The nucleotides are joined to one another in a chain by covalent bonds between the sugar of one nucleotide and the phosphate of the next, resulting in an alternating sugar-phosphate backbone." And "The sugar in DNA is 2-deoxyribose, which is a pentose (five-carbon) sugar. The sugars are joined together by phosphate groups that form phosphodiester bonds between the third and fifth carbon atoms of adjacent sugar rings. These asymmetric bonds mean a strand of DNA has a direction. In a double helix, the direction of the nucleotides in one strand is opposite to their direction in the other strand: the strands are antiparallel. The asymmetric ends of DNA strands are said to have a directionality of five prime (5′) and three prime (3′), with the 5′ end having a terminal phosphate group and the 3′ end a terminal hydroxyl group." All of this reminded me of the 26 Nov 1994 session where the Cs said the following:
> Q: (L) Okay, at the time this "Mark of Cain" came about, were there other humans on the planet that did not have this configuration?
> A: It was added to all simultaneously.
> Q: (L) How did they physically go about performing this act? What was the mechanism of this event, the nuts and bolts of it?
> A: Are you ready? DNA core is as yet undiscovered enzyme relating to carbon. Light waves were used to cancel the first ten factors of DNA by burning them off. At that point, a number of physical changes took place including knot at top of spine. Each of these is equally reflected in the ethereal.
> Q: (L) Is that all?
> A: No. But, do you need more?
> Q: (L) Well, the question I do have is, how many people were there on the planet and did they have to > A: Whoa.
> Q: (L) How many people?
> A: 6 billion.
> Q: (T) That's 500 million more than there are now.
> A: No, 200 million.
> Q: (L) Okay, there were this many people on the planet, how did they effect this change on all of them?
> A: Light wave alteration.
> Q: (L) And light waves, actual light waves, affect DNA?
> A: Yes.
> Q: (T) What was the origin of the light waves?
> A: Our center.
> Q: (L) What is your center?
> A: Our realm. STO.
> Q: (L) So, how did the Lizzies use the light from the Service to Others realm...
> A: They used sophisticated technology to interrupt light frequency waves.
And, of course, we notice the "3-5 code" from the 11 Nov 95 session as well as this odd bit from 14 Dec 1996:
> Q: (L) Along the lines of some of the things that I have been working on recently, I'd like to ask if there's any more information you can give to us about the hypnotic-opener- strobe effect, and what it is preventing us from seeing. Is this one of the things that keeps us from expanding into the next density, in terms of awareness?
> A: Not related to that. You see, the souls that are affected by all these "cloaking" techniques are vibrating on a low level anyway. The point is to block those who are blockable.
> Q: (T) We're not blockable? (L) Is there anything we can do to avoid this blocking? (T) We're not being blocked...
> A: You are not blockable.
> Q: (T) We are not being blocked. We're beyond the blocking.
> A: If you were, would you be doing this?
{...}
> Q: (T) ... yes, but, there's a blocking technique being used on people to lower the vibrational frequency to prevent them from seeing them, right?
> A: The blocking technique is for many things.
> Q: (T) So that people do not understand what's going on around them.
> A: Yes.
> Q: (L) What else?
> A: That is it, in a nutshell. See and know and think or... See, know and think that which is desired.
> Q: (L) Yes, and you know it's there. OK, let me jump over to this other subject of the number 33 and the number 11. Is there anything beyond what was given on 11-11-95, that you could add at this time, about any of the mathematics or the use of these numbers?
> A: Prime numbers are the dwellings of the mystics.
> Q: (L) What do you mean, "prime numbers are the dwellings of the mystics?"
> A: Self-explanatory, if you use the tools given you.
> Q: (L) How can a number be a dwelling?
> A: Figure of speech. [Planchette spirals several times, vigorously] And how interesting that we have a new "cell" phone company called: "Primeco."
> Q: (L) And how does a cell phone company called "Primeco" relate to prime numbers being dwellings of mystics?
> A: Not for us to answer.
> Q: (L) Is encryption the key?
> A: Oh, there is so much here. One example is: "Snake eyes" is not so good as 7,11, eh?
> Q: (T) They are all prime numbers, too; seven and eleven. (L) What kinds of documents or writings... or what would be applicable...
> A: No, Laura you are trying to focus, or limit the concept, my dear. Think of it, what is the Judaic Christian legend for the creation of a woman?
> Q: (L) That woman was taken from the rib of Adam. That Eve was created from the rib of Adam.
> A: Ever heard of a "prime rib?"
> Q: [Groans] (T) I hate being in kindergarten and not knowing what the subject is. Ok, prime rib. We have a prime rib, so...
> A: What happens in a "Primary."
> Q: (L) An election. You narrow down the candidates. What happens in a primary?
> A: Who gets "picked" to run?
> Q: (L) Ok, keep on...
> A: "Prime Directive?"
> Q: (L) OK.
> A: "Prime time?"
Which then brings it back to the dream about the vases that occurred in the context of all this where the Cs said:
> Q: The other part of the dream was that I disappeared and reemerged from a cleft in a rock. I was cleaning... he went to investigate... and he returned and was crying and all this water was flowing out of there like a spring... What was the significance of this?
> A: **Trace minerals interact with deeply held secrets. **
Which makes me think that phosphorus is a key here: defense against the blocking being produced by the "sophophoric screen alteration of the magnetic belt overlay".
So, that gives some clues about the possibilities involved in Earth Changes related to weather. If a flood is caused by "Sopophoric screen alterations of the magnetic belt overlay", we suspect that this is a side-effect of the use of sophisticated technology to interrupt light frequency waves that can directly affect human DNA. There was further discussion on this topic in the 23 Sept 2000 session which, at the time of the session above, was still three years in the future but I will include it here to try to complete the picture:
> Q: ... You once said that the core of DNA is an as yet undiscovered enzyme related to carbon. Is that correct?
> A: Yes.
> Q: Here in this book it says: "Evidence is accumulating that only a relatively small portion of the DNA sequence is for so-called structural genes. Structural genes lead to the production of protein. There are an estimated 50,000 structural genes with an average sized of approximately 5,000 base pairs, which then accounts for only 250 million of the estimated 3 billion base pairs. What is the rest of the DNA for? Some of the DNA is so-called repetitive sequences, repeated thousands of times. The function is unknown. The ALU, repeat, for instance, contains over 300,000 copies of the same 300 base pair sequence. Certainly this DNA is not junk and plays some important role in the gene regulation chromosomal architecture or chromosomal replication. Until 1977, it was thought that genes were single sequences of DNA that are coded into RNA and then into protein. However, further study has shown greater complexity. It is now known that there are pieces of DNA within a gene that are not translated into protein. These intervening sequences, or INTRONS, are somewhat of a mystery, but appear to be a very common phenomenon." Now, is this thing they are talking about, these INTRONS, are these the core that you were talking about?
> A: In part.
> Q: What about this ALU repeat with over 300,000 copies of the same base pair sequence. What is it?
> A: Tribal unit.
> Q: What is a tribal unit?
> A: Sectionalized zone of significant marker compounds.
> Q: What does this code for?
> A: Physiological/spiritual union profile.
> Q: Could you define "tribal" for me?
> A: You define.
> Q: What does the rest of the DNA code for that is not coding for structural genes. What else can it be doing?
> A: Truncated flow.
> Q: Truncated flow of what?
> A: Liquids.
>...
> Q: Okay. Truncated flow of liquids. I'm not even sure what that means. (A) Maybe something was flowing and something cut it off and stopped it and it cannot be developed. It means that something was cut. (L) Does truncated flow mean a flow of liquid that has been stopped?
> A: Yes. Because of design alteration!
> Q: Is this liquid that has been truncated a chemical transmitter?
> A: Yes.
> Q: And would this chemical transmitter, if it were allowed to flow, cause significant alterations in other segments of the DNA?
> A: Yes.
> Q: So, there is a segment of code that is in there, that is deliberately inserted, to truncate this flow of liquid, which is a chemical transmitter, or neuropeptide, which would unlock significant portions of our DNA?
> A: Close Biogenetic engineering.
> Q: I assume that this was truncated by the Lizzies and cohorts?
> A: Close, but more likely Orion STS designers.
> Q: Okay, can you tell us what this specific liquid or transmitter was truncated?
> A: Think of the most efficient conductor of chemical compounds for low wave frequency charge.
> Q: (A) Well, gold is one... (L) Acetylcholine?
> A: No.
> Q: (L) Water?
> A: No.
> Q: Saline?
> A: Closer. It is a naturally bonding combination.
> Q: (L) Well, I'll have to research it. The fact is, we've got 3 billion base pairs... do some of these so-called segments of "junk DNA," if they were activated, would they instruct chromosomal replication to take place with more than 23 pairs as a result?
> A: In part.
> Q: Is there anything we can do in terms of activities or...
> A: No. Biogenetic engineering.
> Q: Was my insight that I had one night that, at some point in time something may happen that will turn genes on in our bodies that will cause us to physically transform, an accurate perception of what could happen at the time of transition to 4th density?
> A: For the most part, yes.
> Q: Are there any limitations to what our physical bodies can transform to if instructed by the DNA? Could we literally grow taller, rejuvenate, change our physical appearance, capabilities, or whatever, if instructed by the DNA?
> A: Receivership capability.
> Q: What is receivership capability?
> A: Change to broader receivership capability.
> Q: (A) That means that you can receive more of something.
> A: Close.
> Q: (A) It means how good is your receiver.
> A: Yes.
> Q: (L) What is your receiver? The physical body?
> A: Mind through central nervous system connection to higher levels.
> Q: So, that is the whole issue of gaining knowledge and developing control over your body. If your mind and CNS are tuned to higher levels of consciousness, that has significance in terms of your receivership capability?
> A: Close.
So, at this point, I think that what was truncated may have had something to do with phosphorus and "chemical energy" flows because of the connection of phosphorus to ATP. Consider the 7 June 97 session remarks:
> Q: Now, there is a thing called the GONG project on Tenerife. My feeling is that it is a mask for something else.
> A: Close.
> Q: What, precisely, is the GONG project doing?
> A: Magnetic frequency. Measurements for possible future use.
> Q: Future use for what purpose?
> A: Discovery. Oh, you are so "brilliant."
> Q: Is brilliant the code word for the discovery here?
> A: You will see.
Note the connection of magnetic frequency and light while the topic we are pursuing is: "Sopophoric screen alterations of the magnetic belt overlay." One wonders, of course, if this has anything to do with the HAARP project? Are experiments being done on dumbing down and controlling the human population (depending on receivership or blockability)?
