luke wilson said:Kamino said:Sorry luke, but to me your question seemed fundamentally audacoius! I'm really surprised so many people answered you constructively but it shows how caring, friendly and patient the growd here is. I really tried to hold back on commenting, but I just happened to read a similar quickfix question of you in the covert depression thread. To me it shows your lack of commitment and understanding of "The (real) Work", as Nienna already pointed out above. Just my 2 cents...
What is your understanding of commitment of 'The (real) work'? How did you expect people to answer? If you don't mind me asking!
luke wilson said:Nienna said:Luke, you are always wanting to take the fast approach, by getting answers cheaply by asking questions.
I didn't know this, if this is how I come across then I'll look to be more conscious about it. I admit I tend to ask some questions where the answers might be obvious or questions where it may appear like I am looking to gain other people's knowledge without going through the trouble that those people went through to get that knowledge.
I suppose what you are saying is that I should ask less questions? I suppose it appears like I am looking to divert from the struggle(?)... I do struggle but maybe not in the right ways.
luke wilson said:Nienna said:Luke, you are always wanting to take the fast approach, by getting answers cheaply by asking questions.
I didn't know this, if this is how I come across then I'll look to be more conscious about it. I admit I tend to ask some questions where the answers might be obvious or questions where it may appear like I am looking to gain other people's knowledge without going through the trouble that those people went through to get that knowledge.
I suppose what you are saying is that I should ask less questions? I suppose it appears like I am looking to divert from the struggle(?)... I do struggle but maybe not in the right ways.
luke wilson said:What is your understanding of commitment of 'The (real) work'? How did you expect people to answer? If you don't mind me asking!
On other news, it appears they delivered my book to a different house.. they guy dropped it in my house and told me so!!
Soooooooo, as of tomorrow, I will have 2 keto adapted books.... obviously, I just need one!
If anyone wants the spare copy, please let me know and I'll send it your way, free of charge!!!

Kamino said:May I ask you a counter question? Assuming you said yes, how much did you read on diet on the sott main page or here in the forum or elsewhere in the meantime, waiting on an answer to your initial call for help?
luke wilson said:Thanks for answering my question Kamino, I didn't mean it to be as a sort of deflection but I was just curious to hear what you thought! Sometimes hearing the same thing said differently by other people helps one understand the concept better!!
Kamino said:May I ask you a counter question? Assuming you said yes, how much did you read on diet on the sott main page or here in the forum or elsewhere in the meantime, waiting on an answer to your initial call for help?
I would say your initial thoughts were accurate in that I was quite hasty. I was waiting to be pointed in the right direction rather than looking to find the 'way' myself. I was slightly daunted by the task ahead and didn't know where to begin... Any ways, at least from this thread I have got the keto-adapted book so something positive came from it!!
I suppose I am caught between 2 concepts, one of 1st trying before essentially networking and another of networking before trying. I suppose I do it wrong. Don't get me wrong, I take plenty of stabs in the dark in life and learn the hard way, without guidance from other people but through experimentation but also in some things maybe I also come across as a very lazy person who is unwilling to put any effort. G says we have many I's and I suppose these are some of my contradictions. Sure, I will take the risks I need to and learn the hard way. The feedback has sort of showed me that I essentially need to be 'less excitable' because when I get 'excited' I act to hastily... i.e. ask questions quickly without thinking for example.. so I just need to let the feeling of excitement dissolve before acting!!
But still, it wasn't all a lose. I got the keto book and got some feedback in the process!!
Altair said:luke wilson said:But still, it wasn't all a lose. I got the keto book and got some feedback in the process!!
I think it's important not to act hastily in any situations (I know it from my experience). If a situation is ambiguous and you don't have enough information to take any reasonable actions then you should collect information first and not act (action bias). And you should be careful about hasty keto-adaptation as well. For some people it can take several months to get fully keto-adapted, so forcing it is of no avail.
Minas Tirith said:I can only say from reading different threads in the Diet section and from my own experience that everyone seems to react differently to different foods.
Some people don't have issues with coffee, for example, while others get their adrenals burnt out. There are loads of food sensitivities. Some posters tolerate eggs, others don't. Some cannot even tolerate butter. Same for the supplements.
What I mean is, nobody can really give anyone else the blueprint of THE KETODIET as it is supposed to be. It is always a work in progress and it is required that one checks on oneself what goes and what doesn't. Nobody can tell anyone here what the ideal breakfast is, often one reaches it through trial and error. This trial and error, I feel, is necessary, however, and the only way to get to know the body/machine better.
M.T.
Kamino said:Altair said:I think it's important not to act hastily in any situations (I know it from my experience). If a situation is ambiguous and you don't have enough information to take any reasonable actions then you should collect information first and not act (action bias). And you should be careful about hasty keto-adaptation as well. For some people it can take several months to get fully keto-adapted, so forcing it is of no avail.
Luke, at least you received some condensed quality information here, on what might help to sort your diet out, I would say, so take your time to digest it ;) .
Thanks Altair, that's an important point as well. Step by step. I tend to overlook that most of this processed food is quite addictive, so to go cold turkey might not be everyone's first choice. I think for most (me included) it took years, " it's when you choose" the C's said once.
Nienna said:Minas Tirith said:I can only say from reading different threads in the Diet section and from my own experience that everyone seems to react differently to different foods.
Some people don't have issues with coffee, for example, while others get their adrenals burnt out. There are loads of food sensitivities. Some posters tolerate eggs, others don't. Some cannot even tolerate butter. Same for the supplements.
What I mean is, nobody can really give anyone else the blueprint of THE KETODIET as it is supposed to be. It is always a work in progress and it is required that one checks on oneself what goes and what doesn't. Nobody can tell anyone here what the ideal breakfast is, often one reaches it through trial and error. This trial and error, I feel, is necessary, however, and the only way to get to know the body/machine better.
M.T.
Yeah, one of the first things people should do is an elimination diet. Everything is explained in that link. This helps you to see which foods you are sensitive to.
That being said, the paleo - or even better the ketogenic - way of eating is great for just about everyone.
Psalehesost said:The ketogenic diet includes an even better elimination diet from the get-go. I think, with what we have learned, that it should really be the starting point for everyone.
Once on the keto diet, further experiments can be made. For example, including or excluding eggs, and testing whether one tolerates butter, ghee or neither of them.
Kamino said:Sorry luke, but to me your question seemed fundamentally audacoius! I'm really surprised so many people answered you constructively but it shows how caring, friendly and patient the growd here is. I really tried to hold back on commenting, but I just happened to read a similar quickfix question of you in the covert depression thread. To me it shows your lack of commitment and understanding of "The (real) Work", as Nienna already pointed out above. Just my 2 cents...
0.6-0.7 oz per pound (lb) of bodyweight
This means that a 200lb man would drink:
200 x 0.6 = 120
200 x 0.7 = 140
Prometeo said:I'm sorry and thankful for your codependency to the forum. But who are you? you have 49 post and Luke has more, that means to me that he has tried to put himself out to network whatever necessary. Your post also has this sense or spice of superiority and merciful feeling in it.