Earthquake Details
Magnitude 5.6
Date-Time Tuesday, February 09, 2010 at 00:47:42 UTC
Monday, February 08, 2010 at 06:47:42 PM at epicenter
Time of Earthquake in other Time Zones
Location 16.085°N, 96.546°W
Depth 40 km (24.9 miles)
Region OAXACA, MEXICO
Distances 45 km (30 miles) N of Puerto Angel, Oaxaca, Mexico
110 km (65 miles) S of Oaxaca, Oaxaca, Mexico
145 km (90 miles) W of Salina Cruz, Oaxaca, Mexico
460 km (285 miles) SE of MEXICO CITY, D.F., Mexico
Location Uncertainty horizontal +/- 4.3 km (2.7 miles); depth +/- 8.4 km (5.2 miles)
Parameters NST=292, Nph=292, Dmin=>999 km, Rmss=0.9 sec, Gp= 83°,
M-type=centroid moment magnitude (Mw), Version=7
Source USGS NEIC (WDCS-D)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
When I tyred to bring up the map of this recent seismic activity .... (Tuesday, February 09, 2010 at 00:47:42 (UTC) - Coordinated Universal Time
Monday, February 08, 2010 at 06:47:42 PM local time at epicenter) of this earthquake as I had before of this seismic event, it was not available?
Now on global scale as far as distances to and of the supposed impact location that has been reported, It showed this earth quake and that the claim of the meteor impact were very close, like in the back yard close. What I first noticed of the map for this day of the earthquake for Feb. 8, or 9, was that it shows 3 and 4 number of quakes or seismic events in proximity to the possible metoer hit.
The earth quake from above was 2 days before. Reported a day later and a before the possible meteor strike the seismic events were before the impact day on the 10Th.
Now I thought what if? Now this idea is hypothetical and I don't not mean to move towards being disinformation but, to just thinking out of the box a bit.
Is it possible or probable that the map of the seismic events (that could not i couldn't find again) could be a representation that there was more than one strike? And or a signature to the effects that if something can leave a 30 meter crater with hole 30 meters deep is perhaps going to cause a seismic signature or a seizure of the fault lines in the area that would looking like a quake to the Richter scales.
And these seismic events from above represents that.
4.8
Date-Time Tuesday, February 09, 2010 at 17:58:13 (UTC) - Coordinated Universal Time
Tuesday, February 09, 2010 at 11:58:13 AM local time at epicenter
Time of Earthquake in other Time Zones
Location 16.08N 92.34W
Depth 207.3 kilometers
Region CHIAPAS, MEXICO
Distances 30 km (20 miles) SW of Comitan, Chiapas, Mexico
80 km (50 miles) SSE of San Cristobal d/l Casas, Chiapas, Mexico
255 km (155 miles) NW of GUATEMALA CITY, Guatemala
810 km (500 miles) ESE of MEXICO CITY, D.F., Mexico
Location Uncertainty Error estimate: horizontal +/- 8.7 km; depth fixed by location program
Parameters Nst=80, Nph=90, Dmin=627.8 km, Rmss=1.08 sec, Erho=8.7 km, Erzz=0 km, Gp=153.0 degrees
Source USGS NEIC (WDCS-D)
And or that the date that is refuted of that day meteor hit to have occurred, is actually different than stated, and that the map of the seismic activity is actually represented could be a (possible since they sometimes travel in a cluster ) representation of a pattern of multiple hits from the heaven's? At first I did not want to post as create confusion or start a wild fire mentality, as this is just food for thought ?