A few headlines from the NATOzist countries that together may tell a story.
The Netherlands willing, but how much?
Sweden to enter NATO, but intentions cross, so maybe not
Denmark gives artillery and leaves itself more defenseless
The first poster alludes to a crusade in Estonia, where allegedly the Danish flag fell from heaven near present day Tallinn.
And in Russia, a memory of the battle on the ice was brought up, with quotes from Joseph Stalin:
Perhaps some NATO countries have learned not to go to Russia and get killed themselves, they just facilitate that some of those that haven't still get the chance. But what a hideous and despicable role to play, when they encourage this to happen and fuel the antagonism with their rhetoric.
Germany and Poland
In The Next Decade, George Friedman writes about Poland:
The Netherlands willing, but how much?
EU state reveals Patriot ‘contribution’ to Ukraine
The Netherlands will send two launchers – not a full battery – as a “political signal” to Russia
If the US asks Ukraine to ask the Netherlands, or will the UA do this themselves?EU country ‘open-minded’ on F-16 jets for Ukraine – media
The Netherlands will consider delivering the planes if Kiev asks for them, ANP reported
Sweden to enter NATO, but intentions cross, so maybe not
If all of Sweden was behind NATO expansion, they would not support this stunt in Turkey, now, would they? Or is it rather that it is conducive for Sweden's own internal strategy of a secular, multicultural, gender-fluid society to support the happening in Turkey, NATO be damned. At the same time, in neighbouring Denmark.Sweden greenlights Koran-burning stunt outside Turkish Embassy
The new diplomatic row comes as Stockholm awaits Ankara’s blessing to join NATO
Denmark gives artillery and leaves itself more defenseless
By working on becoming defenceless, Denmark can allow itself to fold quickly or become occupied by whichever external force is stronger, just like in WWII, it appears as a self-defeating and at the same time opportunistic policy. The Danish flag is a variety of a Saint George Cross. The Wiki has:Denmark's Handover of Entire Stock of CAESAR Guns to Kiev 'Really Hurts' Defense, Gov't Advisor Says
Denmark has punched well above its weight in providing military support to Kiev in recent months, sending nearly $600 million in arms, and training Ukrainian servicemen since 2016. Copenhagen has long shown a tolerance for participation in unpopular modern conflicts, taking part in the US-led invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq in the early 2000s.
The decision to send Denmark’s entire inventory of CAESAR self-propelled howitzers to Ukraine will undermine the Nordic Nation’s defenses, and rob it of a system specifically designed to suit Denmark’s defense needs, a leading Danish defense expert and government advisor has complained.
[...]
Copenhagen announced plans to transfer all 19 of its French-made CAESAR 8x8 self-propelled howitzers to Ukraine on Thursday.
During WWII, in both Denmark and Russia, allusions to this past were usedSaint George was depicted as a crusader knight during this time, but the red cross had no particular association with him. A crusader-era fresco in the crypt of Trani cathedral shows Saint George wearing a white cross on a red surcoat. The white-on-red version was chosen as the Reichsbanner ("imperial banner") by the German crusaders in the 12th century, and Emperor Frederick II used it in his European campaigns of the 1250s after he had returned from the crusades. It continued to be used as the Reichssturmfahne ("imperial war flag") of the Holy Roman Empire, eventually giving rise to the flag of Savoy and the present-day flags of Switzerland and Denmark.
The first poster alludes to a crusade in Estonia, where allegedly the Danish flag fell from heaven near present day Tallinn.
And in Russia, a memory of the battle on the ice was brought up, with quotes from Joseph Stalin:
And Alexander Nevsky:"пусть вдохновляет вас в этой войне мужественный образ наших велик предков"
Which means"кто с мечом к нам войдет от меча и погибнет"
Referring to:"may the courageous image of our great ancestors inspire you in this war"
Here is the poster:"who with a sword will come to us from the sword and perish"
Perhaps some NATO countries have learned not to go to Russia and get killed themselves, they just facilitate that some of those that haven't still get the chance. But what a hideous and despicable role to play, when they encourage this to happen and fuel the antagonism with their rhetoric.
Germany and Poland
This means not only that Ukraine will not get Leopard tanks from Germany, but may also delay or block Poland from sending their Leopard tanks to Ukraine. This outcome may also affect Poland in other ways.Hundreds of Ukrainians besiege Chancellery: 'Scholz, give the Leopard tank free'
21 Jan. 2023 16:31 PM
Hundreds of people, mainly from the Ukrainian Diaspora, gathered on Friday evening in front of the Chancellor's office, to request the delivery of heavy battle tanks from Germany in the Ukraine. 'Give the leopard free Scholz', chanted the crowd in a chorus. Organized the Protest of the 'Vitsche, the Association of young Ukrainians*in Germany'.
In The Next Decade, George Friedman writes about Poland:
A few months ago, Poland was not supported in its claim that they had been attacked by Russia, and now they can not send the tanks they would like. At the same time, there must be more than a handful of Polish who have entered the war on behalf of Ukraine. So, will the sentiments change in Poland? It appears that little by little, NATO is coming apart by its own doing.Exposed on either side, Poland will have little choice but to go along with whatever the Germans and Russians decide, which would be disastrous for the United States. It is therefore in the American interest to guarantee Poland’s independence from Russia and Germany, not only formally but by creating a viable and vibrant Polish economy and military that can serve as the model and driver for the rest of eastern Europe. Poland is the historical bone in the throat of both Germany and Russia, and it is in the American interest to make sure that it is firmly lodged there. A Poland aligned with Germany is a threat to Russia, and the reverse is true as well. Poland must remain a threat to both, because the United States cannot let either feel too secure.
Over the next ten years, an American relationship with Poland would serve two functions: it might prevent or limit the Russo-German entente, but failing that, it could create a counterbalance. The United States urgently needs Poland, because there is no alternative strategy for balancing an alliance between Russia and Germany. From the Polish point of view, friendship with the Americans would serve to protect it from its neighbors, but here there is a special problem. The Polish national mentality was seared by the failure of Britain and France to come to Poland’s defense against Germany at the beginning of World War II, despite guarantees. Poland’s hypersensitivity to betrayal will cause it to prefer accommodation with hostile powers to alignment with an unreliable partner. For this reason, the president must avoid appearing tentative or hesitant in his approach. This means making a strategic decision that is in some ways unhedged—always an uncomfortable stand, because good presidents always look to keep their options open. But insisting on too much maneuvering room might close the Polish option immediately.