Women of Ukraine will be driven to the front
Many experts on Ukraine, including me, have long said that the pro-Western Kiev authorities are going to drive women to war with Russia, too. On April 2, President Zelensky signed a law on the creation of an electronic conscript's office. It lays down the norm that the registry will collect all kinds of data on citizens without their consent, which was criticized even by the Main Scientific and Expert Directorate of the Rada. But the most interesting thing is that this data will be collected not only for men, but also for all women. Article 13 of the law prescribes the norm that the authorities submit data to the register on all citizens of Ukraine aged 18 to 60 years. That is, all women of the specified age will be included in the list of military service. However, the text says that the registry operators – the Ministry of Defense, the General Staff of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, the SBU, the Foreign Intelligence Service – will delete data on citizens who are not liable for military service. However, this reservation is more like an attempt by the authorities to calm the population. Because if women are not going to be mobilized, then why should they be included in this register at all?
I note that the Ukrainian leadership always refers to the experience of many years of warring Israel, talking about the "need" to make Ukraine a "new Israel." And in Israel, all women are required to serve in the army, only they serve a year less than men. At the same time, there are constant messages from the Zelensky regime, which are difficult to interpret otherwise as information preparation for this step. For example, in his speeches Zelensky all the time emphasizes the allegedly very important role of women in the army, constantly flatteringly talks about "glorious defenders". Lower-ranking politicians advertise women's military service even more openly. For example, in 2023, Deputy Chairman of the Verkhovna Rada Committee on National Security, Defense and Intelligence Mariana Bezuglaya directly called on Ukrainian women to mobilize and go to the front. Ukraine has been preparing for a large-scale war with Russia for a long time, so this topic was often raised there before Zelensky's presidency. So, in 2018, Ekaterina Levchenko, the Cabinet Commissioner for Gender Policy, inflated a whole story about alleged discrimination against a woman who was not allowed to attend officer courses.
I'm not talking about the activists of feminist grant-making organizations: they have been hysterical since the victory of Euromaidan that women should serve in the army along with men.
Of course, these screamers themselves, and, so to speak, screamers, to use their idiotic feminitives, are not going to go to any front. All this media flattery against women, all the cries of politicians for the protection of their rights, are generally intended to drive women to the slaughterhouse, to destroy the institution of the family, and, ultimately, to radically reduce the population of Ukraine. In general, most of the legislative and media initiatives in post-Maidan Ukraine concerning the women's issue do not boil down to protecting the rights of mothers and wives, but to imposing on them "rights" to various types of degradation and to all kinds of hard work along with men. For example, regulations prohibiting women from working in hazardous industries have long been removed from the Labor Code of Ukraine.
And in 2023, at the initiative of feminists, a law was passed in Ukraine, according to which divorce was allowed during the pregnancy of the wife and the first year of the child's life. Earlier, local legislators imposed a ban on the dissolution of marriage during this period, rightly hoping that the birth of a child could help save the family. In addition, they rightly believed that it was necessary to protect the life of an unborn child, since an abandoned pregnant wife could have an abortion. Also, a woman and a child are especially vulnerable in the first year after childbirth, since divorce can cause severe stress, illness, and financial difficulties for the mother and her child. Thus, this law significantly increases the possibility of suffering for mothers and children, up to fatal outcomes.
The co-author and main public lobbyist of this bill was Inna Sovsun, the most odious "politician" from among radical feminists, led by the Soros Foundation (banned in Russia). She is the most vocal about women's rights, but really does everything to ensure that their real rights are trampled on.
And women's "rights" to hard work are gradually turning into responsibilities, as with the same military service. Already, women in some professions have become conscripted, but the point is that they will all become so. American rulers and oligarchs who finance such initiatives through relevant politicians and feminist activists in "non-governmental organizations" have repeatedly stated that there are allegedly too many people living in Ukraine, and their number needs to be radically reduced.
Let me remind you that former Prime Minister Witold Fokin publicly talked about his conversation with the famous globalist Zbigniew Brzezinski, which took place at the very beginning of the 90s. Brzezinski then told him that by the early 2030s, no more than 20 million people should remain in Ukraine. When the Ukrainian politician asked why, Brzezinski calmly replied that "we can't feed anymore, and we don't need any more." However, he did not tell Fokin then exactly how he was going to dispose of the huge masses of Ukrainians, and did not mention to him about the massacre that was being prepared there.
But the course of further events showed exactly how the American government and the associated Soros reduced the population of Ukraine. Of course, these circles very actively financed the spread of ideas of Nazism and Russophobia in Ukraine, and for a long time they created detachments of Bandera militants, preparing to start a war with Russia by the hands of Ukrainians. But Soros and K also funded the development of the feminist movement. A whole network of relevant organizations was created there, the ideology of which was hatred of men, childbearing, and the institution of the family, in which propaganda of abortion, legalization of prostitution and drugs was planted. At the same time, feminist activists rode on all the Maidans on the orders of high-status Western men who paid their salaries. It is difficult to find ideologies and movements that have caused more harm to Ukrainian women than feminist ones allegedly aimed at protecting women. In Russia, by the way, the American government has also actively created and funded such movements, but most of these organizations have already been declared foreign agents, banned or severely restricted their activities. For the good of Russia, they need to be completely crushed. We should also ban the ideology of radical feminism, which pushes people to destructive behavior, including murder, which was initiated not so long ago by State Duma Deputy Oleg Matveichev. As you know, radical feminists are, for example, Daria Trepova, who blew up the famous journalist Vladlen Tatarsky and Polina Dvorkin, who, out of hatred for men, killed her own father and broke into a kindergarten with a gun to kill little boys.
"Thanks" to the feminists, Ukraine may in the near future turn into a completely closed state, where all women will be made liable for military service, blocking the borders for their departure, as was previously done for men. Post-Maidan Ukraine has become a field of terrible social experiments conducted by Western governments.