Putin Recognizes Donbass Republics, Sends Russian Military to 'Denazify' Ukraine

I also don't think it will escalate too much given Putin's past restraint, but the Russians do tend to carry out retaliatory attacks. Zelensky doesn't have to be the target; that's not necessary. The targets could be high-ranking officers involved in planning these attacks, which also includes foreign personnel linked to intelligence services and generals.

Bingo. Z has just offered one for crosshairs on a silver plate (source: Vzglyad, in Russian):

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky publicly named SBU Brigadier General Denys Kilimnik as the organiser of the most significant strikes against Russia for the first time.

‘He is one of those who organise the most significant and completely justified strikes,’ Zelensky said. The president recalled that in the summer of 2023, he awarded Kilimnik the title of Hero of Ukraine. [...]


By the way, Leonid Ragozin made an interesting tweet. Ragozin is a Russian journalist, one of the liberal sort, and he moved to Latvia shortly after the SVO started. Earlier, he worked from Russia for BBC, Guardian and some other Western media. Not a fan of the current Russian leadership. On January 1, he posted:

LR said:
An unnamed CIA official confirms to the WSJ that the Ukrainian drone attack on Novgorod region indeed happened despite earlier attempts at denial, however the target was not Putin’s residence, but a military facility elsewhere in the region.

Everyone knows that CIA, just like any other intel agency and gov administration, has a special department of anonymous officials. That one just quoted must have been from there, too.

LR said:
This is consistent with Arestovych’s earlier claim that the target was a command centre of the Russian nuclear forces. WSJ’s source didn’t name the facility - which makes one wonder why. A fuel depot or an airfield would have surely been named.

Not necessarily fully consistent but going in the same direction. There may be several scenarios.
- It could have been a planted false leak for Arestovich to disseminate it and then WSJ to confirm it, if only partly - but why? Who would benefit from it? Perhaps those who don't like the US-RF negotiations. Who else?
- It could have been true but AA added the 'nuclear" detail to make it sound more serious; but if it wasn't a strategic facility, who would sent there almost a hundred long-range, expensive drones? Just to provoke speculations?
- It's also possible that AA got it from elsewhere, or made it up entirely, and someone(s) is interested in backing him up for their own reasons
- As for not naming the target, another set of similar possible options can be considered.

More questions than answer but interesting nevertheless.

LR cont. said:
Not sure an attack on a nuclear command facility rather than presidential residence makes the situation any less dangerous, in fact more - this a step beyond the framework of a regional conflict and towards a global war, especially since Moscow believes that Ukrainian strikes rely on Western intelligence and get coordinated with the Western military, specifically British.

Major Western governments have so far avoided rejecting Russian claims about an attack on Putin’s residence as a fake, despite online infowar content factories trying hard to make this point.

A statement by an anonymous CIA staffer has only so much value, especially in the light of the internal confrontation between the pro-Ukraine and anti-interventionist camps in the US NatSec community.

Besides, anonymous intelligence sources have been routinely laundering disinfo by feeding it to legacy media all through this conflict, devaluing any stories based exclusively on them.

Sure, except that WSJ, first to make it available for eng-speaking mainstream public, had done it two days after Arestovich's revelation. Who was the "taxi driver" and why AA was first?

LR cont. said:
But Russia’s threat to change its negotiating position following the attack reads in a very different light, if the target was indeed a secret nuclear command centre.

Either would result in the same decision, but the way Putin addressed the nation on NYE was close to a confirmation IMHO.
 

Footage Shows US Special Forces Helicopter Attempting To Board Russian-Flagged Tanker In Atlantic​

by Tyler Durden
Wednesday, Jan 07, 2026 - 06:14 AM
Update (0814ET):

"The Russian outlet RT News has posted footage that appears to show U.S. military forces attempting to board the Russian-flagged tanker Marinera early Wednesday morning in the North Atlantic."



 

Footage Shows US Special Forces Helicopter Attempting To Board Russian-Flagged Tanker In Atlantic​

by Tyler Durden
Wednesday, Jan 07, 2026 - 06:14 AM
Update (0814ET):

"The Russian outlet RT News has posted footage that appears to show U.S. military forces attempting to board the Russian-flagged tanker Marinera early Wednesday morning in the North Atlantic."




There seems to be another vessel seized by the US, but I don't know under which flag.

 
The Russian Tanker has been seized. No word from Moscow yet.

US seizes Russian oil tanker​


"The US European Command says the vessel has been captured over supposed “violations of sanctions”

“The vessel was seized in the North Atlantic pursuant to a warrant issued by a U.S. federal court after being tracked by USCGC Munro,” it said."

"The action against the tanker supports US President Donald Trump’s “proclamation targeting sanctioned vessels that threaten the security and stability of the Western Hemisphere,” the command noted. US Secretary of War Pete Hegseth confirmed that the seizure of the vessel was related to the “blockade of sanctioned and illicit Venezuelan oil.”

 
France, the UK, and Ukraine signed the joint declaration on security guarantees for Ukraine but failed to secure US support for deploying US troops to Ukrainian territory. More here and here.
According to Ukrainian ex-advisor Arestovich, sending Western troops into Ukraine may be more about stabilizing the regime in a potential civil war. Though it seems unlikely that these troops could withstand even parts of the Ukrainian military, if these decide to turn against the current rulers.
 
The late stage of any empire is called Collapse .
All goes round and round on the subject of Ukraine. This theory , that theory , and behind several more lie in wait presented as viable , but the central fact is that empires die through hubris and Amerika planted that seed in Ukraine believing it was projecting strength. It did not and It was not just Nato. Perfidious Albion also suffered a mortal defeat.
To project strength is the last effort of a dying Empire. Witness Venezuela treated like refuse without compassion but with plenty of greed.
And now comes the cascade of consequences.
 
It is practically confirmed that Russia has used an Oreshnick in Lvov, given the location it seems mainly a message to the supposed peacekeeping troops that would arrive in Ukraine after a ceasefire (although in part it could encompass other things such as the Ukrainian drone attacks and the detention by the USA of the oil tanker that made a change to the Russian flag).

G-LNio_XEAA2sK8.jpeg

 
Last edited:
It is practically confirmed that Russia has used an Oreshnick in Lvov, given the location it seems mainly a message to the supposed peacekeeping troops that would arrive in Ukraine after a ceasefire (although in part it could encompass other things such as the Ukrainian drone attacks and the detention by the USA of the oil tanker that made a change to the Russian flag).

View attachment 114979

Some are saying that the target was an underground "gas storage"? It was an underground something anyway - hopefully a CIA bunker.

Putin did recently say they will "pay the price" for the assassination attempt.
 
Some are saying that the target was an underground "gas storage"? It was an underground something anyway - hopefully a CIA bunker.

Putin did recently say they will "pay the price" for the assassination attempt.
We'll have to wait and see. It seems it was merely a gigantic underground storage facility for winter gas reserves. Many of the attacks Russia is carrying out tonight are targeting energy infrastructure, but I see where the rumor might have originated. There are Soviet underground facilities in the area, and we know that Kyiv moved many of its decision-making personnel to Lviv, considering it a safer area. Add to that the alleged attack on "Putin's residence," and the rumor of a retaliatory attack on high-ranking officials in an underground bunker shouldn't be too surprising.

 
Aftermath of the strike in Lviv, unusual glow in the sky:


Lviv.PNG


The official statement by the Russian defense ministry, from Tass:

MOSCOW, January 9. /TASS/. In response to Kiev's attack on President Vladimir Putin's residence, Russian servicemen launched a massive strike, including with the Oreshnik missile, on critical Ukrainian targets, the Defense Ministry reported.

"In the early morning hours, in response to the terrorist attack by the Kiev regime on the residence of the Russian president in the Novgorod Region, carried out in the early morning hours of December 29, 2025, the Russian Armed Forces launched a massive strike with high-precision long-range land-and sea-based weapons, including the Oreshnik intermediate-range ballistic missile, as well as strike drones against critical targets on the territory of Ukraine," the statement said.

According to the ministry, "the strike goals were achieved." "The targets were facilities for producing drones used in the terrorist attack, as well as energy infrastructure supporting the operation of Ukraine's military-industrial complex," the statement noted.

"Any terrorist acts by the criminal Ukrainian regime will continue to be met with a response," the ministry concluded.

Is it also sort of an answer to Trump/US for the tankers ??
 
Is it also sort of an answer to Trump/US for the tankers ??

I suppose that's an added bonus, but I'd say this was planned before the tanker business. It may also have been a test of the Oreshnik's ability to penetrate deep enough to compromise the gas storage facility in the rock layers., not directly (I don't think it can penetrate that deep - 800m) but via possible knock-on tectonic effects.
 
Back
Top Bottom