"fight club" communications

[lindrie]

I've been mulling over whether or not to post for quite some time. The topic, in of itself, is already a hard grasp and the mind manipulation through repetition is already very much embedded with these kinds of topics. I'd like to give some context on how I ran across it and why I think its worth looking into, perhaps not the Q post themselves but the point (I think) they were trying to convey. I have not finished reading the thread, I'm on pg 19. I'm guessing the topic that I would like the group's take on hasnt been brought up or it never quite reached the point as this thread is not very active.

The 2020 election fraud was the big turning point in how I was looking for data that was fairly unbias. When the mass media all coordinated on shutting down any discussion on election stuff I started casting a pretty wide net trying to get some baseline of what's really going on. I thought I was making daily choices based on "objective" data, I love Physics and I loved it more when I found out as a child I was loosely following the scientific method for looking at the world. A funny example, I remember watching when my dad drive (I was very little) trying to figure out how other drivers would know when he switched lanes in traffic. I didn't want to ask, mainly because I wanted to figure it out for myself Eventually, one of the days it was quiet enough in the car, that I heard the audio click of the blinkers at a stop sign. That's when I had the realization he had a lever he would turn left/right . My child brain was actually a bit more bummed because I though it would have been something more fancy when it was something more mundane.

Anyway, since I realized the info I though I was basing decisions (like when to buy a house) on was highly filtered and might not even be real, I had to find a way to reset that baseline. I definitely got more than I bargained for. Staying on topic, the Qanon i ran across very early (obviously), but I dismissed it. Not so much as I thought it was bull, but more of, I did read a couple of the archived post and (side rant) nothing is more frustrating that reading "opinion" from "awakened" individuals who didnt even archive links made by the individual that they're evangelizing (end rant).

My perspective, the Q post looked like they were playing a "game" where you dont get told the rules and they want you to solve the puzzle, but in order to solve the puzzle, you have to know the rules otherwise you can't win because that is what the solution is based on. I've seen puzzles like this before and I don't play. An simple example of what I mean, if the unspoken rule is: apple is the answer for anything "sky", and the question posted is: what color is the sky? Who's going to guess "apple"? Noone.

I follow a three strike rule and somewhere along my digging, I ran across my third "strike" where the Q drops "predicted" current event in real time. I don't actually remember which three it was as I wasnt keeping track of the specifics. While i still didnt trust anything anyone was saying about it, I did have a "sigh" moment that I had to really figure out what is going on with this because there's something there and it was important enough that the lying media just wouldnt let it go. At the time, its 2021 and fake fads dont last this long. Eventually on the greatawakening.win a commenter posted a link to a wordpress blog:

Symbolism Communication

decodingsymbols.wordpress.com

And this was the first time "Qanon" made sense. Qanon is the controlled opposition narrative to discredit the messenger. How do you trigger someone? Say Qanon. The first response: there's no Qanon, there's Q and the anon. Mind manipulation through repetion is set. The Q post were highlighting a "hidden" in plain sight communications (comms). Similar to mob speak: sleeping with the fishes. Or military obfuscation on public channel: the eagle has landed. Double Speak: Climate Change. Hey wait a minute, isn't the world boiling now?

Welcome to Fight Club. The first rule of Fight Club, you don't talk about fight club. The second rule of Fight Club: You Don't Talk About Fight Club. Third rule is something like you pay to play (actual movie was something like first time, you fight). In terms of a modern "player" example, what happened to Biden's first wife?

Decoding Symbols' blog also not banned on twitter: https://twitter.com/NewClear314

I've also enjoyed sleepdude who originally posted on greatawakening.win but I think the mod may be compromised? He has a substack now:

sleepydude | Substack

Just a guy with one foot on land, one foot in the grave, and another foot in the dream world.

substack.com

SemperSupra was another that caught my eye but I'm dont look on greatawakening anymore so I'm not sure if they are still active:

SemperSupra - GreatAwakening

Great Awakening

greatawakening.win

 

[lindrie]

I've started watching Dark Journalist recently as a more casual way to learn about the UFO and Esoteric connection. The more I watched, the more it looked like he was tracking the same phenomena as the Q post but under a different banner or scope. He used a term that I think is more fitting for the trend that I've seen, he called Steganography. I was going to start looking through his older videos to see if the "X" marker and Steganography term was the same kind of plain-speak as the Q stuff was alluding to.

But even better, this past Friday live stream, he goes more into details on how he defines Steganography and did a dive on how he found the KONA BLUE steganography in relation to the "X" tech.

If UFO and related "X" tech is of interest to you, I highly recommend it! It's been a fun watch:

In the intro of this video (~2min in), He said he introduced "X" steganography back in 2017 (how interesting!) with it ramping up more recently (disease X, Twitter/X, etc) and he found that the steganography he's tracing goes back to Ancient Greek and "Atlantean" times.

This historical back reference (I've been thinking of it as "comms marker") also seen in one of DecodingSymbols/NewClear314 decode for the Moons of Jupiter and assassination of King Henry the 4 of France. IE the older symbols are carried forward into the present or even "repackaged" to fit with the current fad (modern fad that are created and maintained, in an illusionary sense, by them! Think: Taylor Swift).

At about ~25min, Dark Journalist Daniel Liszt gives the definition that he's working with (with ~21 being the start of the question asked to ~28 which is where he goes more into KONA blue), in a summarized form:

Spoiler: Interesting origin point made in the video

Johannus Trithemius, an abbot in the 15th century, created the "modern" (past 500 years) steganography, system for naming things, based on the Greek version of a "page within a page". This was to fill a need to reveal share what he had found while avoiding prosecution from the very church he worked for (quite ponerologic eh?). Later Trithemius's work was found by the founder of the Golden Dawn in the 19th century. And, continues to trickle out from esoteric circles.

Not to be confused with cryptography, which is more puzzle like and requires deciphering the code, steganography is something that is out there that you see every day that's very public but only initiates will understand its relevance. (Me: initiates don't have to be in esoteric circles or a part secret societies but I'm sure it helps, much harder to be an outside coming in: the "pay to play" sacrificial system)

---

I hope this give enough context for what I'm going for as I'm planning to use this area to keep tracks of any interesting news/trends as election season ramps up. If it turns out there's nothing really here, it will still be fitting since its in "COINTELPRO" section while keeping the noise down in other threads.

Depending on how this election goes (regardless of where you are in the world), I'm wondering if there'll be a matching shift in the news and social media towards the "declass" or if this was a round about recruitment campaign for the next generation of "secret" keepers

 

[lindrie]

...but then, why be so sensitive about it for months?

Also, this doctor told CNN that, these days, with all the pre-screenings and blood tests people undergo, doctors don't 'discover cancer' during operations:

https://twitter.com/x/status/1771244541770658098

So... something still doesn't add up!

This is a good example that double speak may be in play. Cancer, in a general health sense, is an aggressive overgrowth of a cell. If "cell" is then taken in its slang term as a covert group, the Kate news now can be read as a covert faction has gotten too big (unaccountable? sinking too much money and not delivering?) and must be removed. The person as the "face" (Kate in this case) does not have to be aware nor do factions within cells have to actually know each other in person. Plausible deniability is best. Interestingly enough, the twitter video with the clip they chosen to show for Kate shows here with a horizontal stripped shirt. A horizontal stripped shirt is symbolic for someone who unaware of the actual double speak themselves, ie probably not the person coordinating it.

The double speak does not mean that she does or does not have cancer, but that's how they've (whoever is sending message) chosen to send the message. (As in, if it wasnt relevant, why report on it at all?)

 

[lindrie]

If the Universe communicates through symbolism and metaphor, the biggest WOW for me came upon hearing which bridge it is, and WHO it was named after.
Although I’m a mere “elderly Canadian woman”, I recognized the name.
Come on, it’s the...

Francis Scott Key Bridge!​

“The 2.6km (1.6-mile), four-lane bridge — named after the man who wrote the words of the Star Spangled Banner, the US national anthem — spans the Patapsco River just southeast of central Baltimore.”

Baltimore Key Bridge collapse: All we know about the ship crash and victims

Francis Scott Key Bridge collapses after a container ship smashes into the four-lane span, plunging cars into the river.

www.aljazeera.com

Edit: I must admit, I travelled through several of the eastern states, and was a bit of a history hound, and of course, I know that song was written in 1812, when the two countries Canada and the U.S were scrapping, and we( colonial British “Canadians”) burnt the. U.S Whitehouse down...but, hey, my point is the metaphor part, right?

Oh, how interesting! The ship is also named DALI, a person on telegram noted it might symbolic for Salvador Dali, and sure enough, there's a painting called "The Broken Bridge and the Dream (1945)" .

DecodingSymbols has a link for Salvador Dali to coordination of hit jobs (187 murder charged) through connection of the movie "A Clockwork Orange".

But I'm not sure what to make of it

 

[lindrie]

Another clip from his Rogan appearance. This one about Alex Jones and channeling.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1781415843395432766

Another channel I follow poked this same point (Jones prediction of 911) in comparison to William Cooper: one went on to become rich while the other is dead.

Both "predicted" a 911 style hit, both have connections to intelligence agencies (AKA they know how to "read" the plain-sight language).

The channel linked to this video repost of Bill Cooper's Hour of the Time. I havent finished watching it fully but, linked timestamp is set to the segment where Bill goes into poking holes in CNN narrative then some more background of Bin Laden as a intelligence asset used to overthrow the soviets in Afghanistan then repurposed for the New World Order (~25:55 to 30:43). Bill's "prediction" was actually made in earlier in the broadcast, about 11:33 after talking about the Oklahoma bombing, eluding to Bin Laden's attack to be a kind of false flag.

I watched a clip of the Jones' prediction for 911 and I'd say they both predicted it in pretty much the same way. They both said there would be an attack on US soil then blamed on Bid Laden. IMO, I did not see any "prediction" between either of them that I'd consider supernatural, ie of the realm of channeling or similar.


In this "Fight Club" comms, major plans are written out way in advance because that's how it has to be coordinated between groups who can't explicitly communicate to one another (gotta keep that degree of separation). But, for an outsider looking in, the catch would be to find all the comm vehicles then cross reference them (AKA between movies, TV shows, social trends, etc).

I was hoping to find the Beavis and Butthead (MK Ultra/scapegoat/fall guy) Comms for the 911 "prediction" as an example of this, but I'm not sure under which of Decoding Symbols's blog post had the image. It was part of a magazine ad, I think. If I run across it again, I'll post it here. It was a full or half page image of Beavis and Butthead flying in airplanes around two skyscrapers very much like the twin towers. They had bombs in their hand (of the round black kind with rope fuse at the top) with the middle eastern turben on their head. Supposedly the magazine with it was printed before 911, but I was hoping to be able to confirm that part.

 

[lindrie]

Decoding Symbols recently did a post for "Q" symbology (not Qanon but more of "why" Q Clearance instead of "insert other letter" clearance):

https://twitter.com/x/status/1780747517858394210

Those without twitter can read via thread reader:

Thread by @NewClear314 on Thread Reader App

His main point, I believe, is in number 16:

16.
Notice also the story in the paper. The 17K Acre fire freighted the surviving Bear which grew to "17 pounds" in a few months.

The same day 17K Nazi's were given citizenship in the USSR!

17/17/17 Q(uiet)

Tracking smoke to fire = Investigation. Quiet = Lack of smoke.

If you keep leaving smoke trails, you'll end up having another congressional hearing!

Funny enough, I ran across this short a couple weeks back (posted by a fire department no less!)

 

[lindrie]

The True Q

1.
I am always hunting down historic origin points and today I've made a Q breakthrough!

08/03/1977 MKUltra Hearing
08/04/1977 DOE + Q Clearance Established

The point of "Q(uiet)" secrecy is a way to avoid visibility of MKUltra and other explosive (nuclear) topics. pic.twitter.com/HFFwaWnvI1— Symbols (@NewClear314) April 17, 2024

Flat link since I forgot it can embed: twitter.com/NewClear314/status/1780747517858394210

 

[lindrie]

NewClear314/DecodingSymbols on twitter recently did a decode of the movie "Fight Club", the first post of the thread starts here:

https://twitter.com/NewClear314/status/1785625387709743221

via threadreader, for those with no twitter/X:

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1785625387709743221.html

Obviously, this decode caught my eye since I've been loosely calling this Fight Club comms. But, when reading through, it also shows an outline of how "predictive programming" sets up a predefined narrative before hand. In this case, how a comm-aware cell should approach the eventual 9/11 event (before it was known as 9/11), NewClear314 highlights it here (number 6) . (In reference to my prior "911" post )

In terms of the "predictive programming", I think of kinda like a battle plan implementation, a group on top has a goal, let's say to trigger a significant psychological event to corral the masses into a specific direction They own enough of the media and other institutions to frame a public event in a certain light but they dont "own" the masses per say. So instead, they can turn to these comm-aware cells to play the role of the masses (manufactured consent anyone?) in the "public" sphere, ie social media influencers, trending videos, etc. The cells will be the ones that circulate with but in reality they are a "vocal minority" while playing the actual role of a Judas' goat.

Like any battle plan, it doesn't survive first contact with the enemy. First rule of Fight Club, don't talk about fight club. Their internal rules (standards?) of play, don't say the Quiet part out loud! If they can't talk with each other (or risk certain death) and they're an extreme minority (i.e. it can be 1 person in a corporation of thousands of employees), how do they signal to, let's say, the media that their video should circulate as oppose to others? Usually this is already established via funding (think like Joe Rogan or Alex Jones before the lawsuit). But for smaller or more local, they may wear certain attire or accessories (like a freemason necklace) as a signal.

Going the other way, similar logic applies from the media/entertainment side. They can't really suppress all of the creativity (although now, there definitely seems to be a squeeze) but they can dictate through where they allocate funding to cells that are comm-aware OR someone who gets the double speak just enough to still produce the intended message. But that message has to be repeated enough times, "predictive programming", so that the message is understood and not considered a fluke or garbled in translation.

Keep in mind, this is my logic, not necessarily how it actually works. I'm an outside peering in, although quite poorly, so take all with a grain of salt!

 

[lindrie]

Hmm, just saw that while browsing
Whistleblowers in Boeing case tend to die lately ... however from the symptoms description could it be due to vaccine injury? The coincidence is still pretty troubling ...

https://twitter.com/x/status/1786018216059482141

45? or 44? Real time example of fudging the numbers to send a message:

https://archive.ph/WovBh

A second Boeing whistleblower who raised concerns about a supplier who had been ignoring production defects has died suddenly at age 44 on Tuesday.

https://archive.ph/qcmp8

Joshua Dean, 45, a former quality auditor at Spirit AeroSystems, died Tuesday morning from a fast-growing mystery infection, the Seattle Times reported.

What is getting 4warned about? I have no clue but I'm guessing its some kind of insider detail to the Boeing lawsuit, ie some kind of info trying to stay out of the lawsuit, outside of the obvious? I have yet to see a comm for more mundane things like lowering of manufacturing quality 'til plans fall out of the sky so there must be something bigger connected Boeing is covering up with the deaths.

 

[lindrie]

Q: (L) Did we ask about the ship that hit the Francis Scott Key Bridge?

(Niall) No.

(A Jay) Was the steering of the ship into the Francis Scott Key Bridge deliberate and premeditated?

A: No

Q: (A Jay) If not, what caused the power failure of the ship?

A: Power failure had nothing to do with impact. Was side effect of bleedthrough of 4D energies.

Q: (Niall) That was your idea.

(L) I already thought about that. Why don't you just ask me? I'd have told you! I mean, it's like they said they described in - what was it? New Mexico, where you're driving and it looks like the road is straight, but it's really curving, or it's curving and it's really straight.

(Joe) Right. So, the driver, the captain, or whatever, just kind of, like, got confuddled about where he was going.

(L) And I bet he's still freaking out! He was sure he was going in the right direction.

(Joe) So, there were some symbolic aspects to it. It was the Francis Scott Key bridge.

(L) Were there symbolic aspects to it?

A: Yes

Q: (Joe) And is that because of the 4D energies that there's some information involved in it?

A: Yes

Q: (Joe) And was there any bleedthrough aspect to that event in London the other day with the horses and Big Ben?

A: Yes

Q: (Joe) Is there anything to be read intelligently in symbolism of these events, or is it just associated with the place that it is? Or is it predictive?

A: You have been doing well analyzing things when you network.

I always think about this when looking at the news in the lens of comms. But I guess it really doesnt matter since, at least from what I've seen, PTB can frame any event, whether organic or a false flag, to match whatever message needs sending, even if it means straight up lying. It does add a layer of potential complication, for me at least. I've always considered it a purely 3D, covert cell to covert cell kind of communication. I guess I figured if there were any messages from "on high", they'd intentionally not cover it. I suppose it also depends on who the intended recipients are

 

[lindrie]

NewClear314 / Decoding Symbols created a thread talking about his experience in the "MKUltra" system:

https://twitter.com/NewClear314/status/1790018317152895105

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1790018317152895105.html

My internal notation for this system is star/sacrifice child. A good example that I found for the celebrity world is the singer Beyoncé and her sister. Guess who's the star child..

IMO, this system can get much more sinister the closer one gets to the "core" families. Not to discount his experience, because I do believe it occurred and I dont take light of it, but I think the intensity of it happens at different levels of proximity (I have suspicion my family had touch edges of it by accident). I think of MK Ultra more towards the Greenbaum side of "programming". What he experience is for the "cannon fodder", us, the masses, etc.

A couple years back when investigating, I found the topic of satanic ritual abuse which lead into the finding of Greenbaum victims and I came to the above conclusion as a kind of reverse form or a side effect of the social community that would be needed to cover up en-mass any Greenbauming. During this time I ran across Mark Passio's (former satanist) podcast he did starting back in 2010, I'm not sure what he's doing actively now as I didnt really continue down this specific topic (my thread following lead me elsewhere) but I did find he interviewed with one person, Neo, who was part of SRA, Episode #17 (17???), may need to scroll a bit to get to the specific episode. Feel free to listen if you'd like another perspective of what I think is the same "MKUltra" system by another name, if you're not already familiar with the topic. His podcast run ~1hr fyi. And, of course, dont feel obligated to listen to it if its not quite your cup of tea since it can be a quite a heavy topic.

I'm hoping this will put into perspective (at least how I see it) on how and why the "Fight Club" comms still continue and why I think its important to bring some pointers to it, even if its not super precise.

 

[lindrie]

I've been trying to grapple with the "Fight Club" comms in my mind. For me, it seems disorganized and confusing, in terms of contextualizing it (loosely speaking).

NewClear314 on Twitter/X is approaching it more like a historical dive, finding the origin of a comms symbol then tracing it back to the historical context of the time and finding connections that way. The downside is there's so many different hops depending on what is being investigated. I can follow while reading his updates, but when imagining it outside of that its just a hazy cloud.

I thought it be good to share a rough category list I came up with based on the topics NewClear314 has written about prior. Not all encompassing but more of comms that are more or less "solidified" in what I understand that could be used for anyone curious. Just another reminder, I don't know of anyone else that does the same as NewClear314 (AKA Decoding Symbols for the blog). Sleepydude on substack does some but most of what I've read is more of understanding how a symbol's context is understood and could be invoked (such as Tiffany Blue).

• Financial pushes (think dot com bubble or 2008 market crash)
  • Titanic
• how-to for disposable assets (star child v sacrificed child)
  • certain social trends (cartoons when I was growing up, but now I'm sure its more internet based like TikTok or Twitch)
  • 420 Weed movement
• confidential/security leaks of any kind (steganography / Brady Evidence for courts)
  • X/BLUE steganography from Dark Journalist
  • environmental disaster (Chernobyl)
• manipulating the masses (framing "approved" public opinion / manufactured consent / social conditioning)
  • climate change
  • AI
• covert jobs (for paperless trail of plausible deniability)
  • asteroid/comets
  • lottery wins (AKA Payout)
• Faction Coordination
  • Antarctica
  • Sports
• News updates of any the above (knowing which symbols helps here)
  • "nonsense" stories usually fall here
  • bug movement (killer wasp, cicada 13/17 birth cycles)
  • livestock (some news that come to mind: cows flu, chicken/egg plant destructions, etc)

 

[lindrie]

Lead author removed the cryptoterrestrial paper from researcgate for some reason. Masters says he can't discuss the reasons at this point but hopes it goes back up soon:

https://twitter.com/x/status/1801417013941670176

"Alien", ET, UFO and UAP, each have a different context in the fight club comms although in laymen terms it all bundled together.

"Alien" is used in the original sense, a foreign (human) operative that's crossed country/national borders. A covert spy can be a kind of alien but usually a penguin is used as the marker for this. Also note that the term changed from alien to immigrant, ie I grew up hearing illegal alien as a kid which turned to illegal immigrant in my teen years, to whatever it is now, LatinX (bad joke!)??

DecodingSymbols/NewClear314 has the E.T. movie as a marker for how "E.T." (extra terrestrial) is a stand in for "E" "T", the first two letter of the morse code communication. Think of this as the context for transition the comms from one generation to the next, to keep up with "modern" times.

The movie also indicates that E.T. context will be associated specifically with Reese's Pieces candy context, which are unmarked shelled candy based of the original M&M shelled candy, ie a marked cell (a known ownership) versus and unmarked cell (not known or must remain anonymously owned, no trail to follow).

UFO is noted as the marker "alien invasion" of Operation Paperclip. If you think of it in the context of now, for the USA as an example (since I live here), pop media could use UFO (spaceship) articles to covertly inform about cell movement over the open border along USA and Mexico without ruining the public image of the political agenda of the Establishment.

UAP, from what I understand, was "accidently" let out by Hilary Clinton as the new UFO term used in classified document verbiage. Dark Journalist Daniel Liszt notes that this verbiage is used as the marker for CIA cover ops of control narrative "disclosure" of the UFO/high ancient tech to maximize the benefit towards the PTB and their control system. I think of this verbiage as kind of low level filter. If one is willing to change their language to match the narrative, its possible they're willing to compromise much more to "play the game" and one can "publicly" announce their allegiance by conforming with the narrative. So if you want to join the Chris Mellon club, use UAP not UFO.

Keep in mind, there has to be a certain amount of awareness with the usage of the comms language. We're also living in the times that the psychopath and those that follow are "mucking" up the comms language. Comms have to be articulated in a very specific way other wise the meaning and intent is lost (its already has a layer of obfuscation), think Trump Derangement Syndrome as a result reaction if you don't do it right!


Its also an interesting note one of the author's name is "masters". You only ever need one person in the "know" to "drive" the direction of something. Wayback machine has it listed that Lomas was the one that uploaded it, not Masters...

 

[lindrie]

Wolves in Chernobyl radiation zone show resistance to cancer, study reveals

So this article has been on my mind for a while. The "Chernobyl" event is a comms marker similar to the "Titanic" event. Regardless of what actually happened, these kind of historical marker can be re-used as a kind of comms itself.

DecodingSymbols/NewClear314 did a kind of decode on Chernobyl, to decode the event itself.

Since it was specifically a "nuclear" event, perhaps his nuclear post may be better for context:
Nuclear Transparency
Nuclear: Beating A Dead Horse

With the rough understanding, "nuclear" secrets are a kind of secret that can cause chain reactions and are "highly explosive". A more modern example off the top of my head is like the Epstein scandal, if it was properly investigated, it would cause a chain reaction of expose. There's some speculation the 2008 housing market crash in the US was the first cover up attempt of Epstein's dealings.

Sleepydude posted a recent comms definition update that may be more succinct for this use case: Comms Dictionary

Nuclear = Top Secret / World Ending / Chain Reaction - Anything that comes out that will lead to top-secret material being disclosed and the following chain reaction that could implicate just about everyone in the Cabal, exposing their crimes to the public. It’s the most explosive of all information. Mutually Assured Destruction involves everyone releasing the dirt(blackmail) they have on others all at once and then hoping they survive the widespread chaos that would ensue. Power derived from nuclear plants must be throttled to prevent nuclear meltdowns that can result in entire cities being leveled in an instant or polluted with radiation(“look here!”) that can afflict anyone who goes near it, like child porn(cheese pizza). Just having or viewing child porn is a crime from which there is really no cure or treatment.

Wolf = Stooge, Thug, Goon / Henchman - Someone who looks like a dog but is more independent, not officially a part of your organization. Almost always of a criminal background, wolves are pack(gang) animals and will eagerly turn on you should you show a sign of weakness. They respect shows of force, with alpha wolves being the variety most willing and capable to clean up and leave no traces of a hunt(hit job). The primary role of a wolf is to intimidate and watch over illicit goods and their transportation. Full moons indicate a hunt has begun. The most notable example are the hitmen from Pulp Fiction, with Mr. Wolfe acting as the literal pack alpha.

Cancer = Depending on the organ involved, designates parts of your team are now working against you. It’s not necessarily they are working for White Hats, but more or less they’re in it for themselves now and are looting the storeroom before jumping ship.

---

So right now, my rough reading of this article based on similar definitions listed above, is following the fall of the Soviets (Chernobyl), probably more KGB affiliate since that was their "intelligence" arm(?), the remaining cells (wolves) aren't going rogue (cancer) as expected? I see this as something that can be taken two way, one, they could be loyalist, or two, they're resilient, depending on who's side they're working for.

I'm leaning towards wolves as a more generic positive-neutral, as there are "were-wolf" monster comms as an a negative kind of comm. The similar idea of the beekeeper, wolves are probably an independent/unmarked cell of a specific market, in contrast with a dog, which has owners. If they're given a job that's a lose-lose scenario for them, they may have to turn werewolf to save their own skin.

I also did not realize Chernobyl was in the Ukraine region, so I wonder if this article was meant for something ongoing with the current war in the region. If the PTB are trying to convert freedom fighters, cancer is what they would want, I would think. If this was a more observation of the spreading of corruption (the deep state), then not seeing cancer would be an overall positive.


Now see the same article in a different form! Much harder to see it as a comms piece
Mutant wolves roaming Chernobyl Exclusion Zone have developed cancer-resilient abilities: study

Even the comment section is noticing something odd about the article:

Wild boars have been studied for decades post Chernobyl and are far more resistant than the canine population, but aren't mentioned

 

[lindrie]

Spinning up this thread to consolidate a form of double speak I've been noticing that I've been calling "fight club comms". Would any mod be able to move post already made from the Q source / Qanon here as well?