Reaction of (self-proclaimed) psychopath to PP video

Adaryn

The Living Force
I posted a link to PP in French forum on psychology, in a thread previously opened by someone, about the PP book (which came as a good surprise).

Today I found an answer from a reader. Freezing. I translated it (emphases mine) :
http://forum.doctissimo.fr/psychologie/faire-face-au-terrorisme/ponerologie-politique-sujet_211_1.htm

Hello,

I'm part of the 6% psychopaths who are unable to love and who destroy this society's moral principles. I am able to kill without remorse and even more than that.

I am able to do things which are considered to be horrible by normal people, without remorse.

I watched [this video] with intention, and appreciated to see that all psychopaths like me are not lumped all together.
All this is totally true. But I'm not ashamed to be part of a minority.

I'd also like to give my point of view.

I think that 94% of people don't know the hundredth of what I know about the world, the universe et all, I can't explain it, I don't feel stronger or better for that.
But I don't consider myself as evil, I consider myself as an individualistic man without moral principles.

Here's my point of view :
I think that if everyone was like us, the 6%, we'd live in a better world.

There are 94% people who are easy to manipulate, who are afraid to face the absolute truth of causality and who repress their nature all their life. Swallowing the most foolish ideas which help maintain in power guys who are absolutely harmful for them.

That's where the problem lies.
These 94% of people who don't think. Only the 6% do think.

If there was only us, the 6%, we wouldn't be able to achieve a world filled with so many inequalities and horrors such as we see today.
We would only kill each other and we wouldnt be able to make alliances. Like cats, you see. A cat is a sociopath, it tortures a mouse just for curiosity and game. It lives alone and doesn't form packs, it fights and has no self-esteem. It knows how to wh*re in order to get food, for example.

It's, above all, the 94%, who are sheep.
And it's not even the lashes which force them to act this way. No, they do it by themselves ; THAT is the luxury of being a bastard in power these days.

People think you act in an conscientious and thoughtful way, whereas you just create even more havoc, all the while being completely useless.

And do you know what ? There are still people who are able to say that you're a respectable man, etc.


I'm 20, and I claim shamelessly that I have a life experience far superior to any 50 year old man who is part of these 94%.
People come to believe that there is more to life than causality ; that is how religions and other bullshit are created.

Yes, we destroy moral principles, but moral principles are for the 94% who are unable to comprehend the world and its causality ; not only to comprehend, but to live it and accept it.

Anyway, I think ponerology is very interesting.

But the true problem is not us, the 6%. It's the 94% others who are quite cowardly and not really smart.
 
hmmm what is strange is to be so well-documented. a normal psycho could be aware of his pathology without expressing it with appropriate wordings
 
judging from the first posting which translates his writing it looks like a case of self-proclaimedness to me - too much critical distance is IMHO implicit in his writing. i'd say he is misguided or ponerized, but hardly a real psycho. probably somebody living through the "i'm a scary vampire who goes to cemeteries in the middle of night to drink chicken blood" fad, and wearing ultra-kewl attire commensurate with that attitude. but there is always the danger that they'll do some really hurtful things to others and rue that for the rest of their life.

or i might be wrong.
 
name said:
i'd say he is misguided or ponerized, but hardly a real psycho. probably somebody living through the "i'm a scary vampire who goes to cemeteries in the middle of night to drink chicken blood" fad, and wearing ultra-kewl attire commensurate with that attitude. but there is always the danger that they'll do some really hurtful things to others and rue that for the rest of their life.
It does seem that this person is seeking attention or trying to make him different from everybody else; trying to make himself "special."
 
Interesting. He speaks about causality just like Merovingian from The Matrix movie, expressing similar disdain for ordinary people. His lack of restraint to express frankly may be due to his youg age I think, or anonymity provided by the nature of internet.
 
And looks like he reads David Icke too much, like someone who wants to do something good by telling people that he is bad and that they must be aware there is also more persons like him, and that they must not be sheep anymore.

I think that to see psychopathic behavior and to distinguish it from behavior of normal person, one must not be psychopath, I think that they can’t really see what the problem with them is, and he obviously sees it very good. I don’t think that he is really one, but possibly ponerized.And really sounds like he has 20 years and its shows in his narrow views.
 
Nobody notices the fact that what he says about the 94% is objectively true.

It's, above all, the 94%, who are sheep.
And it's not even the lashes which force them to act this way. No, they do it by themselves ; THAT is the luxury of being a bastard in power these days.
I think he's real.
 
Thank you Prayers, for translating and posting this. I certainly felt the hairs rising at the back of my neck reading this. Whew, that was truly shocking.
 
Laura said:
Nobody notices the fact that what he says about the 94% is objectively true.

It's, above all, the 94%, who are sheep.
And it's not even the lashes which force them to act this way. No, they do it by themselves ; THAT is the luxury of being a bastard in power these days.
Yes, but he could have gathered this info from the previous posts of the thread, which as I said is about the PP book, and where someone put extracts of PP -- in which the 6% are mentionned. So it's not completely sure whether he's acting up, or if he's real. But it was really chilling to read this.
I'll keep you informed whether he answers my "scratch message".
 
actually this an interesting question - if evil by definition cannot stay close to light, would we find many psychos involved in psychological work or any work that brings their insides to the light? Would psycho be able to even read ponerology - I mean not to understand it but to be driven to read it?

In any case me thinks this is a wannabee psycho - which might be even worse
 
Deckard said:
actually this an interesting question - if evil by definition cannot stay close to light, would we find many psychos involved in psychological work or any work that brings their insides to the light?
I'm not sure I follow your reasoning here - or use of the word 'light' in this context - there is nothing repellant to a psychopath about psychology - it is often used as a manual on how to interact, to feed and to control. Perhaps it would help to remember that a psychopath does NOT consider himself to be flawed or in need of self discovery or self-knowledge - all those issues that might drive a normal person away from psychology simply do not exist in the mind of a psychopath - there is no fear of discovery or emotional 'oh, no, I don't want to know' - going on inside - they believe themselves to be superior - there is no 'light' in psychology or in understanding more deeply what they are - they just don't work that way.

Deckard said:
Would psycho be able to even read ponerology - I mean not to understand it but to be driven to read it?
Psychology has historically been used by psychopaths in power to control the populace and to lead the society away from knowledge about the psychopath - this is outlined clearly in Ponerology. It is absolutely within 'character' for a psychopath to be drawn to psychology - not only to learn exactly what others may understand about them, but to learn how best to 'hide' - how to interact with normal people most effectively. Psychology can also be used as the perfect narcissistic feeding tool.
 
PFR said:
Yes, but he could have gathered this info from the previous posts of the thread, which as I said is about the PP book, and where someone put extracts of PP -- in which the 6% are mentionned.
I'm not talking about the number, I'm talking about the totally cold - yet TRUE - comment about people being sheep and the 6% basically having their work done for them by the emotions of sheeple.
 
Back
Top Bottom