Reading test

Gaby

SuperModerator
Moderator
FOTCM Member
Reading_Test.jpg
 
Thats awesome, about the only place I got messed up reading was "taotl mses", took me about 2~ seconds to figure out taotl was total.
 
This is a great illustration of why whole language is a better way of teaching reading and phonics is so limitied.
 
taths azamnig but deos it wrok for wrdos like ppoyhhcasty? Not too sure about that one.
 
mark said:
taths azamnig but deos it wrok for wrdos like ppoyhhcasty? Not too sure about that one.
Yeah I think the ease of understanding is because the words are small and they are all in a context of simple sentences where we can kinda guess what word should be there anyway. If one was to make a list of random words with say 7 or more letters each, that might be another story.
 
Kel said:
This is a great illustration of why whole language is a better way of teaching reading and phonics is so limitied.
Actually phonics is probably the best way to learn reading for young people. Sounding out letters (and bearing in mind certain rules such as "igh" sounds like "eye") is the way that I learned to read. It was also the way generations of people learned to read before me. Then shortly after I went through that system, they brought in a system called "word recognition", which is a "whole language" approach. The change was a complete and utter disaster. So many people who are now in their early twenties are the worst readers and writers the country has known. Before that, people could spell and write properly. So the old system of phonics was actually very successful.
 
Funny...I could read that perfectly (took me a second or 3 to work out the letters weren't in the right order)...lol...maybe its my dyslexia?!
 
It's also why psychopaths can so easily deceive us. Even though there are "blanks" or "confusions" in their words and/or actions, we tend to "critically correct" them with our own knowledge of "reading."
 
Back
Top Bottom