Rfid's; cause of cancer in pets

[anart]

Having an implant is equivalent to being a cyborg? We certainly weren't going to reject Cassie or Bella because of a stupid implant.

Only in case of getting a new pet. Even a severely ill or invalid cat can be one's loved one. What I meant: Pathological ideas must not cross the door and enter one's house.

So if there was a needy dog who had been chipped and you were the only one who could save it, you would rather let it stay needy and possibly be killed rather than taking it into your house? Your thinking on this issue does not make a lot of sense to me and I know what you are saying. It's rather illogical to me.

Yes, Sirius, several of your posts lately, in more than one thread, have been extreme and illogical. What is going on with you?

 

[Sirius]

[quote author=Nienna Eluch]
So if there was a needy dog who had been chipped and you were the only one who could save it, you would rather let it stay needy and possibly be killed rather than taking it into your house? Your thinking on this issue does not make a lot of sense to me and I know what you are saying. It's rather illogical to me.
[/quote]Saving lives of animals and planning to get a pet and considering certain connected aspects are two entirely different things. The door and house are meant figuratively. I intended to say that there are certain developments I do not support. This implies that certain decisions must be made beforehand.

Yes, Sirius, several of your posts lately, in more than one thread, have been extreme and illogical. What is going on with you?

What are you exactly referring to? Which reasonings are inconsistent?

 

[anart]

[quote author=Nienna Eluch]
So if there was a needy dog who had been chipped and you were the only one who could save it, you would rather let it stay needy and possibly be killed rather than taking it into your house? Your thinking on this issue does not make a lot of sense to me and I know what you are saying. It's rather illogical to me.

Saving lives of animals and planning to get a pet and considering certain connected aspects are two entirely different things. The door and house are meant figuratively. I intended to say that there are certain developments I do not support. This implies that certain decisions must be made beforehand.

Yes, Sirius, several of your posts lately, in more than one thread, have been extreme and illogical. What is going on with you?

What are you exactly referring to? Which reasonings are inconsistent?
[/quote]

This one, to start and I don't have time right now to go searching for the others, but they did strike me when I read them over the last few days. You didn't answer my question - what is going on with you?

 

[Gwenllian]

When I adopted my little love Bella, a poodle something mix, I tried to prevent her from being chipped, but it seems to be the law in NYC that if you adopt a dog from a shelter, she has to be chipped to be released to her new home.

A simple EM pulse generator would deactivate the chip, but I wonder if it would lessen the risk of a tumor?

We got our dog from someone who abused her, so I assume that she wasn't chipped. I did ask at the time and the woman in question said no, but then again she said a lot of things about my dog which turned out to be lies.
My dog did develop a tumour, but then she was fed the same stuff as they fed their horses.

We have to have our dogs chipped over here, but so far I have been able to refuse. And the vets don't ask, although in the clinic where we were last week there is this huge poster relating the benefits of chipping dogs and cats. Miserable, it is.

Where could I find an EM pulse generator? I have no idea what it is. :D

 

[Lirpa]

A simple EM pulse generator would deactivate the chip, but I wonder if it would lessen the risk of a tumor?

How do I do this? Both of my rescue Pugs came chipped and I have always been concerned about the chips. I always wonder if the chip releases any EMF or anything or sound that only they can hear and that would annoy them. Henry always seems to be itchy in that area where the chip is.

 

[mcb]

A simple EM pulse generator would deactivate the chip, but I wonder if it would lessen the risk of a tumor?

It would depend on what actually causes the tumors, and by what mode the chip was "deactivated." If the problem is that the chip receives enough power from EMF to actually transmit then killing the chip might work. If the problem is that the antenna and/or chip itself concentrates the received energy then it might not make any difference if the chip were working or not. In the latter case the chip would continue to present a risk but would no longer offer any potential benefit.