Risk v. Safety

avivalevy3

Padawan Learner
This idea, that we have to balance the two, came up repeatedly for me over the past week. First, it came up with my therapist, in a discussion about private hugs with a partner. We had what I would call a series of hugs. Some were very emotionally nurturing for me. Others were sort of "pro forma," just being polite kind of "meh" hugs. Then, when I would get ready to leave and ask if he wanted a hug, he would say, "no but I'll give you a hug if you want one." I decided I did not like this and asked him what he feels when we hug. Something like this:
He says, "you overcomplicate things."
"Why?"
"Why do you have to ... demand that I feel something instead of accepting what I do feel?"
"What do you feel?"
"I feel nothing."
What followed was the beginning of a long conversation of giving love, who to give it to and what it is.
The context is giving and receiving "real" love.
A month goes by, we don't see each other.
I begin Biodanza, it's good for me, it's a kind of love workshop, but non verbal, with dance, which is why I asked the C's what they think of it, it's not new. In Israel my understanding is it's been around for 12 years. I work with the new therapist. I write.
I see my "dance partner" again (we live near one another) last week to pick up some labels, we go inside, talk, have tea, I offer a hug without speaking, just using the body language I learned in the class: outstretched arms, raised, open, offering, not asking. (Asking is a slightly different, lower, position). He accepts, with what appears, to my surprise, to be some gratitude. It's a nice soft, comfy, brother-sister hug. He says, "that's better already, softer." I look at him, "softer."
"Yes, softer." Before it was too (he makes strangling motion with his fingers curled up into claws).
"You could have said something before now."
I think I got a smile.
Then the next day, a long stare.
Am I refusing to receive love?
Are we confusing signals?
Are we both afraid to receive love?
Is this love, or something else?
We are both in our 60s. Neither of us has ever married. A series of very strange events led to our meeting.
Can I ask the Cs what's going on here, with this "dance?"
Even "dance" itself is a repeating theme.
I return to Israel, 18 months ago. After many years in the states. I've never danced.
Then, I find out I have Parkinson's. (C's? Comment? Is it Parkinson's? Not Parkinson's? What is it then? 5 neurologists: 1 says no. 1 says maybe something else. 3 say Parkinson's. 1 of those 3 is a Professor. Are any of them right?).
A year of laying around feeling sorry for myself then looking at retirement/nursing homes. Very depressing.
I decide to stay in Akko on my own. It worked out.
Now, all these questions.
The therapist says we each want to know if our love will be received before we risk giving it.
Then is it love? Isn't that a condition? It can't be STO if it's conditional, can it? It has to be agape.
So we hesitate, or we stand there, weighing the chance of rejection. STS, no? another word is ego? Too much thinking?
On the other hand, we don't want to accept something that has psychic strings attached, or an ulterior motive, like sex.
This leads to a question about sex. The therapist & I say sex is not love and love is not sex. I say sex is an expression of love. I think my dance partner knows this, but he says the opposite. It's frustrating.
Before the class, he says to me, "will you be upset if you see me hit on women?"
I say, "of course not."
The irony is my "dance partner" was one of the first Biodanza participants. Biodanza is not a singles activity. It's an intimacy workshop. Why does a 61 year old act like a 16 year old or what's really going on here?
Why do so very many of us have trouble accepting agape/love without conditions? Why can't we look one another in the eye? Why do people refuse to turn off their cell phones at dinner, even if they are not "religious," just to see who is at the table? Why has human touch become something scary?
Biodanza seeks to encourage human connection on more than just a sexual level....perhaps to remember together what that's like. Is it just a hippy renewal Israeli style? The 1960s Haight Ashbury all over again? I don't think so. I don't see any drugs. My teacher does not smoke anything. She takes prescription meds, so do I, nothing else. I did not see any tie dye or scraggly jeans. Just regular people, mostly older, maybe mostly single, maybe mostly lonely but some with jobs, kids...
Your thoughts?
Shalom from Akko, Israel


I want to give love, first, then receive. Or:
I want to give & receive love simultaneously with my partner (context is a Biodanza exercise).
My partner only wants to give love, He stands facing me, making eye contact, with his hand on his heart.
I stand facing him, making eye contact, first with my two hands on my heart.
I have confused the signals (explained tonight by another teacher)
 

Attachments

  • Team_Spirit.jpeg
    Team_Spirit.jpeg
    106.5 KB · Views: 6
Biodanza seeks to encourage human connection on more than just a sexual level....perhaps to remember together what that's like. Is it just a hippy renewal Israeli style? The 1960s Haight Ashbury all over again? I don't think so. I don't see any drugs. My teacher does not smoke anything. She takes prescription meds, so do I, nothing else. I did not see any tie dye or scraggly jeans. Just regular people, mostly older, maybe mostly single, maybe mostly lonely but some with jobs, kids...
Your thoughts?
Touch is a primary sensate from the moment one is born until death, though the emotions( touch can trigger viscerally) is suppressed in men more than in women. Reactions to the specific hug can mean many things under many varied circumstances. We live in a traumatized world and having this type of relief is very good. The issue is about interpretation. The Romance novel project may help you. Each novel is specific dynamic and characters probe the meaning of many things including Love, safety, trust, contentment, romance and so on.

With out going to all or nothing of its effect, one can explore it with objective mind set ( seeing for what it is, knowing we will not know every thing, but easy to get tangled in relationships and so on ). Only more knowledge about the situation with effort in gaining and time in observing and interpreting, we will know.

On the extreme side, we have seen those ridiculous laughing yoga, tree hugging sessions and so on. Obviously they worked atleast for a while, as they produced some feel good chemicals ( at least for while) which tend to fade out with time. If the person is NOT sucked into specific relation by the time limited ability of the method is dawned, it is ok. Any way that's how it looks to me.
 
One purpose of Biodanza is straightforward, honest eye contact and clear non verbal (body) communication. There is no tangling or sucking into which sound like subconscious manipulation. Instead, there is a dance of intimacy. My question has to do with fear of receiving love in general between souls that aspire to STO, unless that is not the dance partner's motive and he's really there for STS matching with a sex partner, if so, that might explain our staring match last week. He told the group he seeks his "life partner." Most of us in the group are in our 60s. Further comments are most welcome.
 
Biodanza sounds a bit tantric without the sex… I can’t offer much in the way of advice but I will say this - your dance partner was probably turned off (for lack of a better phrase) by you asking if he wanted a hug and then accepted it more graciously when you just opened your arms for one. Asking if he wants one almost seems clingy/needy… When I was dating and a guy would ask if he could kiss me, instead of just leaning in to see what my reaction would be, I found it to be a complete turn off. I think asking (even in this age of consent) is bizarre and foreign, it breaks up the connection two people have or would have. Sometimes silence is golden.
 
Yes. It is tantric without the sex. We are fully dressed : )
I've known this guy for nearly 2 years, we shared a house for 10 months but we were never sexual. About a year ago, once, I did lean over to kiss, was aiming for his eye lids, he pushed me away and I never did it again. There is not a whole lot of kissing in the workshops, at least not yet. I am still wondering what happened last week, the staring at each other...since I just started Biodanza about a month ago, maybe my body language said, "keep out" or was unclear. We meet again at the end of next month. Thanks for reading/responding, Expedition26! I did read the link about romance novels, BTW. Not related. This workshop is more about intimacy in general, it's not intended as a singles event to meet people. The other participants in the workshop of perhaps 20 people had no such reaction to me, but they did not have the same interactions with this particular guy that I did, perhaps. So I am wondering if it's past life karma here I am dealing with or something more prosaic?
 
I am not doing it with him. He & I are in a group of about 20 people. One goal is group unity, so having one group member avoid the other group member is something to sort out not avoid...It is not about specific relationships, or romance, or finding a sex partner. That could be how he is (mis)interpreting it. The goal as my teacher explained it to me the other day is human intimacy, person to person, regardless of role, gender. So "dance partner" is a generic term for "fellow human participant in 20 person class" not my personal partner. Neither he nor I have a partner and each of us is open to it.
 
As for persisting past the first rejection (over a year ago), to understand...to make progress beyond rejection. He rejected me, since then, he's been rejected, we both like this Biodanza method...people in a small country with a narrow common interest end up at the same events, knowing the same mutual friends. It's a small world, here. : )
 
I notice my soul description (subtext: The Force is Strong with This One) reflects a question asked/answered, remembering. Merci beaucoups. 🙏
 
Ah, ok. I understand a little more now. But you asked a lot of questions in your initial post. What specifically are you trying to get clarity about?

Since you have so many questions about this person and your interactions with him I would maybe sit down and write it out (journal form), maybe make a list, or maybe meditate on it or think about the specific questions you want answered before you go to bed to help your dreams facilitate the answers.

I also wouldn’t dismiss seek10’s answer about checking out the romance reading. Perhaps the answers are hiding in plain sight behind what appears to be a cheesy novel.
 
Who knows what else may be in the mix. The possible fact that you may have had past life experiences with the people in this group should also be considered. Without knowing the exact truth about these types of things, it can be confusing. Standing firm in your present commitment to exploring rather than reacting to these feelings that pop up might help a bit. A type of weeding process without commitments.

From personal experience, meeting a female that recognized me from a past life and I also recognized her, we hugged. This hug was more out of mutual respect and genuine care than anything. That hug was a beautiful experience for both of us. I don't think there was any sexual interaction between us in past lives, but that wasn't even considered during the exchange. This type of hug, to me, was genuine Agape ĺove.
 
But you asked a lot of questions in your initial post. What specifically are you trying to get clarity about?
I agree with Expedition26, avivalevy3. I read all your posts in this thread, but it's not really clear to me what you would like to discuss and what you are asking from us. Since you are new to our forum you could read a few threads in the What's on your mind section (or other sections for that matter) and see how others present their thoughts and ask for feed-back. I have found others' posts to be really helpful in all kinds of ways.
 
Who knows what else may be in the mix. The possible fact that you may have had past life experiences with the people in this group should also be considered. Without knowing the exact truth about these types of things, it can be confusing. Standing firm in your present commitment to exploring rather than reacting to these feelings that pop up might help a bit. A type of weeding process without commitments.

From personal experience, meeting a female that recognized me from a past life and I also recognized her, we hugged. This hug was more out of mutual respect and genuine care than anything. That hug was a beautiful experience for both of us. I don't think there was any sexual interaction between us in past lives, but that wasn't even considered during the exchange. This type of hug, to me, was genuine Agape ĺove.
Yes, and could also be Love bite.
 
Ah, ok. I understand a little more now. But you asked a lot of questions in your initial post. What specifically are you trying to get clarity about?

Since you have so many questions about this person and your interactions with him I would maybe sit down and write it out (journal form), maybe make a list, or maybe meditate on it or think about the specific questions you want answered before you go to bed to help your dreams facilitate the answers.

I also wouldn’t dismiss seek10’s answer about checking out the romance reading. Perhaps the answers are hiding in plain sight behind what appears to be a cheesy novel.
I journaled so much about this it is turning into a book. I did not dismiss the seek10 answer and I did read the link but romance reading has no interest for me. We're not teenagers, we're old people : ). I am not seeking "romance" nor do I want casual sex or to "fall" in love. I want to learn about intimacy, non-verbal communication and the rest is exercise. If I meet somebody who wants to exchange unconditional love in an affectionate relationship of some kind, great, but that's not the purpose of the workshop. People do meet at all sorts of events, they follow up outside the workshop. I myself am interested in this method as an effective treatment for Parkinson's. I would like to pursue it and see how good I can get at it, and eventually lead groups for Parkinson's patients.

The questions I am asking are not about "this person" so much as about the dynamic of people coming to these intimacy groups hungry for intimacy and yet we (myself included) seem unable to accept what is offered without a struggle of some kind. I want clarity about the quality of what we call "love." The leaders teach agape/STO. Some of the participants say they want agape and appear to want something else. Do we kick people out when they exhibit STS behavior, like hitting on participants? Or do we teach them? If so, what is an STO response to an STS behavior when the individual who comes to the class says they seek one kind of love (unconditional) and yet their behavior exhibits STS (hitting on the women for sex). The groups do attract mostly women.

When he asked me the day before, "do I mind if he hits on other women?" I honestly said, "not at all," because he and I are not a couple. What I did not say is that the leader might mind. The women might mind. This could be why he's unsuccessful in finding a woman, if he's turning a human intimacy exercise into a pickup opportunity, but it's not my place to tell him to stop it. Unless C's have some suggestions, I'll just continue to attend and see what happens.

I was discussing this issue with one of the leaders the other day. She said that when one of her students acted in this way, she kicked him out because he's thinking with his privates not with his heart. I am not sure this is the right path. I know this guy, he wants agape. He's struggling. I myself need guidance in what action to take, because in this context every motion has meaning. Is it a matter of crossed signals? Or of karmic past between myself and this particular guy?

If my questions are still unclear, let me know, I'll try again.

Shalom from Akko, Israel
 

Trending content

Back
Top Bottom