I know what you mean, but am reminded that we are also not here to change the world or at least not force it on people. We provide the tools and the information as objectively as we can but we are not here to violate peoples' free will. There is no free lunch, and informing oneself and educating oneself about the situation that we find ourselves in requires work. Something that the machine abhores.RedFox said:[...]
fwiw this reminded me of something I read ages ago:
Truth Is Public Property
[..]
This is, in fact, the key to everything: the Media. The first thing that has to be done before anything else can be done is to take back the media. The media is the wall between the elite pathocrats and the public. It is the tool used to control and manipulate. In Nazi Germany, Communist Russia, and other totalitarian states down through history, the control of information was/is the means of control of the people. After all, the masses of people that are needed to support any kind of movement are in that part of the bell curve that indicates that they are just “average” and “followers” and “want to be left alone” and can only be moved by moving “en masse.” They are the ones that must be reached. And that can only be done via mass media. We do not own the mass media. I think that less than half of the people in the U.S., and a smaller percentage than that in other places, get their news via the internet. And we all know how much disinformation is on the net. Now, let’s back up and get some perspective here. People need to really think about who’s running the U.S. (and other countries on the planet), and get it firmly in mind that it is big business: oil companies and the arms industry. Now, think of the term: “RUTHLESS MEN”. Ponder it long and carefully. Even if you can’t believe that clinically diagnosible psychopaths are in power, just consider that big businesses are invariably headed by RUTHLESS MEN. The term “Establishment” refers to all those wealthy people across the country who own most of the country. And, as the news has recently reported, it is a very small percentage of the total population. Some people will do anything for money and to protect their interests and their wealth; that is usually how they get to be wealthy in the first place. In my opinion, many of the “industrial barons” of American history were criminals. They are extremists, radical, and most often use religion to justify this extremism and the oppression of others.
It is par for the course for such radicals to label anyone a little toward the center, or even in the center, as “Leftists”. In a country where the largest majority are in the center, neither Left nor Right, they are the ones that are hurt the most.
[..]
When you think about it, where does any private group or individual get off thinking that they “own” information, facts, data about events that happen in our world that affect everyone? The Truth is public property: it belongs to all.
After thinking about this for some time, I have come to the realization that all public media should be publicly owned and overseen by public commissions that are not in any way related to politics – neither elected nor appointed, but selected by random lottery from pools of qualified citizens. Only in this way can we guarantee to ourselves the support that is needed to accomplish everything else that must be done to clean up the mess that Ruthless, Greedy Men have made of our planet.
But in order to even approach that goal peacefully, we need to find ways to bypass the currently existing media – to become our own media.
That is the task before us.
My understanding is that things like BREXIT and the rise of Trump are a vote for change (among non authoritarian people), a vote against the establishment. The establishment seeks to control through directing peoples anger (Arab colour revolutions, Russia is evil etc), and the only choice left to people is to 'vote' for something they still don't want - they can't see any other option.
I don't know if that could be people to aim the message at? Housewives, retired people, college kids. All wanting a better world and not knowing how to get there. People who will protest and defend local or community matters.
Is their any way a distributed 'revolution' (rather than centralized and thus corruptible) could happen, a little like Occupy Wall Street but for the every day person? An every day guide to navigating pathology and finding empowerment/hope though local networking?
Maybe that's too much wishful thinking.
In this day and age, where you can find out information at your fingertips, there is no real excuse for not knowing if the thirst is there. But the thirst is not there for most people and in a way how could it be otherwise. If 6% are psychopaths, 15% enablers, 25% authoritarian followers and throw in the OP's then how could we expect a mass uprising. Yes, a number of those overlap, but when you then take into account that the average mental age due to dumbing down is perhaps 12 (no link found to substantiate it, only from memory) and an emotional age of children, then perhaps we are wishing for too much expecting big changes. Additional there are no Elders in our society or role models and the very few that there are, such as Putin, are vilified.
So the word expecting might sometimes get in our way AND get us down. Perhaps non-anticipation and keeping our eyes and ears open while we clean our own machines and keep "adding" objective SEEING to the SYSTEM and networking about it, is the way forward.
Fwiw.