The problem, IMO, is that you are breaking etiquette rules that are standard in most forums similar to this one. People who join a forum such as this one have a more or less similar view and understanding of the world, and that understanding is furthered by (ideally, as it is on this forum) years of research, publication and discussion by the members.
A new member who blunders in with precisely the opposite view, who has either not done the research of has done their own research and drawn the opposite conclusion, but demands that other members 'hear him out' and re-discuss the basics of the topic is not going to be well-received and, from a practical point of view, should find another forum where their views are shared.
This is more or less what you have done, at the very least on this topic, and when your approach is not well-received you, like other people we have encountered, start shouting "censorship" when it is not censorship but simply a refusal to engage with you on a topic that we have all, long since, come to definite conclusions on that are the opposite of yours.
In this regard, you seem to think that our conclusions are in "error", and that if you can only provide enough of your evidence we will change our minds to one extent or another. But this is a mistake on your part, we will not change our minds on this topic because our view on this topic is not merely informed by the kind of 'evidence' you bring up but is underpinned by an entire world view that spans many other domains.
So my advice to you is to try to understand this and accept it. If you cannot understand it, then this forum is not for you. If you can understand it but don't accept it, then this forum is also not for you.
www.nbcnews.com
