Joe said:What I can never understand is how no one seems to express any suspicion when it's revealed that warnings were given in advance by US intelligence services.
At what point is it acceptable to view such warnings (of which there have been many) as predictions, with foreknowledge and likely complicity?
And how come that nobody finds it "strange" when the CIA just happens to know more than the actual local authorities? It's pretty insulting, yet they just let them be wherever and whenever. No need to ask, no need to cooperate with the locals, nothing. They just walk into a country like they own it, then take the credit for being oh so good at "predictions", and they wash their hands off of the entire event.