Saudi Arabia elected to UN Women's Rights Commission

Arwenn

Ambassador
Ambassador
FOTCM Member
Well if this isn't one of the most absurd things, I don't know what is!! I did a search on SoTT but couldn't see it there. Where are all the feminists now?

In a secret ballot vote, the repressive regime received support from 47 out of the 54 UN Economic and Social Council nations for its appointment to the Commission on the Status of Women.
Accountability organisation UN Watch, which first exposed the decision, described it as “absurd”. Executive director of UN Watch Hillel Neuer said “electing Saudi Arabia to protect women’s rights is like making an arsonist into the town fire chief”. “Saudi discrimination against women is gross and systematic in law and in practice,” Mr Neuer said in a statement. “Saudi Arabia bans women from driving cars. Why did the UN choose the world’s leading promoter of gender inequality to sit on its gender equality commission?”

A spokeswoman for the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade refused to say whether Australia supported Saudi Arabia’s candidacy. “Places on the Commission on the Status of Women are allocated according to regional groupings,” she said. “Australia is not in the same regional grouping as Saudi Arabia. “In this instance, the regional grouping of the Saudi candidate was uncontested, with countries nominating for the five positions”.

However, Mr Neuer said this was irrelevant. He told The New Daily: “Australia is not responsible for the fact that the Asian group put up no other candidates, but it could and should have voted against Saudi Arabia, and should have convinced its allies to do the same. “If Saudi Arabia failed to get 28 affirmative votes, even if there were no competitors in the original group, the misogynistic regime would not have been elected.” The 45-member Commission on the Status of Women “is the principal global intergovernmental body exclusively dedicated to the promotion of gender equality and the empowerment of women”, according to the UN.

Human rights groups have long criticised the Saudi government for its approach to women’s rights. According to Human Rights Watch, adult women in Saudi Arabia live under a guardianship system that renders them “legal minors who cannot make key decisions for themselves”. They must obtain permission from a male guardian to travel, marry, or exit prison, Human Rights Watch said. In a report last year, the organisation did acknowledge that the country had improved in the past 10 years, with moves such as allowing women to enter the workforce and politics.

Former New Zealand prime minister Helen Clark, also a former UN Development Program administrator, wrote on social media that it was important to “support those in the country who are working for improvements in the lives of women”. Asked by The New Daily to clarify her comments, Ms Clark said whether it was a good outcome “depends on your point of view”. “Women in Saudi Arabia lack rights many of us take for granted. Notwithstanding that, UN Member States voted the country on to the Commission. One hopes the position is not used to weaken the Commission’s stance on women’s rights,” Ms Clark said on Twitter.

Greens foreign affairs spokesman Scott Ludlam said the Saudi government had an “atrocious” record on women’s issues. “We’re obviously concerned that rather than engaging with the work of the UN CSW and working towards equality at home, Saudi Arabia may seek to negatively influence or disrupt the UN CSW,” he told The New Daily.

Saudi Arabia will now sit on the commission between 2018 and 2022, joining other recently elected nations such as Algeria, Iraq, Japan and Ecuador.
_http://thenewdaily.com.au/news/national/2017/04/26/saudi-arabia-un-women/


Saudi Arabia elected to UN women's council despite gender inequality in kingdom

Saudi Arabia has been elected to the United Nations Commission on the Status of Women, despite the country being ranked by human rights experts as one of the worst for gender equality.
The Middle Eastern kingdom was one of 12 new countries elected to the UN body in a secret ballot. It will serve a four-year term beginning next year, according to a statement from the UN Economic and Social Council. The role of the UN's Commission on the Status of Women is to promote gender equality and the empowerment of women. According to its website, the body said it was "instrumental in promoting women's rights" and "documenting the reality of women's lives throughout the world and shaping global standards on gender equality".

But Human Rights Watch said Saudi women were forbidden from obtaining a passport, marrying or accessing higher education without the approval of a male guardian — usually a husband, father, brother, or son. Saudi women are also banned from driving and are forced to have the permission of a male guardian to travel or work in the oppressive Middle East theocracy. In a report last year, the NGO said "as long as it [Saudi Arabia] fails to take steps to eliminate the discriminatory practices of male guardianship and sex segregation, the Government is undermining the ability of women to enjoy even the most basic rights".
_http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-04-25/saudi-arabia-un-womens-council-gender-equality-concerns/8469258
 
Some of the other countries that were elected are highly questionable as well. The others elected to the council are Algeria, Comoros, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Ghana, Kenya, Iraq, Japan, South Korea, Turkmenistan, Ecuador, Haiti and Nicaragua. While not as absurd as Saudi Arabia there's still the prevalence of FGM and polygamy without the consent of the first wife in some of these countries, among other things.
 
Arwenn said:
Well if this isn't one of the most absurd things, I don't know what is!! I did a search on SoTT but couldn't see it there. Where are all the feminists now?

It's just crazy. Is the UN trying to show the world what a useless, backwards and repugnant institution it is? With an election like as well as electing Saudi Arabia to lead the UN Human Rights Commission last year, it seems so. Russia and China need to form an alternative to the UN, and do it pronto! There were some whispers some time ago about that but nothing official.

There's a few articles on Sott about the recent election:

https://www.sott.net/article/349260-Utter-insanity-Election-of-Saudi-Arabia-to-Womans-Rights-Commission-makes-UN-complicit-in-crimes said:
Utter insanity: Election of Saudi Arabia to Woman's Rights Commission makes UN complicit in crimes

https://www.sott.net/article/349075-Taking-the-piss-UN-elects-misogynist-theocracy-Saudi-Arabia-for-Womens-Rights-Commission said:
Insult to Injury: UN elects misogynist theocracy Saudi Arabia for Women's Rights Commission
 
Renaissance said:
It's just crazy. Is the UN trying to show the world what a useless, backwards and repugnant institution it is? With an election like as well as electing Saudi Arabia to lead the UN Human Rights Commission last year, it seems so. Russia and China need to form an alternative to the UN, and do it pronto! There were some whispers some time ago about that but nothing official.


I honestly don't know why the UN hasn't been vetoed yet by Russia & China, they are sham of an organization for sure.

Renaissance said:
There's a few articles on Sott about the recent election:

My bad, I must have missed those articles somehow, SoTT editors are all over current news and the MSM's BS. :)
 
Well, last time around, they bribed 'Big Brother Britain':

British values and the bribery that got Saudi Arabia on the UN Human Rights Council

The paper trail in such matters is always useful, and given that Britain remains one of the most secretive states in the western world, those things are not always easy to come by. Light, however, was already shed by cables released through WikiLeaks suggesting that a degree of haggling had taken place between the states over the subject of compromising human rights.

The Saudi cable trove, made available to WikiLeaks last June, has spurred various groups to comb through the foreign ministry collection with an eye to decoding the Kingdom's sometimes inscrutable positions.

The relevant documentation in this case touches on talks between Saudi and British officials ahead of the November 2013 vote on membership of the 47 member body. Cables from January and February 2013, separately translated by UN Watch and The Australian, discloses proposed positions of support.

About time: Outrage growing over UK role in voting Saudi Arabia to UN Human Rights Council

According to notes released by WikiLeaks and published by The Australian newspaper, diplomatic cables between Britain and Gulf kingdom suggested that the UK was involved in a secret vote-trading deal to make sure Saudi Arabia gained a place on the panel.
 
Back
Top Bottom