Self assembling nano tech in Pfizer vaccine?

gottathink

The Living Force
FOTCM Member

This is a full report from apparently a New Zealand scientist examining unused Pfizer shots. So they we’re left over after a day of vaccination.

It shows self assembling Nano tech in slides made up of drops of Pfizer vaccine which have then been heated.

Is this for real? I’m a bit astounded, and what’s to stop them putting this into any other shot you get ?
 
There is a French version of this article here:

We don't have to forget an eventuality similar as the one mentioned by the C's about previous particles discover: contamination of some samples.

I wonder if we can test by ourself. If someone have access to a good microscope, raise your hand! :-)
 
It looks like a model of a city, but why is he surprised if since 2020 nanotechnology "started" to be implemented in vaccines? In fact, it seems that in some low-profile countries, such as Chile, nanoparticles are being used in other ways in the environment as a justification to combat covid. Well... we must learn about rats in order to perceive the truth... :nuts: It's exhausting that game of "yes we use nano, no we don't use nano, well now if we are using nano, they don't cause harm... well maybe a little".

Suspicions grow that nanoparticles in Pfizer's COVID-19 vaccine trigger rare allergic reactions


B: The Potential Risks of Nanotechnology -
Some advocates of nanotechnology articulate "pie in the sky" promises regarding medical advances that may prematurely moot any debate on the subject of potential negative implications of unchecked broad adoption of the technology. We hear little about the not so socially redeeming application of nanotechnology research and development. Medical applications of technology create a natural support base in a broad cross-section of society, which may be willing to forgo critical analysis of the technology in lieu of perceived benefits. While many researchers speak about the great potential of nanotechnology, others are articulating the potential risks of nanomaterials. Pat Mooney, an activist of the ETC Group (Action Group on Erosion, Technology, and Concentration), an organization dedicated to encouraging social responsibility of the production of technology,[22] has called for a moratorium on the commercial production of nanomaterials until its risks are better understood and regulations have been instituted.[23] Mooney raises the issue that normally harmless particles can trigger intense chemical reactions and biological damage when they are produced at the nanoscale and then inhaled. For example, while particles of gold are relatively safe, nanoparticles of gold are actually chemically reactive, and have the potential to disrupt biological pathways.[24] Some scientists have raised question as to whether inhaled nanoparticles can infect not only the lungs, but cross into the brain via nasal cavities or through the placenta into developing fetuses because of their extremely small size.


6.5 How should harmful effects of nanoparticles be assessed


In addition, the use of healthy animal models may hamper the interpretation of the results as some of the effects listed and may only be a risk for susceptible organisms and predisposed individuals, but not to healthy people (Kreyling et al 2004). Age, co- pollutants and a compromised respiratory tract can modify the pulmonary inflammation and oxidative stress induced by carbonaceous nanoparticles (Elder et al 2000). For chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, the generation of free radicals on the surface due to high reactivity of nanoparticles, and the induction of oxidative stress, might contribute to the induction of inflammation (MacNee et al 2003).


Spanish - The potential of copper nanoparticles in the fight against coronaviruses

In recent weeks, various community and ministerial authorities have been encouraging the use of masks with copper fibers, paint, aerosols with nanoparticles of the same metal, with the aim of distributing them to health officials, garbage collectors and the possibility of coating buses with this nanotechnology based on this metal of great importance for the national economy has also been raised.

Research looks at inflammatory nature of lipid nanoparticle component in mRNA vaccines


Notably, intranasal inoculation with the same dose (10 μg) of LNP (as in the intradermal delivery) caused a high mortality rate in mice – about 80% of the treated mice died in less than 24 hours. The researchers found that the LNPs' inflammatory properties are not site-specific. They observed a fast diffusion, dispersion, and distribution rate in the tissues, upon internal delivery.

"The public was not told the that the vaccine trials excluded anyone with known preexisting health problems, including people who have autoimmune diseases. I have autoimmune thyroiditis. Doctors have long known that people with autoimmune conditions are at high risk of adverse reactions to vaccines of all kinds (not just the new covid vaccines.) But I did not know this. Most people do not know this. If I'd known about the way the trials were conducted I would never have even considered getting vaccinated!"
 
Found that almost identical image of the squared crystals here on pinterest via google images, but the author gave no info. Many salt and sugar crystals share similar shapes anyway. This one below could be a photoshopped image though.
View attachment 54476

https://www.wkiri.com/today/?p=3085
January 22nd, 2013 - Salt. Best viewed ~1 hour after deposition on the slide, with partial crystal formation; if you wait longer, the slide becomes crowded, and since the crystals are cubes, it’s hard to get them all in focus (too much relief!). I love this shot. It reminds me of Flatland.

https://www.wkiri.com/today/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/Img00016.jpg
If you shorten the address of some websites, you can sometimes access the chronological archive of your images and go to the source page: Index of /today/wp-content/uploads/2013/01

The integrated image search option is very good for searching a large majority of the sources from which an image comes from. Yandex is excellent.

That is why this all information only makes me noise around something that was already known and never providing substantial information. It is like using the uncertainty, the carrot and stick but to motivate non-vaccination, the fear in reverse.
 

This is a full report from apparently a New Zealand scientist examining unused Pfizer shots. So they we’re left over after a day of vaccination.

It shows self assembling Nano tech in slides made up of drops of Pfizer vaccine which have then been heated.

Is this for real? I’m a bit astounded, and what’s to stop them putting this into any other shot you get ?
I think it is real, it has been mentioned in the Corona thread. Below follows what the Cs mentioned have about "chip" within the last two years.
(LQB) VAERS vax injury database indicates that some vaccine batches are much more toxic than others from the same manufacturer. Is this intentional?

A: Partly, but mainly due to gross incompetence and negligence.
But of the weird structures found in these vaccines, what is due to incompetence, and negligence, and what is real technology, or is the gross incompetence and negligence tolerated because it also is a cover for what is going on, so it becomes harder to identify a pattern?

(Andromeda) Or Putin. But he was very light on the whole thing. He wasn't extremist at all.

(L) And Trump is trying to push a therapy that will work and getting a lot of flak for it. Well, a lot of these questions here on our list kinda become irrelevant after the C's explanation already... Here's one:

Should one just passively accept the chip and wait out the NWO/4D STS invasion until it falls on its own sword?

A: Avoid if possible. And more twists and turns ahead!

Q: (L) So, if you are in a situation where you have to accept, you just do it and do all you can to counteract quietly, same as with vaccine. Um... Here's one:
The situation developed:
(L) Now one thing that's really been bugging me is this thing about masks. For years, they put all this money and effort into creating facial recognition software. They put cameras everywhere. Now all of a sudden they're putting masks on everybody which makes facial recognition software just completely obsolete - after all that money and time and effort! So, what's the real deal with the masks?

A: Facial recognition was never the full plan as it can be easily thwarted. It was used to accustom populace to tracking and surveillance. The ultimate surveillance is chipping. The fake pandemic justifies the vaccine with chip and wider tracking mandate. The mask is similar to antismoking. It induces obedience and allows identification of dissidence. Masks have the additional advantage of inducing brain damage and lowering of intelligence and general health.

Q: (Joe) Masks induce brain damage...

(Andromeda) Low oxygen?

(L) Lemme ask: Is the brain damage from low oxygen causing the death of neurons?

A: Yes

Q: (L) And the lowering of health is because of the accumulation of viral and other pathogen loads in the masks themselves?

A: Yes

Q: (Gaby) Could they also reactivate latent or stealth infections?

A: Yes

Q: (Andromeda) There's nothing good about them.

(Joe) So, are they planning to surreptitiously chip people with the vaccine without telling them?

A: Yes

Q: (Joe) And that's Gates' chip.

(L) And I expect there'll be some overt chipping for those who agree to it, and covert chipping by a vaccine.

A: Yes


Q: (Chu) And it means that 100% or most of the medical staff will be pretty sick and retarded if there was a REAL pandemic.

A: Yes

Q: (Chu) Great!

(Joe) That's why doctors are so stupid. They wear masks all the time. No offense, Gaby! You're an exception.
At the moment, it is not clear to me what is what in these vaccines
(Joe) In all the vaccines they're releasing for Covid, is there any chipping, or...?

(Niall) They answered that. They suggested it themselves without us asking.

(Joe) Well, that was back then. Are there chips in any of the vaccines they're administering?

A: Yes

Q: (Joe) Which ones? Pfizer?

A: Selective and specific.


Q: (Joe) And what is the purpose of these chips that are administered selectively?

A: Control.

Q: (Joe) Control of individuals?

A: Yes


Q: (Joe) What kind of control can they affect with those?

A: Tracking and other.

Q: (Joe) Can they have an influence on people's thoughts and behavior?

A: Not thoughts, but physiology.

Q: (L) So they don't need something like that for controlling thoughts. They've got other things for that. But they could probably put something in there that could trigger something that would go off in your body and like create an illness, or...

(Joe) Is that being done for experimentation purposes to do it on more people at a later point?

A: No. Raw control.

Q: (L) No experimenting necessary. They've already done that.

(Andromeda) Are they chips like we think of them, like computer chips? Or is it a higher technology?

A: Nano.

Q: (Joe) Is there anything specific about the people they select, or is it random?

A: Difficult to control.


Q: (L) Obviously, somebody who's easy to control would just, ya know...

(Joe) But then my next question is how do they decide who needs it...

(Niall) Maybe it depends on what they say on Facebook? Those who are dissident get targeted for a chip.

A: Knowledge protects. Review what you have learned about "alien" implants.

Q: (Pierre) But then the most uncontrollable ones won't get the vaccine. They'll refuse it.

A: True. Wishful thinking.

Q: (L) So it's wishful thinking on their part that they think they can get any uncontrollable people controlled?

A: Yes

Q: (Pierre) They will control the individuals that are already sheep.

A: Yes

Q: (L) Okay. Any other questions?

(Artemis) Who created this nanotech? Humans or aliens or inspired by aliens?

A: Both.
 
Back
Top Bottom