Session 1 November 2025

[Gaby]

If it visits the inner solar system only every 26 million years, as the C's have said, then the chances of living within 500 years of that are 0.002%. Even being incarnated in the same 10,000 years that the Twin Sun visits is only a 0.04% chance.

May you live in interesting times!

Well, the Cs would never give the exact number. It's close enough for horseshoes.

Cassiopaean Session Transcripts Search

cassiopaeatranscripts.org

Q: (L) We have been discussing this period of the Brown Star. Is this period 26 or 27 million years?

A: Close.

Cassiopaean Session Transcripts Search

cassiopaeatranscripts.org

(Mark) Regarding the 27 million year orbit of the twin sun, how did people...

(L) Well, we never confirmed that it was exactly 27 million. That was one of the top contenders, but they never would actually tell us. But nevertheless, I'll ask the question because even if it wasn't exactly 27 million, we know it was somewhere in the ballpark of those numbers.

(Mark) How did people in the past become aware of this?

A: Passed down from former advanced civilization.

Q: (L) So maybe kind of like the knowledge of Sirius B and the African tribe that knows about them. Something like that?

A: Close.

I suppose the "good news" is that it has been 300-400 years now since the companion star passed at the distance of Pluto and there has been no cataclysmic comet bombardment so far.

The 17th century was intense, though. Several comets in the sky, other than comet Halley, were described as "giant", "terrifying", "shining as bright as the sun at midday". This was the century of "Roundheads and Cavaliers", the English Civil War, witch hunting, the Black Death, the Thirty Years War, etc. Yet, as the century progressed, the lowest sun activity was encountered in the period of 1645–1700 when on average definitely less than one sunspot group per year was observed. And it was not due to lack of observation. You would think that all those giant comets would be discharging the solar capacitor, yet, there were no sunspots.

Although the 17th century astronomical letter read in the session can't be verified, this one is:

From Giuseppe Ripamonti, De Peste Quae Fuit Anno 1630 (Milan, 1641), Book V, discussing the Milanese plague: Iosephi Ripamontii canonici Scalensis chronistae vrbis Mediolani De peste quae fuit anno 1630 libri 5 desumpti ex annalibus vrbis quos 60 decurionum autoritate scribebat:

“It was a star of fierce and savage appearance. For at that very time when the apothecaries’ workshops were believed to be most active (and indeed were), that long-haired star appeared — seen by many toward the north — and no one doubted that it portended a long-lasting calamity of the heavens”

Thousands of people were dying in Lombardy from the plague as they saw the above. Other than cataclysmic bombardment, in the plasma discharge model, a lot of the action is from electrical phenomena:

Cassiopaean Session Transcripts Search

cassiopaeatranscripts.org

Q: (L) Well, on that point, McCanney says that when the Earth gets into this kind of situation where there’s a discharge thing going on, between the sun and another body and the earth gets involved in it, that the earth itself becomes comet like during that time and it begins also to attract what he calls pollution events. It starts picking up all kinds of dust and stuff from outer space – and even the water volume on the planet gets increased because of this precipitating, because the planet’s picking stuff up from space. It’s growing from accumulating stuff, from acquiring stuff. And if that’s the case, we could be attracting dust loading in the upper atmosphere-regardless of whether or not we pass through cometary dust clouds. All these things that we’ve been noticing going on in the upper atmosphere – strange clouds, long-lasting contrails, extreme cooling - could be exactly as he described. There could also be atmospheric effects of these electric sheets, because he says that there are different kinds of ways of currents and layers of currents. He’s got like a five layer model of how the electromagnetic field of the planet goes, and he says that it’s the cause of El Niño, it’s the cause of Earthquakes, volcanoes , storms, changing of the Jet Stream, and just a whole host of things: it’s all electrical phenomena. He says that the electricity from the sun creates and drives hurricanes and that it is not the temperature of the water. Because he said that if it had to do with the temperatures of the water, one hurricane comes along, sucks all the heat out – then it would be impossible for another hurricane to form for a period of time. And yet you see very often, hurricane after hurricane. So, is he on to something with this theory?

A: Oh you bet!

 

[Sindy-S.R]

I think that is a big leap to make. Do we know that undergrounders immortal or do you make the assumption that because he was an undergrounder, then he couldn't have died on the island? Even if Napoleon did not die on the island of Saint Helena, it doesn't follow that the story about the doppelgangers therefore is true.

In a way, I agree with you that you drew these conclusions, but before knowing that Napoleon was an Undergrounder (for me, they aren't immortal, they just live much longer than us), I suspected it was his double, not Napoleon himself, who died on Saint Helena.
Now that it's known he was an Undergrounder, the likelihood of this legend being true could increase.

Aeneas@, I'm not saying it's true, just that it's very possible.
I recommend you read this; it gives many details about this legend.

Who killed Napoleon? How did he die? Who is in his tomb?

So why, last summer, did a French lawyer, Bruno Roy-Henri, apply to the French defence ministry for the corpse to be dug up again and DNA-tested? And why did the ministry refuse? The answer to both

www.thetimes.com

 

[observer]

Thanks for sharing the session!