Session 1 November 2025

Thank you to the Chateau team for conducting and sharing this interesting session.

(Joe) There was no information involved? The fact that it was over Moab, Utah? Mother of all bombs... Moabites... [laughter]
Moab as in GBU-43/B MOAB where MOAB is an acronym for Massive Ordnance Air Blast. It has an explosive yield of 11 tons of TNT. Nature can create more massive blasts, the minimum for entering the large fireball list is around 0.073 kt of TNT, or 73 tons of TNT, and humans can too whether from mistake or intentionally.

The incident was mentioned by Joe in two post in the thread for Plane crashes and incidents, including here
This article United Airlines Pilot Injured After High-Altitude Debris Cracks Windshield has this image:
Scr SimplyFlying UA1093.png

And they write:
As reported by The Aviation Herald, the incident occurred on Thursday, October 16 as the United 737 MAX 8 was performing Flight UA1093 from Denver International Airport (DEN) to Los Angeles International Airport (LAX). The aircraft was cruising at FL 360 south of Salt Lake City when it descended to FL 260 before diverting to Salt Lake City International Airport (SLC).
Regarding the location Moab, there was in May 2014, the Year of the beginning of the upheaval in Ukraine (UA), this article:
Utah oil spill has environmentalists fearing for Colorado River.

Moab takes the name from a character in the Bible, mentioned in Genesis 19:37. He is the son of the eldest daughter of Lot. The notes vary between editions, but in the New International Version, there is "Moab sounds like the Hebrew for from father."

Genesis 19 is about the destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah, how Lot, his family and two guests were harassed, before he eventually had to flee with his wife and two daughters. Unfortunately, out of the city there was this incident (Genesis 19:26 "But Lot’s wife, behind him, looked back, and she became a pillar of salt."). Back to present time, the plane emergency landed in Salt Lake City, so take the reflection from mythological elements with a grain of salt, also if the city Moab brings forth connotations related to an ancient destruction in Israel, and Salt Lake City was where Charlie Kirk was killed on 910.

While we are here, the plane was going from Denver, is it time to review:

The Denver Airport Material with excerpts from the sessions.
The Denver Airport Material Image Catalog general introductory statements.
The Forum has this thread Denver Airport
 
This is interesting; I've always been fascinated by these "bags" of the gods. In Russian alternative history circles, these objects are sometimes jokingly called "Louis Vuitton bags." But now we know 100% that they are technological devices.
I remember a reference in Monroe works (and it was also underlined in Dimensions by Dr. Jacques Vallée):

Journeys Out of the Body - Ch. XX - p.262 - Robert A. Monroe said:
I seemed to understand that the entity was looking for some substance that might permit breathing in earth atmosphere, and a picture was shown (in my mind) of a pouch, possibly two by three inches, and one inch thick, hung on a belt at the waist, with the statement: “This is how we are breathing now.”

You'll find the entire sequence that spans from nights: 9/9/60, 9/16/60 & 9/30/60, in the aforementioned book on pp. 260-262. I always think of it as a prequel for the Loosh concept which is revealed in his next book.
 
Comets were charged by nemezis and when get closer will disccharge to sun Earth etc. Now this will be big and suden when 4d body apear close to earth as a highly charged body probably metal composed and kaboom.
 
This one seems to be a fake, probably an AI image that took a Sumerian/Assyrian image and generated an "ancient mesoamerican" version of it, with added alien heads and UFOs.
This is not a fake. This is a genuine artifact from Mexico, the "El Toro artifacts." Hundreds of different artifacts (90% are in private collections), stone books, and tablets with UFOs and other attributes from Mexico are known. Photos of these finds appeared online in the late 1990s, when neural networks didn't exist. There are several books dedicated to this phenomenon.
A website with a lot of information is .
Official science, of course, doesn't recognize all of these artifacts. But many of the artifacts have already been dated in laboratories, indicating ages of thousands of years.
One of my "favorite" artifacts is a flying saucer made of lyddite. Артефакт Эл Торо «Ацтлан» «Космический 5-местный корабль» — STAR «AZTLAN»
xgwCGyLOqCOHRVZVp9zmspVt1n6K5XJYqrln1OuIwycFAvbzC9B7w954jFCOEoazPM35p6PjW8fRhsVdf-mJqIhFei1yl56Z97AiTJSBo201Ry62Xw

Lig92ads9RSlgFC4leOaS_XhJYBf5zrpzcQXnWRQjp5VELfNGZC20D-erE_Rl-dWDb503WHpvOOpqRm0V-Rt1ZLMDn_5-h02qupMVYQhkY67BXebhg
 
I was a little disappointed about the confirmation that the Dark Companion was at the closest approach hundreds of years ago, since I took it to mean that we won't see it. Sometimes it is the little things that can keep a person going over the years hahaha. Yet, remembering some exchanges with the C's put me at ease... Just because it is passed closest approach doesn't mean it can't flare up. "So you are saying there is a chance!"

27 February 2016 said:
(Joe) Are we gonna see the companion?

A: Yes

10 December 2022 said:
(Joe) If our twin sun is relatively soon to be visible, what's it gonna... be called? [laughter]

(L) You're worried about what it's going to be CALLED?! [laughter]

(Joe) No, I mean what are they gonna say about it? What would be the explanation for it? Are they gonna say it's a twin sun, or a comet, or... Maybe that's asking too much.

A: Probably will call it a giant comet or the flaring of same.

Q: (Andromeda) So what's it gonna look like?

A: Won't look like much to anyone but astronomers.

Q: (Pierre) I thought Nemesis was a brown dwarf? If it's a brown dwarf, it's unlike a giant comet... It's way dimmer.

A: Can ignite when connected to the circuit.

Q: (Niall) So there could be flaring. They won't be lying about that part.

(Pierre) And it'll look like a comet. A biggy.
 
How strange is the above? Who doesn't think the whole AI thing is going to be a complete nightmare?!
I wonder what you think about this -
The video shows a stone "handbag," and it depicts aliens holding a "cedar cone." And the aliens also have "handbags" in their hands. The circle is complete.;-D
 
@JEEP "How strange is the above? Who doesn't think the whole AI thing is going to be a complete nightmare?!"

Trump and Musk have both been making AI videos of themselves giving announcements or talks. From my research they appear legit. If this form of communication continues, we may never know if the person has approved of the information or is nowhere to be found. Elon's discussions where hair raising predictions of what to expect in the near future, but Trumps where of a more mundane nature.

Just before posting this I check with my local AI, as to the truth of these AI videos. Answers below:

"Yes, Donald Trump recently posted an AI-generated video of himself making an official-sounding announcement—but it was not a live or in-person event. The video was shared on November 6, 2025, and closely mirrored a prior Truth Social post. The video used AI-generated visuals and voice synthesis, matching the wording of a Truth Social post made earlier that week."

"Yes—Elon Musk has posted AI-generated videos, including ones featuring synthetic speech and visuals, and he openly acknowledges and promotes them as part of his xAI platform."
 
Many thanks to the Chateau crew and Mijnoia of Cassiopaea. Regarding Charlie Kirk and those responsible for his death, I found a pretty good analysis with a timeline on the State of the Nation website. It points to roughly the same suspects that the C's mentioned.
 
I'm more and more in awe of the research accomplishments of members here on the forum over the years. What a group of inspired, dedicated and resourceful people!

Thank you all as always for these light-bearing sessions.
 
Where did you find this image?? It’s wearing a watch! :lol:
That one is legitimate: https://www.metmuseum.org/art/collection/search/322614

This is not a fake. This is a genuine artifact from Mexico, the "El Toro artifacts." Hundreds of different artifacts (90% are in private collections), stone books, and tablets with UFOs and other attributes from Mexico are known. Photos of these finds appeared online in the late 1990s, when neural networks didn't exist. There are several books dedicated to this phenomenon.
A website with a lot of information is
The particular photo you posted is not on that website, as far as I can tell. Unless you can provide a direct link to it, how can you claim that it is not a fake? It exactly copies the Assyrian "handbag and cone" imagery, which strongly suggests that it is fake.

Even that website points out that there are fake "ancient alien" stone images being produced, though they think that some are genuine ancient artifacts: http://staraztlan.org/category/fakes_crafts/
 
Back
Top Bottom