Session 1 November 2025

[Gaby]

Maybe it needs only 400 years to pass through the Kuiper Belt which is much closer and much, much smaller. Or did Laura mean 400 years to pass through the inner solar system, not the Oort Cloud?

Laura probably had the definition of the Oort cloud she gave in her 2003 article:

Most of the theories of the "cause" of regular cyclic cometary showers have to do with something that "perturbs" the Oort cloud - a shell of comets that surrounds our solar system.

It refers to sol's companion making its closest approach to the solar system. Not it's millions of year orbit.

And then, some people like McCanney say that the Oort cloud doesn't even exist, as we really are like a planetary nebula with comets and new planets being nursed in the periphery. He can be extremely nitpicky when pushing forth his theories. As far as our understanding of the solar system goes, close enough for horseshoes: region closest to the solar system.

So I think the brown dwarf's grounding effect, reducing positive charge, and increasing gravity of the sun counteracts what we would otherwise expect from comets and such being present. At least at the moment - I don't know what would happen when the circuit is activated and the "current begins to flow" and the brown dwarf is lit up - would the sun also get weird?

This research is all very explained in Pierre's book "Earth Changes and the Human Cosmic Connection". This is why we brought this up in the session. We knew all what we were supposed to be seeing, and it's a match for the 17th Century. Pierre made the assumption that sol's companion was yet to make its closest approach. This assumption stands corrected with this session. It means all the quoted sessions, and the chapters related to Sol's companion that Pierre wrote, can be transposed to the 17th Century. Isn't that exciting?

I kept thinking and thinking of Pierre lately and sol's companion. I couldn't shake the curiosity off. It doesn't matter what I was supposed to be doing, I had to stay on this subject. So I picked up his book to re-read it, and kept reading and reading other stuff, and thinking. I read an article on suns spots and the Maunder Minimum and realized, that's it. I told Laura that her theory of 2003 is pretty much still very valid! Thus, this session and our recent republication of Independence Day on sott.net. Pierre was inspiring us from beyond the veil to come back to this subject .

Assumptions made and the Cs answers to those assumptions can be transposed to the past. Someone did see it light up, perhaps it's just like axj said, it was the orionis nova. See Laura's realizations from 2003, it speaks of our symbolical interaction between the Cs and us:

We have been going back over all the mentions of [the companion star] in the transcripts and identifying our questions that were loaded with assumptions and which thus brought back an ambiguous answer or a "confusing" answer and trying to sort out what the C's really have tried to convey.

As one of the staff members pointed out last night, the C's info is sort of "geared" to my own thinking and if they are giving clues in a sort of "code" so as not to 1) violate free will, 2) create destructive superluminal communication into the past paradoxes, then the information will be delivered in such a way that I will only be able to "get it" on certain points when the proper "triggers" in the environment are tripped.

It was then that I realized that, if our assumptions "colored" the answers or our interpretation of the answers from C's, then we need to revisit this subject seriously with a fresh perspective.

Q: (A) And it is going to happen within the next 6 to 18 years?

A: 0 to 14.

[In the above answer, the C's gave the number "0". We now believe that this was done to accomodate our assumptions that the companion star itself was a "future" event while still giving a time frame in which other related events might transpire. The following clarifies this.]

I guess one question would be - why would it connect to the circuit hundreds of years after its passing? Would the Oort Cloud comets bridge the circuit when there is enough of them between the solar system and the brown dwarf, even though the dwarf has been moving away for a while now? And if the electricity flows enough to ignite the dwarf, what affect does that have on the sun? Would it "wake up" and also flare up?

We can come back to this in a future session. But its closest approach was in the 17th Century. If it did light up, it was back then. The assumption in the session was that it was a future event. You're looking for something lighting up back then, just as axj was researching.

 

[Gaby]

Some scientists claimed in 2015 that the Maunder Minimum will come back:

Solar activity predicted to fall 60% in 2030s, to 'mini ice age' levels: Sun driven by double dynamo

A new model of the Sun's solar cycle is producing unprecedentedly accurate predictions of irregularities within the Sun's 11-year heartbeat. The model draws on dynamo effects in two layers of the Sun, one close to the surface and one deep within its convection zone. Predictions from the model...

www.sciencedaily.com

A new model of the Sun's solar cycle is producing unprecedentedly accurate predictions of irregularities within the Sun's 11-year heartbeat. The model draws on dynamo effects in two layers of the Sun, one close to the surface and one deep within its convection zone. Predictions from the model suggest that solar activity will fall by 60 per cent during the 2030s to conditions last seen during the 'mini ice age' that began in 1645.

Zharkova and her colleagues derived their model using a technique called 'principal component analysis' of the magnetic field observations from the Wilcox Solar Observatory in California. They examined three solar cycles-worth of magnetic field activity, covering the period from 1976-2008. In addition, they compared their predictions to average sunspot numbers, another strong marker of solar activity. All the predictions and observations were closely matched.

Looking ahead to the next solar cycles, the model predicts that the pair of waves become increasingly offset during Cycle 25, which peaks in 2022. During Cycle 26, which covers the decade from 2030-2040, the two waves will become exactly out of synch and this will cause a significant reduction in solar activity.

As we have seen in the last few days, we just had record sun activity for solar cycle 25, and we're in 2025.

"In cycle 26, the two waves exactly mirror each other -- peaking at the same time but in opposite hemispheres of the Sun. Their interaction will be disruptive, or they will nearly cancel each other. We predict that this will lead to the properties of a 'Maunder minimum'," said Zharkova. "Effectively, when the waves are approximately in phase, they can show strong interaction, or resonance, and we have strong solar activity. When they are out of phase, we have solar minimums. When there is full phase separation, we have the conditions last seen during the Maunder minimum, 370 years ago."

This could still be the case, though it doesn't take into account the electrical properties of comets and how they discharge the solar capacitor. We'll see!

 

[ScioAgapeOmnis]

Laura probably had the definition of the Oort cloud she gave in her 2003 article:

It refers to sol's companion making its closest approach to the solar system. Not it's millions of year orbit.

And then, some people like McCanney say that the Oort cloud doesn't even exist, as we really are like a planetary nebula with comets and new planets being nursed in the periphery. He can be extremely nitpicky when pushing forth his theories. As far as our understanding of the solar system goes, close enough for horseshoes: region closest to the solar system.



This research is all very explained in Pierre's book "Earth Changes and the Human Cosmic Connection". This is why we brought this up in the session. We knew all what we were supposed to be seeing, and it's a match for the 17th Century. Pierre made the assumption that sol's companion was yet to make its closest approach. This assumption stands corrected with this session. It means all the quoted sessions, and the chapters related to Sol's companion that Pierre wrote, can be transposed to the 17th Century. Isn't that exciting?

I kept thinking and thinking of Pierre lately and sol's companion. I couldn't shake the curiosity off. It doesn't matter what I was supposed to be doing, I had to stay on this subject. So I picked up his book to re-read it, and kept reading and reading other stuff, and thinking. I read an article on suns spots and the Maunder Minimum and realized, that's it. I told Laura that her theory of 2003 is pretty much still very valid! Thus, this session and our recent republication of Independence Day on sott.net. Pierre was inspiring us from beyond the veil to come back to this subject .

Assumptions made and the Cs answers to those assumptions can be transposed to the past. Someone did see it light up, perhaps it's just like axj said, it was the orionis nova. See Laura's realizations from 2003, it speaks of our symbolical interaction between the Cs and us:






We can come back to this in a future session. But its closest approach was in the 17th Century. If it did light up, it was back then. The assumption in the session was that it was a future event. You're looking for something lighting up back then, just as axj was researching.

Ok now it finally "clicked", thank you! I think I didn't fully grok the implication of their last response, so my brain was still stuck in the "ok but why is it doing stuff in the near future" mode. And yeah that is exciting, now I have to re-read a lot of material with fresh new context!

 

[MJF]

Building on earlier comments made by Gabi, the Maunder Minimum (1645-1715) certainly bookmarked a disastrous period for the Stuart dynasty in Britain. The English Civil War, which started in 1642, saw King Charles I toppled from his throne and executed by the Parliamentarians (the 'Roundheads'). Although the dynasty would continue after an interregnum through Charles's sons, Charles II and James II, James would eventually be forced to abdicate leaving the throne to the female line in the form of his daughters who became Queen Mary II and Queen Anne respectively. The latter's death in 1714 paved the way for the Hanoverian dynasty, which is still on the throne to this day. The year 1715, which marked the end of the Maunder Minimum, would also see the defeat of King James II's son, James Francis Edward Stuart, known to history as the 'Old Pretender', after he led an insurrection in Scotland when seeking to reclaim the throne for the Stuarts.

Since I am a Jacobite, as were my ancestors who fought for Charles I and James II, and am of the Stuart bloodline myself through my paternal grandmother, the coming of the Dark Star can be said to have been a truly ominous omen for the Stuarts.

Funnily enough though, if Prince William succeeds his father King Charles III, it will mean that finally someone of the Stuart bloodline will be sitting on the throne again, since William is descended from the Stuart Kings through his mother Princess Diane. We shall see.
​

 

[Wandering Star]

Some scientists claimed in 2015 that the Maunder Minimum will come back:

Q: (L) So that suggests that it takes like 400 years for something like that to pass through the Oort cloud?

A: Yes

Q: (Joe) And how long does it take to come back?

A: No dice.

Q: (Joe) Would it be 180 years?

A: No. You will certainly soon be experiencing the effects of this last passage for some time to come.

(L) Well, then that kind of answers the question as to why was there an unusually low sunspot occurrence during the Maunder minimum, right? If that's what the C's answered.

(Joe) Well, we don't know exactly what we figured out back then. I think it was probably comets.

The first time was the passage of the companion star.

Let's suppose that a large cluster of comets and asteroids approaches and gradually discharges the solar capacitor until it is left blank, with no visible activity such as sunspots.

Then another Maunder minimum.

In one of the initial sessions, the C's said that the cluster would appear as a single celestial object on approach.

(...)
You will certainly soon be experiencing the effects of this last passage for some time to come.
(...)

September 30, 1994

Q: (L) What body were the Sumerians talking about when they described the Planet of the crossing or Nibiru?

A: Comets.

Q: (L) This body of comets?

A: Yes.

Q: (L) Does this cluster of comets appear to be a single body?

A: Yes.

Q: (L) Is this the same object that is rumored to be on its way here at the present time?

A: Yes.