A. Lobaczewski speaks of "schizoïds" who are people affected by a mild (probably DNA based) anomaly. He explains that during specific times of relative calm, schizoïds tend to come up public with "ideas" who find an echo in society. What happens then is that it gives birth to a pathocracy, a long process during which the schizoïd and his ideas are gradually discarded in favour of a basic STS agenda. Is this what happened with Bacon and Rosicrucians? From your knowledge of Bacon, was he more a kind of guy who wouldn't know that his manifesto was that wrong? Or a real bad guy? If the latter, the whole schizoïd appraoch would not apply.
In addition, I can see a very interesting point: Bacon sees a comet, and he writes his manifesto. I posted, the other day, about the idea of comets as "information flux", rather than "a simple rock" (so, a comet polarity would vary, from a negative information flux to positive). But this is high speculation on my part. Could be that a comet was carrying very negative ideas and that this is what influenced Bacon. As a schizoïd, his DNA-bit would have acted as a tuning receptor for the data - and he wrote the manifesto in turns. This would explain "Bacon was very impressed by the supernovae... and ...". Idea here would be that schizoïds such as Marx, and others who really wrote the big ideologies turning pathocracy - had a comet right in front of their eyes, at some point in time. Could be that those comets were of the family of "negative comets". A catalyst. The specific bit of A. Lobaczewski goes by "during stable times, schioïds believe they found a way to fix the world"; they would "come public" and "tell others". What if there was a trigger for this?
This could be a missing link in A. Lobaczewski's theory? He basically explains that "there exist schizoïds", that "those have deviant ideas", "are manifesto specialists" - and that "their negative potential is set in motion during stable times". As of now, those guys are simply "popping up with ideas". But those ideas give birth to things that are so negative... It becomes odd. The matter with schizoïds is that they are not 100% bad guys; as A. Lobaczewski explains, they are carriers of an anomaly, but they are "torn down between the world of normal people and the feeling for psychopathology/STS". They are far from being essential psychopaths. And so, it's still with them that the worst periods of history start. Was Bacon a schizoïd?
I apologise for taking so long to respond to your question.
Was Bacon a schizoid? The simple answer is that it is impossible really to know. Bacon was quite simply an enigma. If you read my article, Francis Bacon – The Man Behind the Curtain, which I attached to my earlier post, you will see that he was a highly secretive man but then he had very good reason to be. As I said:
"Sir Francis Bacon was a true enigma. He was at once a lawyer, spy, cryptographer, playwright, author, statesman, judge, scientist, philosopher all rolled into one. Seldom in history has a man accomplished so many roles with aplomb in one lifetime. Yet even now, it is hard to pin down who exactly was Francis Bacon. This is because he learned from a very young age to keep his personal views to himself, with only a few trusted confidants being allowed to know his inner most thoughts. This was understandable since he lived in dangerous times where a careless word could cost a man his life. One need only look to his contemporaries Robert Dudley, the Earl of Essex, for whom Bacon acted as a secretary, and Sir Walter Raleigh who had both at one time enjoyed lofty status at the English court only to fall dramatically from grace and ultimately be executed as traitors."
As I pointed out, he lived in an age where one wrong word could cost you your life. Remember here that he was a contemporary of Giordano Bruno (someone he may have met in London) and consider what happened to him. Mrs Henry Pott’s in her excellent book on Sir Francis Bacon titled Francis Bacon and His Secret Society devoted a whole chapter to competing views on Bacon. He had a wide circle of friends who thought the world of him and saw him as a modest and generous man who was very loyal to his friends. On the other hand, others viewed him as intellectually arrogant, haughty, ambitious, cold and lacking in generosity. These qualities might suggest he was a schizoid but then they were made by his enemies who had every reason to smear him. The truth is that for such a famous man, we know very little about his private life and thoughts despite the fact that he wrote so profusely. As Mrs Henry Potts states:
“… but search the records of the time which are, up to the present date, published, and see how far you can enlighten yourselves as to any particulars of Bacon’s domestic life. It becomes after long search, impossible to resist the idea that Bacon has some great purpose to serve by keeping himself always in the background – behind the curtain. Whenever you catch a glimpse of him, “he goes away in a cloud”.
It likewise seems that the whole of his most dear and loving friends combined to conceal his true personality, to assist him to act the part of Proteus*, and to ensure that when he did appear here, there and everywhere, he should be able to pass unrecognised.
You mention the comet which inspired him to undertake his mission. However, he was still only a child of 15 when he saw the comet and it would be many years later that he wrote the Rosicrucian Manifestos, if indeed he was their author (although I suspect he was). As to the reasons he undertook his mission, his 'Great Instauration', these can be gleaned from his disappointing experiences at Cambridge University. Quoting from my article again:
Mrs Pott makes the case that Francis Bacon became the head of the Rosicrucians at the tender age of 15 when he commenced his Great Instauration program. He initiated this program soon after he had come down from Cambridge University after discovering, to his great chagrin, that the university educational system of the day left a lot to be desired and had failed to engage his highly developed intellect. As Mrs Henry states: “at the age of fifteen, Francis Bacon had run through the whole round of the arts and sciences at Cambridge, had outstripped his tutors, and had left Cambridge in disappointment and disgust, finding nothing more to learn there.” Indeed, he was so disgusted that he left without a degree. It was this perceived deficiency in learning and the failure of contemporary teaching methods that motivated him to commence the Great Instauration for the benefit of all mankind.
The question to ask, if we assume here that he was an undergrounder, did he hold a brief from the Nation of the Third Eye to undertake this mission or was it somehow encoded into him and he just awoke to his mission as he grew older? In undertaking this mission, were his motives STS driven or did the Nation of the Third Eye steer him? If the latter, what did they have to gain from it?
Well, if we look at the early 17th century, mankind was still fairly backward and had hardly caught up with the highly advanced Roman civilisation that had ended over a millennium earlier. However, Bacon and his Rosicrucians changed all this by green lighting the Enlightenment and kickstarting the Industrial Revolution. The English Royal Society, whose true instigator was really Bacon, would help to drive the rapid progress of the Scientific Age through men of genius like Sir Isaac Newton. This in my view was an essential requirement if STS forces wished to recreate a New Atlantis culminating in our current high tech society, which exists on the cusp of the transition to 4th density, recalling here that the STS undergrounders' ancestors were once part of the Atlantean civilisation destroyed by the Deluge. How much scientific breakthroughs have been driven through the centuries by STS forces is a moot point (N.B. Tesla and Einstein both claimed to have received some of their ideas in visions).
So, was Sir Francis Bacon the 17th century point man for the Nation of the Third Eye? In this last regard, Bacon can also be said to have been an inspiring force for the creation of the United States of [Rosicrucian] America. Bacon's last work The New Atlantis was required reading for men like George Washington, Benjamin Franklin (a member of the 18th century Rosicrucian Hellfire Club) and Thomas Jefferson. They very much used it as a blueprint. It is not for nothing either that the late President George Herbert Bush (a Harvard University Skull & Bones Man - a pseudo Rosicrucian organisation) described the USA in public speeches as the New Atlantis. And if any country is being used the most to institute the New World Order (the New Atlantis), then it is almost certainly the USA.
Finally, the C's have implied a connection between Bacon and the mysterious enclave of alchemists located in the Pyrenees (my guess is somewhere under the abandoned village of Perillos in the south of France). If he had a direct connection with these alchemists, it probably came around whilst he was a young man on a diplomatic mission to France in the service of Queen Elizabeth I. Then, as now, diplomats may often act as spies and Bacon was certainly a talented cryptographic expert taught by the best in his mentor, the Elizabethan magus John Dee (the original OO7), the man who spoke to angels. Whilst in Europe, Bacon travelled widely, visiting France, Spain and Italy, no doubt making excellent contacts and connections for his secret society and amassing the knowledge and insights that would allow him later to write the Shakespearean plays. However, given what the C's said here, the Pyrenees alchemists would appear to be decidedly STS in their orientation and practice:
Session 16 September 1995:
Q: (RC) And the guy died... (L) That's interesting... Okay, change of subject. Back when we were talking about the pit on Oak Island, and you asked me to do some research on it, the answers I came up with were that the responsible group were alchemists. Is this correct.
A: Yes.
Q: (L) Was one of the alchemists involved
Nicholas Flamel?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) Is it true that there is an
enclave of alchemists that live somewhere in the Pyrenees...
A: Yes.
Q: (L) Is this the group that you referred to as "The Quorum" in a previous session?
A: Partly. [
MJF: which tells us that the alchemists have a connection with the Quorum]
Q: (L) Do these alchemists use this power as talked about by David Hudson to enhance their longevity and their physical health?
A: And
to control. [
MJF: which is clear STS behaviour]
Q: (L) Are there people in this enclave who live for literally hundreds, if not thousands, of years?
A: Open.
Q: (L) How does this monoatomic gold control others?
A: Too complex to answer tonight, as energy is waning.
As to what uses monoatomic gold (a secret also known to the Knights Templar) can be put, the C's had this to say about it later:
Session 18 November 1995:
Q: (L) Now, we have to stop for a minute because I want to tell you something. In the past few months, I have really been watching the sky carefully every opportunity I get. On 3 or 4 separate occasions I have seen what I thought was an ordinary airplane, and I would watch it carefully and then scan to the left or right, and when I looked back at the place where this plane should be, based on observable speed and direction, there would be NOTHING there. I have stood there and searched and searched and found nothing. These things just VANISHED. I knew I had seen it, I knew I wasn't crazy, I knew it couldn't have gone away that completely - and having it happen several times has just really unsettled me. What are the implications of this, other than the fact that we could be completely overflown at all times for any number of purposes and be, as a mass of people, completely unaware of it?
A: Yes, monoatomic gold!
Q: (L) And what does the reference to monoatomic gold mean?
A: Total entrapment of the being, mind, body and soul.
Q: (T) That's what Hudson said... on the video.
A: Strobes use minute gold filament.
Q: (L) How can that compare with taking monoatomic gold internally?
A: What composes minute filament, do you suppose? Hint, it ain't from Fort Knox!
Q: (T) Monoatomic gold.
A: Bingo. You see, this has extraordinary properties.
Q: (T) I'm sure it does! The thing is, if it does what Hudson says it does, the power structure would have shut him down - he wouldn't have gotten this far with it. So, if they are letting him do it, it's because it doesn't do what he says it does, it does the opposite. Which is what he said. When you take the stuff for so many days, you complete the program, it restructures your genes. Isn't that what happened to us before? Do we want to do it again? (L) And, wasn't it said that LIGHT was used to cancel certain DNA factors? (J) Exactly! (L) Okay, how do we block this kind of control?
A: You don't.
It is not for nothing then that Abraham as Moses in the Bible made the rebellious Israelites ingest powdered gold made from the melted down Golden Calf, which they had illicitly worshipped whilst he was receiving the Ten Commandments from Yahweh on the mountain top.
Well if the alchemists use monoatomic gold for control purposes and Bacon was associated with them (ref: their role and his in the concealment of the Lizard beings TDARM on Oak Island), this does not paint Bacon in a good light.
And then there is his major role in launching the 17th century Rosicriucians, although the C's intimated that their pedigree was much older than this. The C's had this to say about them:
Q: (L) Well, okay. Who were the Elohim of the Bible?
A: Transdefinitive.
Q: (L) What does that mean? Transcends definition?
A: And variable entities.
Q: (L) Were the Elohim 'good guys?'
A: First manifestation was human, then non-human.
Q: (L) Are they light beings as some people say?
A: Vague.
Q: (L) Well, what brought about their transformation from human to non-human?
A: Pact or covenant.
Q: (L) They made a pact or covenant with each other?
A: No, with 4th density STS.
Q: (L) Well, that is not good! Are you saying that the Elohim are STS?
Who were these STS beings they made a pact with?
A: Rosteem, now manifests as Rosicrucians.
Q: (L) What is their purpose?
A: As yet unrevealable to you.
Subsequently, Laura made a connection between the Rosteem and the Giza Plateau:
Session 4 October 1997:
Q: In reading the transcripts, I came across a reference to a 'pact' made by a group of STS individuals, and it was called 'Rosteem,' and that this was the origin of the Rosicrucians. In the book 'The Orion Mystery,' it talks about the fact that Giza was formerly known as RosTau, which is 'Rose Cross.' Essentially, I would like to understand the symbology of the Rose affixed to the Cross. It seems to me that the imagery of Jesus nailed to the Cross is actually the Rose affixed to the Cross. How does Jesus relate to the Rose?
A: No, it is from the Rose arose the Cross.
And then there is the very STS role the Rosicrucians played in the destruction of the Knights Templar:
Q: (L) I dug around about the Templars and have, more or less, come to the conclusion that they were just a smoke screen, and that something else was going on at the time that WAS important. I also think that they have been resurrected from time to time and dusted off and blamed for all this secret knowledge that is supposedly lost... am I on to something here?
A: Close.
Q: Who or what brought about the end of the Knights of the Temple?
A: Rosicrucians move as a "thief in the night."
Q: (L) But, as I understand it, the Rosicrucians did not come into being until after the end of the Templars...
A: No.
Q: (L) Do you mean that the information that came out, that pamphlet
* about "Christian Rosenkreutz," that is a purported fable, might be correct?
[MJF: *A Manifesto known as The Fama, which may well have been written by Sir Francis Bacon.]
A: Yes.
Q: (L) Well, goodness sake! The Rosicrucians advertise in magazines!!! Is this worldwide organization that promotes itself so blatantly...
A: Well, the "world-wide" order is not all inclusive.
Q: (L) Is there an
inner circle of this order that is unknown?
A: Yes.
So, it seems the modern Rosicrucians are a manifestation of the 4th density STS Rosteem, who in turn had their roots in Giza or RosTau and thus with the Pyramids that were built by members of the secret Brotherhood of the Serpent instituted by the Orion Lizard beings, which does not sound good from our perspective. Indeed, it is Laura's belief that the Rosteem at Giza established a colony at Haran (or vice versa), the city where Abraham came from and one that is also associated with a mysterious cult of star gazers or worshippers known as the Sabians, noting that Haran is not situated very far from the megalithic ruins at Göbekli Tepe, where the Rosteem and the Sabians may well have had their ultimate roots. This is what the C's had to say about this colony:
Session 22 August 1998:
Q: One of the things I noticed in this book was that they said that there was a colony from the city of Harran in what is nowadays Turkey, and that this colony formerly resided on the Giza plateau. Is there any connection between this colony they mention and the fact that you said that the ‘Protocols of the Elders of Zion’ were composed in Turkey by an ‘Aryan’ source?
A: Yes.
Q: What relationship is there?
A: One and the same.
So, was this colony associated with the Rosteem and thus with the modern Rosicrucians and perhaps the Sabian star gazers of antiquity and, if so, does this necessarily create a connection between the modern Rosicrucians (i.e., their inner circle) and the authors of the ‘Protocols of the Elders of Zion’? If that is the case, it does not paint the Rosicrucians in a very good light does it
Well the jury is out on Sir Francis Bacon. Was he a force for good (STO) or an agent, whether witting or unwitting, for STS forces. You tell me.
.
Thank you for your post, I will re-read it again. There are a lot of things and it's very interesting.
