Session 1 November 2025

Upon seeing the following image from your post, which I have cropped, I was reminded of the statue of "the Lady of Elche".

View attachment 113857
You see the wheel?

I think it could be a helmet for driving a vehicle or a combat helmet like the ones fighter pilots wear.

View attachment 113858
And thanks to this statue we know what the open helmet looked like.

You see the wheel?
The cinema showing the helmets:

 
And thanks to this statue we know what the open helmet looked like.

Helmets and headbands could be very important for handling ancient technology. In the case of El Negro, archaeologists suggest that what surrounds the head is a ceremonial helmet like the one used in the pre-Hispanic ball game. In the stone, you can even see that the "helmet" protects the chin.

Screenshot_20251126-180123_Google.jpg


Some interpret this as an aviator's or astronaut's helmet.

Screenshot_20251126-180107_Google.jpg


As a whole, the Negro stone evokes a person falling in a nosedive. It could also possibly be swimming, but no legs are visible, rather a snake-like or fish-like body like Oanes, who also wears a helmet.

Curious_Myths_p_495_Oannes.jpg

(Approaching Infinity) So was Rama fighting actual lizards or psychopaths?

(L) Ah!

A: Both In some cases. Keep in mind that lizard beings are 4D and can only interact in 3D under special conditions. This is the reason that so-called "fish gods" came and went from the sea on unusual scheduling demands.
 
I think that is a big leap to make. Do we know that undergrounders immortal or do you make the assumption that because he was an undergrounder, then he couldn't have died on the island? Even if Napoleon did not die on the island of Saint Helena, it doesn't follow that the story about the doppelgangers therefore is true.
Given the amount of effort involved in creating, maintaining, controlling undergrounder, their utility to 4d STS is very high - aka Return on Investment as STS works through shortest means achieving their goals. So it is economical to swap the body of the undergrounder with another dispensable human.

Choosing the genes, abducting woman for the conceptions, growing fetus in those liquid chambers with slow heart rate (once a hour) etc. are VERY complicated process.

As we can pull out from C’s sessions w.r.t controlling mechanism 4d STS uses - Nephilim, grays, direct interaction where ever possible, human psychopaths, hybrids whose physical characteristics are distinct from others, deep level punctuators ( human looking), under grounders etc. In terms of historical milestones, Impact rulers had and the program changes.

  • Red headed hybrids ( before yd) - with a assumption that 4D STS is in control.
  • First Aryan types went underground around 1200 BCE, initially due to comets.
  • Nephilim brought in 12k and died out 6k BCE
  • Baalbek Nephilim creation experiment - Venus entry period
  • Sargon the Akkadian - 2279 BCE died - Post 2200 BCE cataclysms, needs new program
  • "Sarah" or Egyptian princess Nefertiti - introduced monotheism based on Zoroastrianism - 1600 BCE
  • Alexander the Great influenced by UFOs - is he under grounder too ? - Around 400 BCE
  • Rothschilds small level punctuator - around early 19th century , control of British empire and Industrialization
  • Napoleon - around early 19th century -
  • Epstein -
  • Macron?
I am sure there is LOT more over the timelines.
 
You could tick "potential match" with Vishnu's fish avatar. No need to validate it, may keep it on the side as a potential match. then you see if you find fish gods elsewhere or if you find more about Vishnu.
I think there is LOT more to it. There are few words to tie - Rama, early Ramayana Writer "Valmiki", Vishnu ( Vishnu as cometary Venus from Vedas, Sukra as planetary venus from Valmiki's Yoga-Vasistha , Sukra as planetary Venus in current day Hindu cosmology), fish (Matsya), avatar doctrine etc.

Rama : 48K BCE Indian High Priest fought with lizards and psychopathy. Psychopathy is mutational result of Nuclear war at 48K BCE.
Ramayan Writer Valmiki:
  • As per C's, Ramayan was initially composed around 9000 BCE where Rama (Hero), Ravana (Villian, fictional (cometary)), but Ravana's entire clan has shape shifting capabilities all over the place).
  • Recently, I opened a book named Vasistha- Yoga by Valmiki. A impulsive purchase purchased long back, I never read, probably I was not ready for it. In that what picked my interest is Sukra's endeavors - More or less matches with Vishnu of Vedas ( A mighty distant cousin of Indra).
    • If Valimiki really wrote Vasistha- Yoga by Valmiki around 9000 BCE looking at the distant wanderings of Cometary Venus ( named as Sukra) by naming names that became nuts and bolts of later Hindu cosmology, it all makes sense, but I need to layout timelines.
    • In fact, I looked at some books from Kumara Kundam early days, they too have detailed cometary venus description
Fish References:

From Wiki :
The earliest account of **Matsya is found in the Shatapatha Brahmana, where Matsya is not associated with any particular deity.** The fish-saviour later merges with the identity of Brahma in post-Vedic era, and still later, becomes regarded with Vishnu. The legends associated with Matsya expand, evolve, and vary in Hindu texts. These legends have embedded symbolism, where a small fish with Manu's protection grows to become a big fish, and the fish saves the man who would be the progenitor of the next race of mankind.[4] In later versions, Matsya slays a demon named Hayagriva who steals the Vedas, and thus is lauded as the saviour of the scriptures.[5]
Remember Shatapatha Brahmana is post Vedic making sense ritual work of Vedas. if Vedas writing ended with YD ( 10.9 K BCE), collection, packaging and other standardization happened AFTER 6249 BCE Aryan invasion by archaic Sanskrit speaking Aryan brahmin priests.

I asked Grok - What is the story line of matsya in satapata brahmana

It appears in Shatapatha Brahmana 1.8.1 (in the context of the Prāyaṇīya and Udāyanīya rituals, but the myth is narrated as an explanatory tale).

Summary of the Matsya story in Shatapatha Brahmana:​

  1. Manu finds a tiny fish
    One morning, while the sage Manu (the progenitor of mankind) was performing his ablutions and offering water (tarpana), a small fish came into his hands along with the water. The fish spoke to him and said:
    “Protect me, and I will save you in the future.”
  2. The fish asks for protection and grows rapidly
    Manu placed the fish in a jar (kamaṇḍalu). But in a single night it grew so large that the jar could no longer contain it. The fish then asked Manu to put it in a larger pit. Manu kept transferring it to bigger and bigger water bodies—a ditch, a pond, a lake, a river, and finally the ocean—as the fish kept outgrowing each container in an astonishingly short time.
  3. The fish reveals the coming flood
    Once in the ocean, the fish (now enormous) revealed its true nature and warned Manu:
    “In seven days, a great deluge (pralaya) will destroy all living beings. Build a boat. When the flood comes, I will come to you. Tie the boat to my horn with a rope.”
    The fish had a prominent horn on its head.
  4. Manu prepares and the flood comes
    Manu collected all kinds of seeds (bīja – representing plants, animals, and the essence of life) and built a large boat. When the deluge arrived, the oceans overflowed, rains poured endlessly, and all land was submerged.
  5. The fish saves Manu
    The giant fish appeared. Manu tied the rope (made from a serpent, according to some interpretations) to the horn of the fish. The Matsya towed the boat through the raging waters, over the northern mountain (identified as the Himālaya or specifically the “Northern Mountain” – Himavanta or Naubandhana), until the flood subsided.
  6. The boat rests on the mountain
    The fish guided the boat to a peak called Naubandhana (“the binding of the ship”). The boat was fastened there. As the waters receded gradually, Manu descended along with them.
  7. Manu becomes the sole progenitor
    Because all other humans had perished, Manu was left alone. He performed intense austerities and sacrifices, desiring offspring. From his offerings arose a woman named Idā (or Ilā), who became his daughter/wife. Through her, Manu became the ancestor of all future humanity.

Key differences from the later Puranic version:​

  • The fish is not explicitly identified as Vishnu in the Shatapatha Brahmana (though later tradition identifies it as Vishnu’s Matsya avatar). It is simply a divine fish, sometimes linked to Prajāpati or Brahmā.
  • There are no Asuras (Hayagrīva stealing the Vedas, etc.) – the flood is a natural cosmic deluge.
  • The emphasis is more on the ritual and sacrificial aspect: Manu’s survival enables the continuation of yajña (sacrifice), which sustains the cosmos.
  • The rope is not always specified as Vāsuki; the mountain is called Naubandhana rather than Malaya or Himālaya in some Puranic versions.
This version in the Shatapatha Brahmana (c. 8th–6th century BCE) is widely regarded as the oldest fully developed flood myth featuring a fish-savior in world literature, and it shows striking parallels with Mesopotamian flood stories (Atrahasis, Utnapishtim, and ultimately Noah), though the Indian version has its own distinct theological flavor.

So in essence:
A tiny fish asks Manu for protection → grows miraculously → warns of a cosmic flood → tows Manu’s boat to safety on a mountain peak → Manu repopulates the earth. This is the core Matsya legend as told in the Shatapatha Brahmana.

Is this thing that grew bigger and bigger is Venus or Mars? If Mars is the one that came nearer and nearer to earth and dumped the waters, then it has to be Mars.
The thing that has horn- If it is Mars, it doesn't have horn by default, but the dumping stream of water can also be seen as stream or horn.
Given that Matsya gave 7 days warning, I was leaning towards Cometary Venus as Matsya - dragging mars into earthly interaction and water dump. so What i mean to say Matsya is the cometary venus in the flood of Noah event, where Mars dumped water on earth.

This is my thought process to reconcile what C's said w.r.t myths.


I am having hard times understanding "came and went from the sea on unusual scheduling demands" - but this is very precise:
  • Look for a fish[-god]/person
  • Must come from the sea - or go to the sea. Simple motion.
  • An unusual schedule / "unusual scheduling demands"
If the lizards cannot remain in 3D for too long (cf the Men in black), they would appear and disappear, quite quickly. Their appearing would be "odd":
Fair enough. I think we need to gather all fish references all over the world and compare story lines for urgencies ( or unusual schedules)
"And Rama, while he approached the shore, noticed that old man ...". Kind of "an apparition". Out of nowhere.
I am not sure of the source of the text you mentioned. But, Ramayan has LOT more shape shifting phenomenon than Mahabharat. So allegories to 48 K BCE Rama event is a better fit.
Grabbing all pdfs of all Indian texts, starting a search on the folder for "fish" - and see if anything comes out? You keep when it's a mention of "fish headed". If you find anything, you can then refine Vishnu's fish avatar and determine if it's the same.
Probably, I will have to do it later for few reasons. There are SO many layers of interpretations made by so many people over long time, it is time consuming. The main point I am trying to say if some body wrote it , doesn't mean it is correct. I prefer to map it against comet angle.
Does the Vishnu fish avatar appear in unusual circumstances? I had a look at the wiki but I need to mold my mind and factor in all the names etc to really understand the circumstances of his apparition. From what I see, he pops up and saves Manu. Would be about the exact moment where Vishnu pops up. "Vishnu appeared to the fellow human, in the form of a fish, and appeared from behind of a rock". That would match. "Unusual scheduling" matching the Men in Black thing - "just popping up".
My line of thinking is rather simple. Some body wrote it means , there is a motivation and masses bought it means they saw some thing, resonated with it, took it forward with patronage. Sky is easy fit for it all.

The necessity of Vishnu and avatars came after Cometary Venus settled in the orbit in 3rd millennium BCE. So they have to fit in all the old stories from different new books ( Puranas and modifications of old epics Ramayana and Mahabharata ) and fit in to Avatar doctrines of different deities - Vishnu, Siva , Shakti etc.
Any thing that which shows that Vishnu cannot stay too long? "And Vishnu had to take care of additional things, in the ether..."
Please let us know the source of the text or context.
 
Thanks for sharing the session.

Interesting. In fact, the predominant Chinese and Asian culture is a Confucian Marxist culture, with capitalist elements (in line with the various transitions predicted by Marx. ah, I'm not defending Marxism). The price to pay for these elements, in terms of psychopathy, is to be assessed, which is why in other threads I have wondered whether the remarkably low rate of psychopathy assigned to China in the past by CS is still relevant today. Considering the explosion of the entertainment system within and outside China and Asia in relatively recent times, an explosion of evil and luxury slaves is undoubtedly possible, as are the tragedies associated with it. This is one side of the coin. On the other hand, the decadent Western empire is being challenged at the heart of its own propaganda (entertainment) strategy and is taking advantage of this to reaffirm itself (misery loves company), with algorithmic hype totally aimed at magnification. Maintaining an anthropological approach, which is inevitable if one wants to retain a shred of sobriety, all this has nothing to do with darkness linked to Daoism. Ihmo.
Huh???
 
urgencies
This makes sense thank you. The French translation uses "schedule" - calendar. But urgency / emergency tells much about the meaning of the word (not even sure that this is what C meant!)

I am not sure of the source of the text you mentioned.
I invented it, so as to show you that in the Indian texts, you may be able to find out "a guy" (fictional example!) definitely "popping up out of nowhere". You would have to just read texts, where there are fish-people, and see if their apparition is not a bit too exaggerated / too odd / strange / etc.

You know: let's look at the Odyssey, there are a lot of those kind of things. "And there, as Odysseus approached the mound, he figured out that a nymph was sitting there, and etc etc". This kind of thing. A literary process portraying a character popping out of nowhere.

Ramayan has LOT more shape shifting phenomenon than Mahabharat.

This makes the gathering of data complicated, if you end up with tons of fish-people.

Probably, I will have to do it later for few reasons. There are SO many layers of interpretations made by so many people over long time, it is time consuming. The main point I am trying to say if some body wrote it , doesn't mean it is correct. I prefer to map it against comet angle.
Seeing you digging your way into this whole Indian thing, I can only encourage you to listen to yourself, do your best and explore the avenues that you believe are worth exploring.

My line of thinking is rather simple. Some body wrote it means , there is a motivation and masses bought it means they saw some thing, resonated with it, took it forward with patronage. Sky is easy fit for it all.
Let me be a devil's advocate: yes, Vishnu, as you explain it, is multiple, important, very "various", immensely strange, very odd - and "it's a fish-god"!

If I had to bet money on the fact that Vishnu is a fish-god, according to what the C's said: I wouldn't.

I would say: "yeah it looks like, and there is a lot around this". "But I am not sure - I cannot be sure, this requires deeper digging".

You are right, in the sense that "somebody wrote it". There is a motivation, and "Vishnu" has been conditioning thousands and billions of people.

But with this consideration, what you got is:

- Vishnu had a big influence
- "Vishnu-fish god"
- C's speak of fish-gods

Well... It's close... Very close... "All indicates that this is it".

But, technically, according to the rules of logic, I would see that one cannot "make the link", with it.

It's looks very obvious, and to you it's even like "the nose on the face", etc. I would suggest than to keep a buffer here, as a matter of strategy. If your assessment is correct, pieces of the puzzle will naturally fall into their places, according to your idea.

Because if that's a "all indicates that this is it", you must watch out.

Please let us know the source of the text or context.
I invented it again! Fictional example.

In a text, where a lizard would come by, temporarily, there may be a hint, in the text, of "a hurry to leave". I suggest that the writings could be mentioning a fish-person, saying: "...now that I have fulfilled my work, I need to go to other horizons..."

You see? Cannot stay too long, because of the density mismatch etc etc

If the case, how would this be translating? It could be that if you find a fish-god, a very slight mention of "me-need-to-go" could be present..

Good luck in your work, you seem to have many different leads to explore and that things are starting to make sense.

:cool2::-)
 
There have already been several posts about the mysterious purses depicted in ancient carvings in Mesopotamia and South America. However, these have all involved stone carvings of figures carrying them but not a purse itself. By luck, I recently came across a YouTube video which deals with the discovery of an actual stone purse in Iraq. Apologies if someone has already posted the video on this or another thread. Whether this is truly an example of the kind of purse carried by the "gods" or just a stone replica, I cannot say. It is interesting though that the purse proved to be hollow and once the lock was tripped acoustically, the purse opened up to reveal some strange cylinders containing different kinds of ancient knowledge stored on them.

I am assuming here that the discovery was genuine since the purse is apparently now on display in the Baghdad Museum along with details about the cylinders found inside it. I have not had time to research into the matter but would be interested in Forum members comments on the video. Perhaps someone could ask the C's if this is a genuine example of such a purse.

 
Mermaids are the closest I have delved in , concerning Fish people.
The decoding of the brothers Grim fairy tales concerning mermaids show them to be vicious enigmas , strange monstrosities that care not for mankind. All their Fairy tales always disguise the despicable into the acceptable but leaving the researcher clues for who their characters really are.
Years ago while travelling with a guatache in sections of the Amazonian jungles, I came across many tales of mermaid's raids on their villages neighbouring the inlets of the great river. They lose young children and older folk and are very weary of solitude while bathing in river inlets. Never at night. They don't do it . They fear them and speak in whispers about them. Many have seen their eyes glinting and staring back. For them mermaids are very real like moonlight is and I heard many confessions fearing shame that they might not be believed.
Apparently mermaids move very fast on sand or pebbles , with their silver tails swishing and with very strong arms pulling them along. Babies disappear. They carry their victims back to the current , like dogs squeezing puppies with razor sharp mandibles.
I never heard their tales involving helmets or other head coverings , but when one encounters so much smoke I remain open to the existence of Fish People.
 
Quasi-moon
The post begins with the excerpt about the quasi-moon, followed by looking up related articles on SOTT, and what characterises the classes of objects that have been observed to become quasi-moons in terms of their orbits. The Earth is not alone in picking up strays, even fairly small asteroids, below a diameter of 1km can appear with a companion. Along the way, it turned out that 1996, the year mentioned in the recent session, was also the year of the visible comet Hyakutake.

Earth's 8th official quasi-moon... How long has it been in Earth's orbit? - Since 1996.
Session 27 September 2025
Q: (Gaby) Earth's 8th official quasi-moon...

(L) "Quasi-moon", I love that word, it's so quasi! [Laughter]

(Gaby) ...was discovered earlier this year, which is slightly smaller than the meteor that exploded over Chelyabinsk, Russia, in 2013. How long has it been in Earth's orbit?

A: Since 1996.
For gravitational interaction to occur, that would make an object become associated with the Earth as a quasi-moon, the speeds and orbits of the smaller object and the Earth would have to be compatible.

Articles on SOTT related to the topic of quasi-moons
Meet 2025 PN7, Earth's newfound quasi-moon
Earlier images of the object extend back to 2014. It now appears to have been on a quasi-moon orbit for about 60 years, and it will remain so for about 60 more. Eventually, though, it will revert to a horseshoe orbit, one that brings it periodically close to Earth only to back away again, never completing a full circle around our planet.
Images go back to 2014. How do they speculate about the other 50 years? Probably from analyzing the orbit, with the added assumption that all went according to plan, from now until back then, but are orbits of such objects always accurately retraceable?

The next two are about the same object, 2024 PT5 :
Earth's 'mini moon' asteroid escapes after 2 months in orbit Nov 2024
Where the rock came from is something of a mystery, but scientists have good reason to believe it is actually a chunk of the moon itself, likely ejected by an asteroid impact centuries ago.
Two articles, and two suggestions about the origin:
'2nd Moon' orbits Earth after getting stuck in planet's gravity—here's where it came from Oct 2024
Where Did It Come From?

Over the years, countless other space objects like 2024 PT5 have grazed by Earth. This NEO is said to originate from the Arjunas, a secondary asteroid belt in the solar system that aligns closely with Earth. Hoards of NEOs can be found within this cluster, and some have even visited Earth before. The latest flyby closely resembles a prior one called 2022 NX1, which orbited Earth in 1981 and 2022 before bidding farewell. When 2024 PT5 says sayonara in November, it won't return to greet us again until 2055.

A comment about the Arjuna asteroids:
The Arjuna asteroids (also known as "Arjunas") are a dynamical group of asteroids in the Solar System. Arjunas are near-Earth objects (NEOs) whose orbits are very Earth-like in character, having low inclination, orbital periods close to one year, and low eccentricity.
Potential members of the Arjuna group with their Apollo (APO) or Aten (ATE) group classification in parentheses, include:
The Apollo asteroid Wiki has an image that shows what the differences in orbit are between Apollo and Atens:
Neo_orbit_types.jpg

The Apollo asteroids cross the orbit of the Earth because when they are at their nearest distance from the Sun, their perihelion, they are closer than when the Earth is the furthest away from the Sun, its aphelion.

For the Aten class asteroids, the situation is the reverse, they cross the orbit with the Earth, because when they are the furthest away from the Sun at their aphelion, they are further away, than when the Earth is at its closest distance from the Sun, its perihelion.
The Chelyabinsk meteor, that exploded over the city of Chelyabinsk in the southern Urals region of Russia on February 15, 2013, injuring an estimated 1,500 people with flying glass from broken windows, was an Apollo-class asteroid.
The Wiki says that more than 21,000 Apollo class objects are known, of these about 10 % are potential hazards.

Another SOTT article:
New 'quasi-moon' asteroid 2023 FW13 discovered near Earth, has been travelling alongside our planet since 100 BC June 2023
Following 2023 FW13's initial discovery in March, space observers dug into the data and found observations of the asteroid dating all the way back to 2012, according to Live Science's sister site Space.com.
"all the way back to 2012" (how old is that writer), and then backdated to the time Caesar was born, is along the lines of the story about 60 years for the 2025 PN7 which they can reliably trace to 2014. There is of course a difference between 2000 years and 60; maybe they match observations to models and then they rewind the models to show what the models tells them reality looked like back in time.

A comparatively small object can have a moon:
NASA spacecraft discovers asteroid sporting tiny moon Nov 2023
In data and images beamed back to Earth, the spacecraft confirmed that Dinkinesh is barely a half-mile (790 meters) across. Its closely circling moon is a mere one-tenth-of-a-mile (220 meters) in size.
moon.jpg

If a comet has a diameter of a few km, many times the size of the above case, would anything prevent it from having companions?

Are there more quasi-moons out there? Given that the objects can be quite small, and difficult to observe, there are probably more, and in a way the articles admit as much. "Oh, it has been out there for 60 years! Oh, it has been out there since Caesar was born!" At the same time, the gravity field of the Earth is not like Saturn og Jupiter, and the ability to attract an object is not nearly the same. Perhaps there is also something about the nearness to the Sun, as neither Mercury nor Venus have moons of their own. Our Moon also does not have moons, but it has scars from impacts. To continue on that tought, if one compares the list of large fireballs and impacts that have hit Earth with the short list of small orbiting or semi-orbiting objects, it is clear what is more common for Earth.

1996 - the year of Comet Hyakutake
The Cs mentioned the 1996 in the session
as the time for the beginning of the association with the gravity field of the Earth. Wondering if there per chance were any comets that passed by in 1996. There was Comet Hyakutake, but it would be too fast to enter into orbit around the earth. Nevertheless it was still an interesting event that illustrated how quickly a comet can show up in the skies.
Comet Hyakutake (formally designated C/1996 B2) is a comet discovered on 31 January 1996.[1] It was dubbed the Great Comet of 1996; its passage to within 0.1 AU (15 Gm) of the Earth on 25 March was one of the closest cometary approaches of the previous 200 years. Reaching an apparent visual magnitude of zero and spanning nearly 80°, Hyakutake appeared very bright in the night sky and was widely seen around the world. The comet temporarily upstaged the much anticipated Comet Hale–Bopp, which was approaching the inner Solar System at the time.
Hyakutake is a long-period comet that passed perihelion on 1 May 1996. Before its most recent passage through the Solar System, its orbital period was about 17,000 years,[2][7] but the gravitational perturbation of the giant planets has increased this period to 70,000 years.[2][7]
Aphelion ~1,320 AU (inbound)[a] ~3,500 AU (outbound)
If gravitational perturbations of the the giant planets could change the orbital period of Hyakutake from 17,000 to 70,000 years, what might a dark companion of the Sun, with a mass about 35 times heavier compared to Jupiter be able to do?

Hyakutake moved from being invisible to being prominent within weeks
Hyakutake became visible to the naked eye in early March 1996. By mid-March, the comet was still fairly unremarkable, shining at 4th magnitude with a tail about 5 degrees long. As it neared its closest approach to Earth, it rapidly became brighter, and its tail grew in length. By March 24, the comet was one of the brightest objects in the night sky, and its tail stretched 35 degrees. The comet had a notably bluish-green colour.[7]
Comet_Hyakutake_inner_solar_system_1996.png

Comet Hyakutake's trajectory through the inner solar system, with a high inclination, passed closest to the Earth in late March 1996, passing over Earth's north pole. It was at perihelion on May 1.
It is fascinating, (since this case was not terrifying) that a quiet sky can light up with such a short time.

The Wiki explains how a satellite managed to register localized changes in space following the passage of comet Hyakutake. The example can give us some idea of what a passage of a comet can mean electrically and magnetically in some instances.
The Ulysses spacecraft made an unexpected pass through the tail of the comet on 1 May 1996.[21] Evidence of the encounter was not noticed until 1998. Astronomers analysing old data found that Ulysses' instruments had detected a large drop in the number of protons passing, as well as a change in the direction and strength of the local magnetic field. This implied that the spacecraft had crossed the 'wake' of an object, most likely a comet; the object responsible was not immediately identified.[22]
From the passage of Comet Hyakutake, more is known about what can happen, when a comet passes near. One question might be, when there was a drop in protons, was that because they were absorbed or neutralized by negative charges or where did thy go? Looking around for ideas, there was from an electric universe newsfeed:
A predictive milestone for the electric comet model. In her November 2021 doctoral thesis, Sofia Bergman, PhD student at the Swedish Institute of Space Physics, used SPIS (Spacecraft Plasma Interaction Software) to measure low-energy ions around Comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko. A large amount of positive ions were measured flowing inward towards the comet's nucleus—instead of outward as expected—evidence of a negatively charged object.
 
This is going to sound absolutely ridiculous, and even though I’ve put off posting about it, it keeps coming back to me. So, feel free to respond with a laughing emoji. The C’s did say “stranger than you can imagine”, so here’s my silly experience.

One day this week I was on my break at work. I was sat in my car watching Alexander Mercouris. At one point I went to grab my cup out of the cup holder and I accidentally knocked the cup against the centre console area of the car interior, just under the radio. It made a small bang as I hit it. Immediately, Alexander Mercouris’ dog started barking in what sounded like another room in the background of the video.

I know. It’s a stupid thing to share here. But there’s a couple of points. Firstly, if any of you have seen the film “Deja Vu” with Denzel Washington, you’ll remember there’s a certain scene which jolts your understanding of reality and physics which was somewhat similar to what happened in my car. I don’t want to say more because I don’t want to give any spoilers for anyone who hasn’t seen the film. But it’s a clever scene that ‘stays with you’ and if I hadn’t seen it, I wouldn’t have thought much about this car incident other than it being an amusing coincidence.

The other thing is that being a pet owner, I have a lot of experience in observing how mammals respond to unexpected anomalies. The way the dog reacted when I knocked my cup was the way you would have expected it to react if I had been in the room with Mercouris.

Well, I tried not to share it, but couldn’t help doing so :lol: I guess I’m just thinking that at the very least, sharing this experience (even if it’s completely wrong and ridiculous) might serve to at least open our minds to just how strange things might get.
 
By luck, I recently came across a YouTube video which deals with the discovery of an actual stone purse in Iraq.
I would classify the video as suspect, as the archeologist that they quoted is actually Dr. Luiz Moura, a medical doctor. No one would ever know him, except for extremely very few people, who happen to include me. At some point, I dug up everything ever published or available on autohemotherapy, including Dr Moura's interview relating his case studies on autohemotherapy. Fascinating interview!

Caption from your video:

brave_screenshot_cassiopaea.org.png


Dr Luiz Moura, talking about autohemotherapy:


😅
 
Looking around for ideas, there was from an electric universe newsfeed:
This has been the point of James McCanney for decades. In simple terms for the lay person, "comets are like vacuum cleaners".


fig1.jpg
 
There have already been several posts about the mysterious purses depicted in ancient carvings in Mesopotamia and South America. However, these have all involved stone carvings of figures carrying them but not a purse itself. By luck, I recently came across a YouTube video which deals with the discovery of an actual stone purse in Iraq. Apologies if someone has already posted the video on this or another thread. Whether this is truly an example of the kind of purse carried by the "gods" or just a stone replica, I cannot say. It is interesting though that the purse proved to be hollow and once the lock was tripped acoustically, the purse opened up to reveal some strange cylinders containing different kinds of ancient knowledge stored on them.

I am assuming here that the discovery was genuine since the purse is apparently now on display in the Baghdad Museum along with details about the cylinders found inside it. I have not had time to research into the matter but would be interested in Forum members comments on the video. Perhaps someone could ask the C's if this is a genuine example of such a purse.​

I'm with Gaby on this one. Personally, I think that it would be a good description of finding an actual 'purse' but I think it's just a later stone carving and not an actual device. And when the narrator mentioned 'data storage device containing knowledge, at the molecular level, from the dawn of civilization' and that quantum imaging was used, I got the feeling someone made an AI story from AI research to the extent that it sounded like the plot to the next Indiana Jones movie.

Indiana Jones and the Purse of the Gods.jpg


Yes, I would see this movie.
I love the fish!
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom