seeker of light
The Force is Strong With This One
Is Godel and Einstein worth looking at again.
Session 10 February 2018
- Thread starter Laura
- Start date
D
Deleted member 4320
Guest
Honestly, I'm getting confused about this whole Semite thing, because various information on this topic. Maybe let's go back to the basics...
Cassiopaeans distinguish between two races: Kantekkian and Homo Sapiens. Elsewhere in the session, the Cassiopaeans say that these true Homo Sapiens, the indigenous peoples of the Earth, from a very long time before the Kantekkians came to Earth, are remnants such as Aborigines and Native Americans.
Now, what are the indigenous Kantekkians to be like? Tall, well-built, fair or dark blondes, they have blue or green eyes, fair skin, straight hair, narrow noses.
What are real native Earthian (Homo Sapiens)? Let's take the Aborigines as an example. Medium height, average body, brown or black hair, brown or black eyes, dark skin, curly hair, wide noses.
Semits is said to be a genetic type formed from the Kantekkian and Homo Sapiens genetic types. So we're not just talking about interacting and reproducing these two types of human. The formation of a new genetic type suggests some interference based on genetic engineering. So, since the appearance of the Semites, we actually have three kinds of man on planet Earth. Kantekkians (dominant today on the planet), Semites and Homo Sapiens.
What will be characteristic of the Semites, then? On a more spiritual and energetic level, they will, on the one hand, be attached to, adapted to, and identified with the Earth. Thus, they may be inclined to protect planet Earth and regard it as their home and opposing Alien domination. It's one thing and the other thing is that through their part of the genes of the Kantekkians origins, which are closer to the rest of Orion, they open them (Semites) to wider cosmic influences including the positive influence of STO.
This is a very dangerous mix, in the perspective of 4D STS (and 3D STS in cooperation with them), because Semites are attached to the Earth and will defend it, and they still have a predisposition to be a competition for 4DSTS (and 3DSTS), due to their higher predispositions and powers opening them for cooperation with the Cosmos, so to speak. Therefore Consortium strive to eliminate the Semites yet before the transition to 4th Density.
What are the physical aspects of the Semites? Well, we can expect that they will be distinctive in that they will clearly reflect the physical features of Kantekkians and Homo Sapiens, which will be in balance with each other. For example: As normal Kantekkians would be tall blonde and Homo Sapiens would be avarage with black hair. So we can expect Semite can be be very tall while having black hair and brown eyes. Or some other combination... Semite can have light skin, blue or green eyes (which is Kantekkians) and a set of Homo Sapiens traits (short stature, curly hair and a wider nose). I think the general rule is that for Semites it will be characteristic that those features that belong to Kantekkians and Homo Sapiens will be clearly visible and in equilibrium.
What about the Jews? The Jews are not real Semites. They are one of the Kantekkian's group. A real Jew will have blue eyes, a long narrow eagle nose, will be tall. And Semite can already combine these (Kantekkian) features with other features typical of Homo Sapiens. May be tall, have a long, narrow, eagle nose (Kantekkians) and dark, curly hair (Homo Sapiens).
Central Asia is said to be the home of the Semites. We can assume that they emigrated to the West. The time of World War II was the time when they began to be driven out of Europe (of course, unfortunately also killed). In current times, we still see the war with Russia (close to west front of Central Asia) and we can expect more hostilities in the area of Central Asia and the periphery and neighboring areas (Afghanistan, Iran).
How correct can we make this part of the session? If high, what does it actually mean for us? Let me straighten it out by thinking out loud.
Cassiopaeans distinguish between two races: Kantekkian and Homo Sapiens. Elsewhere in the session, the Cassiopaeans say that these true Homo Sapiens, the indigenous peoples of the Earth, from a very long time before the Kantekkians came to Earth, are remnants such as Aborigines and Native Americans.
Now, what are the indigenous Kantekkians to be like? Tall, well-built, fair or dark blondes, they have blue or green eyes, fair skin, straight hair, narrow noses.
What are real native Earthian (Homo Sapiens)? Let's take the Aborigines as an example. Medium height, average body, brown or black hair, brown or black eyes, dark skin, curly hair, wide noses.
Semits is said to be a genetic type formed from the Kantekkian and Homo Sapiens genetic types. So we're not just talking about interacting and reproducing these two types of human. The formation of a new genetic type suggests some interference based on genetic engineering. So, since the appearance of the Semites, we actually have three kinds of man on planet Earth. Kantekkians (dominant today on the planet), Semites and Homo Sapiens.
What will be characteristic of the Semites, then? On a more spiritual and energetic level, they will, on the one hand, be attached to, adapted to, and identified with the Earth. Thus, they may be inclined to protect planet Earth and regard it as their home and opposing Alien domination. It's one thing and the other thing is that through their part of the genes of the Kantekkians origins, which are closer to the rest of Orion, they open them (Semites) to wider cosmic influences including the positive influence of STO.
This is a very dangerous mix, in the perspective of 4D STS (and 3D STS in cooperation with them), because Semites are attached to the Earth and will defend it, and they still have a predisposition to be a competition for 4DSTS (and 3DSTS), due to their higher predispositions and powers opening them for cooperation with the Cosmos, so to speak. Therefore Consortium strive to eliminate the Semites yet before the transition to 4th Density.
What are the physical aspects of the Semites? Well, we can expect that they will be distinctive in that they will clearly reflect the physical features of Kantekkians and Homo Sapiens, which will be in balance with each other. For example: As normal Kantekkians would be tall blonde and Homo Sapiens would be avarage with black hair. So we can expect Semite can be be very tall while having black hair and brown eyes. Or some other combination... Semite can have light skin, blue or green eyes (which is Kantekkians) and a set of Homo Sapiens traits (short stature, curly hair and a wider nose). I think the general rule is that for Semites it will be characteristic that those features that belong to Kantekkians and Homo Sapiens will be clearly visible and in equilibrium.
What about the Jews? The Jews are not real Semites. They are one of the Kantekkian's group. A real Jew will have blue eyes, a long narrow eagle nose, will be tall. And Semite can already combine these (Kantekkian) features with other features typical of Homo Sapiens. May be tall, have a long, narrow, eagle nose (Kantekkians) and dark, curly hair (Homo Sapiens).
Central Asia is said to be the home of the Semites. We can assume that they emigrated to the West. The time of World War II was the time when they began to be driven out of Europe (of course, unfortunately also killed). In current times, we still see the war with Russia (close to west front of Central Asia) and we can expect more hostilities in the area of Central Asia and the periphery and neighboring areas (Afghanistan, Iran).
It is interesting how much the perception of older sessions changes over time, I guess this is a good sign because we eventually change with learning, so we look at older sessions from a completely different point of view.
For days I'm thinking of reading Inside the Criminal Mind one more time, and since Laura mentioned it in this session, it seems like a good sign to me.
For days I'm thinking of reading Inside the Criminal Mind one more time, and since Laura mentioned it in this session, it seems like a good sign to me.
Interesting you mention the above..I forget what I was originally searching for yesterday but whatever it was linked to the following thread: Raine, Samenow, Fallon: Neuropsychology & The Work. It's been a long time since I read some of that thread..Anyway, after reading a bit from that thread yesterday, I thought of reading Inside the Criminal Mind again.It is interesting how much the perception of older sessions changes over time, I guess this is a good sign because we eventually change with learning, so we look at older sessions from a completely different point of view.
For days I'm thinking of reading Inside the Criminal Mind one more time, and since Laura mentioned it in this session, it seems like a good sign to me.
I think I'll review this session again too
I just got done listening to Dan Carlin’s “Wrath of the Khans” series. He talks about the modern books being written about the Mongols, even mentions Weatherford, that are trying to paint a different picture of their history, portraying them in a much more positive light.
Dan Carlin states, and I agree, how do you separate the positive from the negative? Saying the Mongols were progressive on religious freedom and opened trade routes, but downplaying the 50 million people they killed, isn’t possible IMO. It’s like saying Hitler killed millions of Jews, but let’s look at the positive things he did. It’s too intertwined. You would have to ask the people of the time if they thought the slaughter of millions was worth potential benefits.
