How correct can we make this part of the session? If high, what does it actually mean for us? Let me straighten it out by thinking out loud.Q: (Pierre) Another question: Years ago in a previous session, you mentioned that Nazi Germany was a rehearsal. Next time, who is going to play the role of the Nazis, and who is going to play the role of the Jews?
A: That should be obvious by now. The objective, as we have said, was/is to eliminate true Semites from the gene pool.
Q: (L) Well... The question I have - and I'm not sure that I ever really asked it in such a direct way, or if it was ever really answered - is: What is a Semite?
A: Central Asian genetic type formed from two main lines.
Q: (Chu) Which lines?
A: Kantekkian and Homo Sapiens.
Q: (Artemis) Didn't they say that Kantekkians were the ones most filled with light and superpowered energies inside them?
Q: (Artemis) So they want to get rid of superpowered energy?
Interesting you mention the above..I forget what I was originally searching for yesterday but whatever it was linked to the following thread: Raine, Samenow, Fallon: Neuropsychology & The Work. It's been a long time since I read some of that thread..Anyway, after reading a bit from that thread yesterday, I thought of reading Inside the Criminal Mind again.It is interesting how much the perception of older sessions changes over time, I guess this is a good sign because we eventually change with learning, so we look at older sessions from a completely different point of view.
For days I'm thinking of reading Inside the Criminal Mind one more time, and since Laura mentioned it in this session, it seems like a good sign to me.