Session 18 May 2024

Well, that is another problem with Weston Price. He focused on bone and teeth benefits but there are other benefits that I am not sure if they could all be explained with K2, such as fertility and easy delivery. Also killing bacteria in saliva.

Other scientists from that period focused on other things and I couldn't see that K2 was a proper explanation for things that they were seeing.

So yeah, if you focus just on Weston Price and just on things that he was focused on, you can be satisfied with the K2 explanation. But if you decide to go further than that, that explanation becomes unsatisfying. Well, at least that's my stance on that.
But by that measure, it could be other components in the butter oil. Not just "Activator X" And when you start talking about other downstream effects of what he was using, the multi component hypothesis would make a lot of sense. I mean when you have natural products non processed products, there is no telling how many micronutrients might exist we don't even appreciate.
 
But by that measure, it could be other components in the butter oil. Not just "Activator X" And when you start talking about other downstream effects of what he was using, the multi component hypothesis would make a lot of sense. I mean when you have natural products non processed products, there is no telling how many micronutrients might exist we don't even appreciate.

Exactly. But the reason we do not appreciate them is that scientists stopped experimenting with natural products. And the chemists took over the role of biologists. In such organization of science, there is no room for non-material things in our diet.
 
In this post, I discussed a possible reason for the "Michael Jackson confusion":
 
We are three weeks into 2026. Whereas the thread Sol (sun) and its phenomena has turned 128 page in just under ten years, in the last three weeks it has moved four pages from Jan 1, 2026 on page 124.

Since this session discusses the activity of the Sun, and how it may influence the planet, it is relevant for the latest developments reported in the above thread.

So, what does quickening mean, then, in terms of the solar flare effects, or solar storm effects? - Quickening. - Whatever is present is "jumpstarted".
(L) [...] Okay. It says here ‘Niall and Joe have questions about the CME.’ So, ask your questions, Niall and Joe.

(Niall) When was the last year in which auroras were seen as widely around the world as they were last week?

A: 1989.

Q: (Joe) Is it just the strength of the current that would dictate damage to Earth's electrical infrastructure?

A: Direction of eruption also.

Q: (Chu) So, that's why it didn't fry everything.

(Joe) Okay. Are there any effects on human beings from an event like the one from last week?

A: Of course!

Q: (Joe) And would the answer to the question of what those effects are, be: ‘Depends on the person’?

A: Yes.


Q: (Joe) So, they can be positive or negative?

A: Yes.

Q: (Joe) I see. Does it involve DNA changes, essentially?

A: Sometimes.

Q: (Joe) What is the most common effect, let's say, on human beings from such things?

A: Quickening.


Q: (Joe) Okay. So, is that in any way similar to the purported effects of the Wave about hyperkinetic sensate and amplifying what is in a person?

A: Minor similarity.

Q: (Joe) So, what does quickening mean, then, in terms of the solar flare effects, or solar storm effects?

A: Whatever is present is "jumpstarted".


Q: (L) Okay. This next question:

(Navigator) After the recent solar flares, some predict that there will now be an uptick in volcanic and earthquake activity in the next 30 days. Will we see that?

A: To some extent, yes.

Q: (Navigator) Did these recent solar storms affect human health?

A: Spa [See previous answer].

Q: (Laurentien2) Was the HAARP experiment at the same time as the solar storm a coincidence, or was it deliberate?

A: Coincidence. Interfered with HAARP activity.
More coming!
(Andromeda) Do you want to ask if the recent auroras are what the C’s were referring to when they said ‘watch the seas, skies, and land’ recently? Or is there more to come?

A: More coming!

What inspired me to look up this session was this spiral formation, lasting for probably no more than a few moments, but quite impressive:
2026-01-21 192119.png

The image is from a Ventusky linked camera in Oksnes in Norway. Here is another screenshot for the sake of documentation:
2026-01-21 203148.png


Edit: Before the excerpt quoted first there is another related question that precedes:
Q: (L) Okay. We've got quite a list of questions, so we might as well get on with it. Now, the first question is from Laurentien2, and he asks:

(Laurentien2) Are CMEs (Coronal Mass Ejections) related to the opening and closing of the Sun window?

(L) Well, that stopped me right there because, what is the Sun window? Now, I know the C’s have said that the center of spherical objects are windows, but I don't believe they ever said what they were windows to, and I don't think we ever asked that, did we? I mean...

(Laurentien2) Yeah, I thought, Laura, that they were a window to another realm, to another density. That's how I interpreted it.

(L) Right. So, I guess the first question we should ask before we even go any further with this, is, you said that the centers of spherical objects (and I think they even said all spherical objects, in a sense) were windows. So what is it a window to?

A: Depends on the object.

Q: (L) Okay. So, what is the window at the center of the Sun an opening to, or a window to?

A: Antiuniverse object.

Q: (L) Okay. So, the center of the Sun opens to an antiuniverse object. Is that antiuniverse object like an anti-Sun?

A: Close.

Q: (Ark) But you know, coming back to this question, once there is a window in a spherical object like the Sun, the window stays open as long as this spherical object remains a spherical object. And only what goes through this window can change or can fluctuate depending on activity.

A: Yes.

Q: (L) So, the window stays open because its function is as a window.

A: Yes.

Q: (L) Okay. So, there is no opening and closing of the Sun's window as long as the Sun continues to exist as a spherical object. And therefore, the question about coronal mass ejections is not relevant to the window state of the Sun. So, let's ask the next question: Are coronal mass ejections significant in some way, in a more than just, you know, ‘exploding thing’ sense?

A: Yes.

Q: (L) And what are they exactly?

A: Surges in heliogap field.

Q: (L) Okay. Surges in heliogap field. What… [laughs] I'm gonna do it, what is a heliogap field?

A: Field surrounding solar system.

Q: (L) Okay. So, I read about this Voyager spacecraft that they sent up years and years ago, and it was going into the outer reaches of the solar system and there were some strange effects on it when it started getting close to the reach of the Sun's... What would you call it? Its electrical reach.

(Andromeda) Electromagnetic field?

(L) Yeah, something like that. Yeah.

(Scottie) There's a name for it.

(Andromeda) Yeah, I know...

(L) I don't exactly remember what they call it. Do you know, honey?

(Joe) The heliofield.

(Niall) The heliosphere.

(L) That's it. Okay. So, does this have anything to do with the end of the heliosphere?

A: Yes.

Q: (L) And is there a gap outside this heliosphere?

A: Yes.

Q: (L) And you're saying that there was a surge. Where does that energy come from that surges across this gap and enters the heliosphere?

A: Other systems.

Q: (L) ‘Other systems’, as in solar systems or star systems?

A: Yes. Also galactic current.

Q: (L) So, there is a galactic current that's flowing in the galaxy, yes?

A: Yes.

Q: (L) And this galactic current crosses the gap into our heliosphere?

A: Yes.

Q: (L) And causes surges because it adds energy to our system. Is that it?

A: Yes.

Q: (L) And those surges can cause CMEs?

A: Yes.

Q: (L) And can those surges also cause very, very big ones?

A: Yes. Some surges can cause a star to explode.

Q: (L) Well, that's pleasant. Is that what's going to happen here?

A: No.

Q: (L) How do you know it's not going to happen? [Laughter]

A: Current is not that strong at present.

Q: (L) All right. Laurentien2, are you happy? Everything's okay now?

(Laurentien2) Yes, from what I understand, I'm happy, Laura. Sorry.

(L) Okay. I just wanted to make sure we handled your question with sufficient thoroughness. And we found out a few little things. [...]
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom