Session 21 March 2026

Thank you for the session! always mystified- thank you!

wanted to share this headline in reference to 'April Drop Dead day'


The Treasury just declared the US insolvent. The media missed it​

Story by Steve H. Hanke, David M. Walker
• 1d•
3 min read
Markets today

INX ▼‎-0.37%‎

DJI ▼‎-0.18%‎

COMP ▼‎-0.84%‎
U.S. President Donald Trump stops to speak to reporters as he departs the White House on March 20, 2026 in Washington, DC. © Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images
The U.S. government is insolvent. That’s not hyperbole — it’s the conclusion drawn directly from the Treasury Department’s own consolidated financial statements for fiscal year 2025, released last week to near-total media silence. The numbers: $6.06 trillion in total assets against $47.78 trillion in total liabilities as of September 30, 2025.

~snip
makes me fear the crypto trap, where they pull the plug- but we the people will not go along with it /grin /cheers!
 
Thank you for the session :-)

Q: (Niall) What was the reason for Netanyahu's apparent absence from meetings over the last two weeks?

A: Wait and see!

Q: (Joe) Okay, is Netanyahu dead?

A: No dice.

Q: (L) [laughter] Is that one of those realities that is in flux?

A: Yes

Q: (Joe) It's really hard...

(L) Is the cat alive or dead? [laughter]
I wonder if the C's answer could be interpreted as Netanyahu being in a coma. In that sense, he's not dead nor really alive.
 
That is a good question. How can committing to a conclusion shape reality, without becoming wishful thinking?

It seems that committing to a conclusion should be seen in the context of assessing what is more probable of being the truth. So the conclusion is only regarding what we see as the highest probability, while still staying open to other possibilities.

How this relates to reality shaping is less clear. It seems that to shape reality we need to perceive reality (and ourselves) as clearly as possible first. Maybe the knowledge that comes from clear perception is what helps shape reality.

Thank you for further clarifying this. What you've written makes sense to me. Anyone else has something to add?
 
Dirty nukes, there could be a lot more at stake. Israel could be kamikaze.

I see it like this:
Through acquisition of knowledge we set prior distributions for e.g. historical events. That distribution, whilst the outcome was crystallised in this timeline may have been different in a different timeline, hence it has a probability distribution. From that using a conceptual Bayesian framework we can formulate a posterior distribution for significant future events.

This process I think is intuitive, meaning we don’t actually run calculations but our brain/ mind being a quantum computer automatically does it. This is how knowledge shapes reality. By adding more information into the system effectively increasing our Density. Higher Densities entails increased knowledge/light/love.

That process is statistical modelling and this able to be described by geometric algebra with complex numbers.

Edit: when doing Bayesian modelling we use machine learning algorithms to find the distribution of an outcome by running a calculation over and over and over again using the different possible values for predictor variables (ie they have a distribution). Which means we come up with a distribution for the outcome variable. And a specific outcome has a level of compatibility with our distribution. Nothing is concrete because but even the Cs know everything. But the more we know the closer we get to being able to closely predict the future.

Thank you. Could you help me get clarity on the term distribution and how you're using it?

Distribution meaning how the chance percentages are distributed along the various possibilities?

For example:

Q

Where will someone live next year?

A

Country A: 20%
Country B: 1%
Country C: 78%
They won't be living next year: 1%
 
He's collapsing, psychologically disintegrating because his image's in tatters now, he's no longer the Peace President he wanted to be remembered as. So the rage is directed elsewhere, externalized. At the same time he seeks refuge deep in his trusted yes-men to soothe all of this. Who tell him he's doing great, he's in charge, he's the one with the final decision. IMO.

That's how it looks to me too.

People are getting all emotional about Trump on all sides and either fall into outrage or mindless loyalty. This then leads to simplistic takes, like "he's been an evil psyop all along" to "trust the plan" and so on.

I think what we could observe, which is also aligned with what the Cs said over the years, is this: Trump was NOT a Deep State cutout unlike most presidents, and all recent ones. He was a genuine populist, therefore a wildcard, and the Deep State fought him tooth and nail with propaganda, phony lawfare, election rigging, and finally the attempt to take him out.

This had been enough for most people, including us, to root for him - not because he's some sort of savior or even will be able to do much good (if any), but because he represented a sort of "breaking of the system", both rhetorically, via his erratic "fluidity" and via the reaction by the Deep State he provoked - a great "unveiling". This has always been Trump's main positive effect, even to this day.

Now that never meant he was a great guy, he always was a bombastic Narcissist with questionable morals, to say the least. But objectively, he was a wildcard, a thorn in the Deep State's side, a mainstreamer of common sense, and a "great revealer" both consciously and by accident. He also had good intentions ("he will try" as the Cs said) to do something good for the US, misguided as it may have always been. Which is little, but tellingly enough to send the entire establishment into a frenzy.

Then when the Butler thing failed, and apparently taking him out wasn't an option anymore, the PTB switched gears in an effort to use him for their purposes. How do you do that? Easy: you put blackmail-pressure on him while simultaneously exploiting his weak, narcissistic psychology. You surround him with manipulative whisperers, sideline everyone who exhibits at least some sanity (and kill Charlie to make an example of what happens when you try to have the "wrong" influence on him), while maximizing the blackmail pressure. Because you know that Trump in his narcissism and Dunning-Kruger won't "grow to the occasion" (unlike a JFK or RFK) but rather, to shield himself from the reality that he has become a powerless tool for destruction, escapes into ever-crazier fantasy worlds where he's the "peace president" and genius negotiator etc. The blackmail-pressure also makes him even less able to think straight.

So they got their precious Iran war, and perhaps it indeed took a Trump to get us there. On the positive side, this whole mess, coupled with the erraticness and as a result all kinds of admissions by the Trump admin, has only accelerated the "great unveiling". I cannot help but think this is part of the long-term plan of a Cosmic Rebalancing, including the possible destruction of Israel in the long term the Cs hinted at (sort of the cosmos doing its thing).

So, while we can be morally repulsed by Trump's behavior, we should also look at it coldly, from a more objective, "cosmic" position, as part of the natural process. The bad guys might be using Trump, but he also is a conduit for chaotic, but necessary changes.
 
:flowers: yes I love how C say we have to think from within of our own discernment and project through us what we feel is right or harmonious. It is very much like my needlepoint work. Before I start I have general design, but it is just basic framework and general idea and key image - story, as everyday light plays differently on that and I am not following design if it is not fitting the light harmony of that day I am on it. If I planed to use dark blue, but some other shade of blue or color fits better that day, I just change it, etc. It is not easy to explain. But thank you for this interesting conversation with the "future" that we make.

I also see in their answer what we young people do already. We can't accept war, so we can disconnect form the informations told to us, and just by not participating mentally and emotionally we do erasing war from upcoming new reality projection, because our opinion is not made by logic but it is from our heart, naive and honest way to live not to die. We, young people, we are all orphans in this world this or that way, and we don't want to die and fight for mistakes done by our elders that put us in this situation when we don't know how our future will be, as we have to listen to them. No we don't have to listen to no one but to our hart. We don't have, and most of us can't achieve, and most of us don't want to achieve this meaningless life impose on us of run for money and success, in constant fear and fight for invented useless problems, we can't resolve, as they are not real, but they are impose to make us feel we are incompetent and only some VIP people knows what we all have to do?!? While we the new fruits of this life, we have to live like zombies, insted od bringing new. Thx to C to confirm that :))))

And funny is that just in last few days, since 21st and 1st day of Spring, I am re-organising my little home garden and doing a design for my 1st big needlepoint that will resemble new 6D earth, how I call it, and it is something between flat earth and our planet earth known characteristic. I am curious to see up to June and 1st day of Summer, when I hope to finish it, what I will got from my play with light, world hints and my inner impulse that goes from my heart to cosmic imagination.
 
Well, the C's said that some psychopaths do "graduate" in a sense:
I did a while back discussion with AI about that and come to conclusion if they go to 4D STS they are at the lower end of hierarchy if they want to be part of that hierarchy and not operate on their own, there they are also like here only functional machines because of lack of their essence, that is soul that is sum of one being and experiences through all lifetimes, source of knowledge, experience of reality and in STS reality with negative alignment that is essentialy power, souled beings have a higher level of intelectual level in a sense, cunninges and deviousness maybe better words, would not say creativity in a full sense of a word because there is none because all that and instinct is blocked because of wishful thinking. Higher negative magnetisim and not so much thinking limitation is a difference I would say.
That is a good question. How can committing to a conclusion shape reality, without becoming wishful thinking?

It seems that committing to a conclusion should be seen in the context of assessing what is more probable of being the truth. So the conclusion is only regarding what we see as the highest probability, while still staying open to other possibilities.

How this relates to reality shaping is less clear. It seems that to shape reality we need to perceive reality (and ourselves) as clearly as possible first. Maybe the knowledge that comes from clear perception is what helps shape reality.
I see it there is one ultimate objective reality on 7D that is filtered down through lower levels, and it is up to lower levels to align to that filtered reality on that level that is as close one can get to more objective reality on that level, so it is not about "creating" reality but accepting what is, so in that way creating your own or collective/consensus reality that is based on objective one, as above so below, or it can go to other end and be percieved through the lens of wishfull thinking, lies, creating your own reality that will be in conflict with objective reality and for that there will be consequences on individual and collective level.

Here’s what bugs me here: why won’t he just come out and say he’s being blackmailed that his near and/or extended family will be killed or ruined if he doesn’t play ball? Basically, own the narrative by blowing the whistle. What could they do to him then? If his family members did all of a sudden start to die as a result of accidents or suicides it would reveal the hidden hand a little too much. And while psychopaths are very poor - if not incapable - of predicting the results of their actions, this one isn’t really hard to predict. “Epstein didn’t kill himself” is already a meme, people know that there's a hidden hand behind it all and that this hand os above the law. Maybe I'm naive here, but the way I see it is that the propaganda war would be close to lost at that point and I don’t think his handlers would risk that when it’s already going poorly for them.

Sure, he’s surrounded, but where he’s sitting he has access to tons of incriminating evidence of what Israel is really doing and the extent of their influence over the U.S. - and the world at large. And there are tons of conspiracies around that very influence out there. Murdering him or his family members after he revealed his being blackmailed would just confirm those conspiracies to be true. So why not go rouge and spill the beans to loosen the grip?

The only ways I can explain it to myself is that it’s too huge of a gamble to make for him - or that his ego will not let him because this would be too damaging to his own image. The guy’s ego is the size of Texas and that's one heck of a weakness of his. Either that or maybe he just doesn't think he'd be believed given the grip the PTB have on the media and narratives the public is fed. He's seen what they can do: they stole his election and tied to murder him - while remaining invisible to the vast majority of the population.
As said it is not so black and white, every person is different and will choose different actions. Try to put yourself in that position, on the one hand all your close ones will die and like you said maybe it will have no consequence because of controlled narrative like with Epstein files on populace because of their comfort and much too lose yet and if it does it will create chaos and civil war and like you said his big ego has hard time accepting reality or acting in accordance with it, and not so much knowledge to see chaos is inevitable and that he has no way out of it unscathed or without some hard sacrifices for himself. He could only choose to sacrifice close ones/himself for greater good or greater good for his survival and his family(which ironicaly as always will not last long where the world is going or there is possibilty of being labeled as traitor, or killed in the end by the devil he was blackmailed by), if it was ever a choice for himself.

Thanks for sharing another great session, it was to be suspected american war casuilties were bigger because of ban on funerals, but this number was suprising, especially with number of ships and planes being hit, and with crisis looming and April coming it is becoming so crazy fast that the real ride is only starting to take place it seems even if it was expected long time ago coming, that first view is something different, weird times. On the one hand there is some relief Israel is getting it s due and US propaganda all mighty fake image falling down and some justice being served, and on the other "uncertainty" what the future holds and everything going down the drains.
 
That's how it looks to me too.

People are getting all emotional about Trump on all sides and either fall into outrage or mindless loyalty. This then leads to simplistic takes, like "he's been an evil psyop all along" to "trust the plan" and so on.

I think what we could observe, which is also aligned with what the Cs said over the years, is this: Trump was NOT a Deep State cutout unlike most presidents, and all recent ones. He was a genuine populist, therefore a wildcard, and the Deep State fought him tooth and nail with propaganda, phony lawfare, election rigging, and finally the attempt to take him out.

This had been enough for most people, including us, to root for him - not because he's some sort of savior or even will be able to do much good (if any), but because he represented a sort of "breaking of the system", both rhetorically, via his erratic "fluidity" and via the reaction by the Deep State he provoked - a great "unveiling". This has always been Trump's main positive effect, even to this day.

Now that never meant he was a great guy, he always was a bombastic Narcissist with questionable morals, to say the least. But objectively, he was a wildcard, a thorn in the Deep State's side, a mainstreamer of common sense, and a "great revealer" both consciously and by accident. He also had good intentions ("he will try" as the Cs said) to do something good for the US, misguided as it may have always been. Which is little, but tellingly enough to send the entire establishment into a frenzy.

Then when the Butler thing failed, and apparently taking him out wasn't an option anymore, the PTB switched gears in an effort to use him for their purposes. How do you do that? Easy: you put blackmail-pressure on him while simultaneously exploiting his weak, narcissistic psychology. You surround him with manipulative whisperers, sideline everyone who exhibits at least some sanity (and kill Charlie to make an example of what happens when you try to have the "wrong" influence on him), while maximizing the blackmail pressure. Because you know that Trump in his narcissism and Dunning-Kruger won't "grow to the occasion" (unlike a JFK or RFK) but rather, to shield himself from the reality that he has become a powerless tool for destruction, escapes into ever-crazier fantasy worlds where he's the "peace president" and genius negotiator etc. The blackmail-pressure also makes him even less able to think straight.

So they got their precious Iran war, and perhaps it indeed took a Trump to get us there. On the positive side, this whole mess, coupled with the erraticness and as a result all kinds of admissions by the Trump admin, has only accelerated the "great unveiling". I cannot help but think this is part of the long-term plan of a Cosmic Rebalancing, including the possible destruction of Israel in the long term the Cs hinted at (sort of the cosmos doing its thing).

So, while we can be morally repulsed by Trump's behavior, we should also look at it coldly, from a more objective, "cosmic" position, as part of the natural process. The bad guys might be using Trump, but he also is a conduit for chaotic, but necessary changes.

This is essentially the same conclusion I've come to, personally, as I've been watching all this unfold from the sidelines. I see Trump as an agent of change -- a catalyst whose personal agenda is more or less inconsequential to the larger picture.

But while I'm on the subject of Trump's "personal agenda," one thing that piqued my interest a while back that I haven't seen mentioned on the forum was this somewhat off-the-cuff quote from him saying that he's heard he's at the "bottom of the totem pole" when it comes to getting into Heaven. He specifically stated that his push for peace between Russia and Ukraine was so he could hopefully save enough lives to give him a better chance.

I was so intrigued by this comment that I think about it regularly. Trump isn't one to be self-deprecating, so him expressing such a sentiment stands out to me. If taken literally (which seems appropriate, as Trump isn't a metaphorical speaker), I wonder who, exactly has told him that he's not heaven bound? It could simply be a case of his many detractors getting to him, but there is a sincerity to this quote that I just can't discount completely. It could also just be his own internal moral compass peeking out from the miasma of McDonald's and Diet Coke swirling within him, but again, I have a hard time believing he voluntarily self reflects. He has a gold toilet, for Pete's sake; I doubt he lets his mind wander into spiritual matters while sitting on it.
 
Back
Top Bottom