Session 21 March 2026

[seek10]

That lifespan of 8k wasn’t the normal, I believe they said 8k was the max that a human could stay alive not that it was the regular life span.

I remeber that. that's why I mentioned diff possibilities inlcuding the 8K (max.) possibility

Few options in interpreting:

• Their life span is too larger than 8K at that time - unlikely
• Other option is different type of reality. - implications of it are as vague as it could be.
• Another option is They didn't bother to create them immediately.
  • If we take 8K as life span, it will be 55K + 16K = 71 K BCE , Approximation to 68K BCE.
  • If we take 2500 years life span, it will be 55K + 5K = 60K BCE
    • According to Cayce, the motivation to create the new technology is invading Beasts. most probably, that is after 68K BCE as that involves all sorts of destructions and volcanic eruptions etc.

Other day, I was watching video on Sumerian kings list. They have long life spans before flood (Antediluvian - before deluge) and dramatic reduction of age after flood. Some interesting interpretation based on their 60 base (they call it sars - 3,600 years) math calculations.

• King ages vary from maximum 48K. Total of these kings 240K years. - sumerian Kings List wiki
• 
• After the flood, gods (4D STS -C's)came and gave knowledge. There is another video that say after that period, information came into control of priests as the technological development stopped with the flood. - The Sea-Men Who Taught Humanity Everything — And the Exact Moment They Were Sent Away

I suspect the length of sars changed over time and the writers of these sumerian tablets used uniform 60 base on to the past to interpret the oral tradition they got.

I see similar precedence in the Indian side.

• Yuga length started with 5 years (lunar calendar year - during pre-flood period when Vedic text was written and the survived tit bits were compiled later and packaged as books we see now ) , it changed over time ( after 6K BCE) and later lot of more variations came to accomodate the reality - 4 yugas, sub yugas, some transition periods(As a buffer) etc.
• Rama ( C's places him around 48 K BCE) from Valmiki Ramayan supposed to have lived 12K years. He belonged to Iksvakus dynasty. But, one looks at the Iksvakus dynasty list( only came from Puranic literature written much later - most probably after 2200 BCE) there some kings whose stories belong to YD period
  • Ex: Bhagiratha (Ancestor of Rama) bringing Ganga (river) to earth story - most probably that is Mars dumping water vapor on the earth - 10.7K BCE.
    • i.e. Puranic writers had clues of past through oral tradition and tried to organize it in tradition. But, the sequence of kings may not be exactly correct.

 

[Tuulikki]

Another amazing and insightful session. Thanks so much for everyone concerned. I can understand the comments of the C's regarding encouraging us to do the heavy lifting and not to expect answers on tap. My dad was of a likemind when it came to my maths homework. "If I do the work for you, you will never learn to do it yourself". At that point - late in the evening on the Sunday before the homework was due to be handed in on Monday morning, I just wanted him to do it for me....I never did learn to do it for myself....

I have been mulling over the Trump fiasco a lot lately. I suppose he is the useful idiot that needed to be POTUS at this time in order for the situation with Iran to take root. I suppose whatever happens, it can always be said that the president was not in his right mind when he made these far reaching and insane decisions. Can anyone imagine this situation occuring with the likes of Obama in a position of power?

And another thing that makes me wonder is: if psychopaths are just minions and tools, when why not suicide Epstein for real? Why go through all this trouble to get him out, keep him alive, and relocate him to South America?

I still cannot figure out why Epstein was shipped out instead of being killed in a suicide situation. He obviously had a massive hold over many elite persons but just killing him would end possible blackmail and threats. Was he considered a useful enabler who could be put to evil work in South America and too good to lose? Did he have "friends" in high places who felt "kindly" toward him.

 

[JEEP]

Forgot to post this in my last entry:

I stumbled upon this weather forecast yesterday, waited a bit to post because i have no records about this guy expertise but it seems that there is already some action going on in the middle east sky.

The gods are angry - very angry!

BTW, a high of 81 degrees F today, and 44 tomorrow here in central Ohio, and lows still in the 20s. The spring blooms being fried and frozen.

The Daily Show's Jon Stewart:

As many of you know, war is god's way to teach Americans geography . . . and class is in session!

 

[T.C.]

Can anyone imagine this situation occuring with the likes of Obama in a position of power?

The deadly US foreign policy continued under Obama, so it’s not like Obama wasn’t an easily manipulated useful idiot. It seems to be a matter of public record that Obama’s attitude towards both the Ukraine and Iran was that it was a bad idea because both countries had escalation dominance and winning either war would be logistically impossible.

So the question then is, “why now?”

I think there may be many answers on that. Probably the main one is that for whatever reason, the timing wasn’t right? It’s not like Obama is squeaky clean and can’t be threatened and blackmailed, or any other previous president for that matter.

It strikes me as significant that the Russians are wiping the floor with Ukraine now. I do wonder if the puppet masters felt that if they were ever going to attack Iran, this was their last chance, whilst Russia was still militarily committed to the SMO. If they didn’t and Russia completed its SMO objectives, their military and political aid to Iran would make an attack on them unthinkable.

Maybe for all the power the Israelis have over the US, they’ve been kept on a leash for years when it came to Iran. We know that the assassination attempt on Trump was intended to be the trigger event for attacking Iran if it had been successful, so they’ve been trying to set this up for a long time before Feb this year. The 12 day war last year and the more recent attempt at protest-fomenting and infiltration in Iran also shows that they’ve been desperate for a while to make it happen.

Maybe ‘a window is closing’, or something like that. Not just temporally, but dimensionally too.

 

[Josi]

(irjO) Are human parts introduced into processed food in the United States?

A: Sometimes.

Q: (Andromeda) Why?

A: Sometimes it is accidental. Sometimes it is intentional. But it is not very common.

I have seen the video. It is hard to find as it is taken down often., but here is a short audio clip and quote from " Interview Rabbi Abraham Finkelstein and Pastor James Wickstrom". FWIW.

https://www.tiktok.com/video/7251952512842943786

 

[unkl brws]

Great session and a great education! Thank you.

Another amazing and insightful session. Thanks so much for everyone concerned. I can understand the comments of the C's regarding encouraging us to do the heavy lifting and not to expect answers on tap. My dad was of a likemind when it came to my maths homework. "If I do the work for you, you will never learn to do it yourself". At that point - late in the evening on the Sunday before the homework was due to be handed in on Monday morning, I just wanted him to do it for me....I never did learn to do it for myself....

Agreed. It feels like the training wheels have come off the bike and that is when the ride becomes interesting...maybe even fun!

 

[nortkee]

I think it has to do with what Laura wrote about EEQT. Basically, when an observer makes and effort to come closer to understanding the objective state of a system, that system responds to the observation itself - by becoming more orderly. On the converse, when an observer sees the situation more subjectively or less accurately, the flawed understanding affects the system by creating more chaos. So it is in the primacy of consciousness, made real in our act of seeing and understanding - with the importance of making a well-informed commitment to the state of whatever system we are viewing - that is our primary contribution to reality shaping.

The advice given in this session seems to be that we should invest ourselves more in theories. It's almost like an invitation to play the 3D game - 'for keeps', and not hold back. If one is observing reality, and doesn't 'invest' and just sits around and waits for the answers or stays suspended in the inherent fallibility of 'we can never know for sure' - there is no risk. Where's the burning question, the wonder, the curiousity, the gamble, the spice of life in that? recall J.G. Bennett wrote about hazard... without risk, there is nothing on the line. Choice, meaning, and virtue are drained of their significance as a result.

Thinking about it through the lens of the Parable of the Talents, if we look explore reality, gather data, and construct a cohesive narrative, then commit to that narrative - but don't stake some amount of our Being on it - perhaps our talents are not being invested? No risk and no reward? Perhaps it could be said that only in the context of losing something that anything can be meaningful be gained. So there is a line of action - observation, gathering data, thinking, struggling to formulate a theory or narrative, investment in it, which is an investment of our Being, based on our Knowledge, then networking about it, continuing to observe, correcting it, fine-tuning, or throwing it out completely, etc. All of this will ideally contribute to an orderly shift in the smaller systems we are observing, possible scaling up to the grand System itself.

The personal benefit of this, in addition to exercising the ol' brain muscle, is also the blessing of being wrong and being corrected. Maybe a strange blessing in a forum that's very highly focused on the truth and objective reality. But I think investing, assigning probability, and then being wrong, being told that one is wrong, or being proven wrong by events, and wrestling with that, trying to discern if we are actually are wrong or not, and coming to that decision after deliberation, and admitting to oneself that one was wrong, feeling the burn of it - this is maybe one of the best ways to build character that I can think of. And as such, it'll shape our personal reality, too, in a very beneficial way IMO.

To piggyback off of that, my husband recently mentioned that he read about an experiment where human brain cells were put onto a computer chip and then learned to play the video game DOOM at expert levels within a week, which illustrated the human brain's natural drive to seek order in chaos.

I found this article, which gives some additional context and notes an earlier study where both mouse and human brain cells were taught to play Pong by a similar method. The results appear to confirm that human brains are especially gifted at adapting to new information and adjusting future behavior based on the same:

"Third, and perhaps most striking: human cortical cells initially performed worse than mouse cortical cells before reversing to significantly outperform them. In the first five minutes of gameplay, human cortical cells (HCCs) showed lower rally lengths than mouse cortical cells (MCCs) and even the media-only baseline. The authors interpret this initial underperformance as possible exploratory behavior — a period of active sampling of the environment before the system settles on a strategy. By the final 15 minutes, HCCs had reversed the trend and significantly outperformed all control groups. To the authors’ knowledge, this is the first empirical demonstration that human cortical neurons exhibit greater adaptive learning capacity than their rodent counterparts under equivalent conditions."

It's a very interesting article, but I haven't had the time to do more than skim it for relevant information relating to this post. From what I've gathered based off my initial scan, it sounds like the human brain is far more capable of interpreting failure and making the appropriate changes for the future than mice (unsurprising) and even AI (at least in its current, publicly available form).

To bring it back around to the advice given by the Cs in this session, just because our human brains are especially equipped to gather, evaluate, analyze, and evolve based upon environmental data, we still have to actively make the effort to do this consistently and effectively. However, as biological beings, we are always going to seek ways to conserve energy, so placing our trust in "experts" (either human, interdimensional, or AI) and deferring to their apparent authority seems like a natural way to do so. I think the Cs are essentially encouraging us to become our own experts wherever we can, and network with others as peers wherever possible to fill in any knowledge gaps.

In so doing, perhaps we expand our shared reality, which then ripples out into the larger reality, potentially affecting positive change on a greater scale.

 

[T.C.]

I have seen the video. It is hard to find as it is taken down often., but here is a short audio clip and quote from " Interview Rabbi Abraham Finkelstein and Pastor James Wickstrom". FWIW.

https://www.tiktok.com/video/7251952512842943786

Have you done any research on the veracity of this?

 

[ianvr]

I am worried where this Iran war will lead. More importantly, if we are about to go into WW3 for, who knows how long, what can I do to plan for things to come?

I mean, where will be safe? What can I do to plan and prepare for energy shortages, food shortages, disinformation etc? Will every nation and person being dragged into this war?

Will it be safe to pick “sides”? Will I have a choice or will I be “dragged” into whatever our own government support?

I am asking these questions for my family and friends, how to prepare for and If the worst happens…

 

[Thassa]

The parts I found most interesting:

__________

1) ...a Chinese guy, who does the analyses, he's kind of like a historian... (Scottie) Professor Jiang. (L) Yeah, Professor Jiang or whatever, where he's talking about how dreadful things are going to be and that it's going to be fairly quick and in some places quicker than others because they're all messed up and we're all screwed.

[ His name is Jiang Xueqin ]

___________

2) ...an interview on the Jeremy… what's his name… Corbell? And he was talking to Matthew, Matthew something or other, one of the whistleblowers. (Approaching Infinity) Brown. (L) And, you know, he made the remark at some point that he gets up and cries nearly every morning because humanity is not doing what they need to be doing and we're starting to - not his exact words - but basically escape the fate that is awaiting us because of what these various whistleblowers are saying.

___________

3) Trump with his ear getting nicked and... (Joe) The rabbis are all over that. In the Talmud, the Talmud says that, you know, a servant who wants to remain with his master has to have his ear pierced.

[ what a weird coincidence! ]

____________

4) What was the reason for Netanyahu's apparent absence from meetings over the last two weeks?

A: Wait and see!

Q: (Joe) Okay, is Netanyahu dead?

A: No dice.

...what possible reason could he have for disappearing and his son stopping posting...

___________

5) What's the reason behind the recent mass cattle extermination in Russia? Background: A couple of weeks ago people started to report cases of cattle extermination at local farms by authorities in several regions of Russia...

____________

6) What are the key elements required for AI developing some kind of consciousness?

A: Developing some kind of independent metabolism.

Q: (Mandatory Intellectomy) What abilities would this give the AI beyond what it does now?

A: Self- replication without oversight.

Q: (Mandatory Intellectomy) When talking about "conscious AI", are we talking about large language models (LLMs)?

A: No

Q: (Mandatory Intellectomy) Something more advanced that is not available to the public?

A: Yes

____________

7) William Neil McCasland, retired commander of the Air Force Research Laboratory at Wright- Patterson Air Force Base, was last seen on February 27th 2026... Monica Jacinto Reza, aerospace engineer...

____________

8) Jacob Prichard killed his wife Jaymee and also Jaime Gustitus and then killed himself. All three were research employees of Wright- Patterson Air Force Base.


____________

9) Khara- Khora cave is in Kabardino- Balkaria, Russia's North Caucasus... after a landslide, local residents discovered an underground cave that goes deep into the mountain, with straight and polished narrow... Who built it?

A: Descendants of Kantek.

...What was it used for?

A: Part of a power generator.

Q: (Joe) Was it similar in function to the pyramids of Giza?

A: Yes Q: (Joe) So, are there many kinds of structures like that buried around the planet that are undiscovered?

A: A few. Such power generators did not require multiplicity.

Q: (L) So one...

(Niall) They were that powerful.

(Andromeda) Didn't need that many.


__________


10) I would like to know what kind of physics I need to describe densities. What kind of math? How to get to densities? A: Geometric algebra. Q: (Ark) Geometric algebra. Finite dimensional or infinite dimensional? Can you help me? A: Infinite. Q: (Ark) Do I need quantum theory mathematics for this? A: Not much. Quantum theory, for the most part, describes elements of 3rd density and lower. Q: (Ark) Well, are these densities... should they be treated like phases, like water can be as an ice, or as a liquid, or as a gas? A: Yes Q: (Ark) Okay. That gives me something to start. Okay, thank you.

[...]

(Ark) Geometric algebra can be over real numbers, complex numbers, quaternions, perhaps other fields. Can you help me with this? What kind of geometry? Real, complex, quaternions, octonions, all of them? A: Complex. Q: (Ark) Okay. Thank you.

[...]

(Ark) I need more precision: Geometric algebra, complex, infinite, dimensional. Infinite, countable or uncountable? A: Countable! Q: (Ark) All right.

______

11) What about April drop dead date? That was what, fifteen, ten years ago? (L) At least. And it was something about financial markets. (Joe) And we never got it. Is it still on the cards? Is the band gonna make it? [laughter] (L) Was that one of those predictions that was out of time sequence? A: Yes Q: (L) Do we still have an April drop dead date coming? A: Indeed! Q: (L) Is it going to be this year? A: Maybe.

_____________

12) Q: (JEEP) Is GEET energy transmuting technology worth pursuing? (L) What is GEET technology? (JEEP) It's a device that Paul Pantone invented [...] it's a device he puts on engines, and you put fuel in it that's liquid with maybe some oil or gas, very little. And it gets transmuted to like a plasma powering thing. [...] if we're short on energy, it sounds like it's something that could keep us going. [...]
A: Try it and see!


____________

12) A: Not really. Oil is abiotic.

 

[ryu]

As for self-sacrifice, that's too "low IQ brown-coded third worldism". The dude is commander in chief of the largest empire since Atlantis. Can't he find a dozen trusted agents to exfiltrate his family, give them new identities, and protect them? I sympathize with an average citizen with no power, but at this level, no sympathy.
AKA "the Ghost of Kuwait"

He is not the noble type that’s all. Self sacrifice just isn’t needed when you are a business man. But I am sure that if he could have put his family in safety, he would have done it. Also, his children are all in business and probably have ties to the deep state even if they are unaware. And even if they were, would they leave all their wealth and power behind? I doubt their is a place on the planet where they could hide should Trump reveal the blackmail he is under.