Session 21 March 2026

[OutSky]

That's not the Khara-Khora shaft. It looks like this:

Nope. It’ is a particular image of Khara-Hora according to the source seen linked in the post. Over there (in that site: msn.com), we can see other images of Khara-Hora similar to those seen in this forum and elsewhere. But the interesting to be focused here is the reality of the existence of this ancient site, as well its geographic local, and mostly the C’s statements as pointed out.​

 

[OutSky]

How do we know when a dream is either a useful signpost, or just deceptive? Well is not that a portion of the Work?!!!

^{—this Session: on March 21st 2026—}
A: ………………..Now, we should remind you that we are not here to underwrite your reality and understanding. That is not helpful to your growth and state of being. ………………..You might want to do research and review and network. Then you must assign probabilities and make a commitment to a probable conclusion. This is like exercising a muscle and makes you stronger. Do not clamor for the answers to everything that piques your curiosity. Sometimes you must wait for confirmation only after you have committed to a conclusion. Also, sometimes this is part of the reality shaping process. Do you understand?
………………..
A: You are doing well, but do more networking and thinking!!
………………..
A: Good night and sweet dreams to all! Goodbye.

Next is flashed a short dream —which can be seen in the following quotation— in essence produced at the time of this Session —and written down after 15 days past, or so. It is also pertinent to other threads, thus at least into another one there it is (eventually) quoted. For sure we are all learning, …should be said.

Meanders ^{(as titled this dream)}

Then we reach the roof of those buildings as if careless with the vertigo of such high heights. We are three, or perhaps should we be considered as a pair of close friends and the third one, a guy which we little knew.

Few moments before standing up in that place, that guy saw how I could do a lame though steady levitation one foot (~30 cm) above the ground —very usual in many of my dreams. Then for some (forgotten) reason the guy endangers himself climbing to the top of a tall building. While we are afraid he can plummet from one the skyscrapers then he makes even worst.

The guy somehow grabs a long pink scarf which is lightly coiled about a pinnacle —or antenna-like. Then he jumps from out of the roof to the empty space. But he goes so fast that acquires a centrifugal movement. So, he does not fall but instead horizontally convolutes around the antenna. The fragile rosy scarfed rope, which he holds, goes stretching till, lets say, 19 feet (6 meters). He whirls and whirls, lap after lap. However, little by little the rosy lace gets loose. At last we see how it sets free from its temporary axis and the guy goes away. But he plunges not to the ground but to the stars, and lost.

^{(1864) ”Within the Maelstrom” by Yan' Dargent} ​

We feel urged to rescue him, but he is completely out of sight. My pair looks at me and says, “Let’s go for him. He is stuck in the quadrant...” Also he calmly says to me, “Ignite now!” At the same moment —and never dreamed something like this before— he turns into like a kindled torch. Not surprised I try to do the same. I try again and again but nothing happens.

“Something is not working,” I tell him. He says, “Take this spark, and ignite with it.” He turns to my direction and triggers from his blazing body a spark that like a bullet hits me. The little spark strikes at me and indeed fills my chest in an intense but gentle way. But still nothing happens. He sends another spark. Again nothing further than the warm sensation.

He comments: “You must allow that the electrons reach you. I’ll send another spark to you.” I reply to him: “Oh that is not necessary. I understood now!!!” Then easily my whole being ignites like flames and we fly away to fulfill the rescue.
​

^{(And this remembered me the “spinning-painting”) —by Jules Breton, 1875—}​

​

Furthermore:

September 9, 1995 Session
A:………………..So, you see, as you already know, but we wish to reinforce this, there is so much to contemplate here that it is laughable when those around you refer to certain areas or star systems and claim that there are beings from here or there or wherever, and that their objective is this or that or the other. Because if you knew the TRUE nature of the universe, of All of the universe, of all possible realms, you would also know that any and all things are possible, and, in fact, DO exist! You must NOT forget this.

May 9, 1998 Session
Q: ………………..Recently there was some information about a VERY distant and intense explosion seen with the Hubble telescope... I am interested in what this was.
A: Reflection of other universe’s genesis.

Q: What other universe?
A: They all start, and end that way!

Q: (A) Other universe?
A: What is “big bang” Arkadiusz?

Q: (A) Well, it was a big bang, certainly, but it was in OUR universe and not some other universe...
A: But what was the origin? And from where? All is one and one is all.

Q: (A) What was the origin of what? Our universe? Or the origin of this explosion? Or the origin of everything?
A: Yes, yes, yes.

Q: (A) Okay. What was the origin of our universe. This I don’t know. This I want to know. This is okay to use just words, but if you use mathematical models...
A: That is where you come in.

Q: (A) Well, goody!
A: Each colossal begets its light to where there was no light. And where once there was all light!

Of the Garden of Roses at Worms — anonymous 13th-century ^{(1814 translation)}

Four portals to the garden lead, and when the gates are closed.
No living wight dare touch a rose, against his strict command opposed.
Whoever would break the golden gates, or cut the silken thread.
Or would dare to crush the flowers down beneath his tread.
Soon for his pride would leave to pledge a foot and hand :
Thus Laurin, king of dwarfs, rules within his land.​

The pink Whirlpool Galaxy​

 

[axj]

Nope. It’ is a particular image of Khara-Hora according to the source seen linked in the post. Over there (in that site: msn.com), we can see other images of Khara-Hora similar to those seen in this forum and elsewhere.

It is a stock photo of a salt mine:
https://www.istockphoto.com/photo/tunnel-in-salt-mine-gm1082736396-290423429

 

[Benjamin]

Netanyahoo probably has some power, but this group of Kabbalists who are actually running Mossad and probably other things seem to be his bosses. And since the lines blur at the 'apex of the 3D consortium' they may be receiving orders from their 4D STS bosses.

For fun, I watched this 3 day old video from Vrillium where he goes into Kabbalism and how people have interpreted this stuff. He explains that it is so convoluted that he has trouble making sense of it. This information is probably already known here but it's a comical watch. (33:06)

 

[OutSky]

It is a stock photo of a salt mine:

Okay, good search. Thus we all know that the site msn.com is fallible more than can be thought. Besides, as said:

….the interesting to be focused here is the reality of the existence of this ancient site, as well its geographic local, and mostly the C’s statements as pointed out.

And also was said:

For more on this structure there is also an earlier post that brings videos and other details.

Anyway, next is the fixed image (replacing the earlier one):​

Khara-Hora shaft in Kabardino-Balkaria of the Caucasian Russia.
^{For more on this structure there is also an earlier post that brings videos and other details.} ​

 

[Ruth]

Just because someone in a high level role isn’t important, doesn’t mean they’re not the boss. The boss of a company is in charge of running things but he can be fired or quit and someone else will just come in and do the job instead.

Then there's the difference between "power" and "authority". One is sanctioned and the other is hidden.

For example, the CEO of a company may have plenty of authority (which is given to him by his board of directors and the shareholders), but no actual power, if the receptionist at the front desk is blackmailing him, or any other employee, or outside person is blackmailing/influencing/controling him.

The same is true of Donald Trump. He has plenty of authority, but no power. The ultimate power in this particular relationship seems to lie with Israel and those that are behind them (4D STS).

 

[Ruth]

And what to say of the Homeric Scheria and its people, the “Phaecians,” which according to the C’s, were Caucasians in the present day area around St. Petersburg?

See, as told by Homer, Odysseus arrives in Scheria after the Trojan war. Scheria was then protected from any “common” men by a system sophisticated as much its fantastic ships that had no crew and worked merely via thought. Indeed Odysseus only could reach Scheria thanks to the help of the goddess Athena.

So in actual fact, the whole Trojan War thing might also have been an Atlantis "replay"? As well as Nazi Germany and WWII?

 

[Iggdrasil]

Я не уверен, что мы только что это обсуждали. В Крыму много пещерных городов, например Эски-Кермен, Чуфут-Кале и так далее. Их относят к VI веку, но я не уверен, что у них были технологии, позволяющие создавать в скалах нечто подобное.

 

[Iggdrasil]

Я не уверен, что мы только что это обсуждали. В Крыму много пещерных городов, например Эски-Кермен, Чуфут-Кале и так далее. Их относят к VI веку, но я не уверен, что у них были технологии, позволяющие создавать в скалах нечто подобное.

View attachment 117847

View attachment 117848

Sorry about Russian. I've said
I'm not sure we discussed this yet. There are many cave cities in Crimea, for example, Eski-Kermen, Chufut-Kale, and so on. They are dated to the sixth century, but I'm not sure they had the technology to create something like that in the rocks.

 

[palestine]

Then there's the difference between "power" and "authority"

Thanks you @Ruth I have been (unconsciously) trying to find an answer to this. In French, "authority" relates to power, so I would still be headed for another word. A boss of a company, having "authority", has some power I think - but that's a "IMO" :)

Thinking of that matter, several things appear and it is rather complex. I understand casual thinking makes us indiscriminatedly use a term, for Netanyahu - and that it is correct - but that it does not reflect the reality. So one matter here is possibly that our common words are not sufficient to describe reality. Let me try to show this:

One definition of authority:

the power or right to give orders, make decisions, and enforce obedience.

a person or organization having political or administrative power and control.

So it's a bit both. Next I had a look at synonyms of authority - and found:

jurisdiction

sovereignty

Sometimes, people in power are not representative of the power that outflows from them. This constitutes an obstacle to our understanding, because we are used to use common qualificatives who are meant for usual models.

The matter with B. Netanyahu is that he allegedly has the official power (he's elected, people believe he has much might). In fact, he doesn't, and he reports and obeys to another "hierarchical" authority. This constitutes a problem in regard of "our 3D world & customs": are there words precisely describing this? "Machiavellian politics"... There must exist some. "Puppet", "dictator", "totalitarianism" are frequent ones that I have been stumbling upon, along the course of reading main stream articles. But I have to admit that pathocracy may be a "fit".

I think another problem is to know if Netanyahu "agrees" with this external source of power. If yes, this power and Netanyahu are aligned. If not, the word pathocratic would be of use, because it precisely describes a hijack of power via the official political representative.

Otherwise - B. netanyahu is a straight "extension" of this external power.

I think overall (perhaps not overall the big matter - but one matter): let us remind ourselves that most people don't know about this - so the matter here is to be able to convey a sort of vulgar translation of the reality of Netanyahu, to others, with appropriate words, and perhaps to hint at the few signs showing he's not in charge at all. We have to communicate with others, do some journalistic work & overall remain aligned with reality. We'd have to operate a sort of translation between what we know and what we say to others.

The data we have:

_ Netanyahu
_ _ Kabbalists
_ _ _ 4D STS

In other words:
- does Netanyahu agree with the Kabbalists? With the 4D STS?
- do the Kabbalists agree with the 4D STS

STS is a bit "I want it all" - "no cake for others". I doubt Netanyahu & the Kaballists are on the list, for 4D STS.

I assume Kabbalists perform magic so that they more or less know what sorts of power they are mobilizing. But - they may lack awareness as to the evolution of "manipulating STS forces". This is a no-go road for humans, and ultimately they will have to walk the road the opposite way. I think they cannot short-wire 4D STS spirits and would either be "eaten", or failed by STO.

So - this power that appears at Netanyahu - already went through succesive and various stages. It is "power" but at this stage, the qualificative of "conduit" may fit Netanyahu. A "vector" perhaps?

As stated, the words "authority", "boss", "politician" - perfectly fit but the matter is that they don't account for reality. This is a problem. This is a problem because reality matters more than nomenclature (because we want to know how things are, in the first place. Second comes labelling, descriptivity and wording; I think not the opposite way).

People let me kindly know (if what I wrote makes sense) about this idea, that I consider an "issue", if pleased to. The matter may be completely different than this.

And of course, I think words exist and that they should not be discarded, or branded as "bad". It's juts that there seems to exist situations that make some official words "unfit"; so, the basic language is not "bad" but "may need refining to match several instances"; it has to deal with exceptions - so, new words!