Another example is this:
I used to listen to pop music in English while not speaking that language very well - basically I didn't understand the lyrics.
Some of these songs I liked very much and felt quite attached to in a positive sense - uplifting, calming, making me feel optimistic, alleviating my blues, making me feel more connected etc.
Years later, after having learnt the English language, I noticed, that many of these lyrics were completely idiotic, if not outright bad. It put me off these songs, but I still harbour this past connection to them, remembering the positive effect it had on me ...
Now, I am supposed to negate these positive effects now? I think not ...
To come back to the musical ad: Everything is "manipulated" to some extent, having a motive that is self-serving, if only being to earn a living. But does that necessarily make it bad?
Maybe the Law of Threes applies here: There is good, there is bad, and then there is the precise situation that makes it thus ...
I used to listen to pop music in English while not speaking that language very well - basically I didn't understand the lyrics.
Some of these songs I liked very much and felt quite attached to in a positive sense - uplifting, calming, making me feel optimistic, alleviating my blues, making me feel more connected etc.
Years later, after having learnt the English language, I noticed, that many of these lyrics were completely idiotic, if not outright bad. It put me off these songs, but I still harbour this past connection to them, remembering the positive effect it had on me ...
Now, I am supposed to negate these positive effects now? I think not ...
To come back to the musical ad: Everything is "manipulated" to some extent, having a motive that is self-serving, if only being to earn a living. But does that necessarily make it bad?
Maybe the Law of Threes applies here: There is good, there is bad, and then there is the precise situation that makes it thus ...