Session 23 August 2025

Sorry out of context, tell me, please, where I could ask a questions for the next session?

Or maybe it was yet somewhere, I'm about the tables of years in Sumerian and Egyptian texts. They say about Sumerian something close


Alulim8 sars (28,800 years) or
18 sars and 4 ners (67,200 years)

In Egyptian first God's dynasty the periods are in the thousands years, but less (1–10 thousand years). How could be compared those dates? And how could be right values Sumerian sars and ners?
 
The following post is from the french's section thread by @Jean-Luc , here's a machine translation:

Hello everyone.

I'd like to follow up on Musicinventor's cancer. His diet is wrong: cancer cells feed on carbohydrates, you have to adopt a ketogenic diet and stick to it no matter what. Ivermectin is less effective in the presence of carbohydrates. Jane Mclelland's book « Starving Cancer » is a must-read. Having suffered from three cancers, one of which was due to overdosed chemotherapy, she proposes a protocol of drugs and food supplements that starve cancer, but the ketogenic diet she followed was absolutely crucial in guaranteeing the effectiveness of her protocol. The drugs she proposes, such as metformin, Dipirydamole and Doxycycline, can be found on Indian lab websites.

The original post:

Bonjour à tous.
Je voudrais revenir sur le cancer de Musicinventor. Son régime alimentaire ne va pas: les cellules cancéreuses se nourrissent de glucides, il faut adopter un régime cétogène et s'y tenir coûte que coûte. L'ivermectine est moins efficace en présence de glucides. Il faut absolument lire le livre de Jane Mclelland : Affamer le cancer. Ayant été atteinte de trois cancers dont un dû à une chimiothérapie trop dosée, elle propose un protocole de médicaments et de compléments alimentaires qui affament le cancer, mais le régime cétogène quelle a suivi a été absolument crucial pour garantir l'efficacité de son protocole. Les médicaments qu'elle propose comme la metformine, le Dipirydamole ou la Doxycycline sont trouvables sur internet sur des sites de labo indiens.

And a little clarification:

and SDA stands for "service d'autres"
In fact the actual meaning of SDA in french is "services des autres", which has a slightly different meaning.
 
The following post is from the french's section thread by @Jean-Luc , here's a machine translation:



The original post:


And a little clarification:


In fact the actual meaning of SDA in french is "services des autres", which has a slightly different meaning.

Thank you for clarifying! I appreciate it. Service des autres, I'll remember it now.
 
A: The extreme negative charge building on your planet.

Q: (Joe) Negative charge doesn't necessarily mean negative in the way we... Does it mean literally negative, or does it mean negative or positive electrical charge?

(L) Does it mean negative in the sense of evil?

A: Partly, yes.

Q: (L) Does it also refer to such as say, electricity, or some kind of other cosmic energy?

A: Latter.

Q: (L) So it's negative cosmic energy of some sort?

A: Yes

Not sure if this is related, but James O'Keefe just shared the following creepy dream he had on Sept 10th, the same day Charlie Kirk was assassinated:

True Story: I had a dark nightmare recently. The landline phone next to my bedside table rang, and it was some type of demon who said, “I’m in your basement.” I sprung up from the bed, unable to determine if that really happened or if I was dreaming. For a full 15 seconds, my hands ran alongside the blanket to try to see if this was reality or still that nightmare. I looked at the bedside, and there was no landline phone, and only then did I realize it was just a dream. Whatever that voice was, it was the most haunting tone of voice I’ve ever heard in my life. This dream occurred early in the morning, September 10th, 330am.


https://x.com/JamesOKeefeIII
 
A: The extreme negative charge building on your planet.

Q: (Joe) Negative charge doesn't necessarily mean negative in the way we... Does it mean literally negative, or does it mean negative or positive electrical charge?

(L) Does it mean negative in the sense of evil?

A: Partly, yes.

Q: (L) Does it also refer to such as say, electricity, or some kind of other cosmic energy?

A: Latter.

Q: (L) So it's negative cosmic energy of some sort?

A: Yes




I have been feeling it hard with friends and family. Bad news, really bad news...
I am trying to not take it personally and save my sanity. It's very hard. I understand the game, knowing that we have lessons to learn BUT we are in 3D with our own programs. Damn programs!
 
Laura said:
Q: (L) Was this STS vs STO forces?

A: No. STS vs STS.

Q: (L) So they fight amongst themselves?

A: Yes!

I was surprised by this statement, and yet not at all. Since most of the time, I thought that in 4D there were ‘fights’ between the SDS and SDA. But when I thought about this affirmation that even between the different groups in the SDS there were wars, I realised that it made perfect sense, since they are ‘beings’ who want to have control or power over 3D civilisations. However, I am curious to know if the reason for this conflict, where our world is coveted by other ‘factions’, is so that they in turn can have control over the nourishment that our emotions bring them, or simply for the resources of our planet?🤔

Interesting.
I would say that the fight between them (STS vs STS), is a power struggle where the spoils they dispute is precisely, the control of the resources of our planet, as you said.

And the food they can get from our negative emotions, can be seen as one of those coveted resources (I guess among others) they find on this planet.

In that sense, I find that the way your question is phrased, puts two options as possible grounds for dispute in 4 STS, when in reality, one of those options is part of or within the other.
That is, a good food source is within the resources of this planet for them.
Or that's how I understand it.

It also occurs to me, totally speculating, that those fierce STS vs. STS confrontations in 4D, may be very similar to when here in 3D, a group of criminals shoot it out with another group disputing some territory. This is very frequent when it comes to drug sales, just to give an example.
But to sum it up, I think ultimately the STS vs. STS battles are about positions of power and/or hierarchy.

I think a lot of what happens here in 3D, could give us some idea of what happens in 4D, to a certain extent.

I'm remembering for example, that here in 3D there are always those endless fights for the ports.
Places conducive to the arrival and departure of huge ships, especially from one continent to another, are highly coveted by the different power groups in this world. They fight each other for these strategic locations.

Even what in Geography we know as political maps, which throughout history suffer many changes, many times these changes were directly related to the “natural ports”. Depending on who would dominate this or that port, which is related to the outcome of the battle, new political and/or territorial maps are modified or drawn.

This fight for the natural ports in 3D, is what comes to my mind when I think of battles in 4D, STS against STS, remembering the existence of a great “Dimensional Portal” in Mexico and another one that competes with it in Ukraine.

Could it be that in 4D STS are also fighting for dominance of these portals, similar to the 3D battles for dominance of natural harbors?

Translated with DeepL.com (free version)
 
I would say that the fight between them (STS vs STS), is a power struggle where the spoils they dispute is precisely, the control of the resources of our planet, as you said.

And the food they can get from our negative emotions, can be seen as one of those coveted resources (I guess among others) they find on this planet.
Laura’s article on Michael Topper’s Précis on the Good and the Evil speaks to this battle of factions within STS, all vying for the top. Here are some relevant excerpts, worth reading in full though:
Laura said:
The higher density positive entities are light beings. The higher density negative entities are “light eaters.” Love is light is knowledge. When they induce belief against what is objectively true, they have “eaten” the light-knowledge of the person who has chosen blind belief over fact! When you believe a lie, you have allowed the eating of your energy of awareness! When you do not take the time and trouble to check things out for yourself, to do the research, to compare, to network, to get a consensus, you have given away your power. You have failed in the creative act of learning.

There is an immediate psychic bond produced by belief. There is an instantaneous linkage and interpenetration with the individual who has chosen to believe a lie. The higher-dimensional beings have subtle, vertical filamental axes fixed on human beings. Those subtle nerve-networks process radiant-energy values, drawn in through the etheric “chakras” of the higher-dimensional systems, represented by the pineal/pituitary glands.

The consciousness of that being is literally fed and magnified by the number and relative strength of the subordinate souls who have been voluntarily subsumed to the network. The greater the development of the psychic potentials of the individual who has been co-opted, the more “energy” he contributes to the whole system. The more psychic energy available to the “Commander” of the negative soul hierarchy, the greater his effective power to co-opt even more potent and more difficult to capture souls.

As far as the beings of the lower levels of the STS hierarchy are aware, their objective is to crystallize under artificial pressure of economics, a global power elite structure of indigenous and alien beings that will completely dominate the earth and its inhabitants, thus making it a captured negative resource to “feed” the hierarchy.

This is what the 4th density STS beings perceive. This is their goal. This is all they know: ruthlessness and domination, power and control. The REAL objective is, of course, concealed from them. The even higher density tiers of the Negative hierarchy deliberately distort and mask the character of their objectives from the lower planes of “subordinate functionaries” that are viewed by them as a regimented machinery of beings serving as expendable cogs in an Engine of Conquest. […]

The Objective – the ultimate total destruction that is desired by the Being at the Apex – the total consumption of even it’s minions – is masked from the higher density negative beings below it. The lower levels may “feel” or “sense” the looming black hole of absolute annihilation as they mount through the hierarchy, but the immediate pleasures of their feeding-frenzies keep them occupied, reinforcing the discouragement of the idea of looking any deeper into the Heart of Darkness proclaiming its gospel of Oneness and which has no qualms about making food out of even THEM!

Because the STO contingent honors and conserves the realization of consciousness in all forms and under all conditions, it has greater resources to sustain creation. It has access to an even more powerful allegiance of unified conscious resolve and collective intent so that the negative hierarchy is met with resistance at every turn. And this STO resistance is a great deal more in harmony and alignment with the Logoic pattern so that it possesses the sum value of the Creative as Its enforcement.

The negative hierarchy, however, because of its intrinsic nature, must “borrow” the creative extensions and waking tools-of-being as much as anything or anyone else while, at the same time, being antagonistic toward them! In short, its intrinsic nature is that of self-loathing from which it must continually flee, requiring more and more energy to protect it from its own “truth.”
 
Back
Top Bottom