Session 24 January 2026

[Mark7]

Rejoice always, pray without ceasing, give thanks in all circumstances; for this is the will of God in Christ Jesus for you. Do not quench the Spirit. Do not despise prophecies, but test everything; hold fast what is good. Abstain from every form of evil.

Don't be close-minded, but question everything, be like the geese that can drink the milk and spit out the water. Knowledge protects.

Thanks for the revealing session.

 

[Andrew]

Why is it needed though? Why were the dinosaurs needed?

I assume life on Earth was installed for a reason. But maybe it evolved, and humans were installed (for a reason). But if dinosaurs were installed for a reason, I wonder what.

I feel like this is related to the question from @Professor Chaos.

(L) Yeah, there's not too much that can be done even by microevolution. It can refine something, but it usually just breaks things. In order to give it a little more clarity, my thought was that in the beginning, somebody was experimenting on this planet. And if you look there are these vast ages of one thing, or just one type of thing, and then the next age of something a little more advanced... For a period of time, the whole planet was covered with whatever it was, and then, BOOM! Extinction. Then for a period, it was covered with another thing then BOOM! Extinction. At each level, you can see that everything is increasing in complexity and variety. So yes, it gives the impression of evolution, and in a way, it is: it is evolving in the minds of the 4D creators/engineers and they keep trying new things. And yes, there is the appearance of common descent because, in fact, there is “common descent” in that when the engineers find something that works, they use the template, even the DNA, again and again. So, somebody was learning how to build things. Somebody was freakin' practicing! Then they say, "Oh, that was handy! Let's use that for this!" Remember, the Cs said that human beings lead the DNA smorgasbord parade of all that exists on this planet. We've got genes that are in worms and flies and fish and apes and whatever. That used to really upset me when they would say stuff like that. It would really gross me out. But it's true. We share many genes with so many other families and species. That's because those parts worked in a certain way and did certain things that were wanted, and the 4D engineers used them again and again, modifying this or that, but basically, the DNA instructions have to be the same because it’s an information code.

The C's also said:

A: In 4D, eventually it will be your job to engineer lifeforms on new worlds.

 

[Bernardo GA]

Many thanks to the whole team for putting together and sharing this wonderful session.

An idea popped into my head wondering if there was a connection to early music being produced electronically with the military. Surprisingly, it seems that that's it's (in?)direct origins. I thought it was really interesting.

That connection you just made seems excellent and very insightful to me.
The fact that electronic “music” has been linked since its origins to the activities of the military-industrial complex, with all that that implies, is truly significant.
It fits perfectly with the anti-human treatment that humanity receives from 4D STS.
But let's remain true to our soul nature, with faith, because this nightmare cannot last forever.

A: Pray without ceasing. The universe is very aware. Goodbye

 

[Good Optics]

Thank you very much for the session. Lots of questions. On the discussion that ensued at the end, I have had some thoughts on how densities can be framed to be better understood by us and wrote a substack on it as below. It might make greater sense to the technically minded. Note that it was written with ChatGPT's help.

A Virtualisation Hypothesis for Densities, Time, and the Infinite Nature of Creation

I have been in tech field for long enough to understand how systems work and in a semi-conscious way, trying to apply some of my field learnings to the reality itself.

sidho.substack.com

I think this might actually be conceptually correct. "Infinite Mind" is a concept I more-or-less created by and for myself, to begin with. The matter though has been to so much as begin to be able to explain it to anyone else. This work is something of a start. Thank you

 

[panoptix]

Reminded me of this exchange from June 13, 2015:

(Perceval) They said there are some types of music that are listened to by certain types of people... Certain types of emo music or whatever that certain types of young people listen to, like outsiders or loners and that kind of thing, and those people could be tracked as candidates for "use"...
A: The 70's were the time of development of such concepts and technologies. The 80's were the period when implementation became more widespread. At present 90 percent of broadcast music has corrupting elements.

Q: (Pierre) So we have to listen to old music. Music from before the 70's. Or classical music.
(L) Obviously we need to be paying much closer attention to our musical tastes, and analyzing what it is about songs that we like. And obviously, we need to pay a lot more attention to what we listen to in the background. But that means I'm safe since I only listen to old classic rock like Bob Seger, whose music is the best! [laughter]

Although these questions happened in the context of this question: "Is the NSA using musical tastes and downloads to track and identify certain 'types'?", we can also see that the synthesizer began to be commercially sold in 1971 (again that year!), matching perfectly with the advent and development of technologies to "track" and perhaps "use" (program and later trigger) people.

Very interesting. Perhaps you can help me with this exchange from 7 May, 2016:

(L) I'm not terribly interested in this other bunch of questions... Lemme move to this one:

I found this article that sums up a widespread belief about digital vs analog audio, IE CD vs turntable.

I have tested many thousands of phonograph recordings made over a period of more than eighty years, and have found that almost most examples have been therapeutic, often highly so.[3] In 1979 this changed. I suddenly found that I was not achieving the same therapeutic results as before, that playing records of the same compositions to the same patients was producing a completely contrary effect! Instead of their stress being reduced and their Life Energy being actuated, the opposite was occurring! For instance, music that I had long used to promote sleep now seemed to be actually aggravating the insomnia. I found in one case that instead of the music helping a patient withdraw from tranquilizers, it seemed to increase his need for them. Special tapes for businesspeople to use during their rest periods seemed suddenly to increase rather than reduce their stress. These findings were very alarming.

When I investigated these and many other paradoxical phenomena, I found that in all cases they were related to the use of digital recordings. These were vinyl records (and later CDs) made from digital masters.[4] When I substituted analog versions of the same work, sometimes even with the same performers, the positive therapeutic effects were again obtained. There seemed to me little doubt that something was “wrong” with the digital process. Apparently the digital recording technique not only did not enhance Life Energy and reduce stress, but it was actually untherapeutic; that is, it imposed a stress and reduced Life Energy. Through some mechanism, some severely detrimental effect on the Acupuncture Emotional System, the digital process was somehow reversing the therapeutic effects of the music!

A: If one is depending on a 3rd density effect, analog is best. If one is attempting to tap higher or "other" realms, digital is more likely to capture the effect.

Q: (L) So if you just want a 3rd density thing like giving somebody drugs or something, you use something analog like records that deliver actual physical vibrations or whatever to the individual. But if you're trying to capture or transmit other realms or other-density effects and so forth, then digital is better. Let's face it, if you're trying to make a recording of ghosts for example, and you leave some kind of recording device in a haunted house and it is supposed to make a record, that would require a kind of cross-density type of energy that would be pretty momentous, I think. It's mechanical. So mechanical effects happen with analog. Digital can be very subtle, electromagnetic...

I'm confused:

Q: (luc) Are they referring to AI music specifically, or just generally to electronic music genres?
(L) I think they said electronic music.
(Chu) Yeah, but like a keyboard or music produced by a computer?
(Joe) Define electronic music.
A: Artificially produced.

 

[MikeCopp]

Thank all of you for sharing this wonderful and cheerful session!! You all the crew are the best !!
And thanks Alejo for sharing that biblical passage at the end. It is so inspiring and uplifting.
Greetings from Spain and a big hug.

 

[mariowil7]

Thanks For this amazing session, kudos to The Chateau Crew, Laura The C's and all the forum members that participated in this session...