Session 27 September 2025

[KaWaiAwaAwa]

I wasn't surprised to read what the C's said, but am confused considering a video seen recently. It featured a very qualified expert who pointed out that any projectile fired towards Charlie should've kicked the mic battery pack away from Charlie, BUT the video shows that the battery pack moves towards Charlie, which he concluded rules out a projectile being fired from the battery pack. Any thoughts about how his point and the C's explanation can be reconciled?

I thought they said that it came from the the smaller microphone attached to his shirt. Probably on the backside and that it was some type of explosive device instead of a projectile. Could have been a shaped explosive.

 

[KaWaiAwaAwa]

I understand that there was an explosive mic AND a bullet coming from the back.

We may tend to read the following dependently:




But I operate a distinction and understand those two chunks relate to two different motions.

I may be wrong and I would be happy to dig this deeper.

Could have been a shaped charge.

 

[KaWaiAwaAwa]

It doesn't need to be very very powerful to pass through his neck from close range.



It could be a shaped charge that directs the projectile at a specific angle.

If it was a shaped charge, it wouldn't need a projectile if it was right on his neck.

If that is the case, then they obviously needed to remove him immediately even though he was already dead. The only people who could have done that would have been his team that hauled him off.

 

[lilies]

A: Make it a point to keep a low profile from here on. Things are about to get stranger than you can imagine.
Q: (L) Does that mean on social media?
A: Yes

At near the penultimate Newsreal's end it was remarked that "In the next Newsreal we are going to reveal the solution about the Kirk's assassination."
Immediately I became worried about the Team publishing a probably new session info detail - held just to get this solution - and as a result getting into trouble with Mossad agents. Next I thought the Team will probably take care and exercise caution, which you did right in the beginning of this new session: Knowledge Protects.

So my missing Israel line from that specific session years ago -
"A: Total destruction cannot come fast enough for Israel!!"
- was probably a similar cautionary action, maybe suggested by lawyers. As is now noted at more than one updated/redacted session dealing with sensitive revelations.

Team frustration is totally understandable. This powerlessness that we cannot strike back like in a war and at the same time MIC having total power to strike, softkill and sue with all the corporate power of their army of lawyers and banksters is absolutely annoying.

 

[lilies]

Q: (L) Well, if they look different, what does that mean?
A: There is a genetic imprint and a "spirit" glow of life force, but not the soul identifier that makes everyone unique if they are souled.

I do sense this specific mention as "background radiation". "Dark matter." Imagine the "physicalized static-noise in the universe" visually as a grey clay wall and on it - an OP feels to me - like a grey tapestry is hung - (so its difficult for me to differentiate from the background radiation) and the OP (to my senses) is perfectly blending into this boring background STATIC and from that emptiness is coming its voice: this is the organic portal speaking. Empty. I call them, because they feel like: "Empty closed cardboard boxes and there is a freaky human voice is coming out from the center"
I posted a couple times now about having the God-given talent to see-sense souls. I can only see the spherical light-energy / soul-power glow +_plus / as it is radiating out from_+ the unmistakeable ball-shaped gravity field of space-time distortion area, in the case of a souled individual: it can be a human of course, but can be animal as well. Once in a lifetime dogs are easiest to detect with such built in 'soul radar'. The observed target better has to move / ambulate, jump and turn around and bark and play and make dog-expressions. While the observed human must move (if possible) / gesticulate and talk, while I move around them and observe the person.

IIRC just like Don Juan talked about observing the Luminous Egg.

((So what about a Lizard? A (black) souled Lizard? Or a black souled human? What would they feel / look like for someone with similar senses? ))

Horses probably are recognizable this way as well, because last week I detected a nuanced intelligent articulation in the male horse's frequent neighings. He was put (on a rope) to pasture, and he was watching me intently, as I did my fasted sprinting exercise. They are more intelligent than dogs as you can see on YT, where the horse can spell out the names of the owner's family members using letter cards.

Souled animals - whom I detect having this ("vestigial") soul-imprint also show that they will become a 3rd Density human soul soon - are seem to be / feel / look like suprisingly PURE and innocent to this kind of 'Second Sight'.

While 'freshly having become souled'-humans in their [one of the] first souled incarnations are exuding only a weak soul energy (power) radiation (described above). Which is precisely why they are more difficult to detect. Like a faint light is harder to notice in darkness. These new young souled humans in their mannerisms and behavior resemble much more their former self, the animals, as they display animal behavior patternings, suggesting that just recently they have ascended from recognizable: chicken, pig, dog, slug, fish, etc.. Imprint-patternings of their former animal selves are well recognizable to my eyes.

Note the curious fine detail in the C's explanations suggesting they see a lot more about this as a complicated technical issue.

For example reading their words "soul glow" I immediately remembered that the plant life force of grass I posted about years ago I see as a silver glow of hazy mist hovering above the spring grass and it can be fed on / eaten energetically, just like cattle grazes on physical grass plant matter. It just was not nourishing much, when I tried.

 

[Ghazi18]

Amazing session, Thank you guy so much!

 

[Natus Videre]

At near the penultimate Newsreal's end it was remarked that "In the next Newsreal we are going to reveal the solution about the Kirk's assassination."
Immediately I became worried about the Team publishing a probably new session info detail - held just to get this solution - and as a result getting into trouble with Mossad agents. Next I thought the Team will probably take care and exercise caution, which you did right in the beginning of this new session: Knowledge Protects.

Don't worry, NewsReal has mastered the art of revelations.

Niall: Joe, could you get closer to the mic?
Joe: Sure, hopefully it won't explode in my face.
Niall: These things fly by so quickly these days.
Joe: And when they are properly tuned, they can produce sonic booms!
Niall: Speaking of sound, did you know that security guards make great DJs?
Joe: Yeah, they don't skip a heartbeat when they roll up their sleeves.
Niall: Now, let's talk about Charlie.
Joe: The official story is very convincing. Bi-bi Charlie, rest in peace.

 

[John Michael James]

I think he's Netanyahu's puppet. It's pathetic.

This video about twins and Trump’s twin always hit me deep. You got “good” Trump the first term. He isn’t funny anymore. I don’t see much behind his eyes these days, or anybody else really up on the stage. It looks like invasion of the body snatchers to me.

 

[latulipenoire]

Thank you for this shocking session, I'm grateful for all the ensuing discussion too.
After reading about the palestinians and all the chaos and violence that surround us at the present time, I remembered feeling quite down recently, thinking how everything in our reality is so entropic and designed to extract our joy, our "time" and our energy, how our moments of peace and contentment seem so few, how disaster looms ahead, how fragile we are.

Then I began praying for my soul and for every soul that is learning, remembering this group and that we are here to learn and to help, if we may.

Thank you and keep safe and alert, everyone.

 

[Ruth]

(L) Was he supposed to be on the scene?

A: Yes

Q: (L) Did he just not go for some reason?

A: Yes

Q: (Joe) So they had to rush a substitute in?

A: Something like that. There were also a lot more videos than "they" would like. It is all getting very messy in the public mind and "something must be done."

Q: (L) "Something must be done" doesn't sound good...

Did Candace actually find the "substitute"? He looks pretty similar to the guy they thought was Tyler Robinson. From her latest podcast today.

 

[JGeropoulas]

Thank you for the session.


What is the link to the video? How much does this guy know about tiny explosives?

It's all good, but he begins discussing the microphone issue is 14:00

 

[JEEP]

It's all good, but he begins discussing the microphone issue is 14:00

He is Larry C. Johnson of Sonar21 who made this observation previously:

Let me put one other fact on the table — Charlie Kirk was on the Ukrainian death-list.

And lo and behold, Candace now has a hunch that there might be a Ukrainian AZOV battalion connection particularly as it relates to Phil Lyman's young male relative (nephew/cousin?) and his two friends along with curious ties to UVU and Utah in general, as well as Tyler's Uncle Mikey - Mike Mitchell. She's says she'll have more on this tomorrow.

Her latest episode here.