Session 27 September 2025

[axj]

I suppose the Sphinx may have been transported, by lithospheric shift and extreme TES wander, to a place where it suffered monsoon-like deluges, but I am more inclined to think that Egypt enjoyed lush conditions long ago. There's plenty of evidence for that.

According to the C's, the Giza pyramids and the Sphinx were built by Atlantean descendats around 8,600 BC, or about 2000 years after the Younger Dryas Atlantis cataclysm and deluge:

October 5, 1994 Frank and Laura

Q: (L) Who built the great pyramid?

A: Atlanteans.

Q: (L) What year was it built?

A: 10643 years ago. [...]

Q: (L) Was the sphinx built at the same time?

A: Yes.

August 22, 1998

A: [...] Stonehenge was built 8,000 BC, by the way.

Q: If it was built in 8,000 BC, and the Pyramids were built 8,649 BC, which is 10,643 years ago, more or less, that means that they were built at almost the same time, or at least within 600 years of each other. If they were built at almost the same time, were they built by the same, or similar, groups of people?

A: Atlantean descendants.

During the final Atlantis cataclysm (around 10,900 BC or 10,700 BC) there was some lithospheric shifting, which would have produced a lot of tsunamis worldwide - plus the water from Mars raining down, the water vapor canopy collapsing, as well as meltwater from the ice shields if some comet fragments struck there.

But these Younger Dryas "deluges" apparently happened about 2000 years prior to the construction of the Giza pyramids and Sphinx. And there is indeed a lot of evidence that the Sahara was green and more rainy from around 12,000 BC to around 4000 BC (African Humid Period), which probably can explain the water damage on the Sphinx and its enclosure.

It is also possible that some 'minor' cataclysms in the last 10,000 years left some marks at Giza too:

March 22nd 2014

(Pierre) Did the catastrophic events that occurred around 2300 BC modify the axial tilt of our planet?

A: Yes.

Q: (Pierre) How many degrees?

A: 20. Not in an "instant" but quickly enough taking scale into account.

Regarding the upcoming physical pole shift due to a 'restoration of perpendicularity' of the rotational axis and some lithospheric shifting, there was a lot of information in this session:

October 31, 2001

Q: (L) Now according to these guys who are writing this web page about pole shift, they say it can be predicted where the poles will shift to. Is this in fact the case?

A: No.

Q: (L) Why can't pole shifts be predicted? Can't we know where the new pole will end up?

A: Chaotic function here

Q: (L) Okay, in a pole shift does the lithosphere of the planet slide on the core? (A) No. We have to be very precise. There are three possible things that would come under the name pole shift. Only one of them may come, or two, or three, okay? And these are the following -1) the axis of rotation with respect to stars is changing, straightening out for instance; this is one thing; while all the rest goes with the axis, the lithosphere and the magnetic field. 2) Second, the axis stays where it is, maybe it shifts a little bit; the lithosphere stays where it is - maybe it wobbles - but the magnetic field changes: for instance reverses. 3) Third, axis stays, magnetic field stays, but the lithosphere is moving. So that's three ways a pole shift can happen. And of course there are things that come together. The most dramatic one which is seen from outside is when the axis of rotation changes. The next dramatic one is probably when the lithosphere changes. And the third of unknown consequences is when the magnetic pole changes, okay? So, we want to have an understanding what will be the main change. (L) Well I guess we ought to ask an even more basic question: are we looking at a pole shift happening? That's starting at the beginning. (A) Alright. (L) In the next ten years. Is a pole shift possible in the next ten years?

A: Yes.

Q: (L) Is a pole shift of the axis...(A) Honey, you ask if the pole shift is possible, of course it's possible. But suppose it's almost zero probability? 'Is it possible' is not the right question. 'Is it going to happen?' That's a question. (L) Okay you ask, carry on. (A) Are we looking at a pole shift during the next ten or so years with a high degree of probability?

A: Yes.

Q: (A) In this concept of pole shift, what would be the main feature of this pole shift, of all those which we were discussing?

A: New axial orientation, and magnetic reversal.

Q: (L) That's fairly dramatic. (A) Alright, now, change of axis or orientation of axis of rotation: can we say we would straighten up, getting almost perpendicular to the ecliptic? Or the other possibility is that it will fall down being almost parallel to the ecliptic. The third is that we'll flip completely by 180 degrees. We know it's highly unpredictable, but can we have a clue from which one is, so to say, dominate?

A: Perpendicularity will be restored.

Q: (A) We know the axis will change dramatically and magnetic reversal will happen. You didn't mention a change or shift of the lithosphere alone. Can we...

A: Lithospheric shift will feature to some extent.

Q: (A) But, that means eventually that the equator will almost not change because...

A: Correct.

Q: (A) So it will just shift a little bit, but its not going to go to Hawaii? (L) Oh rats! That was my theory! Well, it was a good idea. (A) What about changes in the lithosphere: can we predict a little bit of change in geography, coming from motions in lithosphere and changes in water level?

A: Chaotic features predominate but in general it will be safer inland and in mountainous areas since less folding occurs in such locations.

Q: (A) Now, the major, the change of the orientation of the axis, what would be the main trigger, force, or activity, or what kind of event will trigger this change of the axis?

A: Cometary bodies.

Q: (L) Are the planets of the solar system going to kind of shift out of their orbits and run amok? Is that a possibility?

A: Yes.

Q: (A) Due to cometary orbits alone?

A: Yes. Twin sun also.

Q: (A) When we speak about these cometary bodies, are we speaking about impacts?

A: Some will hit.

Q: (A) What would be - if any - the role played by electric phenomena?

A: Twin sun grounds current flow through entire system setting the "motor" running.

Q: (L) Does this mean that all of the different bodies of the solar system are like parts of some kind of giant machine, and once this electric current flows through them, depending on their positions relative to one another at the time this current flows, that it has some influence on the way the machine runs?

A: Yes, more or less.

 

[Adobe]

Some thoughts related to recent discussions:

The Lighthouse:

The lighthouse shines to guide and illuminate, not to send boats out to bring in the lost. Its up to the lost to find their way. At the bottom of the lighthouse is a school, free if your willing to do the work. I don't see it as appropriate for the lighthouse to proselytize, but just be there—be open—and shine. The ocean storm will rage, the ships will fire upon one another, the light house should—just shine.

Turning Point:

TP appears to have been, and still is, a Borg Op, Charlie himself was something different. Two problems I see created by Charlie's removal. 1) Charlie can't really be replace. And its obvious that people are noticing a political party trying own the TP. 2) 100s of millions receive a wake up call, a "shock" to the populace. Many are on their way back to church and many are not, but all are looking for "something". That's got to weird-out the STS-4D and the earthly PTB. Some will find their FRV, some will find our FRV. In ones and twos, or thousands, I think our FRV is also growing.

The Borg "List":

As for me, and IMO only. I think, that cake has already been baked. Back in the 90s there was the "Main Core" (list) and following up until "DOGE" I'm thinking C.A. Fitts was correct when she "assumed" that the DOGE project finished putting all our data into the Borg computer. The good news? The C's said the computer represents the book of life. And being listed on the side of the resisters, puts me on the right side of the book. Good for the soul, but maybe not so much for the body.

What can be done:

It's useless, impotent, and non-consequential trying to deal with the Borg. The Italians and others are trying to stand down their country. Good for them, but that tactic will probably only lead to mass bloodshed, and starvation. BUT, the mass could turn their faces away from the Borg, and ask the DCM for "help" like this...

"Someone" or a group of someone's' in the right position (a Tucker type) ask the world to pray: ask the creator, whoever you believe the creator to be, use your own name, and if you are an atheist? pray to yourself, that works for me, just pray on this certain day or week this short request. Dear creator; deliver us from evil, and bring balance to our world...amen. very short, and non religious. Pray it as many times as you think of it throughout the day. If a mass turns to what would essentially be 4-5-6 and 7-D and asked for balance I doubt it would be ignored, and whether it be: better leaders or comets, balance is what we are looking for. Appealing anything to the Borg is worthless.

Thanks all

 

[Dragan]

Thank you Laura and Andromeda, Chateau crew and all who participate at this session.

 

[Thebull]

Yes thanks for another great session. Crazy times for sure. Stay safe everyone.

 

[Cristal]

Thank you for the session!
Thinking about the Erika Kirk remark that she's "a bit shady" made me think of what they said a little before

And what I was wondering is when a person, a souled person dies and they were married to an OP, can they look down on the Earth and their former partners or whatever and tell that they are OPs? I mean do they look any different or seem any different?

A: Yes to both.

Q: (L) Well, if they look different, what does that mean?

A: There is a genetic imprint and a "spirit" glow of life force, but not the soul identifier that makes everyone unique if they are souled.

I was wondering whether she might be an OP. While with her husband she used his reflection of a soul,but left alone she is going with whatever influence is around...

 

[palestine]

TP appears to have been, and still is, a Borg Op

It's useless, impotent, and non-consequential trying to deal with the Borg.

Appealing anything to the Borg is worthless.

Yes I find it difficult to discern the exact motions taking place at STS; seems to me that the C's recently said that there would be "internal battles" (in STS).

As a fervent reader of a: Lobaczewski, what transpires more and more is the concept of "infiltration process", then "taking over" - for whatever structure - and all of this being operated into the background, so, ever concealed. To the eye, the structure does not change.

In addition, there are folk wisdom's takes such as "taking it all", "one last man standing" etc, and i suppose there could have been such a motion, even applied to, let's say "medium" STS infrastructures.

So, could be, an overall seizure of some STS infrastructures AND a process having been done via the A. Lobaczewski model - gradual change in the HR department, gradual switching of the key positions, etc.

The result would be that a normal person facing such a structure would overall fight a "front" aggressive "protagonist" - but one who's manipulated and who saw its whole structure "seized" and turned, because of some "stealer". This points out to an external "guy", a professional stealer, who'd be in charge. There would be blackmail, internally, and elements would be forced to comply.

Freemasonry is wide, has an office in each city, and always flirted with serious aspects of reality (and densities), for instance the "STS/STO balance". Alchemy, Kabbalah, etc. And how much damage this could do if somebody "Put their hands on freemasonry": Nobody would see it, nobody would know about it, and the whole structure would be funneled towards different goals. Just an example, and we could see the process for Biden's White House. So: who remained cold-headed and is still "around"?!

And so, I never watched Star Trek, but it seems to me that "the Borg" could fall into this consideration.

That's my naïve take, and it's mostly relating to the concepts of A. Lobaczewski. It seems to me that the Universe is balance, and that STS must comply to the overall STO/STS balance. I believe that some STS elements could wrongly think of STS as "free for all", when the STO/STS balancing motion is in fact a basic component of the Universe - rather than something encouraging STS to grow and "eat the rest". Such simplified take will only appeal to really low-level psychopaths - and I believe that STS has actually a very few margin. I sometimes even dare to think of STS as a Cosmic duty; in term of gathering with STO, and discussing the margin in term of the overall balance. In this light, STS appears quite under a different light. It's not necessarily a run for the destruction of the planet - but a task of checking the orders of "the big boss", could be, the Sixth or the Seventh - and then adjusting. We are far from "compulsory greed". I sometimes see this aspect and believe that it exists - could be at very high levels. I may be wrong and this assessment would be wrong, too. But the Universe is overall not about entropy, its basic foundations are a form of growth - and one cannot beat that. It would be relating to the overall progressing structure, the overall density structure, up to God. It has been designed in a specific way and will alays "prime"; so to speak. Hey I hope that I am not off track! I wanted to provide some takes based on "the Borg"!

 

[Persej]

(Gaby) Seismic tomography reveals 2 giant “blobs” in the lowermost mantle, one beneath Africa and one beneath the Pacific. They sprawl across 30% of the core-mantle boundary area, with spatial scales on the order of 1000s (km) in width, and up to 1000 km above it. These blobs exhibit lower than average seismic wave speeds, thus they are named "Large low-velocity provinces (LLVPs)”. What is their origin?

A: Internal heating.

Q: (Gaby) What role are they playing, if any, in current Earth changes?

A: Heating up, destabilization, opening up for the reception of cosmic waves.

I don't if my situation is connected to this, but I would like to mention something. A few days ago, I noticed that the cold water in my kitchen is unusually warm. This happened at the same time that we got a winter-like cold weather, so I was expecting very cold water since I live on the ground floor and there is nothing below me to heat the water. At that time, I thought that perhaps the earth didn't have time to cool down from the previous warm days, so I didn't say anything to my mother. But today she commented that the water is unusually warm because we both naturally expect the water to be cold whenever it's cold outside. I measured the temperature of cold water, and it's 20C! The maximum temperature outside today was 10.7C, and was below that in the last 48 hours. I measured the temperature of the cold water in the bathroom and it's the same situation. I asked my mother if she ever experienced something like this before and she said no.

 

[Corvus]

Thanks for another very informative session.

 

[Moine]

Hey I hope that I am not off track!

You're not off the track. Freemasonry is just one of many possibilities where these things take root in.

For any structure of organization that provides benefits to its members of:

1) status,
2) society,
3) "networking" in the professional sense -- wherein you have access to resources others do not and likely never will,
4) tradition in a mythological/religious/ceremonial fashion,
5) knowledge -- to be conferred only to in-group members,
6) family -- #'s 1 through 5 tend to coalesce into closely related groupings, especially ethnically, and predominantly genetically

..... These things create a longitudinal and generational effect upon those involved. What is really at play, is long-term and entrenched in-group, versus out-group effect. These things may make no real sense, if you don't consider a cursus honorum -- basically "Hey kiddo, you need to go do this, that, and then go talk to some guy, because he's got a job lined up for you!". Raising up one's children in proper morality is largely forgotten when you've got a whole externalized system to "guarantee you benefits" without you doing any "work to merit those benefits".

Thus the next generations end up doing all such things, because it's what they "need" to do. Furthermore, they end up intermarrying each other, for generations. This is systematized inbreeding.

People know you don't marry family, because this has bad effects. However people usually forget with whom they're related, because no one keeps genealogies anymore. This is furthermore guaranteed to be forged, if not forgotten. This is one way in which the pathology spreads throughout entire hierarchical systems.

---

But the universe is indeed harmonious, however these harmonies are scarcely evident from our point of views. The universe is also always doing its thing, so if you have some disharmonious thing, within a harmonious environment, it will be brought into harmony, one way or another, regardless of outcome.

Kantek comes to mind regarding this, within a 3D frame.

There's also the possibility for endless intricacy. Iirc, the C's stated that they help 4D STS too, whenever asked, since STO helps all, and not just other STO. I can't find the exact session because STS/STO are just used so many times, and I'm unaware of any wildcard or string query features within the transcript search site.