Session 27 September 2025

[sid]

The article on Sott about the social media is spot on and helped make sense of some of my own observations over the past few years. My own time on social media is actually not that high. I go on X every now and then to comment, like or re-post stuff that could be helpful to someone out there, regurgitating Laura's Grok conversations and so on. You just never know that you might help one more soul see the burning fire and get out of the house before its too late for them. Fwiw

 

[life]

thank you for the session.

i originally presumed the fine line above kirk's right ear was capillary discharge from an entrance wound; after further review i see it was his chain. thanks again.

nope. i was incorrect

does anyone else see the problem with the shaped charge answer ?

i'd bet mr Newton would nod in agreement here

the explosive force of a tiny shaped charge, like those used in pagers, would have set his shirt mic in motion moving away from the area in contact with his chest - this did not happen; instead it moved TOWARD i.e. upward and into mr Kirk.

what made his chain fly away ?

would a tiny shaped charge in the links of his chain hurtle the chain away in the blink of an eye ?
would it drive pieces of chain, skin and bone inward and upward, and be concealed by his shirt as the explosive forces push the chain in the opposite direction creating a whip like motion and flinging itself from his neck ?

at 0:23/0:45 above the letter "D" and between the shirt collar it looks like someone pinched his shirt and pulled it up, and something of an arc forms within the shirt material above the entire length of the word 'freedom'. what would make that portion of his shirt rapidly and briefly form a semicircular shape ? a breaking chain perhaps ? bits of chain link perhaps ?

remember the footage of airliners traveling through concrete and steel with zero deceleration ? how does that happen ?

how does a shirt mic containing a shaped charge explode under his shirt creating a blast wave or moving a projectile that results in a massive internal wound that pierces / exits his neck / throat, yet also moves up and toward the wound ?

i don't have the answer(s), just ideas and questions.

twenty some years ago Krycek controlled nanobots in Skinner ... ahhh, you say, but that was a television show.

was it ?

cheers, and thanks for reading.

 

[KaWaiAwaAwa]

On the positive side, it is heartening to hear that 70% do not believe the official "lone gunman" explanation.

I have already commented on this. But new developments are saying that the judge is ordering everyone who was there at the event, and everyone who might have information about the case and anyone who personally knew Charlie to shutup. It's a wide ranging gag order.

Obviously that includes anyone who interviewed him or that he interviewed not to mention the 3000 plus people who were at the event.

Something is seriously wrong.

 

[Bernardo GA]

These days I was reflecting on this:

(Joe) In the last session they said... I think I asked if the program change that was planned to be the assassination of Trump that didn't happen, if they had another one planned, another program change plan? In the last session they said, "upcoming". Was the Charlie Kirk assassination that?

A: Yes

I have the impression that these actions of the Quorum have everything or at least a lot to do with the amount of "Free Will" that humanity can exercise at the mass level.
That universal right cannot be taken away from humanity, indefinitely or without measure.
The imbalance caused by a violation of this magnitude is so great that the continuation of this experience would not be possible. Or if it were to continue, it would not be as a school of learning for souls.
It would become exclusively a feeding system and nothing more.

And I believe that every time that is about to happen, as is the case in the current reality, something with enough potential to prevent the death of this school as such must happen.

Having said that, I now want to explain how I understand Charlie's murder in full view of the world as an opportunity to increase the balance.

While there are quite a few people realizing what is happening in the world, at the mass level the reality is totally different, as we already know.
And it is to change a certain reality in the masses that these program changes are aimed at, as I understand it.

Before continuing with this reasoning, I must say that to the question: resistance to what, is what is needed to increase the balance, my answer would be resistance to IMPOSITIONS.

We live and are part of a universe of free will.
That is why we feel a visceral rejection when they want to impose something on us. We always want to be able to choose. That is what moderately healthy Souls do.

But in order to resist an imposition, one must first become aware of the existence of such an imposition.
And the manipulation of the masses includes the masses following their routines and continuing to believe that they are well informed, that they are aware of what is happening, who choose freely and consciously , etc.
Historically, it has always been normal for the dominant and ruling class to manage with great skill to hide the evil that mobilizes them.
In order to have more manipulative power, they have always preferred the disguise of good guys.

However, this pattern of behavior is changing in recent times.
For some reason, perhaps the arrival of Wave , the actions of this ruling class are becoming more and more brazenly, undisguised

The world population is having the opportunity to see the Beast more clearly (I hope this opportunity is not wasted)
And the murder of Charlie before the eyes of all the people, may contribute in a transcendent way in that direction.

This is what occurs to me to think, when I remember that in the Quorum there is SAO presence and, not only STS.

For the STS side, who perpetrated and carried out the crime, this is a simple act of intimidation, to scare and try to silence the people who are beginning to wake up and who are in positions of influence in the population.
That is, people who, if they are awake, are a danger to the Matrix.

But 4D STS is the highest level of illusion.
What they see as a benefit to themselves in the immediate, usually has the opposite effect on the total equation.
We have to “wait and see”.

Translated with DeepL.com (free version)

 

[SasaM]

I am not sure if the C's or Ra have said that the axis was perpendicular before (no seasons) and when.

On Wikipedia page about equinox it says:

An equinox is equivalently defined as the time when the plane of Earth's equator passes through the geometric center of the Sun's disk. This is also the moment when Earth's rotation axis is directly perpendicular to the Sun-Earth line, tilting neither toward nor away from the Sun.

Since the Sun-Earth line is basically defining the plane of the ecliptic, would that what's described in the quoted Wikipedia text qualify as "perpendicularity being restored"?

 

[axj]

Since the Sun-Earth line is basically defining the plane of the ecliptic, would that what's described in the quoted Wikipedia text qualify as "perpendicularity being restored"?

The plane of the ecliptic is the orbit of the Earth and most of the other solar system planets around the sun. Earth's axis is currently tilted 23 degrees towards that, resulting in seasons.

If Earth's axis was perpendicular to the orbital plane of the ecliptic, there would be no more seasons.

 

[SasaM]

The plane of the ecliptic is the orbit of the Earth and most of the other solar system planets around the sun. Earth's axis is currently tilted 23 degrees towards that, resulting in seasons.

If Earth's axis was perpendicular to the orbital plane of the ecliptic, there would be no more seasons.

It was discussed in the past (e.g. this post), no seasons would be only if the rotational axis remained constantly perpendicular to ecliptic.

The Sun-Earth line is by definition in the plane of ecliptic, and equator is by definition perpendicular to rotational axis, so at days of equinoxes Earth's axis is, being perpendicular to Sun-Earth line, basically perpendicular to ecliptic at that moment.

So the question might be, did the C's refer to axis becoming perpendicular and staying so for who knows how long, or that axis becomes perpendicular at any or some point in future time?

 

[axj]

So the question might be, did the C's refer to axis becoming perpendicular and staying so for who knows how long,

Since the equinoxes already happen twice a year, the "restoration of perpendicularity" refers to the axis having no more inclination instead of the 23 degrees it has now.

As to what you said in a previous post about Earth changing its orbit by 23 degrees, it is true that this could restore perpendicularity of the axis towards the orbital plane as well, but it seems extremely unlikely.

 

[Nienna]

I am not sure if the C's or Ra have said that the axis was perpendicular before (no seasons) and when.

The Cs did say this in Session 31 October 2001:

Q: (A) In this concept of pole shift, what would be the main feature of this pole shift, of all those which we were discussing?
A: New axial orientation, and magnetic reversal.
Q: (L) That's fairly dramatic. (A) Alright, now, change of axis or orientation of axis of rotation: can we say we would straighten up, getting almost perpendicular to the ecliptic? Or the other possibility is that it will fall down being almost parallel to the ecliptic. The third is that we'll flip completely by 180 degrees. We know it's highly unpredictable, but can we have a clue from which one is, so to say, dominate?
A: Perpendicularity will be restored.

Which to me, means that it was perpendicular in the past.

 

[SasaM]

As to what you said in a previous post about Earth changing its orbit by 23 degrees, it is true that this could restore perpendicularity of the axis towards the orbital plane as well, but it seems extremely unlikely.

IRC, the C's were asked about that possibility in one of the sessions and basically opted for the actual axis shift.