Session 28 February 2026

I spoke with a local I met recently. He is half Maori and half English. He did not make contact with his wider Maori family until he was an adult and came to NZ. He told me how when he met his grandfather before he died he experienced a downloading of knowledge from him. This was in Rotorua a very geothermal active region. Literally there are boiling mud pools in spots all around town here. I told him I had an experience that I feel was an example of downloading knowledge also. It was back in 2012 in Christchurch NZ, where a large earthquake had destroyed the city centre. This may imply the possibility of some sort of portal or thinning of the veil associated to geological activity.

I went to Christchurch to attend a Cranial Sacral therapy training course. I sat next an osteopath from the UK working in NZ. He was a remarkably talented individual. We both went to look around the city and the rebuilding of it and had dinner. During this time I had the strange sensation of downloading information. I said to him,
“I am so sorry I am not trying to take energy from you” as I explained I felt like I was downloading his knowledge. I felt quite embarrassed about it. He reassured me it was perfectly okay. I don’t recall his words but I understood it was meant to happen.

When I returned home my own body work practice completely transformed into something new. It happened instantly when I got back and was not a gradual change over time.
Something similar happened to me, but it wasn't information, it was energy. I was at a company party, three of us were talking, when energy appeared between us. I don't know if anyone else noticed it. It was very quick. At first, I didn't want to accept it, fearing that I was taking it away from someone else. But it kept offering itself to me, so I accepted it. I felt very pleasant for the whole week after that, everything was suddenly easier.
 
Do they both belive fighting antichrist
Lol, it reminds me of one of the lines in the 4th verse of "Industrial Disease" by the band Dire Straits:

"Two men say they're Jesus, one of them must be wrong". The joke is actually they're BOTH wrong!

When it comes down to this dispute (I'm assuming you mean the Middle East conflict), it's probably a question of how much wrong there is on either side, and that's difficult to discern without knowing all the facts.

Here's the song, and it's weird how prophetic it turns out to be. Especially as it was most likely written in 1981 (and released in 1982). It can be watched and listened to on YouTube.

 
And why do they always end up in Argentina? This is, by the way, a ridiculous example of this buffer: Hitler was supposed to be in Argentina, Elvis was supposed to be in Argentina, and finally Tupac. But in reality, Dr. Mengele was probably there. But Argentina has already been ridiculed so much that no one takes it seriously. There's a buffer.
South America is a big place. Recently Baron Coleman was talking about Costa Rica in relation to sex and child trafficing (and the country having links with Erika Kirk's charity). Strictly speaking this is not South America, but I did wonder if Epstein would end up in that kind of region.
 
On Erika Kirk, I say this as she was mentioned as being a psychopath personality. This is just my opinion, but when I look in her eyes, I think she's been MK Ultra'd, not the Trauma Based type, but the Chemical type as in Medication type, I think Chelsea Clinton was too, I could be wrong, but I don't think so.
And on that basis, I'm wondering if psychopaths (who are really 'broken OPs') make better candidates for programming. Realistically they SHOULD be easier to program.....?
 
South America is a big place. Recently Baron Coleman was talking about Costa Rica in relation to sex and child trafficing (and the country having links with Erika Kirk's charity). Strictly speaking this is not South America, but I did wonder if Epstein would end up in that kind of region.
Yeah I just said Argentina cause it was always mentioned.
So why was Kirk eliminated anyway? My theory is that he was simply genuine and truly believed in his views, and was also quite clever. And puppets who don't actually believe what they're saying are more convenient.
 
Yeah I just said Argentina cause it was always mentioned.
So why was Kirk eliminated anyway? My theory is that he was simply genuine and truly believed in his views, and was also quite clever. And puppets who don't actually believe what they're saying are more convenient.
He was mentioned as someone who could become president after Trump, his elimination is then similar to that of Robert Kennedy. “Charlie, I think you have a good shot someday at being President.” - Donald Trump. In combination with his separation of American and Israeli interests and Israel’s failed attempts to bribe him.
 
And on that basis, I'm wondering if psychopaths (who are really 'broken OPs') make better candidates for programming. Realistically they SHOULD be easier to program.....?
I'm not sure about it because technically they have that cold empathy, which makes them keep their own inner eye on everything and not fall emotionally so easily.
Note that "psychopath" has become a colloquial term for people with certain tendencies, much like "narcissist." But that doesn't mean they are clinically so.
On the contrary, "true psychopaths" may not be conspicuous, but may even make a good impression and simply be at the center of a well-developed system of people, views, behaviors, etc. This does not mean being programmed, but rather pattern recognition, gaining benefits, building position, etc.
 
He was mentioned as someone who could become president after Trump, his elimination is then similar to that of Robert Kennedy. “Charlie, I think you have a good shot someday at being President.” - Donald Trump. In combination with his separation of American and Israeli interests and Israel’s failed attempts to bribe him.
That makes sense. I remember Trump being asked about him right after, and he replied something like "Yeah. Oh, by the way, we're renovating our ballroom. It's going to be great."
 
I'm not sure about it because technically they have that cold empathy, which makes them keep their own inner eye on everything and not fall emotionally so easily.
Note that "psychopath" has become a colloquial term for people with certain tendencies, much like "narcissist." But that doesn't mean they are clinically so.
On the contrary, "true psychopaths" may not be conspicuous, but may even make a good impression and simply be at the center of a well-developed system of people, views, behaviors, etc. This does not mean being programmed, but rather pattern recognition, gaining benefits, building position, etc.
True psychopaths have an absense of feeling. In order to fit in to society they have to "act" in order to be accepted as some version of normal. They are a bit like 'empty vessels'. Which means to me they can be filled up more easily with programming of whatever sort that their operators want them to display. This leads me to the impression that both psychopaths and OPs make better tools (and manchurian candidates?) via programming and brain washing. They are more like machines in this respect. People see psychopaths as serial killers. This is an example of 'acting out' because they have no feelings - they are trying to 'create' them. But there are many more out there who don't have feelings who are not serial killers. This is just how I see psychopaths - an absense of feelings.

The ones with personality disorders have disregulated and often out of control feelings and emotions like anger and shame which causes them to act in a psychopathic way. I haven't ruled out that some of these people (or ones who enable them and support them) are actually what we could called 'souled' (i.e. non-OPs), humans, but are in fact on an entropic tragectory.

Many people call someone a 'psychopath' because of their behaviour, but they clinically would be catagorised as narcissists of some sort.

At least, this was what I was trying to point out recently to a friend of mine who has one of each, as siblings. There are different ways of handling problematic behaviour from each (potentially).

At least, that's where my thinking is currently at with trying to 'see the unseen' in terms of why people behave the way they do.

Oh, also, when it comes to empathy, I think too, there is a difference between emotional empathy and intellectual empathy. Psychopaths don't have it in either form.... and what's more, don't see why they should.

My position seems to be evolving as I see different things.
 
Back
Top Bottom