Session 28 June 2025

Further about meditation, 'meditation en masse', combining together at different times in different longitudes/countries/continents for even a relatively short period, seems worth considering for at least some of us. The 'en masse' part suggested strengthening meditation by tuning in together in time, though I could be taking 'time' too literally.
Right now this forum has Members 7,872.

Even if everyone did the meditation (of course that is not possible for obvious reasons), for the planet I don't think it can be considered massive.

There is a tendency to consider responses as being intended only for this small group, when they may have a broader audience.
 
This makes me wonder about this problem I developed with my ability to do the exhale properly during E.E. My breath is shaky, wavy on the exhalation only. Probably around a year ago during EE I felt a sensation rise around the belly area and rise to my heart and I felt a strong quivering there and then my breathing exhalation was affected from that point on. Thank you for the session.


Q: (Jones) Stephen Porges Polyvagal Theory states that the ventral vagal nerve is myelinated and projects to the organs above the diaphragm, the dorsal vagal nerve is non-myelinated and projects to sub-diaphragmatic organs. However, he also mentions that there are some non-myelinated nerves that arise in the dorsal nucleus of the vagus and project to the heart in mammals. The role of these non-myelinated nerves to the heart are not definitively understood. What is the role of these non-myelinated nerves that project from the dorsal nucleus to the heart?

A: Feedback
 
Unmyelinated fibers originating from the dorsal nucleus of the vagus and projecting to the heart appear to play a role in slow and primitive autonomic responses, probably related to survival states (marked bradycardia, immobilization) or to background cardiac regulation.

Their exact function remains uncertain
 
Last edited:
Right now this forum has Members 7,872.

Even if everyone did the meditation (of course that is not possible for obvious reasons), for the planet I don't think it can be considered massive.

There is a tendency to consider responses as being intended only for this small group, when they may have a broader audience.
I had a conversation with A buddhist Monk (ive known him over 20 years)a few years back , I recall sharing with him that I didnt feel that I was doing enough in terms of service -

He said that he remembered his root teacher (Achan Cha) telling him a story

One day a terrible fire broke out in a forest - a huge woodlands was suddenly engulfed by a raging
wild fire. Frightened, all the animals fled their homes and ran out of the forest. As they came to the
edge of a stream they stopped to watch the fire and they were feeling very discouraged and
powerless. They were all bemoaning the destruction of their homes. Every one of them thought
there was nothing they could do about the fire, except for one little hummingbird.
This particular hummingbird decided it would do something. It swooped into the stream and picked
up a few drops of water and went into the forest and put them on the fire. Then it went back to the
stream and did it again, and it kept going back, again and again and again. All the other animals
watched in disbelief; some tried to discourage the hummingbird with comments like, "Don't bother,
it is too much, you are too little, your wings will burn, your beak is too tiny, it’s only a drop, you
can't put out this fire."
And as the animals stood around disparaging the little bird’s efforts, the bird noticed how hopeless
and forlorn they looked. Then one of the animals shouted out and challenged the hummingbird in a
mocking voice, "What do you think you are doing?" And the hummingbird, without wasting time or
losing a beat, looked back and said, "I am doing what I can."
 
(L) Well "massacre" doesn't mean that they necessarily were in a battle. So, am I on the right track here?

A: Close.

Q: (L) Was there any hyperdimensional manipulation about this?

A: That's the crux of the matter. Just as it is today.

(seek10) Could the current suppression of women be seen as a form of karmic rebound?

(L) What now?

(seek10) Well, in some areas, women seem to play a somewhat diminished role. Could this be part of a karmic rebalancing act?

A: Partly.

Q: (Joe) Hang on, we must be talking about some very different types of women from 5,000 years ago, or in 5000 BC, because the idea that women in general could massacre men if men didn't want them to, doesn't fit.

(Niall) Well, how? Yeah.

(L) Are you saying that there were libtard women back then?

A: Close. [laughter]
I'd argue that today we have 4D STS campaign with a goal to surpress,and take away power from the men, and to overempower women. We see it in the governments meddling into male female relationships (marriage courts etc., and in more and more giving of tax payer money to women), where they are basically taking away power and energy from men and are giving it to women.

We also have many 'empowered' women using their bodies and their bodies alone to extract resource and power/attention from the weak men. A woman today can sell her body and become a milionare with almost no shaming at all (its very normalized in the degenerated west) while men are digging the ditches and dying in wars. That says a lot in itself.

I can speak from personal experiences in dealing with abuse done by women. A recent example was an abusive woman at a workplace trying to psychologically abuse me (she needed someone to dump her need for abuse on and I was a nearest target), and when I expressed my boundary and told her NO! we are done here, don't speak to me again, she immediately went for her phone to call some guy workmate playing a victim and setting him on me, saying "you can say goodbye to your life when he comes". Keep in mind all I did was say no to her verbal abuse attempt and denied her need to abuse someone to relieve her emotional/ego hurt.

Now in retrospect a proper response by me should have been calling the police, that was the logical wise move then considering I was on a 'foreign' field and she made clear death threats amongst some witnesess, but out of respect from my employer who has contract with her employer I didn't.

In short, big guy lapdog came to my face (not even asking what really happened) and threatened violence and told me to leave my workplace or else. Before he came I went to two witnesses who have their shop next to that place and heard what was happening. A woman and a man. I went to a man who I am good with and I see him as a positive guy in his seventies who 'doesn't want to step on any toes' and wants to be friends with everyone. He seemed scared, he was just sitting on his chair doing nothing. I told him 'did you hear what she is saying, she is death threatening me with another guy?' and he just said 'don't argue guys'. Weak! And in his seventies. Imagine how weak most of the younger generation men in the west are.

The situation ended with me quiting my job that day (I was planning on doing it for days prior and I saw that guy telling me to go as a comfirmation from above). Both woman and man witnesess didn't say a single negative comment to the woman abuser (in short enabling her behaviour), her employer didn't offer any apologies for the behaviour of his employees and only told my employer that it's best I don't come there any more. Btw he is the person with a lot of wealth in the small town I currently live in.

Main thing the universe showed me with that experience is the power an abusive and entitled woman has over the weak men who don't have their character based on truth. It's a horrific reality that if there is no law and order, such women could literally massacre men by using other weak men even today in these times in the degenerated west, and almost no one would bat an eye, it would be excused just because she is a woman. And it doesn't matter how good a person you are as a man (and I assure you they are all aware of my kind nature). Don't you find that scary too?

Women in general (and I'm talking about common matrix type women here) are often abusive/tyrannical when they have power. I believe that is one of the biggest issues of the degenerated west today. This video explains it pretty well:


Also there is a good chance that women body covering customs (like islams hijab) in their origin have the memory of what happened when men let women have all the power in society, and how that made men weak and how that brought the destruction from the heavens (and thus it was instilled in culturo-religious mandates). It wasn't just to protect men from their sexual weakness towards womens body.

It was to protect women from their destructive arhetype/aspect nature. To keep women modest (unable to simply use their womanhood/bodies to get the power over men, and then not needing to have any good female character/archetype traits...cause why would they today in the west amongst all the weak men.. all they need is their body...and that is a recipe for a disaster..no pun intended), to protect both women and men from themselves, from their base animalistic natures, and to protect the civilisation from collapsing, because the ancients learned first hand that when in such times on 'degeneracy of morals', humans are always overpowered by their basic natures of sexual and social hierarchy. And that's likely another reason why PTB don't like Iran's religious/traditional regime.
 
Last edited:
Thank you for the session.

A: Often massacred.

Q: (Joe) By who?

(Niall) By the women?

A: Yes
When the discussion got to the males being eliminated from the societies, the first thing that crossed my mind was the (unrelated?) Biblical Angel of Death and the firstborn of Egypt, which prompted me to wonder if any of these cases were the mothers killing male children, maybe blaming it on crib death, but infanticide nonetheless.
Perhaps the massacre is just getting started in current times with autism rates reaching 1 in 30, with most of the autistic being boys, and most of them receiving autism causing vaccines from women nurses and pediatricians, as well as SIDS sudden infant death syndrome by vaccines as the modern version of crib death.
 
(seek10) If time permits, I have a question. In chromosomal studies, there's a phenomenon known as the Y-chromosome bottleneck. During this period, it is estimated that for every 17 females, there was only one male who left descendants. This event is believed to have occurred around 5000 BCE, although the exact timing varies. What factors might have contributed to this genetic anomaly?
--
"bottleneck in Y-chromosome lineages surfacing within the Younger Dryas boundary that in contrast to demographic reconstructions based on mtDNA, strongly indicated an accelerated differential between males to females, rising from a previous 1 male to every 3.5 females to 1 male for every 8 females by 8,000 BC and a staggering 17 females per single male by 5,000 BC, before as dramatically falling back in ratio to where we stand now with near parity of global birth rates." THE ONCE AND FUTURE SKY GOD? – From Göbekli Tepe to The Zodiac – and Beyond…' THE ONCE AND FUTURE SKY GOD? – From Göbekli Tepe to The Zodiac – and Beyond…

(L) Well, seek10, you ought to be able to figure out why there's a bottleneck in Y-chromosome! A bunch of people died! Especially in the Younger Dryas boundary, for crying all night! It accelerated.

(seek10) The anomaly seems to result from a disproportionately high rate of male mortality.

(L) Yeah, right. Okay... One male to every 3.5 females, to one male for every eight females by 8000 BC and a staggering 17 females per single male by 5000 BC. Near parity of global birth rates. Okay. Okay, it is obviously not simply cataclysmic activity.

(Andromeda) It's a long period of time.

(L) Yeah, that covers a long period of time, so... Well, what was the reason there?

A: Notice that there were matriarchies in that window of time.

Q: (L) Yeah, so...

(Joe) So they sent all the men to die...

A: Consider the divide between men and women now.

Q: (L) So are you suggesting that maybe during those times, women became angry at men, because they thought men had been responsible for bringing down the wrath of the gods on them?

A: Close.

Q: (L) And they formed matriarchies and began to suppress men in some way, because they blamed them for all the problems?

A: Close.

Q: (L) Was that in fact the cause of the problems?

A: Partly, sure.

Q: (Joe) What happened to all the men?

A: Often massacred.

Q: (Joe) By who?

(Niall) By the women?

A: Yes

Q: (Joe) No...

(Niall) What are we talking about, Amazons? Men are stronger...

(L) Well, maybe the legend of the Amazons came from something like this.

A: Yes

Q: (L) And what about the legends of the women turning against their husbands? And there are Greek stories about... Who was it, the sons of.. who was it? Egyptus and the Sons of the Greeks or something. And they had all these men and married all these women, and then they were unhappy about it. The women were unhappy about it, and they were given a signal or something. They all killed their husbands in the night. I think they were like the 50 sons of Egyptus and the 50 sons of... Somebody look it up. But, okay.


(seek10) Could the current suppression of women be seen as a form of karmic rebound?

(L) What now?

(seek10) Well, in some areas, women seem to play a somewhat diminished role. Could this be part of a karmic rebalancing act?

A: Partly.

Q: (Joe) Hang on, we must be talking about some very different types of women from 5,000 years ago, or in 5000 BC, because the idea that women in general could massacre men if men didn't want them to, doesn't fit.

(Niall) Well, how? Yeah.

(L) Are you saying that there were libtard women back then?

A: Close. [laughter]

Q: (L) Don't laugh!

(Joe) That still doesn't make any sense.

(Chu) Well, they could have used poisons and stuff...

(L) Think of all the stories in the myths about it! They came from somewhere!

(Joe) Who did? The myths?

(L) Yeah!

(Joe) But are we talking about women who are physically stronger than men in 5000 BC?

A: No.

Q: (Joe) So why did men allow women who were physically weaker than them to massacre them?

(L) Read the myths. It'll tell you how. I mean, consider the story of Judith and Holofernes in the Bible. She waited until he was asleep, and put a tent peg against the side of his head, and hit it with a hammer. I mean, women have all kinds of ways.


(Joe) Yeah, of course.

(L) They don't have to be stronger than men.

(Joe) Well, they said "massacre".

(L) Well "massacre" doesn't mean that they necessarily were in a battle. So, am I on the right track here?

A: Close.

Q: (L) Was there any hyperdimensional manipulation about this?

A: That's the crux of the matter. Just as it is today.

Q: (Joe) So there were matriarchies at the time that propagandized that men were the cause of all ills. And maybe to some extent they were, but not totally. And then they just basically... That's crazy. Well, I suppose you're talking about a lot fewer people, even though it's eight to one or 17 to one, you're talking about small groups, right?

(L) Right.

(Niall) But it's so pervasive that it shows up in...

(Chu) the DNA.

(Niall) Yeah, the genetic records.

(Joe) Yeah, but it's still small numbers compared to today, if you transpose it to 8 billion people.

(L) Yeah, but think also about the whole Zoroastrian thing. They were having all the raids, the cattle raids and all that kind of stuff. And then the poor, peaceful cow wasn't able to provide milk and cheese for the farmers. So everything was all messed up. So just read, what's her name? What's her name, Approaching Infinity?

(Tuatha de Danaan) Settegast, isn't it?

(L) Yes, Mary Settegast.

(Joe) There's an Irish myth about the Brown Bull... Queen Maeve and her husband were definitely in a... she was the queen and he was...

(Niall) Number two.

(Joe) Yeah. But he had more possessions than her. Well, they were equal in possessions, except that he had a magnificent brown bull and she didn't have one. So she went on a war, with a war party...

(L) See? You got a myth right there. Okay, seek10, are you happy?

(seek10) Yeah, that makes sense. Agriculture is generally believed to have begun around 7000 to 6000 BCE, though some suggest it may have started even earlier—possibly before the Younger Dryas. If we go with the assumption that agriculture began around 7000 BCE, does that imply that women were primarily responsible for agriculture at that time?"

A: Mostly.

Q: (seek10) This whole idea that agriculture led to surplus, which then allowed people to go to war and so on, doesn't seem entirely accurate.

(L) Yeah. It's almost like they were doing agriculture so they would have food to eat, so they didn't have to go out hunting. Because they didn't have any men around to do the hunting, and whatever.

A: Yes

Q: (L) Okay.
That is indeed mind-blowing, especially if you consider that according to that genetic study the Y-chromosome bottleneck was basically world-wide. It started all the way around 20,000 BC, continued going up through the Younger Dryas and peaked around 5000 BC.

Then it sharply dropped, which is in itself a fascinating topic - how and why the change from matriarchy to patriarchy happened around 5000-4000 BC. According to that study, the Near East or Middle East were about 1000 years ahead of other places in that change. Was this change to patriarchy due to some kind of major change in the religions? Or a mini-cataclysm that was blamed on matriarchy?

All this implies that matriarchy was carried over from Atlantean times and did not begin with women blaming men for the Younger Dryas cataclysm of 10,000 BC. Did it have anything to do with psychopath numbers being usually higher in men? Since hyperdimensional manipulation was involved, it seems unlikely that 4D STS would have wanted to reduce the number of psychopaths.

Here is the graph showing the rise of the Y-chromosome bottleneck since around 20,000 BC:

9..jpg

And here is @Michael B-C talking about all the findings of this study (this post is linked in this session too):

 
[/QUOTE]
(L) Trump is like a drunk parent! [laughter] I mean, read the book Children of Alcoholic Parents and I mean, it's not a joke. Trump is like that drunk parent, and the child is trying to hit the target. He may not be like that inside his own family and in private, but his public persona is like that drunk parent that the kid can never know what's going to come next, what's going to happen. And I mean, they're just, like, getting whiplash and getting emotional trauma. The American public is just getting traumatized by all this crap!

Thank you so much for this illuminating session.

The image of Trump as an alcoholic father and his children trying to hit the target seemed quite lucid to me.

I haven't read the book Laura recommends. I remember there was a thread about it, but I couldn't find it.

Thanks to this forum, I became very interested in the topic of trauma, following a discussion in a thread about the book Healing Developmental Trauma by Aline LaPierre.

I liked this methodology so much that I even studied it and became certified as a Somatic Experiencing (S.E.) therapist, which is a methodology that addresses shock trauma.

In S.E., I learned that traumatic situations can affect defensive orientation responses.

We often focus on the fight, flight, or freeze defense responses, but trauma also affects an early stage of the defense response, which is danger orientation.

The orienting response is a natural reflex that occurs when we notice something new or potentially dangerous in our environment. In SE, this response is recognized as a fundamental part of how the body prepares for action, whether attack or flight: the attention of the senses is focused on finding the source of the potential danger and assessing its threat level. In this initial stage, there is no fight-or-flight defense response.

Often, it is not possible to complete an orienting response because the attack action is very rapid or, as in the case of parental neglect, the signs of danger are confusing: sometimes the same parent who is aggressive is the caring and protective parent.

This can lead to difficulty reading the external environment, emotional instability, paranoia, hyperalertness, continually seeking danger, absence (missing pieces of the puzzle, so one doesn't know if there is a threat, much less how to respond to the potential threat), avoidance (denying the negative aspects of the relationship to fill in cognitive or emotional gaps).

Perhaps something similar is happening to us with Trump.
 
(seek10) Well, in some areas, women seem to play a somewhat diminished role. Could this be part of a karmic rebalancing act?

A: Partly.

Lately, I've been participating as a visitor in meetings of a Sufi group. I've seen that they have a sincere search for knowledge and that their Sheikhs are a married couple (a man and a woman). This latter aspect is unusual in Sufism, as the Sheikhs (masters) are generally men and almost never a couple.

Despite this, in religious ceremonies, women sit separately from the men and do not participate in the prayer and dance circles.

Sufis are very open-minded, but the rules of tradition are inviolable: such as fasting, not eating pork, saying daily prayers, and not drinking wine.

I wonder if this secondary role of women is a response to the despotic matriarchy that lasted for several thousand years. I ask myself the same question about Catholicism.

And perhaps the myth of Eve's temptation by the serpent on the tree of knowledge speaks to this era of matriarchy and Lizzie's influence on the restructuring of society.

Was patriarchy a counterrevolutionary movement? Why did monotheistic religions strengthen patriarchy? Did the 4D SAS favor periods of matriarchy or patriarchy to their advantage, only to create divisions? Does the 4D SAS not care who is in power, whether men or women? Isn't there a more favorable energy for the 4D SAS's plans, feminine or masculine?
 
That is indeed mind-blowing, especially if you consider that according to that genetic study the Y-chromosome bottleneck was basically world-wide. It started all the way around 20,000 BC, continued going up through the Younger Dryas and peaked around 5000 BC.

Then it sharply dropped, which is in itself a fascinating topic - how and why the change from matriarchy to patriarchy happened around 5000-4000 BC. According to that study, the Near East or Middle East were about 1000 years ahead of other places in that change. Was this change to patriarchy due to some kind of major change in the religions? Or a mini-cataclysm that was blamed on matriarchy?

All this implies that matriarchy was carried over from Atlantean times and did not begin with women blaming men for the Younger Dryas cataclysm of 10,000 BC. Did it have anything to do with psychopath numbers being usually higher in men? Since hyperdimensional manipulation was involved, it seems unlikely that 4D STS would have wanted to reduce the number of psychopaths.

(....)
Slightly related to this ( fwiiw ) :

Session 29 July 2006 :

(...)

Q: {Everyone looks to Perceval as though he figured something out}. (Perceval) Well I didn’t really figure anything out, I was just thinking about it and decided that the new plan was to introduce the psychopaths in order to effect the total control of the planet along certain lines)

A: And “culling” the non-psychopaths.

(...)


------------------------------

Session 3 September 2008 :

(...)

Q: (L) Okay, so if it's due to a mutation, when did the original mutation occur?

A: More than one occasion, but first time was fifty thousand years ago.

Q:
(L) Is it true that psychopaths... well, we know they appear in the population at a certain percentage. Do they increase at various times in history so that they grow more numerous and kind of take over the planet and create a lot of destruction, and in creating this destruction, do they destroy themselves or reduce their own numbers significantly, kind of like populations of rabbits and foxes or something like that?

A: Very similar, yes.

(...)
 
Q: (L) So human consciousness is causing or interacting with the internal energies of the Earth itself, which is producing waves, which are then in some kind of conflict with cosmic energies?

A: Yes

Q: (L) Is there anything we can or should do about this?

A: Meditate en masse.

Q: (L) So large numbers of people should meditate and try to bring some kind of peace or resolution to the Earth?

A: Yes

I've mentioned several times on the forum that the Twin Hearts Meditation by Choa Kok Sui, who created Pranic Healing, has been very helpful to me.

I mention it again because it recites the prayer of St. Francis of Assisi, often called the Prayer for Peace. In it, the practitioner asks God to use them as an instrument or channel of His peace, love, reconciliation, faith, etc., and transmits that feeling to the earth in the form of a sphere in their hands. It is also intended that these feelings be sent to the people who need them, and at the end, blessings are also sent to Mother Earth.

I think this meditation, or a similar one, can be very useful because it requires the practitioner to feel those feelings within themselves and then send them to people on earth. Therefore, it is not just an intellectual exercise of empty words, but an exercise in which the practitioner must be directly involved in feeling and intending the change in emotional frequency.

I'm making this version in Spanish:

Here's a video in English that varies the format a bit, so you can check it out:
 
Thank you for another brilliant session. My condolences for your loss @msante.

Wow. Surprised and yet not surprised. The PTB/Consortium definitely wanted Carney as the overseer for their vassal state of Canada.

I suspected they had stolen the election but I had no idea that the conservatives actually had so much support.

FWIW, here's a Youtube video of Mark Carney celebrating his election victory by singing "I cheat to get what I got". Pretty creepy.

Mark Carney singing "I cheat to get what I got"
 
whitecoast) In the official Canadian election results Carney and the Liberals won 44% of the vote and the Conservatives won 41%. What percentage of real, non-rigged Canadian votes went for each?

A: 48 to conservatives. 35 to libs.

Q: (L) Alright.
I found this interesting, with all of the thousands of participants in the conservative party rally's in the western provinces of the country, I thought he would be a shoo in. Not so, My friend was in the line up for 2 hours in the early voting and the general consensus was that it would be a conservative win...Both electoral districts in the area we reside were declared Conservative. In the electoral district I reside almost 40,000 people voted in the early elections. I voted on the last day, and I was informed I had already voted, It was a gong show. No real oversight and the electoral officer, told me to sign this sheet of paper with my name but no address or connection. I refused. She had two folders one for electoral discrepancies and another to report to elections Canada. I wonder if they were ever received. I did post my objections and complaint to elections Canada, never to be heard again.
I suspected they had stolen the election but I had no idea that the conservatives actually had so much support.

FWIW, here's a Youtube video of Mark Carney celebrating his election victory by singing "I cheat to get what I got". Pretty creepy.

Mark Carney singing "I cheat to get what I got"
 
(Joe) But are we talking about women who are physically stronger than men in 5000 BC?

A: No.

Q: (Joe) So why did men allow women who were physically weaker than them to massacre them?

(L) Read the myths. It'll tell you how. I mean, consider the story of Judith and Holofernes in the Bible. She waited until he was asleep, and put a tent peg against the side of his head, and hit it with a hammer. I mean, women have all kinds of ways.

Q: (L) Was there any hyperdimensional manipulation about this?

A: That's the crux of the matter. Just as it is today.

Thanks for this informative session, as usual!
I was going to quote some members who commented on this topic, but I'll keep it simple.

Laura pointed out natural ways that men might have died, such as wars and cataclysms. Obviously, war is a natural driver for men's diminishing population, since the "winners", most likely Alpha males, would usually enslave the captured women and use them as servants, concubines, or wives.

Infanticide of males might have been another way to achieve this. In the same fashion as in China's past, there has been female infanticide caused by inheritance laws (only men could be heirs to the family heritage).

1 man for 17 women might also be a natural way for the races to repopulate faster since 1 male can easily seed as many women as he wants.

Regarding women's means to overpower adult men, one needs only to read some history (or watch documentaries) to understand how some could be shrewd and/or cunningly evil, simply to obtain what they desired, gain power, or climb the social ladder. They had many ways to get rid of someone, may it be blackmail, slander, poison, hiring someone to do the job, planting fake evidence, etc.

In recent history, we have Affair of the Poisons (French: L'Affaire des Poisons), a major scandal that unfolded in the late 17th century during the reign of King Louis XIV (France).
Origins: The scandal began after the 1672 death of Godin de Sainte-Croix, whose papers revealed letters and vials of poison linked to his mistress, the Marquise de Brinvilliers. She was convicted in 1676 of poisoning her father and two brothers to secure their inheritance, using arsenic-based mixtures. Her execution marked the beginning of widespread paranoia about poisoning in France. This affair spanned until 1682.

In ancient History, which I'm not versed in but interested in, I could cite a Chinese historical fiction that aims to depict noble Chinese women power struggles. There are countless other sources that could be cited, but I haven't read or seen them. All I can say is, some of them were vicious as hell, all hidden under a perfect facade.



Regarding hyperdimensional influences, we've all witnessed and discussed these issues. One guy who is very good with Mind Control is Jason Christoff. However, he seems to omit anything hyperdimensional: I've read that he doesn't take these things seriously, and he's part of the "virus denial" movement. Other than that, his theories make a lot of sense, and he has been able to figure out that these agendas are carried by ancient evil using black magic, which goes back to old Egyptian families.


1. Females are the new strength figures in most movies
2. Females are encouraged to work outside the home and to exchange their dreams of motherhood and family for the fun laced pursuits of material items and never-ending good times in the big city
3. Females are imprinted with repetitive content designed to mind control them to consume large amounts of wine or alcohol.
4. Females are generally encouraged to attack their own breasts, a center of reproduction and healthy offspring.
5. Females are conditioned, mind controlled and socially engineered to be overly sexual, with the death of marriage as the end goal.
6. Females are being conditioned in the exact same way mice were conditioned in what's called The Universe 25 experiment. In the Universe 25 experiment, mice were given a city of never-ending fun, self-gratification and hedonism. Food, sex and entertainment were unlimited.
7. The Bad Mom's mind control agenda is another psy-op and female behavior modification operation that inverts everything a female needs to be happy, healthy and to love her life.
8. Women are conditioned to never be happy with their natural weight, their natural hair color, their natural eye color, their natural bodies, their natural hair thickness or length, their natural lip size, their current husband, their current partner or their status level in life etc.
9. Females are conditioned constantly to have very low self-esteem by drowning the female in screen images of other females, who have much better lives than themselves.
10. I'll use point 10 to sum up here. We're seeing the dangerous high peaks of these agendas today, with single females now being attacked by men dressed as women....within female sports, in female washrooms and even at female speaking events etc.



Throughout history, the ruling 1% always ran into one problem that they could NEVER deal with. The one problem was VERY STRONG WARRIOR LIKE MALES. If there was ever a failure of the ruling 1%, regarding their tyrannical rule and their immoral spread of imperialism…it was MEN who were STRONG, VITAL and who understood right from wrong. This is why the strong male is being targeted now covertly, for extermination.



The subconscious mind is the part of our brain complex that literally manufacturers our behaviors and our beliefs. The subconscious looks for repetitive themes, imprints or content (using our eyes)

look at the men in these popular cartoons (The Family Guy and The Simpsons): Out of shape, lower IQ, lazy, weak and childlike. Did you notice "fat and drunk Thor" in the last Avengers movie? What about the infantilized single men of Seinfeld....George, Jerry and Kramer? What about the characters played in the typical Adam Sandler or Will Ferrell movie? What about Kevin James in "The King of Queen's"? Are these characters strong leaders or just a non-stop all you can buffet of immature/child-like role models for the fertile subconscious mind to mimic? It's time to start looking at all men, in all TV shows and/or movies, which our social engineers serve up for our subconscious mind to mimic, copy, emulate and mirror. Even in The Family Guy cartoon, the male baby is always trying to kill the Mom (psychopathic behavior) and the male dog is an alcoholic. Perfect role modelling for the human farming colony. Keeping the male of any species weak and dysfunctional is step one for the take over and enslavement of that species.




Many people can look out the window today and easily understand that most adults in our society talk, think and act like children.
Most adults today conduct their lives like a 12 year old who happened to find $500 behind the couch plus the keys to a car near by. Driving from one place to the next, using the body as a chemical fun factory that they flog to get the most chuckles and fake feel good emotions out of. The forever children of our society are destroying our culture but that was always the plan to begin with.

The facts are simple. You can't farm lions. You can only farm lambs. You can't manipulate, steal from, lie to, govern and control strong, healthy and independent adults. You can certainly manipulate, rule and control overweight, morally corrupted and sick/feminized beta men who go to comic book conventions.




Documents seized from a secret courier of the Bavarian Illuminati in the late 1700’s exposed that a small group of men had sinister intentions for ruling the world. The documents seized showed the step-by-step plan as to exactly how they would execute this dark agenda through the centuries. First of all, the strongest men had to be eliminated, in order to leave a thick syrup of the most mentally and physically weak in each geographic region. The primary method by which this would be executed would be to systematically and covertly take over the government of each nation and then fabricate manufactured situations to draw each country into a sequence of false wars.

Although each different country would be controlled by the same invisible hand, the idea of each country being different, had to be imprinted into the psyche of each culture, in order to get the strong humans to kill each other off. The primary method used to manipulate the humans in this manner were different country names, different flags, fake borders, passports and events like the Olympics, the World Cup etc etc.

These orchestrated events made sure that the uninformed humans believed that the countries were different, run by different people, reflective of the will of the people living there etc etc. Nothing could be further from the truth and this is a ORCHESTRATED PSY-OP. By controlling both sides in each war, from the top level of the ruling pyramid, this small group of men could literally sacrifice millions of the strongest males per year all around the world.

This group has been working on removing the strong males for a very long time.
 

Trending content

Back
Top Bottom