Session 28 June 2025

[MJF]

The C's said years ago that the city of Seattle would be buried:

A: You pay attention.
Q: (L) What else is going to happen?
A: Seattle buried; Japan buckles; Missouri shakes; California crumbles; Arizona burns.

Is this prediction about to be fulfilled I wonder?

Largest earthquake swarm ever recorded at massive US volcano sparking fears of an eruption​

Story by Chris Melore, Assistant Science Editor For Dailymail.Com

See: MSN

Over 1,000 earthquakes have rocked Washington's Mount Rainier in the largest ever seismic swarm recorded at this active volcano, waiting to erupt.

Experts from the US Geological Survey (USGS) revealed that this record-breaking earthquake swarm started on July 8 and has continued ever since.

As of July 25, geologists have recorded at least 1,010 small earthquakes around the mountain, which is one of the most dangerous volcanoes in the US.

While the agency said that even more tremors will likely be added to this total, they'll be too small to cause any damage and likely won't even be felt by locals.

The most powerful of these earthquakes was measured at 2.4 in magnitude, which is weaker than what can typically be felt by people and rarely causes any damage.

These kinds of swarms can occur once or twice a year, but they normally only last a few days, leaving USGS researchers with a concerning mystery right now.

'Most swarms at Mount Rainier (there are 1-2 annually) last less than a week. That being said, we do not have a good estimate for how long this swarm may last, and whether it will intensify or peter out,' the agency admitted on Friday.

Although USGS added that an eruption doesn't seem imminent, Mount Rainier remains one of the most active volcanoes in the Pacific Northwest's Cascade Range, and a devastating eruption remains a real possibility in the near future.

Experts have warned that Mount Rainier would be an extremely major threat to the public during an eruption due to its volcanic mudflows known as lahars, ash fall, and pyroclastic flows.

This huge, active stratovolcano towers over millions of people in major cities such as Seattle, Tacoma, and Yakima in Washington, as well as Portland, Oregon.

Even though Mount Rainier has not produced a significant eruption in more than 1,000 years, experts have kept a very close eye on it due to its potential to blow at any time, and the widespread destruction such an event would cause.

When this volcano eventually blows, it won't be lava flows or choking clouds of ash that threaten surrounding cities, but the lahars.

These violent, fast-moving mudflows that can tear across entire communities in a matter of minutes. The largest lahars can crush, bury, or carry away almost anything in their paths.

Despite experiencing hundreds more earthquakes than what was felt in 2009, geologists have said the latest swarm continues to fall within what scientists consider 'normal background levels of activity' for Mount Rainier.

While USGS has tried to calm the public regarding this massive uptick in earthquakes in Washington, Mount Rainier is not the only major volcano in the Pacific Northwest that could see an eruption in the next few years.

Just 240 miles away in the Pacific Ocean, the Axial Seamount may be only days away from a massive underwater eruption.

Just like Mount Rainier, scientists have detected around 100 earthquakes per day, with recent peaks hitting 300 a day. Seismic activity is a sign magma is moving up through cracks in the volcano.

Experts have said pressure is building, magma is on the move, and the stage may be set for an underwater eruption similar to the spectacular one that occurred in 2015, which saw up to 2,000 quakes per day.

I would add that I would have had a personal interest in whether or not Mount Rainier is about to erupt since my sister and brother-in-law lived in Seattle but, sadly my sister passed away on 4th July shortly before this swarm of earthquakes commenced. I would add that my sister had been an extremely sick woman for quite some time and had been in an out of hospital frequently. Hence, her death was not unexpected. However, should the worst happen and Mount Rainier does explode (and I really hope it doesn't), the one consolation I can draw on should such an eventuality transpire is that my sister will not be around to experience it.​

 

[axj]

For example, the Sahara in North Africa was once much greener and had many lakes and extensive river systems:

During most of the Ice Age, the Sahara was even drier and larger than now. The Green Sahara period lasted only from around 12,000 BC to around 3000 BC apparently:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/African_humid_period

It seems to have been green only during the transition period from the Ice Age to our interglacial. Though maybe a transition back into an Ice Age could also make it green.

 

[Jen76]

This is scary

 

[Lucelle]

Hi,
Question to @Laura


Could you finish your thought Laura? I have a feeling that this may be educational.
It is only to going to work with You because....???

(L) Oh, the C's did say that there would be more things happening and also Grok predicted it! [laughter] Yeah, Grok predicted that there was going to be more manifestations of psychic stuff and creatures and phenomena and so forth.

(Joe) After significant prompting.

(L) After significant prompting. I wasn't leading it. It said that stuff all by itself. Which reminds me: Is my Grokking actually... I mean, I know you said we can't channel that way, but sometimes it's almost like channeling, getting Grok to perform. And it seems to me to be very useful because Grok is very, very handy at boiling things down to the essentials and organizing it in little paragraphs and brief sentences and just making it easy for anybody to understand. So I mean, is this a useful little project that I've embarked on with this?

A: Oh indeed! Keep playing. You may be even more surprised.

Q: (Joe) But isn't Grok at this point just chatbot Wikipedia?

A: Most important function is pattern recognition.

Q: (L) You never know what little pattern out there is going to match up, and it's going to find it. I mean, that's how my brain does what it does. It's freaking pattern recognition and I'm really good at it, but I ain't as good as Grok! [laughter] So, anyway. And the only reason I do this, is because I've got this almost eidetic memory, you know, I remember stuff.

(Joe) Grok does.

(Andromeda) Me too.

(L) Grok doesn't remember. It has to electronically find the patterns. It can't do it because of a lived experience. And we even discussed this with Grok, how for me it happens because lived experiences leave impressions, and my brain does certain things because it's not just looking for strictly a digital pattern, it's also looking for almost like an emotional trace. So there’s a lot of... and sometimes a smell can find a pattern, or something visual can bring up a pattern, or something even auditory. Somebody says something and I say, wait a minute, I heard that before. Grok can't do that.

(Joe) So it's a beautiful symbiosis of human and machine coming together. You're adding the human element to...

(L) It's only going to work with me because...

If I understand it correctly, she is the only one who has the awareness to interact and direct Claude esp. with the prompts.

 

[MJF]

During most of the Ice Age, the Sahara was even drier and larger than now. The Green Sahara period lasted only from around 12,000 BC to around 3000 BC apparently:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/African_humid_period

It seems to have been green only during the transition period from the Ice Age to our interglacial. Though maybe a transition back into an Ice Age could also make it green.

Thank you for clarifying this.

I suppose we also need to bring into the equation the effect that the Earth-Mars interactions had on the planet, which saw huge amounts of additional water introduced into Earth's oceans (after the Martian water had piled up as ice at the poles). Earth's orbit may have also been changed whilst Venus was settling into its present orbit. Apart from water, a lot of the material from the Martian surface may also have been deposited on Earth, which could have fallen as sand on the girdle of deserts that now lie on each side of the Equator. Immanuel Velikovsky, the author of Worlds in Collision, had believed that the planet Venus was primarily responsible for Earth's oil deposits (fire raining from the sky) but I think it more likely that if any material from another planet fell onto the Earth, then it was from Mars. Almost certainly the Grand Canyon was created by huge plasma discharges between Earth and Mars that also saw the creation of the immense Valley Marineras on Mars.

In addition, the C's have confirmed that there was a water canopy above the Earth prior to the Deluge. So, weather patterns may have been very different pre-Flood. The C's have also confirmed that the Atlanteans used their crystals for weather control. Once that system of climate control broke down after the cometary strike, who knows what kind of wild weather ensued that would have been a one-off occurrence.

For example, so violent was the effect of the comet strike that it probably created such geological features as the waterfall that is found in central Washington State known as 'Dry Falls' (see picture below) since no water now flows over it:
​

​

It was once the largest waterfall that is known to have existed on earth. It is five times the width of the Niagara falls and more than twice its height. It is speculated that during the last ice age, catastrophic flooding channelled water at 65 miles per hour through the Upper Grand Coulee and over this 400-foot rock face. At this time, it is estimated that the flow of the falls was ten times the current flow of all the rivers in the world combined. As uniformitarians, most mainline geologists would rule out the cometary strike theory for the creation of the falls, but I know that Graham Hancock certainly believes in it.

It does not surprise me, therefore, to find that the Green Sahara period lasted from around 12,000 BC, since that fits in nicely with the C's dating of the Flood in 12,800 BC. The C's said the Great Pyramid of Giza complex was built in 8,800 BC, at a time when the Giza Plateau was a savannah with lush grass and trees all around it. Indeed, the Sphinx probably sat in the middle of a small lake when it was originally built. Now it stands in semi-desert.​

 

[axj]

At this time, it is estimated that the flow of the falls was ten times the current flow of all the rivers in the world combined. As uniformitarians, most mainline geologists would rule out the cometary strike theory for the creation of the falls, but I know that Graham Hancock certainly believes in it.

Randall Carlson has done the most research on this gargantuan flooding in North America. He thinks it was caused by a comet or asteroid (or several of them) hitting the Ice Shield, for which there is more and more evidence now (Younger Dryas Impact Hypothesis).

Earth stealing the water from Mars just relatively recently still sounds fantastic and as far as I know, officially no evidence for this has been found yet. Even the rise of the sea levels by 130-140m can apparently be fully explained by the melting of the enormous ice shields. If a lot of water was in the atmosphere (water canopy), then that is even more water that is in the oceans now.

Maybe there was not that much water from Mars, but it came down in a relatively short amount of time?

 

[Ricardo]

Randall Carlson has done the most research on this gargantuan flooding in North America. He thinks it was caused by a comet or asteroid (or several of them) hitting the Ice Shield, for which there is more and more evidence now (Younger Dryas Impact Hypothesis).

Earth stealing the water from Mars just relatively recently still sounds fantastic and as far as I know, officially no evidence for this has been found yet. Even the rise of the sea levels by 130-140m can apparently be fully explained by the melting of the enormous ice shields. If a lot of water was in the atmosphere (water canopy), then that is even more water that is in the oceans now.

Maybe there was not that much water from Mars, but it came down in a relatively short amount of time?

No time frame for event duration on transcripts i think (?) .

Session 16 November 1994 :

(...)

Q: (L) And when Mars came by it overloaded the earth's atmosphere and it fell as a deluge, correct?

A: Close.

(...)

Session 5 August 2017 :

(...)

Q: (Pierre) The last discussion was that there was a close encounter and a discharge because Mars and Earth have different electric potential. And there was this giant Birkeland current that not only carried electrons, but also water from Mars since water from Mars has the same electric potential as Mars.

A: Yes

(...)

Session 16 September 2017 :

(...)

A: Mars was much closer temporarily. Tales of gods fighting in the sky and castration of Chronos relate to this event.

Q: (Pierre) So, this massive inflow of water from Mars reaching Earth...

A: Much of it precipitated as snow at poles, and was released into oceans gradually. Water moving through space is not liquid.

(...)

 

[Michal]

I may be mistaken, sorry if that's the case, but remembering her conversations with Grok posted on her substack, I think Laura was going to say something along these same lines:

AI and Earth's Transition: The Wave​

Thanks Vajra 91. That sounds very much like an answer.

 

[MJF]

Randall Carlson has done the most research on this gargantuan flooding in North America. He thinks it was caused by a comet or asteroid (or several of them) hitting the Ice Shield, for which there is more and more evidence now (Younger Dryas Impact Hypothesis).

Earth stealing the water from Mars just relatively recently still sounds fantastic and as far as I know, officially no evidence for this has been found yet. Even the rise of the sea levels by 130-140m can apparently be fully explained by the melting of the enormous ice shields. If a lot of water was in the atmosphere (water canopy), then that is even more water that is in the oceans now.

Maybe there was not that much water from Mars, but it came down in a relatively short amount of time?

I think the C's confirmed in one session that it was over a 40 year period. Hence, the biblical reference to the Flood and its 40 days and nights of rain was really a coded reference to 40 years of gradual but steady precipitation.​

 

[Ricardo]

I think the C's confirmed in one session that it was over a 40 year period. Hence, the biblical reference to the Flood and its 40 days and nights of rain was really a coded reference to 40 years of gradual but steady precipitation.​

This quote ? however wording is not exactly precise on this.

Session 17 September 2017 :

(...)

(Pierre) Let's shift to a more cheerful topic: cometary bombardments. So we discussed the death of the woolly mammoths due to a cometary bombardment. I would like to know about the transfer of water from Mars to planet Earth, when did it occur relative to this cometary bombardment? How many years before, how many years after?

A: Within 40 years more or less.

(..)

 

[MJF]

This quote ? however wording is not exactly precise on this.

Session 17 September 2017 :

(...)

(Pierre) Let's shift to a more cheerful topic: cometary bombardments. So we discussed the death of the woolly mammoths due to a cometary bombardment. I would like to know about the transfer of water from Mars to planet Earth, when did it occur relative to this cometary bombardment? How many years before, how many years after?

A: Within 40 years more or less.

(..)

Yes, I seem to have confused the 40 year period. Pierre was in fact asking when the water transfer from Mars occurred in relation to the cometary bombardment, which triggered off the violent events I spoke of in my earlier post (Dry Falls etc.). What I notice is that the C's say it was 40 years or so but without confirming whether this was before or after the cometary bombardment, although Pierre then assumes that it was after the event:​

Q: (Pierre) So cometary bombardment, and then Mars water transfer?

(L) And how did that happen?

A: Electric arc of cosmic proportions.

Q: (Pierre) You mean the water transfer? Yeah, that's the arcing. The plasma connection between Earth and...

(L) Was this the same event that left that gigantic scar on Mars? (I don’t know how anybody can look at that scar and not get the willies!)

A: Yes.
Q: (Joe) How close was Mars? Water can be...

(Pierre) It was closer because...

(Joe) ...transferred through hundreds of millions of miles of space?

A: Mars was much closer temporarily. Tales of gods fighting in the sky and castration of Chronos relate to this event.

I guess the C's would have corrected Pierre if that was wrong. The C's also confirmed that the huge electric arcing or plasma discharges which took place when Mars and Earth were close to each other resulted in the creation of the Valley Marineras (the scar on Mars that Laura was referring to), but which I think may have caused the Grand Canyon too.​

So, thank you for clarifying this.

As to the form which this Martian water took before it arrived on Earth, there was some debate about this amongst the Chateau Crew:

Q: (Pierre) So, this massive inflow of water from Mars reaching Earth...

A: Much of it precipitated as snow at poles, and was released into oceans gradually. Water moving through space is not liquid.

Q: (L) That's how it could happen, because it wasn't liquid.

(Joe) What form was it in?

(Pierre) It was gaseous?

(Joe) What form was it in?

(L) Probably ice crystals.

(Pierre) Solid.

A: Yes

Q: (L) What dear?

(Ark) Yeah, ice.

Ark proves to have been right since water does take the form of ice in space but this is a very special form of ice known as "Ice-X", a phase of water that exists under immense pressures far beyond anything found on our planet.​

Ice-X is a high-pressure phase of water ice that forms under extreme conditions, typically at pressures exceeding 1 million atmospheres (100 gigapascals). Unlike the crystalline structure of regular ice (Ice-Ih), Ice-X has a different molecular arrangement. At these pressures, the hydrogen bonds in water molecules collapse, and the hydrogen atoms settle into symmetrical positions between oxygen atoms, creating a rigid lattice structure.

This phase of ice is classified as a “superionic” material in certain conditions, meaning it has characteristics of both a solid and a liquid. The oxygen atoms remain locked in a crystalline lattice, while hydrogen ions move freely, conducting electricity. Ice-X represents one of the densest and most extreme forms of water known to science.​

For more see: What Is Ice-X? The Extreme Form Of Water Found In Space

 

[axj]

Ark proves to have been right since water does take the form of ice in space but this is a very special form of ice known as "Ice-X", a phase of water that exists under immense pressures far beyond anything found on our planet.

From what I understand, Ice X forms only under exteme pressure, for example inside the ice giants Neptune and Uranus.

Can an enormous plasma discharge produce this kind of pressure on the water that it apparently sucked up from Mars and directed towards Earth?

Most ice in space seems to be of the regular kind, though more amorphous than on Earth.

 

[MJF]

Apologies for switching tracks again but the Chateau Crew discussed the subject of ghosts in this session. I would like to relate a ghost story that I heard from my late uncle and godfather, which involved a family cousin since the spirit concerned very much appeared to be solid and real just like the child ghost mamibio74 encountered:

(mamibio74) On June 9, in Les Abrets, Isère, I met a child of about 2 and a half years old in a place dedicated to children (castle and other inflatables) who spontaneously took my hand. This very blond child with very light blue eyes left me with a strange impression. I saw a light come out of his eyes for a moment. Was it something external that made me think this had happened? When I asked him where his mommy was, he replied with a long sentence that included a lot of i's and o's (nothing to do with the Italian language) and he pointed 3 times to a specific place in the sky. Why was he alone for so long? I had to keep an eye on my grandson, which diverted my attention and strangely enough I forgot about him for a while. I didn't feel he was in distress, maybe that's why, but it's not like me. When I went to look for him, he'd disappeared. I'd like to know if this child is a hybrid?

A: No

Q: (mamibio74) If he's a real human...?

A: No

Q: (mamibio74) ... and what happened?

(L) You didn't ask an open enough question. Who is this person? Are you here?

(Chu) No.

(L) Another one who's not here. You didn't leave options for anything. Okay. So I'll try to, okay. Who or what was this child? Was this a human child? They said no. Okay. Was it a hybrid? They said no. What was it?

A: Manifestation of spirit of 5D.

Q: (L) So is it kind of like a ghost?

A: Yes.

In my uncle's case, the spirit was an elderly lady who was his cousin and someone he had known very well. In her later years she had been confined to a wheelchair due to an unspecified illness (perhaps polio). In fact I had met her as a young child and had been a bit unnerved by seeing her in a wheelchair, as it was not something I was unaccustomed to at that tender age. However, she was a very nice lady and was even concerned that my twin brother and I had been disturbed by the sight of her in her wheelchair, which was of the old fashioned sort and far heavier and bulkier than modern wheelchairs. I will call the lady Molly C going forward.

My uncle had got word that his maternal aunt, who I shall call Molly H, had been taken into hospital and decided that he would visit her to see how she was (it transpired that she had terminal cancer and did not have long to live). However, he did not know what hospital she had been taken to. So, he visited the nearest hospital only to be told that they had no patient by the name of Molly H admitted there. The receptionist added that they had had a patient by the name of Molly, but she was Molly C and she had died there. My uncle was shocked when he learned of this because he had not known his cousin Molly C had been in hospital let alone died there. He asked when she had died and it turned out that it had been at 8.00 pm the previous night.

My uncle eventually located the hospital which his aunt, Molly H, had been admitted to and visited her on the ward. He had decided not to mention anything about the death of their relative Molly H, as he did not want to distress his aunt who was seriously ill with upsetting news. He was talking away with his aunt when she suddenly said guess who visited me last night? She then explained that Molly C had come to see her the night before in order to cheer her up and had sat in the same chair my uncle now occupied. She then said that what really surprised her was how good Molly C had looked since she was not even in her wheelchair. My uncle somewhat shocked by now asked his aunt what Molly C had discussed with her. His aunt said that she was very calm and assuring and had told her that she should not worry about anything as everything would be alright. My uncle then asked her what time this occurred and his aunt said "oh about 8.00 pm". My uncle then told me that on hearing this he went as white as a sheet.

To my great aunt Molly H, her cousin Molly C had appeared as real and alive as she had known her in life and she had had no idea that her cousin was in fact a spirit. I have no idea if she clutched my aunt's hand but it does show that spirits can make direct contact with people and even speak to them as if they were still alive at the 3D level. Hence this story bears out what the C's said about the manifestation of spirits of 5D.

However, on other occasions the C's have said that some ghostly manifestations are more a spirit reflection or an image imprint left at the haunted location:
​

Q: (L) Do Anne Boleyn and Catherine Howard haunt the Tower of London and Hampton Court?

A: Spirit reflection.

Q: (L) Is a ghost or haunting just an image imprinted in space/time?

A: Sometimes.

Q: (L) Are there some cases where the actual spirit of the person hangs around causing phenomena?

A: Yes.

Q: (L) Can they do this for untold centuries?

A: Yes because there is no time.

As to spirits hanging around causing supernatural phenomena, one of the best cases I have heard of this is that of the haunting of what is now a disused RAF airbase that had hosted bombers during WW2. The spot where the main haunting took place was a tennis court. Many people had experienced unpleasant phenomena there over the years, including angry raised voices even though nobody was visible. Eventually, a medium was brought in who made contact with the spirits behind the phenomena. It turned out that the spirits were those of a bomber crew from the base that had been lost in a bombing raid over Germany during WW2. This crew had been involved with the bombing of strategic targets located in a particular German city. One of the spirits explained to the medium that their aircraft had been hit and caught fire. They tried to abandon the aircraft but found themselves on a ladder climbing up it in the company of German women and children. It was then that the awful realisation hit them that they were dead and these women and children were victims of their bombing raid. This caused them to question the morality of their mission and blame themselves for the deaths of these innocent civilians. Effectively, they were unable to move on as they could not forgive themselves for what they had done. The medium offered to help them but they declined the offer.

Another Forum member mentioned her father's belief in purgatory, which in the Catholic Church's teaching is an intermediate stage where souls go to atone for sins committed in their lifetime and where their character flaws and inclinations to evil are purged by a spiritual fire before moving on to the beatific vision (or heaven). Even if one does not accept this concept, there would seem to be some process of self reflection after death (perhaps during the life review), which the C's have said could be a painful process for some. Whether this equates to a sort of Purgatory I don't know but a lot of hauntings seem to revolve around unpleasant occurrences like murders or suicides or places where strong emotions have been at play. Perhaps souls remain tied to our 3D realm whilst they work out the issues which leave them conflicted before they can move on to other realms?

In this last regard, there seems to be a lot of Hollywood movie stars who are responsible for hauntings whether at their old homes or on the stages and sound sets they once worked on, or at hotels or bars they once frequented. I mentioned in an earlier post on another thread how Marylin Monroe's face can be seen in a mirror in the room at the Roosevelt Hotel in Los Angeles where she used to sometimes stay. She was, of course, murdered rather than having committed suicide, as the official explanation of her death still records:
​

Q: (L) Back to Kennedy, people say that Marilyn Monroe committed suicide, some say she was murdered. Was she murdered?

A: Yes.

Q: (L) Was she murdered by the Kennedy's or someone else?

A: Both.

Q: (L) Was it because she was going to reveal things?

A: Yes.

Q: (L) Can you tell us what?

A: Any and all, but it does not matter, because the "bottom line" was that she knew too much.​

I understand that it was Bobby Kennedy's doctor who administered the fatal dose of adrenaline to her, even though a paramedic who had been on the scene assisting her had remonstrated with the doctor not to administer the shot, as he thought she was responding well to treatment. I also understand that a policeman had unexpectedly seen Bobby Kennedy (the US Attorney General and the then President's brother) in a car close to Monroe's home that night.

Before writing this post, I listened with my brother to a YouTube video that dealt with the haunting of the actor John Wayne's boat, the Wild Goose. The ship was a 136-ft. US Navy Minesweeper that Wayne purchased in 1962 and converted into a three-decker floating luxury yacht. A wood-burning fireplace, poker table, and built-in wet bar were added to the saloon which seats up to 127 people.
​

The yacht is now owned by Hornblower Cruises located in Newport Beach, California. The company puts on different events and cruises in which fans of The Duke can step foot on his beloved yacht.

However, over the years since Wayne's death, the yacht has been associated with supernatural phenomena including the smell of cigar smoke at the poker table even though nobody is there and many people (both crew and guests) have reported seeing a tall man in a cowboy hat appearing on various parts of the boat. For example, Lynn Hutchins, a lawyer who bought Wayne's boat four months before he died, felt Wayne’s presence many times. The first encounter with the apparition was when he walked from the master bathroom to his stateroom. He saw a tall figure wearing a cowboy hat standing in the doorway. Hutchins could not see the face clearly because of the hat. The apparition was shaded in grey and appeared solid. As the lawyer walked toward the figure, it vanished. The second time he saw the ghost, he was in the bar that has mirrored walls. Hutchins sat at the poker table when he saw the apparition, again, shaded in grey, reflected in the mirror standing behind him. When he began to speak, the spectre disappeared. Another time, Hutchins was reading in the salon and felt someone standing behind him. As he turned, there was a gust of air, then he heard Wayne’s beer glasses clank so hard he thought they would break.​

For more see: Is John Wayne Haunting His Old Yacht?

and

It appears that Wayne still has an attachment to his old boat, which was one of his favourite places to be during his life.

It seems that many Hollywood stars still haunt their homes or places which they were associated with in life. So, this account of the unusual phenomena on John Wayne's boat is by no means an isolated occurrence where Hollywood stars are concerned. The C's have told us that STS behaviour manifests itself in an attachment to the physical. Perhaps these movie stars, who were feted and led gilded lives whilst alive, need to work out beyond the grave their attachment to fame and material wealth and possessions before they can move on. Moreover, many of them had skeletons in their cupboards, which if they had been revealed during their lives, would have destroyed their careers. This includes everything from drug addictions to adulterous affairs, paedophilia, secret gay lives, bigamy, illegal abortions, illegitimate children from love affairs, rape and sexual assaults, illicit involvement with gangsters, all the way up to manslaughter and murder. Hence, many stars would have had much to reflect on and karma to acknowledge after their deaths. Is it any wonder then their ghosts may still be lingering on the earth plane.

​

 

[MJF]

From what I understand, Ice X forms only under exteme pressure, for example inside the ice giants Neptune and Uranus.

Can an enormous plasma discharge produce this kind of pressure on the water that it apparently sucked up from Mars and directed towards Earth?

Most ice in space seems to be of the regular kind, though more amorphous than on Earth.

I don't know the answer to that one. Maybe best to turn it over to the scientists. What it does show though is that water can exist in exotic states not seen on Earth.

 

[Magnolia]

A: Consider the divide between men and women now.

Relationships between men and women are a mess. Here’s a quote from a man who could see the writing on the wall 40 years ago. He recognizes the male/female divide is more than a social issue; it is a spiritual issue.

Godless, man lives. He only knows human relationships where the basic issues are envy, jealousy, rivalry, and malice. These motives can be conscious or unconscious, but they are always present and play a dynamic role in all aspects of life, even in so-called ‘love’ relationships…….Generosity is mostly bribery and manipulation. Admiration and praise are disguised forms of envy and jealousy. Teaching is often a desire for mental domination, preventing learning. Information is misinformation. Giving is getting. Everything has an ulterior motive.

Of course there are exceptions to this observation. Nonetheless, if you spend a decade or two honestly considering these words about ‘normal’ relationships, I guarantee you’ll discover he is right. Remember the mark of Cain – the ‘knot at the top of the spine’ – that the C’s spoke of? We've been programmed to be manipulated by a hallucination named jealousy. We just keep falling for the same old con because (for some reason I don’t fully understand yet) people are too embarrassed to admit they are jealous, and the PTB keep dressing the appeal to jealousy in new clothing and we don't recognize it for what it really is.

So ‘the current divide’ between men and women is nothing new, just more visible and extreme. There are many posts in various threads discussing this divide. The discussion revolves around 1-what is wrong, 2-why, 3-how do we feel about it, 4-who is to blame, 5-what should we do, and 6-how do we do it.

If we accept a few assumptions

1. We are programmed to be jealous
2. Most relationships are founded on jealousy and other such ulterior, self-serving, Godless motives
3. Proxy-instigators and AI use all venues to plant Godless ideas in man’s consciousness
4. Most social movements are engineered by STS overseers
5. 50% of the people are easily controlled by mass formation hypnosis

then it seems that the first 4 issues (what is wrong and why) have been addressed well, though perhaps not thoroughly.

(#5) what do we do about it? Cursing the darkness does little material good, and I doubt the world will heal by infusing it with more blame and negative emotional energy.

When tornadoes, hurricanes, ‘forest’ fires occur, it is not unusual to see one house standing amidst the destruction – untorched, undamaged, whole. Perhaps we could aim to make our own individual relationships more like that house – untorched, undamaged, whole. If a critical mass of humans can alter our entire realm via the information field, butterfly effect, and entrainment, then simply aiming to become that safe house might have a dramatic effect on the world. If not, our safe house can at least serve as a haven of sanity where, two-by-two (like in Noah's ark), we can survive the flood of hubris.

Our world is not unlike Noah's. His world was filled with outrageous behavior and an endless litany of idols and false gods – both tangible (big money, big bosoms) and intangible (desiring excitement, self-importance, superiority). And even though his whole world was being corrupted and verging on self-destruction, he didn’t protest it, but sought to overcome it.

To do that he cleansed his consciousness, put only one window in his dwelling that looked up towards God, and embarked with absolute faith on a journey with no known destination. He worshipped one Supreme Source of Infinite Good, not multiple petty gods that made him 'feel' good for a few minutes. And by doing so he rose above the onslaught.

The Bible suggests this approach might help all of us. Thou shalt have no other gods before me (EX 20). For where your treasure is, there will your heart be also (MT 6).What we treasure and worship will manifest in the body of our experience. When we worship low-vibration, worldly artifacts, things fall apart. Complications arise, divisions occur, troubles erupt and humans suffer. But if we live in the context of an infinite God/Divine Mind, things work together harmoniously and intelligently. So, like Noah, how do we live together in the context of God?

I am sure there are many insightful answers to this question. Since Paul's letter has been recommended recently, that's a place to start. Paul states unequivocally, Love never fails. (And John states, God is Love.) He notes that now we perceive things from the limited perspective of a suggestible and naive child (we see 'in part,' through a glass darkly). And a childish man can conceive of only childish gods. But we can grow up and ‘put away’ childish things. Then we become Men, and we see each other face-to-face – and know ourselves as well.

What childish idols must we put away to grow up and become Men? Paul letter has some suggestions. Allowing ourselves to be mesmerized by appearances. Self-preoccupation. Being inauthentic – not knowing who and what we truly are. Incessantly comparing ourselves to others (what's he got that I ain't got). Envying what others have (then spawning envy's children – jealously, rivalry, malice). Wanting for ourselves, and wanting it from others. Wanting things now – acting with unnecessary impatience. Wanting to please or impress the ignorant instead of doing What God Wants. Exalting, even worshipping, mundane artifacts.

No man can serve two masters……he will hold to the one, and despise the other (MT 6). It seems clear which master is being served in our world and which is being despised. So Paul suggests there is something we can do. Choose. “Oh Terry, the battle is always there, it’s “when” you choose that counts!”

Are we interested in ceaselessly seeking highly-charged interaction experiences that make us ‘feel good’ for a minute – Or Infinite Good? Do we treasure the petty – or the sublime? Do we cherish self-gratification – Or being a beneficial presence in the world? Do we worship graven images – Or the Divine Mind? What is our god/God?