Session 28 June 2025

[Ricardo]

fwiw , seems unlikely for those crystals to move on account of being large , though they might not be entirely 3rd density though, which may be the reason for not being easily spotted.

 

[axj]

fwiw , seems unlikely for those crystals to move on account of being large , though they might not be entirely 3rd density though, which may be the reason for not being easily spotted.

The forces of an impact or enormous meltwater flows (as has been documented by Randall Carlson) can be large enough, especially if the crystal was on top of the ice sheet.

It seems that Northern Manitoba fits the South Central Canada description the most. I checked and there are apparently no military zones in that area (to keep people from stumbling upon the crystal pyramid). Heavily restricted conservation areas could be a way to hide it:



It could also be underwater in the Hudson Bay.

Was there anything in the sessions to suggest that these large Atlantean crystals may be partly 4D? The C's mentioned that the crystals opened interdimensional portals (not necessarily 4D) during the final destruction of Atlantis, but that's about it I think.

 

[Ricardo]

Was there anything in the sessions to suggest that these large Atlantean crystals may be partly 4D? The C's mentioned that the crystals opened interdimensional portals (not necessarily 4D) during the final destruction of Atlantis, but that's about it I think.

That i'm aware of , nope , however laterals also play a part in this , the example i'm always reminded of is the archives under the Sphinx , which according to E. Cayce would only "be revealed" at the appropriate timing . But this is entirely speculative and interpretive , so take it with a few big crystal salt blocks. Additionally with the tech available to Atlanteans i'd reckon removing ice to install the crystals would be simple and fast enough.( Edit , plus not removing ice below them might mess with ftheir functions ) fwiw

 

[axj]

Regarding the location of the previous geographic North Pole, there seems to be evidence that some very ancient structures (or their foundations) are oriented towards the Hudson Bay:

The theory that a lot of ancient structures around the world are oriented towards former North Poles in the Hudson Bay, Greenland, Norway and the Bering Strait seems to have quite a lot of evidence. The researcher who wrote several papers on this topic (Mark Carlotto) also goes into detail about it on his website. This is an illustration from there:

Meridians of sites aligned to previous locations of the North Pole in the Bering Sea (red), northern Greenland (green), the Norwegian Sea (yellow), and Hudson Bay (magenta).

 

[Harr077]

The pyramids, Bermuda Triangle, StoneHenge and the talk of re-moleculisers (from the 4D crew. Not sure I spelt moleculiser correct I can’t seem to find it on the search) come to mind with discussions of Atlantean crystal placements…
Are there other structures yet hiding in plain sight in line with the old Pole locations ? Are these structures placed in line or some pattern that was integral to the old pole locations?
Makes one want to be an explorer
Just searching meridians I came across the following:

Q: Okay, Mike asks further: The six mountains at Rennes-le-Chateau form a natural pentagon surrounded by a circle. This reminds me of ancient spell-casters surrounding themselves with a circle when summoning spirits or demons. Was this area set up as a giant gateway or place of summoning?

A: Gateways occur where the conditions are right.

Q: Is this area a gateway?

A: Window.

Q: If it is, do the five surrounding peaks contain or shield whatever...

A: Contain is o.k.

Q: So, he is right, it DOES contain. Does this have to do with Atlantean technology and energy production?

A: In an offhand way.

Q: Are there other significant natural formations that follow similar patterns that we should be looking for?

A: Yes, of course. And they are numerous. Monument Valley is but one example.

Q: Well, on the same subject: did Abbe Saunier put clues in the stations of the cross in the Church at Rennes-le-Chateau?

A: Some, but they are gilded.

Q: What do you mean by that?

A: You will see.

Q: Does the message involve all the stations of the cross?

A: Just look. Now folks, remember: Rennes-le-Chateau is a means, not an end. Sort of like unlocking the trunk, expecting to find the gold, and merely finding a map

 

[pinkfreud]

I wonder if they were trying to do some kind of genetic manipulation. Perhaps they were trying to eliminate the psychopathic genes from the population by genetic purging?

If that was the intent, they clearly missed the mark.

Maybe I’m too cynical these days, but …

1. If Psychopathy is a maladaptive trait (and we know it is, as STS ultimately consumes itself), and psychopaths have most recently been estimated to account for 6% of the population (maybe up to as much as 10%,) then a bottleneck could just as logically indicate that women were actively selecting FOR psychopathy.

2. Why are female genetics not factored in to the totality of the gene pool? Is psychopathy only a male trait?

3. The psychopaths are hard at work and winning. Reality does not support the hypothesis.

I don’t mean to be harsh.

 

[Persej]

1. If Psychopathy is a maladaptive trait (and we know it is, as STS ultimately consumes itself), and psychopaths have most recently been estimated to account for 6% of the population (maybe up to as much as 10%,) then a bottleneck could just as logically indicate that women were actively selecting FOR psychopathy.

What makes you think that?

2. Why are female genetics not factored in to the totality of the gene pool? Is psychopathy only a male trait?

No, but it seems to be more prevalent in males.

3. The psychopaths are hard at work and winning. Reality does not support the hypothesis.

What does that have to do with this hypothesis?

 

[pinkfreud]

What makes you think that?



No, but it seems to be more prevalent in males.



What does that have to do with this hypothesis?

One male for 17 females reproducing, if females are selecting against psychopathy, would mean that a vast majority of males were psychopaths. Correct?
If we have a 1:1 ratio for male to females of reproductive age (or pretty near it), but 16 out of 17 men are not reproducing, (and correct my math, please, if I’m doing this wrong) that means 94% of men at reproductive age are psychopaths, or perceived as such.

On the other hand, if women are selecting for psychopathy, we would expect only one out of 17 to have reproductive success (about 6%.)

The C’s said this situation is “kind of like now.” So that makes me think this.

Psychopathy does seem to be more prevalent in males, but what do we base that number on? Violent crimes committed? The result of psychological analysis by an expert psychologist?
And how might those numbers be skewed by perception? What is the ratio of studies done on female psychopathy vs male psychopathy?

Is your hypothesis that the world back then was majority psychopathic, and the bottleneck maybe brought the percentage down? Or is your hypothesis just that there was an attempt to reduce without necessarily having the intended benefits of the effort?

 

[Persej]

Well, the main point of genetic purging is that it works through population bottleneck. That is how you eliminate genetic errors in population. Another thing would be genetic selection, where you want to increase a certain trait in the population by selecting only some members of the population for reproduction.

It is possible that women reproduced only with psychopaths, and your math is correct, but why would they do that? What would they get with that?

I don't think that most men were psychopaths, although it is a possibility.

My hypothesis is that if you cannot recognize who is a psychopath, perhaps the only way to eliminate them from a population is to create a population bottleneck, which would lead to genetic purging of maladaptive traits. And if women thought that only men can be psychopaths, they devised a plan to eliminate psychopaths from a population by creating a population bottleneck from male side.

But we would have to ask more questions about this to the C's to figure out what was going on.

 

[axj]

Well, the C's said that women blamed men for the cataclysms, so it is possible that they were trying to "breed out" certain male traits, maybe the psychopathic ones.

On the other hand, that whole breeding project and mass killing of males seems rather psychopathic in itself. So it is possible that 4D STS directed the women in power at that time to actually increase the number of psychopaths with their breeding program.

Whatever their intention was, the psychopath genetics survived. Is it more or less now than before the breeding experiment? We don't know.

 

[pinkfreud]

Well, the main point of genetic purging is that it works through population bottleneck. That is how you eliminate genetic errors in population. Another thing would be genetic selection, where you want to increase a certain trait in the population by selecting only some members of the population for reproduction.

It is possible that women reproduced only with psychopaths, and your math is correct, but why would they do that? What would they get with that?

I don't think that most men were psychopaths, although it is a possibility.

My hypothesis is that if you cannot recognize who is a psychopath, perhaps the only way to eliminate them from a population is to create a population bottleneck, which would lead to genetic purging of maladaptive traits. And if women thought that only men can be psychopaths, they devised a plan to eliminate psychopaths from a population by creating a population bottleneck from male side.

But we would have to ask more questions about this to the C's to figure out what was going on.

I see your point.
I think women would get the same thing out of pursuing a psychopath (unwittingly or not) that they would now - attraction to confidence, risk-taking, and potentially status and wealth.

But I agree- we would need clarifying questions for the C’s as my possible interpretation is also making a lot of assumptions as to ratios and percentages as they stood 5,000 years ago - I really have no idea what it was like.

 

[Henchman 21]

Well, the main point of genetic purging is that it works through population bottleneck. That is how you eliminate genetic errors in population. Another thing would be genetic selection, where you want to increase a certain trait in the population by selecting only some members of the population for reproduction.

It is possible that women reproduced only with psychopaths, and your math is correct, but why would they do that? What would they get with that?

I don't think that most men were psychopaths, although it is a possibility.

My hypothesis is that if you cannot recognize who is a psychopath, perhaps the only way to eliminate them from a population is to create a population bottleneck, which would lead to genetic purging of maladaptive traits. And if women thought that only men can be psychopaths, they devised a plan to eliminate psychopaths from a population by creating a population bottleneck from male side.

But we would have to ask more questions about this to the C's to figure out what was going on.

How good are women at avoiding breeding with psychopaths these days? Obviously not great, in fact the criminally minded seem to do just fine if not better than regular dudes. If you aren’t up to date on female dating strategies you might be surprised at who they go for and who they ignore. It turns out that women aren’t interested in most men at all. They instead are mostly after men with wealth and basically no morals.
We are now at a point where most men under 30 are virgins. Do you think the same applies for women? No, they can all have sex whenever they like so they are actively selecting against most men and selecting for a very small number of sexually desirable men. They’d literally rather be a part of a harem than have anything to do with the average man. So what kind of people are these men who have the harems?? Not surprisingly these men are not great.
People seem to really not understand what the female condition is or what it represents. Femininity essentially represents STS while male represents STO (I’ll die on this hill). Women are short sighted, living in the present dominated by feeling while men exist in the future due to more advanced reasoning and logic abilities.
Men and women are opposites in so many ways and here’s some examples: Men build culture, women destroy culture (seriously just look at art, men are the poets, painters, writers….,women basically just finger paint with period blood and call it art). Men produce almost everything and women are the biggest consumers which is why commercials are all retarded now, which is because they are pandering to women. Just look at how women vote. These devils are mutilating their children and bringing in masses of low iq rapists (not that high iq rapists are better but don’t worry, women love them too).
The fact so many are fooled isn’t actually surprising as both men and women empathetically prefer women. Basically both men and women always view women as victims. We excuse everything women do as somehow still men’s fault. It’s truly disgusting.
Maybe stop simping for this shit. Can we please hold women to the standards we hold men to. And then maybe as the conversation continues it can become something better than “men need to do better”. So bored with that.

I know I pissed all sorts of people off. I don’t care. Women are so lost that I’m just gonna say it because nobody else will (@pinkfreud and @Serendipity as outliers).

At this point women are becoming the butt of jokes just for being women. This should be alarming and tremendously embarrassing.

 

[axj]

You forget that Western countries that are infected by the woke agenda are not the whole world - it is just a relatively small percentage of the world population (the so-called "golden billion").

Most of the world has completely different male-female relations that seem less pathological than in much of the West.

Unfortunately, you seem to be falling for the divide-and-conquer agenda that aims to create conflict along all possible lines, including race and gender. And by holding such anti-women beliefs you become a useful idiot for the powers that be.

You are on a forum founded by a woman, by the way.

 

[Ricardo]

Human women and Human men are complimentary for near divine reasons ,there's no getting around it , but discussion of relations between must first separate the "tares" , additionally the environment is non-conducive to educating and fostering self-awareness of both and their possible and respective interplay in a somewhat free environment , which we don't have , for the most part. Lumping what media ( in whatever means ) portrays of female social antics in a generalized form ( re Western environment) with a more objective view of the environment , is something the ptb have been largely preventing ( and at times fostering ) for centuries in one form or other , so as to sow discord. Additionally there's the issue of Individuals ( capital I ) which would be completely obviated in such a manner of discussion. The so called manosphere in the internet is a good example of such , mostly , pointless exercises and empty results regarding a better awareness of wtf is going on ( fwiw / my 2x cents).

 

[Ruth]

People seem to really not understand what the female condition is or what it represents. Femininity essentially represents STS while male represents STO (I’ll die on this hill). Women are short sighted, living in the present dominated by feeling while men exist in the future due to more advanced reasoning and logic abilities.

That doesn't explain why far more psychopaths are male than female and yes, they do rule the world. Did you know this planet is run by STS? It has been for a very long time. Hopefully you won't get to "die on that particular hill" too many times. Once should be enough, surely? Or not at all when the sex of a person is taken out of the equation.