Session 28 June 2025

[Ruth]

Speaking on the concept of negative polarities within the feminine is divisive, but we are happy to point out the failings of the masculine every time. Darn that manosphere.

I think that is an illusion. Pointing out negativity is always going to be divisive, especially if a person or group of people holds assumptions and/or programming of some type or another. It matters not at all if a person is male or female.

It's also very likely that a soul may incarnate as both in order to fulfill a desire for learning or an opportunity for self expression.

 

[Ruth]

1. If Psychopathy is a maladaptive trait (and we know it is, as STS ultimately consumes itself), and psychopaths have most recently been estimated to account for 6% of the population (maybe up to as much as 10%,) then a bottleneck could just as logically indicate that women were actively selecting FOR psychopathy.

I'm not sure if being victimised by a psychopath could be construed as "actively selecting FOR psychopathy. Maybe it's just being victimised, controlled and expoited by a negative type personality. Women are just as adept at bad behaviour as men.

2. Why are female genetics not factored in to the totality of the gene pool? Is psychopathy only a male trait?

What makes you think they aren't? I know a female psychopath, so it's not only a male trait.

3. The psychopaths are hard at work and winning. Reality does not support the hypothesis.

Reality doesn't support them very well either because, as you have said, "STS ultimately consumes itself". I include the concept of Evil as the ultimate expression of STS. It will ultimately destroy itself. Is this what 'winning' as a psychopath means? Maybe. They just take so darned long to do it and they destroy so many others along the way.