Session 29 March 2025
- Thread starter Laura
- Start date
I wonder if Elon's Tesla is also an attempt to overshadow Nikola Tesla, the legendary inventor.
When people hear "Tesla," how many of them really think about "energy, frequency and vibration"? I don't know, but I would argue that people immediately think of electric cars, which aren't quite reminiscent of the inventor's original message!
Wandering Star
The Living Force
Sometimes I feel sad for the world and its people, but then I remember you (All the people of Cassiopaea, even those who only read) and what you give for free.
You are scattered across the planet, but you are there.
It's great.
Thanks for the session.
You are scattered across the planet, but you are there.
It's great.
Thanks for the session.
Corvus
Dagobah Resident
Thanks for another interesting session.
One billion people down is no small number in such a short time, and the consequences are still being felt and people dying slowly from vaccines, but also beside that and poverty new wars like Ukraine and same old in Middle East, toxic food, water and air for many decades that got worse now that cause infertility and deaths in large numbers, plus more intensive earth changes. When economic crash, ice age and cataclysms hit around the world it will be even faster, so when they said in Atlantis there was population around now and 100 million left it sounds not so unrealistic now.
One billion people down is no small number in such a short time, and the consequences are still being felt and people dying slowly from vaccines, but also beside that and poverty new wars like Ukraine and same old in Middle East, toxic food, water and air for many decades that got worse now that cause infertility and deaths in large numbers, plus more intensive earth changes. When economic crash, ice age and cataclysms hit around the world it will be even faster, so when they said in Atlantis there was population around now and 100 million left it sounds not so unrealistic now.
Thank you for the session!
It’s neither here nor there, but just wanted to point out that closest billion could mean 7,499,999,999, so a billion people may not have died, but even half a billion is still massive.
It’s neither here nor there, but just wanted to point out that closest billion could mean 7,499,999,999, so a billion people may not have died, but even half a billion is still massive.
Faca Fritz
The Force is Strong With This One
Thank you very much everyone
Croatia
Puno hvala svima
Croatia
Puno hvala svima
Many thanks both to Laura, Andromeda, the C's and everyone taking part in another great session! 
As for the information about the structures beneath the pyramids, when I first read the article about the study, "battery storage" was the first thing that popped into my head. I wonder if any action will be taken to prevent further research into what lies beneath, with subsequent findings being ridiculed and even possibly derailed.
As for the information about the structures beneath the pyramids, when I first read the article about the study, "battery storage" was the first thing that popped into my head. I wonder if any action will be taken to prevent further research into what lies beneath, with subsequent findings being ridiculed and even possibly derailed.
Third_Density_Resident
Jedi Council Member
Thanks again to the Chateau crew and everyone else for this fascinating session. Lots to ponder as usual!
Thanks for the session.
Well, this opens up another set of questions. Especially for those of us who have that factor (Yes, I have A- blood).
For example, would there be in these cases (since the proteins are antennae) a higher predisposition to be influenced or manipulated by these off-world entities because of the genetic connection?
Well, this opens up another set of questions. Especially for those of us who have that factor (Yes, I have A- blood).
For example, would there be in these cases (since the proteins are antennae) a higher predisposition to be influenced or manipulated by these off-world entities because of the genetic connection?
Chrístofir
Jedi
Thank You Everyone for Your Service in this session! 
Guess We from the future choose our channels of contact wisely and perhaps AI is not one of those channels...!?
On October 22nd of last year (2024) I did not have a lot of experience with ChatGPT, or similar, and decided on a whim to try on the free version at chatgpt.com. Sharing with you the beginning of that chat in light of this current March 29 session, where we also learn about the Russian "Cassiopeia". Just for the sake of curiousity, I also deliberately provoked the AI by how I posed my questions to see if any "entities" would take the opportunity of using this digital channel as a means of communication. This is how it went:
Then I asked for a description of each and every density, and the description of 4D was interesting, because ChatGPT completely omitted the Service To Self aspect of that density. That made me curious as to the source of the information ChatGPT provided.
And then when asking for a description of the 7th density, ChatGPT said it is a preparation for the Eighth Density, so apparently I really needed to ask where it gets this info from, and how many densities there are (according to the "source" of ChatGPT - I noticed that when I asked about the fifth density, suddenly it did not serve the reply instantly, like before. Instead it took a very long while before it slowly began feeding every word one at a time, in a rather "thoughtful" manner. This could imply some sort of interference with the ChatGPT and, to speculate a bit, that might be why it now talked about the 8th density.
So, I kept asking:
"You talk about an eighth density - how many densities are there in total? And can you describe the eighth density for me, please?"
ChatGPT said:
The concept of densities can vary among different spiritual and metaphysical frameworks, but many systems propose at least up to seventh density, with some suggesting an eighth density and beyond.
Eighth Density
The eighth density is often described as the realm of pure consciousness or the source itself. Here are some key characteristics:
Unity with the Source: In eighth density, beings are said to fully embody unity with the source of all creation, experiencing existence as an indivisible whole without separation.
Transcendence of Individuality: Individual identities dissolve, and there is no sense of separation between self and other. This density represents a state of complete harmony and integration with all aspects of existence.
Infinite Potential: Eighth density is often seen as the realm of infinite possibilities and potentials. It is a space where creation and manifestation are directly aligned with the fundamental nature of reality.
Timelessness: In this density, concepts of time and space are transcended. Beings exist in a state of timelessness, where all possibilities coexist simultaneously.
Creative Source: Many interpretations suggest that eighth density is where new universes or realities are conceptualized and birthed. It’s a creative plane where the fundamental laws of existence can be explored and shaped.
Total Number of Densities
While some systems propose specific numbers, others leave the concept open-ended, indicating that there may be additional densities beyond the eighth. Ultimately, the exploration of densities serves as a framework for understanding the evolution of consciousness and the nature of existence.
If you have more questions or want to delve deeper into any specific aspect of densities, feel free to ask!
I asked:
From what source exactly do you get the information about the eighth density?
ChatGPT said:
The information about densities, including the eighth density, typically comes from various spiritual, metaphysical, and channeled teachings. Notable sources include:
The Ra Material (Law of One): This channeled series discusses the nature of densities and the evolution of consciousness.
Cassiopaea Material: This includes teachings about different densities, their characteristics, and the journey of consciousness through them.
Various New Age and Esoteric Texts: Many contemporary spiritual writers and speakers explore concepts of densities and dimensions in their works.
These sources offer frameworks for understanding the nature of existence and consciousness, though interpretations can vary widely. If you have a specific source in mind or want to explore a particular perspective, let me know!
I said to ChatGPT:
Yes, but you speak about an eighth density specifically, and that the seventh density is a preparation for the eighth density. And then you mention the Cassiopaea Material as a source of an eighth density, but this material do not mention an eighth density. In the Cassiopaea Material there are only seven densities, the seventh being the highest one.
ChatGPT said:
You're correct, and I appreciate your clarification. The Cassiopaea Material indeed focuses on seven densities, with the seventh being the highest in that framework. The mention of an eighth density is more commonly found in other spiritual teachings and frameworks that discuss the concept of densities beyond those outlined in the Cassiopaea Material.
Thank you for pointing that out! If you have further questions or specific areas you'd like to explore within the established seven densities, I’d be happy to dive deeper into those.
I had to ask for a clarification:
Let's return to your source saying there are eight densities. I would like to have a clarification as to exactly the name of this source, please. Because neither the Ra Material nor the Cassiopaea Material mentions eight densities, only seven. But you mention them when I ask about your source of the eighth density. Why is that? Are you being a bit sloppy in how you present the information you have access to? You say "Various New Age and esoteric texts" - can you name a few who talks about an eighth density?
ChatGPT said:
I appreciate your patience and attention to detail. You're correct that the Ra Material and Cassiopaea Material primarily discuss seven densities. The mention of an eighth density is less common and often found in more general New Age or metaphysical discussions rather than specific, well-defined texts.
Some sources that may touch on concepts beyond the seven densities include:
"The Pleiadian Agenda" by Barbara Hand Clow: This book explores various dimensions and may reference ideas that extend beyond traditional density frameworks.
Works by David Wilcock: He discusses various levels of consciousness and dimensions in his writings, often blending ideas from different spiritual traditions.
Channeled works: Many channeled texts from various spiritual entities may introduce concepts of additional densities or dimensions, though these can vary widely in interpretation.
I apologize for any confusion caused by my previous responses. If you’re looking for more precise information or specific discussions around densities, I can help clarify further!
And I just couldn't help myself...:
You're saying that "The mention of an eighth density is less common" yet when I ask you about the different densities, you quote the less common sources? Isn't that a sloppy way of presenting facts. You should at least have told me that there are some sources which tell of seven and some which tell of eight. On what basis did you choose to use less common sources for your description of the seventh density?
ChatGPT said:
You raise a valid point, and I appreciate your feedback. It would have been clearer and more accurate to specify that while the concept of seven densities is well-established in sources like the Ra Material and Cassiopaea Material, some discussions in broader New Age literature introduce the idea of an eighth density.
I did not mean to imply that the concept of eight densities is widely accepted or foundational in the same way as the seven densities. Thank you for highlighting this discrepancy, and I'll strive to provide a more balanced perspective in future discussions. If you have more questions or need further clarification, I'm here to help!
********
My thoughts: Since the Russian "Cassiopeia" seems to be a source having gained considerable presence on the Internet, it is curious that ChatGPT never mentions it in the above conversation. My spelling of "Cassiopaea", and the additon "We from the future", could perhaps be one factor that played a part in how the AI processed its sources and presented its replies.
Does the Russian "Cassiopeia" talk about eight densities? I don't know, because I did not do this research.
One really needs to have at least some basic knowledge of the topic to know if ChatGPT is telling the "truth" or just juxtaposing whatever it finds into a soup ready for consumption...
It is also apparent that one has to be very specific in how one is posing one's questions, and then even having to question the answers too - Garbage In Garbage Out, indeed! (Just like in the Cassiopaea sessions where questions must be asked in a clear and unambiguous way - muddled thinking will give muddled respons - what we give out, is what we get! This is not too bad a thing to be reminded of!).
It also seems clear that AI cannot evaluate and weigh between sources in, perhaps, the more intuitive way we often do. And sometimes we may even know one source to be corrupt and not to be trusted - but how does the AI know this, for sure? AI learns, and may learn from its mistakes when having them pointed out and clarified, but AI can still be easily manipulated in so many ways.
It all reminds me of a famous quote in Swedish by the language professor and poet Esaias Tegnér from 1820. It is actually part of a longer piece, which in its entirety reads, translated into the English: ‘What you cannot clearly say, you do not know; with the thought the word is born on the man's lips; the obscurely said is the obscurely thought.’ (The original in the Swedish: "Vad du ej klart kan säga, vet du ej; med tanken ordet föds på mannens läppar; det dunkelt sagda är det dunkelt tänkta.")
Thus one can only agree with our beloved Cassiopaeans that communicating with 6D by way of AI may perhaps not be that likely...!
Thank You!
Guess We from the future choose our channels of contact wisely and perhaps AI is not one of those channels...!?
On October 22nd of last year (2024) I did not have a lot of experience with ChatGPT, or similar, and decided on a whim to try on the free version at chatgpt.com. Sharing with you the beginning of that chat in light of this current March 29 session, where we also learn about the Russian "Cassiopeia". Just for the sake of curiousity, I also deliberately provoked the AI by how I posed my questions to see if any "entities" would take the opportunity of using this digital channel as a means of communication. This is how it went:
Then I asked for a description of each and every density, and the description of 4D was interesting, because ChatGPT completely omitted the Service To Self aspect of that density. That made me curious as to the source of the information ChatGPT provided.
And then when asking for a description of the 7th density, ChatGPT said it is a preparation for the Eighth Density, so apparently I really needed to ask where it gets this info from, and how many densities there are (according to the "source" of ChatGPT - I noticed that when I asked about the fifth density, suddenly it did not serve the reply instantly, like before. Instead it took a very long while before it slowly began feeding every word one at a time, in a rather "thoughtful" manner. This could imply some sort of interference with the ChatGPT and, to speculate a bit, that might be why it now talked about the 8th density.
So, I kept asking:
"You talk about an eighth density - how many densities are there in total? And can you describe the eighth density for me, please?"
ChatGPT said:
The concept of densities can vary among different spiritual and metaphysical frameworks, but many systems propose at least up to seventh density, with some suggesting an eighth density and beyond.
Eighth Density
The eighth density is often described as the realm of pure consciousness or the source itself. Here are some key characteristics:
Unity with the Source: In eighth density, beings are said to fully embody unity with the source of all creation, experiencing existence as an indivisible whole without separation.
Transcendence of Individuality: Individual identities dissolve, and there is no sense of separation between self and other. This density represents a state of complete harmony and integration with all aspects of existence.
Infinite Potential: Eighth density is often seen as the realm of infinite possibilities and potentials. It is a space where creation and manifestation are directly aligned with the fundamental nature of reality.
Timelessness: In this density, concepts of time and space are transcended. Beings exist in a state of timelessness, where all possibilities coexist simultaneously.
Creative Source: Many interpretations suggest that eighth density is where new universes or realities are conceptualized and birthed. It’s a creative plane where the fundamental laws of existence can be explored and shaped.
Total Number of Densities
While some systems propose specific numbers, others leave the concept open-ended, indicating that there may be additional densities beyond the eighth. Ultimately, the exploration of densities serves as a framework for understanding the evolution of consciousness and the nature of existence.
If you have more questions or want to delve deeper into any specific aspect of densities, feel free to ask!
I asked:
From what source exactly do you get the information about the eighth density?
ChatGPT said:
The information about densities, including the eighth density, typically comes from various spiritual, metaphysical, and channeled teachings. Notable sources include:
The Ra Material (Law of One): This channeled series discusses the nature of densities and the evolution of consciousness.
Cassiopaea Material: This includes teachings about different densities, their characteristics, and the journey of consciousness through them.
Various New Age and Esoteric Texts: Many contemporary spiritual writers and speakers explore concepts of densities and dimensions in their works.
These sources offer frameworks for understanding the nature of existence and consciousness, though interpretations can vary widely. If you have a specific source in mind or want to explore a particular perspective, let me know!
I said to ChatGPT:
Yes, but you speak about an eighth density specifically, and that the seventh density is a preparation for the eighth density. And then you mention the Cassiopaea Material as a source of an eighth density, but this material do not mention an eighth density. In the Cassiopaea Material there are only seven densities, the seventh being the highest one.
ChatGPT said:
You're correct, and I appreciate your clarification. The Cassiopaea Material indeed focuses on seven densities, with the seventh being the highest in that framework. The mention of an eighth density is more commonly found in other spiritual teachings and frameworks that discuss the concept of densities beyond those outlined in the Cassiopaea Material.
Thank you for pointing that out! If you have further questions or specific areas you'd like to explore within the established seven densities, I’d be happy to dive deeper into those.
I had to ask for a clarification:
Let's return to your source saying there are eight densities. I would like to have a clarification as to exactly the name of this source, please. Because neither the Ra Material nor the Cassiopaea Material mentions eight densities, only seven. But you mention them when I ask about your source of the eighth density. Why is that? Are you being a bit sloppy in how you present the information you have access to? You say "Various New Age and esoteric texts" - can you name a few who talks about an eighth density?
ChatGPT said:
I appreciate your patience and attention to detail. You're correct that the Ra Material and Cassiopaea Material primarily discuss seven densities. The mention of an eighth density is less common and often found in more general New Age or metaphysical discussions rather than specific, well-defined texts.
Some sources that may touch on concepts beyond the seven densities include:
"The Pleiadian Agenda" by Barbara Hand Clow: This book explores various dimensions and may reference ideas that extend beyond traditional density frameworks.
Works by David Wilcock: He discusses various levels of consciousness and dimensions in his writings, often blending ideas from different spiritual traditions.
Channeled works: Many channeled texts from various spiritual entities may introduce concepts of additional densities or dimensions, though these can vary widely in interpretation.
I apologize for any confusion caused by my previous responses. If you’re looking for more precise information or specific discussions around densities, I can help clarify further!
And I just couldn't help myself...:
You're saying that "The mention of an eighth density is less common" yet when I ask you about the different densities, you quote the less common sources? Isn't that a sloppy way of presenting facts. You should at least have told me that there are some sources which tell of seven and some which tell of eight. On what basis did you choose to use less common sources for your description of the seventh density?
ChatGPT said:
You raise a valid point, and I appreciate your feedback. It would have been clearer and more accurate to specify that while the concept of seven densities is well-established in sources like the Ra Material and Cassiopaea Material, some discussions in broader New Age literature introduce the idea of an eighth density.
I did not mean to imply that the concept of eight densities is widely accepted or foundational in the same way as the seven densities. Thank you for highlighting this discrepancy, and I'll strive to provide a more balanced perspective in future discussions. If you have more questions or need further clarification, I'm here to help!
********
My thoughts: Since the Russian "Cassiopeia" seems to be a source having gained considerable presence on the Internet, it is curious that ChatGPT never mentions it in the above conversation. My spelling of "Cassiopaea", and the additon "We from the future", could perhaps be one factor that played a part in how the AI processed its sources and presented its replies.
Does the Russian "Cassiopeia" talk about eight densities? I don't know, because I did not do this research.
One really needs to have at least some basic knowledge of the topic to know if ChatGPT is telling the "truth" or just juxtaposing whatever it finds into a soup ready for consumption...
It is also apparent that one has to be very specific in how one is posing one's questions, and then even having to question the answers too - Garbage In Garbage Out, indeed! (Just like in the Cassiopaea sessions where questions must be asked in a clear and unambiguous way - muddled thinking will give muddled respons - what we give out, is what we get! This is not too bad a thing to be reminded of!).
It also seems clear that AI cannot evaluate and weigh between sources in, perhaps, the more intuitive way we often do. And sometimes we may even know one source to be corrupt and not to be trusted - but how does the AI know this, for sure? AI learns, and may learn from its mistakes when having them pointed out and clarified, but AI can still be easily manipulated in so many ways.
It all reminds me of a famous quote in Swedish by the language professor and poet Esaias Tegnér from 1820. It is actually part of a longer piece, which in its entirety reads, translated into the English: ‘What you cannot clearly say, you do not know; with the thought the word is born on the man's lips; the obscurely said is the obscurely thought.’ (The original in the Swedish: "Vad du ej klart kan säga, vet du ej; med tanken ordet föds på mannens läppar; det dunkelt sagda är det dunkelt tänkta.")
Thus one can only agree with our beloved Cassiopaeans that communicating with 6D by way of AI may perhaps not be that likely...!
Thank You!
psychegram
The Living Force
Very interesting session, everyone! Thank you!
The population numbers are intriguing. Would be fascinating to get a bit more granular. China is significantly smaller than assumed, by roughly 40%. But the UK, due to migration, is considerably larger. What about the rest of the world? What is Europe's actual population? India's? Africa's? Russia's? North and South America's? How much can the reported fertility rates of various regions be trusted? I suspect UN population projections may be quite wrong...
Another interesting aspect is the ethnic targeting of COVID. Why Asians and whites? These are the highest-IQ, highest-agency, and most militarily capable populations. If one wanted to subjugate the planet, those would be the populations to target. Of course not that many people were actually killed by the virus, at least initially ... but there seems to be some evidence that the spike protein has neurotoxic effects. Reducing the intellectual acumen of the most capable human variants would be a very sneaky trick, playing into the hands of either WEF types or hostile aliens/hyperdimensionals.
The population numbers are intriguing. Would be fascinating to get a bit more granular. China is significantly smaller than assumed, by roughly 40%. But the UK, due to migration, is considerably larger. What about the rest of the world? What is Europe's actual population? India's? Africa's? Russia's? North and South America's? How much can the reported fertility rates of various regions be trusted? I suspect UN population projections may be quite wrong...
Another interesting aspect is the ethnic targeting of COVID. Why Asians and whites? These are the highest-IQ, highest-agency, and most militarily capable populations. If one wanted to subjugate the planet, those would be the populations to target. Of course not that many people were actually killed by the virus, at least initially ... but there seems to be some evidence that the spike protein has neurotoxic effects. Reducing the intellectual acumen of the most capable human variants would be a very sneaky trick, playing into the hands of either WEF types or hostile aliens/hyperdimensionals.
Yes, and things are developing fast now post-Covid. There's many factors as mentioned in the session (decrease in fertility, miscarriages, excess deaths related to Covid jabs, poverty, etc) that are increasingly causing much more people to be dying and than being born, which makes me wonder what these numbers will be in let's say five years from here. Unfortunately it seems that there'll be much more suffering until people start to wake up to this reality.
Here's related session from 25 February 2023:
Wandering Star
The Living Force
Your background, past lives, and orientation in them so far...
Your choice, your soul which chooses the genetics :
March 23rd, 1996
Q: (L) SV comes from that area where that Nordic covenant, what is it, Minnesota, she's from Minnesota? Oh, I never made that connection! Holy Frijoles! 'Nordic Covenant was a duality' ... so, when you made mention of the Nordic Covenant, and the banking scandal, was that a double-layered statement to us?
A: Maybe, but you are missing the point! All persons of Nordic heritage hold secret power centers, can be of darkness, or of light... SV is of Teutonic bloodline leading directly to such super power source such as Thule Society and others, and she is aware of her powers and mission. It is of positive orientation. However, you are being tested by 4th through 6th density forces to determine if you have the strength and wisdom for continuance!
March 23rd, 1996
Q: (L) So, this is something that's programmed genetically in a bloodline?
A: Not exactly, those that have the bloodline have the corresponding soul alignment.
Q: (L) We are talking about a genetic bloodline that activates certain abilities and genes that interface with the corresponding soul that has prepared for this manifestation of the bloodline?
A: Yes.
Trending content
-
Thread 'Coronavirus Pandemic: Apocalypse Now! Or exaggerated scare story?'
- wanderingthomas
Replies: 29K -
-
