Session 29 March 2025

[Jones]

(Altair) Was RH negative blood originally the result of some genetic manipulations?

A: Yes

(Altair) If so, for what purpose?

A: Those most connected to off-world bloodlines.

Q: (L) So was it genetically manipulated off-world in an older time and place? Is that what you're suggesting?

A: Yes

Q: (L) And it's more closely connected. Are these bloodlines negative bloodlines?

A: Some but not the way promoted by the ignorant.

Q: (L) You mean all those people who say if you've got RH negative, you're reptilian. Is that it?

A: Yes

Q: (L) Well, my mother had RH negative blood. I don't think I'm a reptile. I didn't get it though. Okay, background to the next question:

What are the odds that this genetic manipulation is a continuing interference?

A personal example where an A+ mother has two daughters to different fathers and both daughters are 0- blood type. I asked grok what the odds were of that and while it's not impossible, the odds are very low. I asked the question three times since grok gave an approximate answer and the highest of the three answers was 1.64%

Grok's calculation below:

To determine the odds of a woman with A+ blood having two daughters with O- blood with different fathers, we need to break this down into the genetics of ABO blood types and Rh factors, then calculate the probabilities step by step.
Step 1: ABO Blood Type (A to O)

• A+ blood type: The woman has the phenotype A and is Rh-positive. For ABO, her possible genotypes are AA or AO (since A is dominant over O).
• O- blood type: Each daughter has the phenotype O and is Rh-negative. For ABO, the genotype must be OO (since O is recessive).
• For a child to have O blood, they must inherit an O allele from both parents. Since the woman has A blood, she must carry the O allele (genotype AO). If she were AA, she couldn’t have an O child, so we assume she is AO.
• Father’s contribution: Each daughter’s father must contribute an O allele. This means each father must have at least one O allele (genotypes OO, AO, or BO).
• Population frequencies (approximate, based on general data):
  • O allele frequency: ~0.63 (common in many populations).
  • A allele: ~0.33.
  • B allele: ~0.04.
• Probability a random father has at least one O allele:
  • OO: 0.63 × 0.63 = 0.3969.
  • AO: 0.33 × 0.63 = 0.2079 (x2 for OA order = 0.4158 total).
  • BO: 0.04 × 0.63 = 0.0252 (x2 = 0.0504 total).
  • Total = 0.3969 + 0.4158 + 0.0504 = ~0.863 (86.3%).
• For an AO mother and a father with at least one O allele to produce an OO child:
  • Mother (AO) gives O: 50% (0.5).
  • Father gives O: If he’s OO (100%), AO (50%), or BO (50%), weighted by their prevalence among O-carrying fathers:
    • P(OO) = 0.3969 / 0.863 = 0.46 → 100% O.
    • P(AO) = 0.4158 / 0.863 = 0.48 → 50% O.
    • P(BO) = 0.0504 / 0.863 = 0.06 → 50% O.
    • Weighted avg = (0.46 × 1) + (0.48 × 0.5) + (0.06 × 0.5) = 0.46 + 0.24 + 0.03 = 0.73.
  • Child is OO: 0.5 × 0.73 = 0.365 (36.5%).

Step 2: Rh Factor (+ to -)

• A+: The woman is Rh-positive (genotype RR or Rr).
• O-: Each daughter is Rh-negative (rr).
• For an Rh-positive mother to have an Rh-negative child, she must be heterozygous (Rr), as RR would only produce Rh-positive kids (Rr or RR) with any father.
• Population frequency (approximate):
  • R (positive) allele: ~0.6.
  • r (negative) allele: ~0.4.
• If mother is Rr (given she has A+ and an r child):
  • She passes r: 50% (0.5).
• Father must pass r (genotype rr or Rr):
  • rr (O-): 0.4 × 0.4 = 0.16.
  • Rr (O+): 2 × 0.6 × 0.4 = 0.48.
  • Among O blood type fathers (OO), P(r) = 0.4.
  • P(father is rr) = 0.16 / 0.3969 = ~0.403 (since we’re restricting to OO fathers for simplicity).
  • P(father gives r) = (0.403 × 1) + (0.597 × 0.5) = 0.403 + 0.2985 = 0.7015.
• Child is rr: 0.5 × 0.7015 = 0.35075 (35.1%).

Step 3: Combined Probability per Daughter

• ABO (O) and Rh (-) together: 0.365 × 0.35075 = ~0.128 (12.8%).

Step 4: Two Daughters, Different Fathers

• Each daughter’s blood type is an independent event with different fathers.
• Both daughters O-: 0.128 × 0.128 = 0.016384 (1.6384%).

Final Considerations

• The woman must be AO Rr (plausible, as ~50% of A+ people are AO and ~33% of Rh+ are Rr).
• Exact allele frequencies vary by population, but these are reasonable averages.

Final Answer: The odds are approximately 1.64% (or about 1 in 61).

I asked if both O and Rh- were recessive to clarify my understanding of the above:

Yes, you’re absolutely right! Both the O blood type in the ABO system and the Rh-negative (rh-) trait in the Rh system are recessive. Let me explain why:
ABO Blood Type: O is Recessive

• In the ABO blood group system, there are three main alleles: A, B, and O.
• A and B are codominant, meaning if you inherit an A and a B, you’ll have AB blood type.
• O is recessive because it only expresses itself when paired with another O allele. If you inherit an A or B allele alongside an O, the A or B will dominate, resulting in A or B blood type, respectively.
• So, for someone to have O blood type, their genotype must be OO. If they had AO or BO, the A or B would mask the O, making them A or B.

Rh Factor: Rh- is Recessive

• In the Rh system, there are two main alleles: R (Rh-positive) and r (Rh-negative).
• R is dominant, and r is recessive.
• If you inherit at least one R allele (genotypes RR or Rr), you’ll be Rh-positive because the presence of the R allele produces the Rh antigen on red blood cells.
• To be Rh-negative, you must inherit two r alleles (genotype rr), as the r allele doesn’t produce the antigen, and it’s only expressed when there’s no dominant R to override it.

Summary

• O is recessive to A and B in the ABO system.
• Rh- (r) is recessive to Rh+ (R) in the Rh system.
• For a child to be O- (OO rr), they need to inherit the recessive O and r alleles from both parents, which is why the mother and father must each carry these recessive traits (e.g., mother AO Rr, father OO rr)

For general interest sake, I asked what the population density of each Rh- blood type was - grok corrected my question and also gives distributions of the types in different countries.

When you ask about "population densities" for A-, B-, AB-, and O- blood types, I assume you mean the percentage or frequency of these blood types in the general population, as "density" typically implies a measure of distribution across a population. Since these are the Rh-negative blood types within the ABO system, I’ll provide their approximate frequencies based on global averages and some regional variations, using widely accepted data.
Blood Type Frequencies (Rh-Negative)
The prevalence of blood types varies by region and ethnicity, but here are rough global estimates for the Rh-negative blood types you asked about, based on data from blood donation organizations and genetic studies:

• A- (A negative):
  • Global estimate: Around 6-7% of the world population.
  • Details: More common in Europe (e.g., ~7-8% in the U.S., higher in parts of Scandinavia). Less frequent in Asia and Africa, where Rh-negative types are rarer overall.
• B- (B negative):
  • Global estimate: Around 1-2% of the world population.
  • Details: Relatively rare globally. Higher in parts of South Asia and the Middle East (e.g., India has slightly higher B prevalence), but the Rh-negative factor keeps it low.
• AB- (AB negative):
  • Global estimate: Around 0.5-1% of the world population.
  • Details: Yes, AB- is indeed "a thing"! It’s the rarest of the eight main ABO/Rh blood types. It’s slightly more common in Caucasian populations (e.g., ~1% in the U.S.) but extremely rare in Asian and African populations.
• O- (O negative):
  • Global estimate: Around 3-7% of the world population.
  • Details: Known as the universal donor, O- is more common in Western Europe (e.g., ~6-7% in the U.S., higher in some Celtic populations) and less common in East Asia (e.g., <1% in Japan). Globally, it averages around 3-4% when weighted by population size.

Key Notes

• Rh-negative rarity: Only about 15% of the global population is Rh-negative (lacking the RhD antigen), with the majority being Rh-positive. This makes A-, B-, AB-, and O- less common than their Rh-positive counterparts (A+, B+, AB+, O+).
• Regional variation: These percentages shift significantly by region. For example:
  • In the U.S., O- is ~7%, A- ~6%, B- ~2%, AB- ~0.6%.
  • In East Asia, Rh-negative types drop below 1% due to a high prevalence of Rh-positive genes.
  • Among some indigenous groups (e.g., Native Americans), Rh-negative was historically almost nonexistent before European contact.
• Data source: These figures align with estimates from organizations like the American Red Cross, Stanford Blood Center, and global health studies, adjusted for a world average.

Final Answer
Here’s a concise summary of the approximate global population frequencies:

• A-: ~6-7%
• B-: ~1-2%
• AB-: ~0.5-1%
• O-: ~3-7%

These are rough averages and can vary depending on the specific population you’re looking at—let me know if you’d like breakdowns for a particular country or group!

(ScioAgapeOmnis) Yes. The original actual picture is more like wavelengths. It’s just like green and red blotches and stuff. And personally, I can't make out how they got these details in the rendering because looking at it, it just looks, there's like this something that resonates under the pyramid, but it's like a big blob. You can't really make out the details. So I don't know how they said, "Oh, it's eight columns. They have a spiral around each column". That part of it was confusing to me.

I sometimes see video shorts where people and their vehicles have gone missing and a team of men scan waterways and other bodies of water on suspected routes they could have travelled in their cars. They will be sitting in a boat on a waterway showing their scan screen and it looks just as you describe. The men will be saying 'oh look, there's a car' and I can't see anything that looks like a car on the scan screen. I guess these instruments need some sort of training to be able to interpret the red, green and orange blotches.

Thank you all for sharing the session

 

[Bluegazer]

Your background, past lives, and orientation in them so far...

Your choice, your soul which chooses the genetics :

March 23rd, 1996

I don't want to make offtopic, but this is the way things are with my genealogical line:

On my maternal grandfather's side, northern Italians. Mereto di Tomba. Udine. (Mestroni surname) Then on my maternal grandmother's side, Spain (Martinez surname). And now from my paternal grandmother, Galicia (Rua-Comesaña). And here the twist. My paternal grandmother's father according to history was Scottish. And from what I could find out many Galicians are somehow related to the Scots. For example they share the use of bagpipes. Then you find out a little more and you find out that there were Vikings in Galician lands between the IX and XII century. Finishing those events: With the end of the period of the Viking invasions began the arrival of Nordic pilgrims to Santiago de Compostela following the Camino de Santiago. Among these pilgrims were important figures such as King Sigurd of Norway, in the autumn of 1108, the Vestvegr sea route that connected Scandinavia with Galicia, lasted about eight days of crossing.

So... well maybe there's something hidden in there between one or another dna sequence.

It's intriguing to me because I would really like to know something about my past to understand the present and prepare for whatever needs to happen.

 

[Bluegazer]

What are the odds that this genetic manipulation is a continuing interference?

A personal example where an A+ mother has two daughters to different fathers and both daughters are 0- blood type. I asked grok what the odds were of that and while it's not impossible, the odds are very low. I asked the question three times since grok gave an approximate answer and the highest of the three answers was 1.64%

Interesting. In my case, my mother is A+ and my father is O+.

 

[Jones]

Interesting. In my case, my mother is A+ and my father is O+.

Here's what grok says:

To calculate the odds of an A+ mother and an O+ father having an A- child, we need to analyze the genetics of both the ABO blood type system and the Rh factor system. Let’s break it down step by step.
Step 1: ABO Blood Type (A from A+ and O+)

• A+ mother: Her phenotype is A and Rh-positive. Her possible ABO genotypes are:
  • AA: Two A alleles.
  • AO: One A allele, one O allele (O is recessive).
• O+ father: His phenotype is O and Rh-positive. His ABO genotype must be OO, as O blood type requires two recessive O alleles.
• Child is A-: The child’s phenotype is A and Rh-negative, so the ABO genotype must be AA or AO (since A is dominant over O).
• Inheritance:
  • Mother (AA): Passes A 100% of the time.
    • With father (OO): Child is AO (A blood type) 100% of the time.
  • Mother (AO): Passes A 50% or O 50% of the time.
    • With father (OO): Child is AO (A) 50% or OO (O) 50% of the time.
• The child needs to be A (AA or AO). The father always passes O, so:
  • If mother is AA: Child is AO (A) 100%.
  • If mother is AO: Child is AO (A) 50%.
• Mother’s genotype probability (based on population):
  • Among A blood type individuals, ~1/3 are AA and ~2/3 are AO (approximate, varies by population).
  • P(AA) ≈ 0.33, P(AO) ≈ 0.67.
• P(child is A) = P(mother AA) × 1 + P(mother AO) × 0.5 = (0.33 × 1) + (0.67 × 0.5) = 0.33 + 0.335 = 0.665 (66.5%).

Step 2: Rh Factor (+ and + to -)

• A+ mother: Rh-positive, so her genotype is RR or Rr.
• O+ father: Rh-positive, so his genotype is RR or Rr.
• A- child: Rh-negative, so the genotype must be rr.
• For the child to be rr, both parents must pass an r allele, meaning both must be Rr (heterozygous), as RR cannot pass r.
• Inheritance:
  • Rr × Rr: 25% RR, 50% Rr, 25% rr.
  • Child must be rr: 25% (0.25) chance if both parents are Rr.
• Parents’ Rh genotype probability (based on population):
  • Rh-positive frequency: ~85% (R allele ~0.6, r allele ~0.4 globally).
  • Among Rh+ individuals:
    • P(RR) = 0.6² / 0.85 = 0.36 / 0.85 ≈ 0.424.
    • P(Rr) = (2 × 0.6 × 0.4) / 0.85 = 0.48 / 0.85 ≈ 0.565.
  • Both must be Rr for an rr child: 0.565 (mother) × 0.565 (father) = 0.3192.

Step 3: Combined Probability

• P(child is A-) = P(child is A) × P(child is rr) × P(both parents Rr).
• P(child is A) = 0.665 (from ABO).
• P(child is rr | both Rr) = 0.25.
• P(both parents Rr) = 0.3192.
• Total = 0.665 × 0.25 × 0.3192 = 0.0531 (5.31%).

Final Answer
The odds of an A+ mother and an O+ father having an A- child are approximately 5.3% (or about 1 in 19). This assumes typical population allele frequencies and that the mother can be either AA or AO and both parents can be Rr.

 

[unkl brws]

Thank you for this session.

Q: (L) That's a poorly formed question, by the way. How to ask it... Just because I say it's poorly formed doesn't mean that I know better! I know what you're trying to find out.

I've wondered if there was a guide or reference thread on how to properly ask the Cs a question. I did a search for thread titles using the word "question" and got seven pages worth. This was the most interesting (to me):

Thread 'Asking The Right Questions, a guide to critical thinking'

Mar 22, 2015

Asking The Right Questions
eighth edition, M. Neil Browne, Stuart M. Keeley,

The book sponsored by the C's ;) .

Need to be read in deep but seem very good from what I saw. Even if some thing which are said in the book are obvious, the interesting part is on "how to communicate" on those obvious things. Complement of the "Crucial conversations" book?

Here's the chapters:

1 The Benefit of Asking the Right Questions
2 What Are the Issue and the Conclusion?
3 What Are the Reasons?
4 What Words or Phrases Are Ambiguous?
5 What Are the Value Conflicts and Assumptions?
6...

• Ellipse
• Replies: 0
• Forum: Books

• 

Just food for thought (osit).

A: Yes, things may get dire as summer approaches. Just sit tight and hang on! Goodbye.

Q: (L) I don't know if I like that.

I don't know if I like it either. However, I'm glad for the warning. Similar to the warning given a few months before the Covid restrictions and mandates were implemented;

A: Now, we would like to say something of interest to all: Soon things in your realm will become very chaotic and strange. It will give chills to many. Be not alarmed! It will pass and there will be a new reality to explore. Cosmic forces will be displayed and there will be many searching for answers. Be prepared to give the help that is needed. Be together in love and peace. Goodbye.

Eyes open. Stay sharp.

 

[Herbal witch]

Thanks for another interesting session.

One billion people down is no small number in such a short time, and the consequences are still being felt and people dying slowly from vaccines, but also beside that and poverty new wars like Ukraine and same old in Middle East, toxic food, water and air for many decades that got worse now that cause infertility and deaths in large numbers, plus more intensive earth changes. When economic crash, ice age and cataclysms hit around the world it will be even faster, so when they said in Atlantis there was population around now and 100 million left it sounds not so unrealistic now.

Combine this with the Earth's changes and the numbers will be far wider and in far reaching locations as well. According to the Cs, there is another pathogen coming along soon. That too will wreak it's own havoc for the depopulation of the planet. A new perspective, isn't it? Thanks to the Chateau people and this new session. Really interesting and as always, eye opening as well.
By the way, Laura stated that she ate an exclusive "carnivore" diet for about 3 weeks and feels much better. Can Laura tell us what kind of meats she ingested? Beef? Chicken? Fish? Others? Thanks guys.

 

[Ricardo]

(...)
By the way, Laura stated that she ate an exclusive "carnivore" diet for about 3 weeks and feels much better. Can Laura tell us what kind of meats she ingested? Beef? Chicken? Fish? Others? Thanks guys.

( Fwiiw ) Session 18 May 2024 :

(...)

(L) Grass fed beef or supermarket pork. Well now you're adding another parameter to it.

A: Grass fed is better on both counts. But in absence, pork is better.

(...)

 

[Alix]

Thank you all for the hard work in gaining and presenting this session to us. Keeping our heads (i.e. our grip on reality) is becoming more and more important. Being there when asked for help will be paramount OSIT.

 

[ranger]

Another great session. Thank you very much.

 

[Nević Nenad]

Thaaanks!

Interesting really on population numbers.

 

[Emet-Selch]

Thanks a lot for the session, to C's , Laura and whole team who was involved.

Could AI be used to predict future events?

A: Sure!

Q: (L) Well, I guess if you give it enough parameters and say: "What do you think's going to happen?" It's going to tell you...

Let's start to play the Lottery using IA xD

(L) Anyway. I'm tired. I'm ready to be done. No more questions. Is there any message or any question we should have asked that we didn't ask to, which we could get an answer here at the end?

A: Yes, things may get dire as summer approaches. Just sit tight and hang on! Goodbye.

Q: (L) I don't know if I like that.

things may get dire? I can think a lot of possibilities stuff coming events , a new plandemic, another global war or conflict, even a solar flare. Anyway, I guess we'll have to wait and see, but yeah, become what you must, hang in there until the end!

 

[sToRmR1dR]

Thank you Chateau for the interesting session!

 

[meadow_wind]

For general interest sake, I asked what the population density of each Rh- blood type was - grok corrected my question and also gives distributions of the types in different countries.

Thanks for this session! Questions about blood type are interesting.

Both my parents are O- (which is quite surprising by itself) so I'm obviously O- !
But even more surprising is that both fathers of my kids are O+... Go figure out how I pick that up.
My son is O+ but I still don't know my daughter's blood type because they forgot to write it in the booklet when she was born. Most likely O+ too.

 

[DreamGod]

Thanks for the Session!!!

 

[Matty F]

Thanks for the new session and all the work that goes into it. Take care everyone x