Session 29 March 2025

If the phantom years theory is correct, then there may have been no gap because those 500 years did not actually happen.
It was Donald H. Frew who made these comments, which I quoted (although for some reason I then referred to him as Drew in my article:-)). However, you make a very good point here. It think it highly unlikely that Frew would have been aware of the phantom years theory.
 
Curiously, Harran is also famous for its beehive houses, which makes one wonder whether there could be a connection here to the Freemasons and Merovingians, who also paid homage to the humble bee, often using it as a sacred emblem in their iconography or decoration.

something like those structures here in ireland at Fahan (Glenfahan)


also St Gobnait patron saint of Bees !

Yes, I can certainly see the likeness. Thank you for posting this article even if my Norman kinsmen were described as the villains of the piece (they normally were too :lol:). Perhaps it is just a case of people adopting the same basic structure at different times and in different places. The ubiquitous pyramid shape would, be another example which appears all over the world. As they say, there is nothing new under the sun.

It seems that the good folk of the mysterious village of Rennes-le-Chateau in southern France also adopted the stone beehive shaped hut too but in their case it appears that the huts really were linked to bees, as they were intended for honey production according to the C's:​

Q: Then he asks: about the beehive huts in the area, to which you answered 'not germaine,' and he said 'yes, but I'm curious about the beehive huts.' Is there any symbolism to the beehive huts in the area? {Not to mention the funny spelling of the word “germane”.}

A: None.

Q: What were they used for?

A: Honey production!

Q: In what manner was this honey production accomplished?

A: Carefully, so as not to get stung!

Q: Very cute. Who was using these beehive huts for honey production?

A: 19th century agrarians.


You will note above that Laura picked up on the C's unusual spelling of the word "germane" (meaning "relevant") in their original response to the question about the beehive huts. They used the spelling "germaine" instead and this was not the first time in the transcripts that they had done this either:

Q: (M) What are the beehive huts in the area?

A: Not germaine.


This spelling is though the same spelling as found in the name of the infamous con man Comte St. Germaine who was reputedly an alchemist, something the C's said was actually genuine where the colourful count was concerned:​

Q: (L) Comte St.Germaine claimed to be able to transmute lead into gold. Was this true?

A: Yes.


When the C's answered "not germaine" to M's question about the beehives, they could just have responded "irrelevant" but they chose to use the unusual spelling of "germaine", which suggests they had intended this as a clue.

The Comte St Germaine is one of history's mystery men but there are some who think he may have adopted the disguise of a gentleman fop to hide his real identity as a leading Rosicrucian, one who may even have played a critical role in facilitating the US Declaration of Independence. The count had been captured in London in 1745 and held as a Jacobite spy after incriminating letters were found on his person. Hence, he had on at least one occasion certainly been involved in cloak and dagger activities.

Going out on a limb here, I just wonder if the Sabians of Harran may have been connected in some way to the STS Rosteem who in turn are linked to Rostau (meaning "Rose Cross") or, using its modern name, Giza, the Rosicrucians' predecessors or earlier manifestation according to the C's:
Q: (L) Well, that is not good! Are you saying that the Elohim are STS? Who were these STS beings they made a pact with?

A: Rosteem, now manifests as Rosicrucians.


Since they seemed to act as an ancient repository for Hermetic teachings, the Sabians of Harran may like the Comte St Germaine have been practising alchemists too. So, even if the symbolism of the beehive hut may have had no relevance, were the C's trying to draw our attention to a link between the Rosicrucians (via the name "Germaine") and the Sabians of Harran, who maintained in antiquity a colony at Giza (Rostau)?​
 
FWIW, Randall Carlson discusses the 'underground structures' found below the Giza Pyramids plateau.

This episode touches on:

The synthetic aperture radar scans under the Khafre Pyramid

The 8000-foot-deep Nile Canyon and its erosion history

Evidence of massive ancient floods across Egypt and the Sahara

Karstification, caves, and plausible geological explanations for voids

Human activity in pre-desert North Africa and the Green Sahara period

Connections to ancient myths and global flood patterns

Rather than leap to speculation, Carlson builds a grounded case for what might lie beneath the surface — and why it matters.

 
Let's read this message literally
and lets read dire as eID or erID (some form of electronic ID).

Things/commodities? may(in May?) get eID (be digitised), as summer (bull run) approaches. Just sit tight on your assets and hang on for a wild parabolic bull run in the markets.


It seems to be starting - digitisation/tokenisation.
And markets (crypto and stocks) are already confirming the reversal to the upside, while Bitcoin (the mover of digital currencies) had recently already set a new all time high in the price and looks to have just started the parabolic phase that will lead to euphoria and bubble bursting afterwards. And stock markets too.
Summer of the markets approaches.
'Dotcom 2.0'. bubble / digital economy bubble.

IMG-20250512-WA0012.jpg
 
My apologies but I posted a follow-up post on the mysterious structures discovered under the Giza Plateau mistakenly on the 26 April 2025 thread instead of here - see: Session 26 April 2025

Since posting the article about a second large underground structure located under the Mankaure pyramid, which is the smallest of the three main pyramids at Giza, I came across an article in the latest edition of Nexus Magazine (June/July 2025) on the original discovery, which has now been validated by the C's. This article by Sanja Korlaet called 'What lies under the Giza Plateau' provides a bit more background detail on the scientific team behind the discovery and also covers the reaction to it.

Just to remind people, this was how the subject was brought up in this session:​
(ScioAgapeOmnis) A new study using synthetic aperture radar from Italians and Scottish researchers claims to have found a vast underground complex beneath the Giza pyramids, including eight vertical cylinders, spiral pathways, and cubic chambers stretching over 6,500 feet and linking all three pyramids. Presented on March 15, 2025, although it could be a fascinating discovery, these findings await peer review and some experts remain skeptical pending further evidence.

(L) Were these legitimate scientists?

(ScioAgapeOmnis) Yeah, they are. Apparently they wrote a very similar paper in 2022, which I mentioned on our thread that is along the same lines, minus the columns and all that crazy stuff, deep, deep, deep underneath the pyramid. But they were talking about additional chambers within the pyramid itself and it was a big paper and these scientists have a bunch of other papers to their names, so they look legitimate, except this time around, it doesn't appear to be a full paper that's published. There's some kind of conference in Italian talking about these findings. So I'm hoping there would be an actual paper at some point. But that's it so far.

(L) All right. Oh, the picture's here. Is there anybody who hasn't seen it?

Q: (Chu) Yeah. Can we have the link on the chat?

There's a 'vast underground city' below Egypt's Giza pyramids, scientists' wild theory claims — but experts debunk it as 'fake news'

The pyramids at Giza

(Approaching Infinity) Just a little bit of background... I haven't looked into it too deeply, but this is just what I saw from social media. One of the scientists, some people have been trying to discredit him because he also wrote a paper about alien abduction. I don't know his entire take on it, but at least one of the guys is into weird stuff as well. But then one criticism I've seen is that some people are claiming that the Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) technology, they're saying it can't be used to detect things that are underground. I don't know one way or the other, but that's just one of the things that I was reading online. So if that's the case, it sounds like they're almost using this technology in a novel way, and so that would be a hurdle to overcome if they're trying to convince skeptics or to just actually do an excavation to try to verify it. But I just thought I'd throw those two things out there.

(L) So they're saying that this kind of radar can't, synthetic aperture radar...

(Joe) Joe Rogan had somebody talking about it, so that's why it's all...

(L) And that's why it's all... So he had one of the scientists on to talk to him?

(Joe) No, somebody just talking about it, not one of the scientists.

(L) It's really interesting because this picture in here in the questions is better than the pictures there.

(Niall) That's someone's reconstruction, whatever signature they got, it probably looks nothing like that. That's an artist's rendition.

(Andromeda) Creative interpretation...

(ScioAgapeOmnis) Yes. The original actual picture is more like wavelengths. It’s just like green and red blotches and stuff. And personally, I can't make out how they got these details in the rendering because looking at it, it just looks, there's like this something that resonates under the pyramid, but it's like a big blob. You can't really make out the details. So I don't know how they said, "Oh, it's eight columns. They have a spiral around each column". That part of it was confusing to me.

(Joe) So what's the blob under the pyramids?

(Niall) Is there a blob?

(L) The question:

(ScioAgapeOmnis) Is there any truth to these recent claims from some scientists that there are very large structures under the Giza pyramids?

A: Yes.

Q: (L) Are they anything like what is depicted in these artists' renderings?

A: No. We have said that pyramids are energy collectors and dispersers.

Q: (SAO's girlfriend) Oh, that's what I was saying. Sorry. I don't have to be here. Sorry.

(L) Who's whispering?

(ScioAgapeOmnis) Sorry, my girlfriend is here. She was like, "I said that! I said that!"

(SAO's girlfriend) I didn't know microphone was on. Sorry. Sorry.

(ScioAgapeOmnis) I kept it on so I can keep talking. No, you're good. You're good. You didn't even say hi. You can say hi.

(SAO's girlfriend) No, I know you're on camera.

(ScioAgapeOmnis) She hates being on camera.

(L) Oh, so do I! [laughter]

(SAO's girlfriend) I was just passing by and I heard that and I was like, "Oh gosh!"

(irjO) So can I ask a following question on that? Is it what the picture of the scan was getting is just plasma, like those columns? It was just like, I don't know how to ask the question. Sorry.

(L) Yeah, I don't either. So you're not helping me.

(Joe) They said yes, that there are structures. So what is it... like what kind of structure was being read by this scanner?

A: Energy storage "batteries".

Q: (Joe) Is it correct that these were made at the same time as when the pyramids were built?

A: Yes

Q: (Joe) What's the primary material that these "batteries" are made from?

A: Stone and metals and quartz.

Q: (L) So I guess they're devices.

(Joe) How deep are they?

A: 500 feet

Q: (L) And what did they say that they were seeing?

(ScioAgapeOmnis) 680, I think. (irjO) 720 meters. [MJF: the article gives 648 metres]

(L) Did you look at any of the individual authors of these works to track 'em back to the universities?

(ScioAgapeOmnis) Not that far. I just know that there are known scientists that have a lot of published papers to their name, but I haven't tracked 'em explicitly as to who they're connected to. And there is a thread on the forum I think discussing more so I have to remember more about this.

The article provides a brief biography of the three main researchers heading the project who were working under the name of the Khafre Research Project SAR Technology Team.

1. Dr Fillipo Biondi is an aerospace engineer with a PhD in telecommunications engineering, a master's degree in space engineering and international space law, and a master's degree in quantum optics and information. He is a synthetic aperture radar (SAR) specialist. It was he who developed the technique to measure and locate underground structures and voids using acoustic information extracted from satellite radar data (SAR Doppler tomography).

2. Dr Armando Mei is an historian specialising in economic and African civilisations. He has published eight books on an alternative approach to understanding history, including Unravelling Ancient Myths and Legends.

3. Dr Corrado Malanga is a chemist and researcher and has published over 60 articles in international scientific journals in the field of chemistry. He has also pursued interests in exobiology, virtual reality, the study of the universe as a product of consciousness and UFO and alien abduction phenomena for over 30 years. Apparently, he has published several books on these themes the most recent being Khnum-Khufu: Cheops - The End of the Mystery - When the Gods Did not Want to Die, which was co-authored with Dr Biondi and published in Italian in 2023. It should be noted that Dr Malanga was the team leader on the Khafre Project. In this book, the authors used their novel investigative methodology results to highlight a need to radically revise the history of human evolution: one where human races and cultures of the distant past were more technologically advanced than ours at the present time.

]MJF: Have they read the Cassiopaean material I wonder?]

It seem this eclectic trio came together in September 2022 and combined their personal knowledge and experience into a collaboration, which saw the birth of the Khafre Research Project.

It should be stressed that the non-invasive underground investigation of the Khafre Pyramid was conducted through information supplied online by two American aerospace companies. Biondi and Mei confirmed that the Giza underground structures were detected not by one satellite alone but by several different satellites.

The innovative investigative technique developed by Biondi utilises the electromagnetic signal sent by the SAR radar on the satellite which is then transformed into sound information on its return and is capable of detecting micromovements of subsurface structures. The special software developed by Biondi makes sense of surface vibrations and, by using an inverted Doppler effect, turns them into two-dimensional "sound pictures" focused along the vertical dimension (depth or height). Using tomography, these pictures are put together to form a three dimensional model. The team analysed over 200 tomographies and satellite data over the course of a year before coming up with their conclusions. They claim their method "sees" into the ground..

As regards the Khafre Pyramid, they saw five djed-shaped structures positioned centrally above Belzoni's chamber, each consisting of five horizontal layers of stone, separated by low chambers and topped by a sloping roof. They claim the shape of the djed-shaped structures appear to be of the same shape as the djed structure found above the so called King's Chamber in the Great Pyramid. According to ancient Egyptian mythology, a djed is a mysterious pre-dynastic amulet and also a hieroglyph (see below) meaning stability, which also represented the backbone or spine of Osiris, the Egyptian god of the afterlife and the underworld.
1751285962572.png

Could the myth of Osiris's death and dismemberment thus represent the destruction of the Giza Pyramid complex as a working energy producing machine?

All five djed structures appear to be connected by passages. The dark areas seen in the images the Team produced indicate voids while colours are used by the computer to present different vibrations and therefore different materials of the structures found.

Below ground the Team found what they believe are eight vertical cylindrical structures appearing as hollow wells, positioned in a north-south direction, four in each row, descending to a depth of 648 metres and merging with two large cubic chambers of 80 x 80 metres (see image below). They claim each well is 20 metres in diameter and is surrounded by descending coil like structures, which may be a stairway giving possible access underground.
1751289906511.png

The article points out that this was not the Team's first ground-shaking discovery since in 2022 Biondi and Malanga published a scientific paper titled "Synthetic Aperture Doppler Tomography Reveals Details of Undiscovered High Resolution Internal Structure of the Great Pyramid of Egypt'. I would certainly give them full marks for long titles :-). Their research apparently revealed the existence of many previously unknown chambers and corridors above and below the bedrock level.

Perhaps the most interesting SAR Doppler Tomography discovery in this case was the outline of a large horizontal chamber above the north end of the Grand Gallery, which was 23.5 metres long, which was connected to a horizontal double corridor 72 metres long [MJF: There is that magic number again!] reaching the King's Chamber and going around it. The chamber is rectangular shaped and is spatially reminiscent of the large "void" previously found by the Morishima Team in 2017 using muon particle scanning. I would point out that the void in question was considered to be as long as the Statue of Liberty in New York to give you some idea of its size. This discovery of a large new chamber as well as the void found by the Morishima Team fits in well with what the C's said years ago about their being more chambers in the Great Pyramid than the authorities admit to:​
Session 22 August 1998:
Q: (L) Was the pyramid itself ever used as a sounding mechanism, the chambers?

A: Not exactly.

Q: How many chambers or cells are there in the Great Pyramid?

A: 19.

Q: So, there are some that have not been found yet.

Curiously, the C's may have subtly hinted at the use of satellite technology to uncover more of the secrets of the Great Pyramid in the following extract from the transcripts:
Session 14 May 1998:
A: Pyramid is slow to give up secrets to those looking directly.

Q: So, if you don't look for anything in particular?

A: Maybe one should also gaze skyward.

Of course, the C's may have been referring to stellar objects here such as potential supernovae, but their statement does work when you consider that Biondi and Malanga were looking at the Great Pyramid indirectly using SAR Doppler Tomography with no preconceived intentions on their part.

On top of the discovery of the new chamber, they also found a north face entrance chamber, beyond two chevrons, which had also previously been detected by the Morishima Team.

The Underground Passage

In my previous post on the latest discoveries made by the Khafre Research Team, I noted: "Is there yet to be found an underground passageway leading into this huge underground storage complex? If so, what exciting discoveries may await the archaeologists?"​

Well it seems as though the Khafre Research Team may have found just such a passage.

The Osiris Shaft is a known underground structure with an entry positioned near the causeway of the Khafre Pyramid. It runs 35 metres below the surface and consists of three levels. The shaft leads to the first level, which is an empty corridor that leads in turn to the next shaft. This shaft opens up to a chamber comprising six rooms that contain two sarcophagi made of granite. The shaft in the floor leads then to the next level, which is a larger chamber containing water and a submerged sarcophagus that was apparently found empty. There are also four pillars surrounding the waterbed supporting the ceiling.

When the Khafre Research Team concentrated on examining the Osiris Shaft using the SAR Doppler Tomography method, they found all the known structures. However, to their surprise, they discovered that there was much more to this known structure. An unknown shaft was revealed below the known structure that kept leading deeper and revealing new chambers etc., down to a depth of 1.2 kilometres. There is also a scanned area from the Pyramid of Khafre to the Valley Temple, which is riddled with large and deep shafts cut into the bedrock and showcasing very straight vertical edges cut at 90 degree angles. To the Team, one of the shafts showcasing a perfect straight cut reminded them very much of a lift or elevator shaft. This would make sense if you needed a means to descend 1.2 kilometres quickly. The mind boggles to think that our ancestors could build a 1.2 kilometre lift shaft 10,800 years ago.

Reaction to the Khafre Research Team's Discoveries

Since none of the Team are accredited Egyptologists, they are considered as "outsiders" by mainstream academia. Mainstream Egyptologist and former head of the Egyptian Supreme Council of Antiquities Department Zahi Hawass has been quick to dismiss the discovery via a statement posted on his website and social media:​
"Dr Zahi Hawass, renowned Egyptologist, has stated that the rumours suggesting the presence of columns beneath the Pyramid of Khafre are nothing but fabrications propagated by individuals with no expertise in ancient Egyptian civilisation or the history of the Pyramids. He further emphasised that the Supreme Council of Antiquities has not granted these individuals any permits to conduct work inside the Pyramid of Khafre."​
To obtain approval from the Ministry of Antiquities to undertake research on any site in Egypt, you must first sign, ahead of your research, a confirmation of the currently accepted paradigm that all ancient structures on the Giza Plateau and other sites around Egypt were built by dynastic Egyptians. One can readily see why the Egyptian authorities want to maintain this outmoded paradigm since any discovery that suggests that the last great wonder of the ancient world still standing was built by people other than the native Egyptians of pharaonic times would be a huge blow to Egyptian prestige. Unfortunately for Hawass, as the Khafre Research Team used satellites positioned in orbit and freely available data obtained from them, they did not require permission from anyone since they were not undertaking invasive archaeological research.

Implications of their Discoveries

Near the end of the Bologna conference Dr Malanga said:
"One thing is for sure, the ancient Dynastic Egyptians did not build this structure. They did not have the tools. It is logical to expect the older structures the deeper we go into the ground. It is also logical that structures that are below ground precede the structures above, as that was the only way to build such a complex. The ancient Egyptian Dynastic civilisation did not have the level of technology to dig this deep, so that is out of the consideration."​

In the words of Dr Mei:
"The structures that are found below the Giza ground level is the most compelling evidence of the existence of the previous technologically advanced culture."​

When asked to give an idea of the age of the structures deep underground, Mei gave a a date between 70,000-75,000 BC, quoting a cataclysmic volcanic eruption of Mount Toba, Sumatra around about that time. This was the largest super volcano eruption in human history and almost caused the extinction of the human race. He added that the survivors of the highly evolved civilisation known to us as Atlantis fled to the land of Khemet (ancient Egypt) and restarted their civilisation. They are the ones who built the Giza Plateau monuments and substructures.

Well, he is correct but he has the dating and the causal event for the destruction of Atlantis wrong.

Future Plans

The Team have said that after finishing their investigation of the Giza Plateau, they intend to look at the Serapeum underground structure at Saqqara, the Pyramid of the Sun in Mexico and the Cydonia region on Mars, including the infamous Face. As regards Cydonia, they hope to use satellites that are in Martian orbit, which have been extracting information from the surface for some time.

The only things I would say about investigating Mars is that they may find NASA and the European Space Agency, who own and control the Martian satellites, somewhat uncooperative if Richard Hoagland's experiences are anything to go by.

 
Q: (Joe) So the Chinese government has been lying about the official numbers.

A: Not exactly.

Q: (L) Maybe they just don't know.

A: Yes

This woman explains how China got into this problem. The answer is that people are incentivized to get fake IDs that will allow them to go study or live in other, more developed areas of China, or get some other financial benefits. She doesn't mention another possibility, which I think could be another reason for getting a fake ID, and that is that it would allow people who are blacklisted in a Social Credit System to become normal citizens again. That could explain empty cities. It's not that people disappeared, but that government is building new buildings for people who never existed.

 
(Joe) Was there an element to the original COVID virus that was released, made in a lab Fort Detrick, and released at the Wuhan military games in 2019, was there an element to that virus that was ethnic specific against Chinese?
A: Yes and no.
Q: (L) So was it an ethnic specific weapon?
A: Yes
Q: (L) Was it aimed against the Chinese?
A: Partly.
Q: (Joe) And who else?
A: Varied.
Q: (L) I don't think they want to talk about that because it's very slow and draggy. Was it aimed at white people?
A: Yes
Well, beyond ethnicity, the mainstream media dutifully warned us that speaking English, in particular, was especially dangerous! :-)
 
This woman explains how China got into this problem. The answer is that people are incentivized to get fake IDs that will allow them to go study or live in other, more developed areas of China, or get some other financial benefits. She doesn't mention another possibility, which I think could be another reason for getting a fake ID, and that is that it would allow people who are blacklisted in a Social Credit System to become normal citizens again. That could explain empty cities. It's not that people disappeared, but that government is building new buildings for people who never existed.


A broken clock is right twice a day. She looks like a broken clock to me, or a paid propagandist who works at the anti-China rumour mill.


I was born and raised in communist China. When the 1989 pro-democracy demonstrations broke out in China, I was a student in the United States. Watching journalists at CBS, CNN, and others covering the events live in Tiananmen Square, I was greatly moved by American media’s courage in supporting the Chinese people’s fight for freedom and in covering the truth. However, I soon realized the truth didn’t always reach China. ...

In other words, her story is that she bought into MSM lies during an emotionally intense colour revolution, and that became a watershed moment in her world outlook. That she advertises this doesn't bode well for the objectivity of her many analyses.
 
(ScioAgapeOmnis) Is there any truth to these recent claims from some scientists that there are very large structures under the Giza pyramids?

A: Yes.

Q: (L) Are they anything like what is depicted in these artists' renderings?

A: No. We have said that pyramids are energy collectors and dispersers.

Q: (SAO's girlfriend) Oh, that's what I was saying. Sorry. I don't have to be here. Sorry.

(...)

(irjO) So can I ask a following question on that? Is it what the picture of the scan was getting is just plasma, like those columns? It was just like, I don't know how to ask the question. Sorry.

(L) Yeah, I don't either. So you're not helping me.

(Joe) They said yes, that there are structures. So what is it... like what kind of structure was being read by this scanner?

A: Energy storage "batteries".

Q: (Joe) Is it correct that these were made at the same time as when the pyramids were built?

A: Yes

Q: (Joe) What's the primary material that these "batteries" are made from?

A: Stone and metals and quartz.

Q: (L) So I guess they're devices.

(Joe) How deep are they?

A: 500 feet

Q: (L) And what did they say that they were seeing?

(ScioAgapeOmnis) 680, I think. (irjO) 720 meters.
I saw this posted on Facebook and it reminded me of this session quote. If this is a Sphinx in Pakistan then maybe, as seen in the bottom photo, what is below the monument is something like what might have been built under the pyramid in Egypt as discussed above.

sphinx of Balochistan.jpg

The Sphinx of Balochistan.
In 2004, the completion of the highway connecting Karachi with the port city of Gwadar on Pakistan's Makran coast revealed one of the world's most controversial structures: The Sphinx of Balochistan, located in Hingol National Park.

From a distance, this structure strikingly resembles the Sphinx of Giza. At its base, a temple carved into the rock, now resembling a Hindu temple, suggests the Sphinx towers above an ancient sanctuary.

The presence of a Sphinx in Pakistan is perplexing, as no records indicate that the civilization which built the Sphinx of Giza ever reached this region. The structure features what appear to be the flaps of the pharaohs' Nemes headdress, distinguishable facial features, and paws, according to scholar Bibhu Dev Misra, suggesting an ancient, evolved civilization.

Conversely, most scholars argue the Sphinx of Balochistan is a natural formation sculpted by weathering. No specific excavations or research have confirmed either theory, leaving the structure shrouded in mystery.

Is the Sphinx of Balochistan a natural wonder, or the remnant of an ancient civilization? If man-made, its erosion suggests a very ancient origin. Could the civilization that carved the Sphinx of Giza have migrated to Pakistan, driven by rising seas and desertification? This remains an intriguing possibility.

 
I saw this posted on Facebook and it reminded me of this session quote. If this is a Sphinx in Pakistan then maybe, as seen in the bottom photo, what is below the monument is something like what might have been built under the pyramid in Egypt as discussed above.

View attachment 111545



Iirc, somewhere in Zechariah Sitchen’s books, he proposed that there was a second sphinx in the East facing the one in Giza. That they bookended Sumer, where the spaceport was. Or perhaps it was Baalbek, I can’t recall. Of course Baalbek is up in Lebanon so that can’t be right…Must’ve been Ur or Sippar (that sounds right). But anyway yeah, twin sphinxes for sure.
 

Trending content

Back
Top Bottom