Session 30 September 1994

[palestine]

Hello, I have a very basic question in regard of this bit:

Q: (L) How many years ago did the flood of Noah occur?

A: 12656. (10,662 B.C.)

I would like to understand what the 10662 BC date precisely refers to.

If I am not mistaking, the flood of Noah refers to the water drop, by Mars, on the planet. It has been said that the water was dropped "in the form of snow". It was then "gradually released, as water, in the oceans".

C's say, in another session:

Session 22 October 1994

A: It is a very broad representation. It simply means that there was a cataclysmic event that did envelop the whole planet at that time and that those that were ready to experience that as part of their soul development without exiting the body, were warned ahead of time. But not by trying to manipulate events, but by simply allowing faith to let them acquire knowledge and being naturally drawn into position to experience what they needed to experience to survive the event.

This suggests that the flood of Noah - so the 10662 event(?) - will be best understood as "a cataclysm" that did "envelop the planet".
Thinking a bit of this last bit, indicates that the flood of Noah is a traumatizing event & a cataclysm.

The 10662 event may refer to:

• the apparition of Mars, before it started dropping its water
• the water drop in form of snow
• the gradual release of the water
• all three motions

Thank you!

 

[axj]

The 10662 event may refer to:

• the apparition of Mars, before it started dropping its water
• the water drop in form of snow
• the gradual release of the water
• all three motions

That planetary cataclysm had at least three parts if you look in other sessions as well.

Here is a summary (10900 BC should probably be replaced with 10662 BC):

Post in thread 'Atlantis'

Aug 6, 2025

To sum up what I understand now about the timeline of the final destruction of Atlantis (only from the C's sessions):

10900 BC
- comet cluster impacts
- physical pole shift and axis shift of the Earth
- the plasma discharge from Mars probably caused the gravitational and other changes
- probably the time when the lithosphere became more "plastic" and more easily "reshapeable" (accelerated continental drift?)

40 years later
- deluge of water from Mars
- collapse of the water vapor canopy

Unknown year, enough time for Atlantis to recover after the comets and...

• axj

• 

 

[palestine]

That planetary cataclysm had at least three parts if you look in other sessions as well.

Here is a summary (10900 BC should probably be replaced with 10662 BC):

Post in thread 'Atlantis'

Aug 6, 2025

To sum up what I understand now about the timeline of the final destruction of Atlantis (only from the C's sessions):

10900 BC
- comet cluster impacts
- physical pole shift and axis shift of the Earth
- the plasma discharge from Mars probably caused the gravitational and other changes
- probably the time when the lithosphere became more "plastic" and more easily "reshapeable" (accelerated continental drift?)

40 years later
- deluge of water from Mars
- collapse of the water vapor canopy

Unknown year, enough time for Atlantis to recover after the comets and...

• axj

• 

Thank you very much @axj

I have been trying, indeed, to produce a chronology such as the one you did. I read all those posts and it's very interesting.

I am trying to get the basic dates a bit set. Please don't laugh, but yeah, I have been stumbling upon this session:

(Pierre) Let's shift to a more cheerful topic: cometary bombardments. So we discussed the death of the woolly mammoths due to a cometary bombardment. I would like to know about the transfer of water from Mars to planet Earth, when did it occur relative to this cometary bombardment? How many years before, how many years after?

A: Within 40 years more or less.

Q: (Pierre) So cometary bombardment, and then Mars water transfer?

And so I was picturing:

10702 - cometary bombardment
10662 - Mars interaction

Rather than:

10662: comet impacts
10622: deluge

So you would assert, with certainty, that the second model is the correct one? Sincerely asking!

Too: the 10900 date refers to "the final destruction of Atlantis" - and it has been said that it was because of the crystals. And so, if I may ask: why wouldn't you automatically set the crystals under 10900? I feel that this would even be the only event, that could be written under 10900 with certitude?

I trust that you have been studying those matter extensively. Here, I am trying to double-check what can be said with certainty, and what cannot. Thanks for your thoughts if you'd like to. I feel that we are deducing things, but that it cannot pass the test at 100%. Just a feeling, I may be wrong, etc.

And I don't imply or go the way that the whole picture is wrong - very much the opposite.

Thank you