Session 6 December 2025

[MJF]

Not true. Stone balls have also been found in the Balkans.
Mysterious stone balls in Bosnia and Herzegovina: The largest weighs 37 tons, they can also be found in Croatia
View attachment 114919





We also have the "Cyclopic Walls".
View attachment 114920

Giants.

And the Pyramids which they claim are older than the Egyptians.


Of course, they attribute all this to the Illyrians, for whom it is officially unknown where they came from.
Are they Gor relatives or just descendants of Atlantis?

Just to remind people, the C's confirmed that the pyramidal structures discovered in Bosnia were genuine.

Session 5 August 2009:

Q: (L) Are the pyramids in Bosnia just fiction, or are there indeed built structures under those pyramidal hills in Bosnia?

A: Yes there are pyramidal structures.

 

[Kika]

Thank you! I did not know also that there were some spheres in that region too, although there is some clarification here and it’s the fact that also there are rock natural formations very similar to the costa rican’s spheres.

The ones in your article doesn’t seem natural but there is an electrical phenomena that happened thousands of years ago, where huge discharges on the ground made sand or dirt to stick into spheres formation, like the spheres in Australia. Which were confused with the ones created by people.

Yes, I know, there is a "war" going on over these (cca. 60) .

THE ORIGIN OF THE BALLS
Geologists tried to prove that nature made that perfect shape, and archaeologists tried to disprove them. Everyone has their own theory and they couldn't agree.

Archaeologists say that there are stone balls all over the world made of three different materials - granite, volcanic rock and sandstone. The Zavidović balls should be made of sandstone. Analysis of the material in the USA and Russia has proven that 90 percent of them have what sandstone has, but ten percent is what it doesn't have, which is calcium carbonate and manganese. Which leads us to the assumption that some ancient civilizations crushed rock material and added it to earthen molds, adding calcium carbonate, because it gives strength, and manganese, which is the best binding material.

 

[MJF]

Yes, I know, there is a "war" going on over these (cca. 60) .

THE ORIGIN OF THE BALLS
Geologists tried to prove that nature made that perfect shape, and archaeologists tried to disprove them. Everyone has their own theory and they couldn't agree.

Archaeologists say that there are stone balls all over the world made of three different materials - granite, volcanic rock and sandstone. The Zavidović balls should be made of sandstone. Analysis of the material in the USA and Russia has proven that 90 percent of them have what sandstone has, but ten percent is what it doesn't have, which is calcium carbonate and manganese. Which leads us to the assumption that some ancient civilizations crushed rock material and added it to earthen molds, adding calcium carbonate, because it gives strength, and manganese, which is the best binding material.

Working from memory here, I seem to recall that when Morris K Jessup mentioned the stone balls in his book The Case for the UFO, the gypsy commentators in the Varo Edition suggested they had been used as weapons fired out of spaceships and were mass produced from moulds. Such a weapon seems a bit primitive though when you consider the C's have spoken of STS forces using EM weapons to hit targets, such as at Stonehenge. However, primitive as it may seem, there have been proposals by the USAF (which may have been implemented for all we know) to use tungsten rods based within satellites in space as kinetic bombardment weapons - sometimes known as the 'rods from God' or Project Thor - Quoting from Wikipedia:​

A kinetic bombardment or a kinetic orbital strike is the hypothetical act of attacking a planetary surface with an inert kinetic projectile from orbit (orbital bombardment), where the destructive power comes from the kinetic energy of the projectile impacting at very high speeds. The concept originated during the Cold War.

Typical depictions of the tactic are of a satellite containing a magazine of tungsten rods and a directional thrust system. When a strike is ordered, the launch vehicle brakes one of the rods out of its orbit and into a suborbital trajectory that intersects the target. The rods would typically be shaped to minimize air resistance and thus maximize velocity upon impact.

The kinetic bombardment has the advantage of being able to deliver projectiles from a very high angle at a very high speed, making them extremely difficult to defend against. In addition, projectiles would not require explosive warheads, and—in the simplest designs—would consist entirely of solid metal rods, giving rise to the common nickname "rods from God". Disadvantages include the technical difficulties of ensuring accuracy and the high costs of positioning ammunition in orbit.

So, perhaps the idea that the stone balls could have been used as kinetic weapons by advanced civilisations is not so far fetched as it may at first seem.

 

[Huila]

Has anyone ever heard of or stumbled upon similar information during their research? Any references in old texts? Any guesses on what this means or what this does?

Carrying out sacrifices/ rituals on particular dates is a common practice among the powers that used to be. They value numbers/ dates and celestial arrangements as to when to carry out their deeds. That might explain why a large number of them appear to claim birth dates on days of eclipses. But how- do they wilfully induce labor on those dates- it can't be a stroke of luck, surely?

Geez Louise, 'sacrificial calendar'... "A: The sacrificial energy was active at the time. Think of "Eyes Wide Shut" type of activities."

A former South African Satanist said every Halloween they would carry out a ritual/ some sects would carry out actual human sacrifices; they did this each year as to will/ bring forth the 'AntiChrist'?. (he offered insight as to why a good number of children may go missing during the halloween period). So Halloween is one date they mark for sacrifice.

Thank you for the session!



If there is something about this time - a calendar of some sort - then it’s probably safe to assume that the events of 9/11/2001 also fall into the ‘sacrifice’ category.

Yes 9/11 appears to be an important marker for them. Do not discount that the Kirk and Yu Menglong took place close to that date as well. Back to 9/11. There some schools of thought that suggest these other dates; 9/11; 3/11; 6/11. It's like are following/ venerating those all important promoted numbers of the 3,6,9 (By Nikola Tesla, Hindu Tradition etc). The 3/11 ritual/sacrifice has been attributed to the Japanese Fukushima event.

That leaves another ritual/event to take place on 6/11 or has it already taken place?

But wait it does not end there- others suggest 3,6,9 is not the entire complete sequence of important numbers; that the final number is 12 (that circles back to the 3). If true 12/11 may be another important calendar date for these people to perform another ritual/ sacrifice.

As a general rule Masons may look to carry out rituals when the Moon is in Taurus; where as the Pope class/ Vatican may look to carry out their rituals when the Moon is in Scorpio. Preferably when the Moon is full in either sign; but they may still carry out their activities in spite of the fullness of the moon.