Session 6 December 2025

[Pat]

Thank you for the session. Always looking forward to read you.
Very interesting about the partners relationship and the giving of love. Could retention for a 6 months period or more be beneficial for a man?
Is the act necessary for the construction or continuity of a relationship?
Thanks again for all the information.

 

[Claus]

Thank you all for the session, and also thank you for the exchange here. As always very interesting topics

 

[Jones]

Thank-you to everyone for the session

. And there’s also the thread on a book called Cupid’s Poisoned Arrow- it’s been years since I read the book, but from what I recall it was along the lines of what Laura brought up in the session.

Yeah, that thread come to mind for me too. There has been mention of the practice of the karezza method both in that thread and others - I don't know if that or something like it is what is being referred to in this session yet though.

Another thing that come to mind for me was the beginning of the relationship between Ian and Beth in Jennifer Ashleys The Madness of Lord Ian McKenzie where he, though aroused, did not initially engage in sex with Beth while he bought her to orgasm. Of course until the subject has been fully written about, I'm not yet sure if that's what Laura is driving at here.

 

[Breo]

Thank you crew, team and all involved for another amazing session. Being very grateful for your ongoing work and sharing. Much love, blessings, prayers and protection for all the forum.

 

[TheTodd]

Very interesting.
Thank you for the session!

 

[T.C.]

Thank you for the session!

(meadow_wind) Has Yu MengLong been murdered?

A: Yes

Q: (meadow_wind) What were the motives for his murder?

A: Ritual sacrifice.

Q: (meadow_wind) Is there a connection between Charlie Kirk's murder and Yu MengLong's?

A: Very indirect, but yes.

Q: (L) And when you say 'very indirect, but yes', What exactly was the connection?

A: Time was right for sacrifices.

Q: (L) So you mean that there is some kind of... a sacrifice calendar?

A: Yes

Q: (L) Well, she points out here, odd coincidence:

- Charlie Kirk, time of fatal injury 12:23 PM September 10th

- Yu MengLong alleged time of fallen death, but most likely died earlier. 5:00 AM September 11th, 2025

And then there were a bunch of chaotic energy, rare natural events that struck China around that period. September 10th, September 13, 15 and 21. Okay, what's up with that?

A: The sacrificial energy was active at the time. Think of "Eyes Wide Shut" type of activities.

Q: (L) So what is that? I never saw that. I didn't want to see it.

(Joe) It's a movie about the classic kind of secret society, masks, masonic kind of ritual sacrifice. Was Yu MengLong in some way involved in that or was he abducted by those people before that sacrifice?

A: He was the chosen sacrifice.

If there is something about this time - a calendar of some sort - then it’s probably safe to assume that the events of 9/11/2001 also fall into the ‘sacrifice’ category.

 

[Arne]

Thanks a lot for sharing. Much much appreciated.

 

[seek10]

Thank you for the wonderful session.

Thanks for the great session!

But what's in the purse, then? If it's not a receiver of 4D energy, then it's generating the energy that's being directed by the pine cone?
Is the energy purely 3D? I'm getting the feeling it may have something to do with audio frequencies...

I was suspecting that pyramids which collect energy as a reservoir involved in the process. May be these purses are small scale energy holders from large scale pyramidal reservoir ( collects through grid), redirected through cones for moving megalithic objects. May be, It is like our technology - electric generators ( coal or water or atomic), through local transformers to household supply.

Thank you all for the session


(...)


Open question to all: how much, in your opinion, does this imply a jeopardizing of the Chinese government?

I am unable to answer that question myself, but "above" means "above", so there is a hierarchical aspect at the level of power dynamics. I can't ignore this.

I understand that the session refers to a transnational network of individuals, and I know that this network acts via infiltration; it's usually found in banks, show-business, and "elite" positions. Where money and power are.

So, I was pondering the degree of independence of the Chinese government in regard of this "structure".

I feel comfortable with the idea that it is not proper than to bind the CCP with those events. The stuff is external to it, but the problem is that there may be infiltration.

Thanks @meadow_wind for having asked about this case. It provides clarity. Much can be sorted thanks to your questions I believe!

Every body has their own program despite the labels ( democracy or communism etc.) . 4D STS will not allow any major country to go out of its control. Nation is not just land, it is the people. people can be hooked on to power for their purposes irrespective of governance structure it chooses through historical background. The current China built up on Mao's massive purges aka fear. So it is reasonable to assume that these types of 'occultists' involved all along. In any case, we know so little about China.

 

[hiker]

Thanks for the session!

(Nienna) In previous posts, the C's have said that the Apollo mission did take men to the moon and Neil Armstrong did walk on the moon although the dates stated in the session were not quite accurate. Do the C's still say that this is true?

A: Yes

Q: (Nienna) Did the Apollo missions land on the moon with the help of secret or advanced technology?

A: No

Q: (Joe) Did the Apollo astronauts see or experience anything on their trip to and on the moon that shocked them and that they could not speak about?

A: Yes. That is the reason so much confusion has been shrouded about the topic.

(Joe) What did the Apollo astronauts see?

A: Aliens and altered reality.

Q: (L) Are there things on the moon that are part of another reality that we cannot consistently see?

A: Yes

Q: (Joe) So what they saw was something that is normal on the moon - that wasn't put on for their benefit?

A: Yes

Q: (L) And those people that are always seeing flashes of light on the moon, I've heard about people that train their telescope on it and they just watch it all the time. Are those flashes of light related to this altered or other reality?

A: Yes

Dr. G, a clinical and forensic psychologist and a body language expert, analyzed the demeanor of the astronauts during the Apollo 11 post mission press conference. (He also dealt with the press conference held before the mission.)

His conclusions?

I do acknowledge that there was a lot of pacifying behavior that we saw. We saw what some people might associate with lying or deception. We saw people having to calm themselves down a lot. Now, there are multiple explanations for this potentially. They could be that they are uncomfortable because of being in front of all of these people. It could be that they're uncomfortable because they just went on a space trip because they were in quarantine for 21 days. There's a variety of reasons why they could be stressed, but we do see distinct patterns of certain questions, particularly as it relates to memories of going into space. We do see more signs of pacification and more of a need to calm themselves down at those times.

So, I can actually see why people are skeptical and suspicious of this press conference or of both of these press conferences because their behavior does suggest a lot of stress and anxiety. And you would think for people that are astronauts that they would manage it a little bit differently. But ultimately this was also a a time period where people were not on TV a lot where an event like this was one of the biggest events in human history. So it could just be that there was a tremendous amount of pressure and they didn't know how to act on TV that they didn't feel comfortable with it. It's also possible that there was lying and deception going on.

I noticed that at 17:46, Buzz Aldrin answers a question about the moon surface, an "innocuous" subject, in a very clear and firm way without any fidgeting (as Dr. G put it), whereas the general memories of being up there seemed to bring anxiety to all three.

Looks like they did go to the moon, but perceiving aliens and altered reality was what disturbed them. If they didn't have foreknowledge of the things they would see there, it must have been a true shock to the system to experience the "high strangeness" happening on and about the moon. (Despite having had some briefing of what to expect, seeing it with their own eyes would have ”brought it home” for sure.)

 

[N1mTzo]

I wonder how they silenced them to keep this hush so successfully.

If I remember correctly, absolutely all the Apollo astronauts who landed on the Moon were Freemasons (and it wasn't particularly hidden). So you just have to pick the right guys to keep them quiet.
Furthermore, during the Moon landing, the astronauts' voice broadcast was interrupted several times "due to technical problems." Clearly, even the trained "Masons" were literally shocked by something on the Moon, and it couldn't be broadcast to the general international broadcaster on Earth.

Has anyone ever heard of or stumbled upon similar information during their research? Any references in old texts? Any guesses on what this means or what this does?

There are bloggers on YouTube who cover this "occult" topic and gematria well. It should be noted that YouTube and Google mercilessly crack down on such bloggers (deleting particularly dangerous videos or labeling them "conspiracy theory"), so they often have to resort to "Aesopian language" to keep their videos from being deleted.

Numerous Hollywood stars (of varying stature) have been sacrificed in such "rituals." Almost always, it's disguised as an "accident" or suicide.
I've read a lot about it, but I've never been 100% sure it's all true. The C's confirmed that this whole ritualistic horror is real.

How are the victims chosen? Is there a certain criteria such as a person's birth or natal chart that fits the timing?

You could do a detailed search on YouTube and Google on this topic yourself; there's tons of information there. By searching, you raise your frequency, and besides, knowledge protects.
To throw some bones: a person's date of birth, name, and place of birth are significant; many "stars" are tracked from birth. This applies to actors, directors, screenwriters, singers, writers (and other media personalities). The topic is very complex and vast; you won't understand it in half an hour.

 

[Matty F]

Thanks for another amazing session and all the hard work that’s goes into it.
Amazing how before a session I’m thinking about things that then get bought in it! Peptides and retention have been on my mind. Reading Hunters testosterone book at the minute so it’s all tying in. Thanks again.