Session 6 December 2025

Many thanks to the whole team, and also to everyone who attended via Zoom, for this wonderful new session. ❤️

A: Love gives all.

What a great reminder!
Sometimes I realize, or at least feel, that I am not giving enough.
I feel a kind of imbalance in my daily life.
I feel that I receive more from others than I am actually giving.
And I am not saying this to sound good or anything like that.
Honestly, sometimes I don't know how to be of service to others, especially in the harsh and difficult daily grind.
That's why I am grateful to the Cs for reminding me of what Love is and does. Also to St. Paul for the same reason, and to all of you for walking together.
And thank you again for sharing the session, just a few days after it took place. :flowers:

Translated with DeepL.com (free version)
 
Thank you so much for the session and thank you for asking for details on the moon landing. I was 50/50 on whether: we didn't go, or if we went and found something controversial. That explains the post-mission press conference behaviour, the "loss" of the all the original footage and the nonsense claims that they've lost the technology to go back and their reluctance to do so.
 
Since you are advising men to join Freemasonry, I hope you’ll be equally open to receiving advice?

Knowledge protects, so I would recommend two things.

First, read the book, “Egregores” by Mark Stavish.

After you have read it, read this Cassiopaean session:
(Navigator) Do "egregores" exist as Stavish describes them? A being created from the thoughts of a group of people which then takes a consciousness of its own, and needs to be fed from time to time, and being either positive or negative.
(L) Okay. That's basically what Stavish's main egregore definition is...
(Andromeda) Basically like a group attachment.
A: He is close except it usually happens from the top down. That is, a being can influence a group of people to take certain actions and thereby establish a feeding pool for itself.
Thank you @T.C. and @LVX in Tenebris for share your experiences and recommend Mark Stavish's book, which you can find it here: Egregores The Occult Entities That Watch Over Human Destiny.

I was in the initiatory meetings of a Rosicrucian lodge branch of I.F.H. where Dario Salas Sommer (a.k.a. John Baines): Putin's counselor was the author of some remarkable books. In fact, I made a quickly advance in the preliminary courses (which are based on Gurdjieff books).

But as I recapitulate the events on 2012, my continuous questioning about Archons and the “gold-bearing broth of humanity” (Loosh) was not welcomed for an applicant, besides as I didn't attend to the rituals and ceremonies and only I was just heading towards their august library. Certainly, some events that I cannot explain, let's say a serious string of unfortunate events, accompanied by restless nights and a concentrated chaos in my poor third world economy made me give up on going forward.

Considering the response provided by C's, I'd like to recommend Kyle Griffith's War in Heaven and this post about another great book: Light-bearers Of Darkness.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Many thanks to the whole team, and also to everyone who attended via Zoom, for this wonderful new session. ❤️



What a great reminder!
Sometimes I realize, or at least feel, that I am not giving enough.
I feel a kind of imbalance in my daily life.
I feel that I receive more from others than I am actually giving.
And I am not saying this to sound good or anything like that.
Honestly, sometimes I don't know how to be of service to others, especially in the harsh and difficult daily grind.
That's why I am grateful to the Cs for reminding me of what Love is and does. Also to St. Paul for the same reason, and to all of you for walking together.
And thank you again for sharing the session, just a few days after it took place. :flowers:

Translated with DeepL.com (free version)


This doc says love has to balance 2 opposites: "Law" (structure/rigidity) and "Grace" (freedom/chaos)... if it goes 100% law, everything freezes. 100% grace = total chaos. both result in zero meaning but love is the sweet spot in the middle - the "optimising principle", basically saying love is the logic that stops the universe from crashing by balancing order and novelty so life evolves.
 

Attachments

But as I recapitulate the events on 2012, my continuous questioning about Archons and the “gold-bearing broth of humanity” (Loosh) was not welcomed for an applicant, besides as I didn't attend to the rituals and ceremonies and only I was just heading towards their august library.
🤣

(This smiley's name is "rolling on the floor laughing")

I am sorry that you underwent negative events at the time of leaving this lodge; it seems to me that Rosicrucians may be more polarized than Freemasonry, so that different concepts apply.

I believe that it's good that this is "behind", now, for you, so that you can focus on different things!

After all, if you were naturally more interested in their library than their main thing, this is telling. It's not something for everybody.
 
Not a typo, single men don’t seem to have the same responsibilities regarding retention as coupled men.

I don't get why all the "pity" for married (or in a relationship) man. Any man single or married should take care to not waste his vital energy. That's no impediment to enjoying sex and pleasure with his loved one.

From my perspective and observation the fastest way to destroy his magnetism, health and personal life is by abusing and wasting away his seed.

Don't fall for your doctors ill advise, maybe thats how you got to the doctors office in the first place.
 
I was in the initiatory meetings of a Rosicrucian lodge branch of I.F.H. where Dario Salas Sommer (a.k.a. John Baines): Putin's counselor was the author of some remarkable books.
I'm afraid I don't quite understand what you tried to say or indicate.

Dario Salas Sommer is well known in Russia and indeed, some of his thoughts got recognition from Putin, and his books are recommended by the education system. But it's far away from him being Putin's counselor. Why did you use that term? Furthermore, the embedded link, meant to provide explanation, I'd guess, goes to "The Clinic" article titled The Chilean philosopher who inspires Putin's speeches, where one can read, in machine translation:

Ameríca Economía indicates that Salas' books are present in the libraries of Russia's most important universities and are included in the list of scientific and literary works recommended by the Russian Writers' Union.

Last year, the website esceptica.org dedicated an article to him titled Charlatan of the Month: Darío Salas Sommer, alias John Baines

Today we have dedicated this post to a low-profile but quite prolific charlatan with decades of practice," they write, citing that Darío Salas Sommer (alias John Baines) was born in Santiago, Chile, in 1935. In 1970, he founded the Institute of Hermetic Philosophy, a shady operation with all the hallmarks of a cult where, for a monthly fee plus other services, the unsuspecting are instructed for several, many years in this gentleman's method for becoming a “stellar being,” a kind of superman who achieves a higher consciousness, frees himself from his imperfect mortal condition, and other nonsense that serves to exploit the narcissist in all of us.
[bolding, mine]

following is a link to esceptica which is unavailable at least for my location. But it looks to me that "The Clinic" was expanding on Ameríca Economía article (of 2015), already a bit exaggerating in saying that "The influence of Salas Sommer in Russia is such that he was invited to speak at the Summit of the BRICS countries (...)", linking to somewhat more accusatory text at esceptica.

So the logical conclusion regarding the quote above would be something along the lines: Sommer is a charlatan running a cult, and look, he is Putin's counselor. Is that what you meant to say? Or, perhaps, something was "lost in translation", literally and/or metaphorically?
 
I don't get why all the "pity" for married (or in a relationship) man. Any man single or married should take care to not waste his vital energy. That's no impediment to enjoying sex and pleasure with his loved one.

From my perspective and observation the fastest way to destroy his magnetism, health and personal life is by abusing and wasting away his seed.

Don't fall for your doctors ill advise, maybe thats how you got to the doctors office in the first place.
I personally think none of the rules people think of apply to me really. I was still a virgin at 35 after my wedding night because we couldn't figure out how to work it. Eventually it became apparent she had to work on it and get it in before I lost it hardness-wise
and I had to even then rely on her to tell me if I lost it. To orgasm I had to play a fantasy in my mind essentially like I was still going solo like I had to until 35. Just looking at girls was better really.
 
I don't get why all the "pity" for married (or in a relationship) man. Any man single or married should take care to not waste his vital energy. That's no impediment to enjoying sex and pleasure with his loved one.

From my perspective and observation the fastest way to destroy his magnetism, health and personal life is by abusing and wasting away his seed.

Don't fall for your doctors ill advise, maybe thats how you got to the doctors office in the first place.
Yeah, you’re correct. it’s just conditioning to think that a man will only receive pleasure and fulfilment from sexual engagement if ‘the job is completed’.
I understand a man can climax without ejaculating, wouldn’t that be a worthwhile avenue to explore?

My attitude and opinion has changed since I gleaned a little insight on this topic, I no longer feel pity, I see the awakened and awakening men who come across this information invigorated by this awareness to take back their masculinity.
 
Dario Salas Sommer is well known in Russia and indeed, some of his thoughts got recognition from Putin, and his books are recommended by the education system. But it's far away from him being Putin's counselor.
Because that was IFH' members qualify him. And I'm not referring only to the branch on my country but the central one in Chile. In fact, they claimed that their Order was a continuation of the one that had emancipated South America; in effect, he is the founder of the Latin American Bolivarian Foundation. Kindly study Simón Bolívar and San Martín; also check El Cruce de los Andes for more context.

I was only a few months in IFH, as I said, in the beginning of 2012. Before entering, I've read all the published material from John Baines in Spanish and I spent many hours talking about his ideas with the mentor assigned to the introductory classes. That mentor was the Latino American coordinator of IFH.

Of course I didn't know that at that time, neither that Baines was the Rosicrucian and speakerperson of the LA Order. BTW, at that time neither understanded very well what was a Rosicrucian besides Jacques Vallée confession to Hynek; I think is a good moment to cite it:
Forbidden Science I - Chicago Sunday 13 November 1966 said:
“For me,” Hynek said, “the challenge was discovering the limitations of science, the places where it failed: the phenomena it couldn’t explain.”
“Had you studied the paranormal before deciding to become an astronomer?” I asked.
“I’ve spent a lot of time reading about esoteric subjects. Of course, I wouldn’t say any of this to my colleagues; they’d think I was crazy. But as a student, I read everything I could find about the Rosicrucians and the Hermetic philosophers,” Hynek replied.
It was my turn to take a deep breath.
“I could also confess that I’ve spent several years in the same studies,” I finally added. “Until recently, I was even taking a course with the Rosicrucian Order.”
“Oh, really? Which one?” Hynek asked.
“AMORC, which is based in San Jose.”
“You know,” Hynek said, “there are several movements that call themselves Rosicrucian.” Among the Hermetic writers, I was very impressed with Max Heindel when I was younger, until I began reading Manly Hall's books. Eventually, that led me to Rudolf Steiner, whom I believe to be the most profound of the group.
“I have always admired the ancient traditions that maintain there is no such thing as a physical Rosicrucian organization,” I concluded. “The only valid Rosicrucian order, they maintain, is not found on this level of existence. And they insist that true initiation, the only illumination of the spirit that counts, cannot come from any human teacher, but only from Nature itself. When I read that, I ceased to be a member of the San José group. I continue to wonder about the existence of a genuine Rosicrucian community that remains unseen.”

The mentor presented me to the head of the library, and we remained friends up to Pandemic times. As I was outside their “league,” we meet in a Café. We usually interchanged books, some that were unavailable for me outside the Order; and they were very interested in UFO material, but curiously that kind of books were forbidden in their library.
following is a link to esceptica which is unavailable at least for my location. But it looks to me that "The Clinic" was expanding on Ameríca Economía article (of 2015), already a bit exaggerating in saying that "The influence of Salas Sommer in Russia is such that he was invited to speak at the Summit of the BRICS countries (...)", linking to somewhat more accusatory text at esceptica.

So the logical conclusion regarding the quote above would be something along the lines: Sommer is a charlatan running a cult, and look, he is Putin's counselor. Is that what you meant to say? Or, perhaps, something was "lost in translation", literally and/or metaphorically?
In 2017, when Baines was near his death, they told me about the rapport with Putin. In fact, that Baines was a member of the diplomatic chamber of affairs. It was far to discredit them, based on these links:
Notice the first link is endorsed by Sputnik: Happy to be corrected if I have got the wrong end of the stick. Meanwhile, La Tercera is a mainstream newspaper, not only online but also in print in Chile. For the benefit of the forum, I am taking the time of translating into English:
“Modern society, in its pursuit of material development, can lose sight of the profound meaning of existence. I am certain that you, the unwavering leaders of your people, when making decisions about the development of the world order, understand that economic and material success can only be lasting and secure if they are based on the deepest moral, ethical, and spiritual values,” the Chilean philosopher stated in his address at that summit, followed by that of Russian leader Vladimir Putin: “The lack of morality in politics and business is disastrous for all of humanity. I couldn't agree more with Darío Salas Sommer that acting in accordance with moral principles is not only just, but also profitable.”

There are also some other circles where Baines is criticized. In my country, I'm touch since 2013 with people who were the first members of IFH in the middle eighties. In fact, they label it as a cult because the rigid hierarchy imposed on new members, and some bizarre stories that perhaps aren't the right place to discuss, given that some of them involve minors.

Of course, it's impossible to determine whether this is a directive from the Chilean headquarters or a deviation in the chain of command in my own country. In either case, I think it's right to distance oneself from groups with these practices, and I would indeed describe them as cults.

Finally, and this is a first-person account, at IFH the minimum time required for “evaluation” is four years. It's said that this is enough time to save on travel and living expenses to flight to Chile in order to be initiated vis-à-vis by the Rosicrucian hierophant. For many of my classmates at the time, that was the summum bonum. For me, it resulted in my first “red flag.”

Why I said our acquittance ceased with the pLandemic? Because they were biased towards the “prick.” In fact, they hesitated to meet again with a non-vaccined one.
 
Back
Top Bottom