Session 6 December 2025

Many thanks to the whole team, and also to everyone who attended via Zoom, for this wonderful new session. ❤️

A: Love gives all.

What a great reminder!
Sometimes I realize, or at least feel, that I am not giving enough.
I feel a kind of imbalance in my daily life.
I feel that I receive more from others than I am actually giving.
And I am not saying this to sound good or anything like that.
Honestly, sometimes I don't know how to be of service to others, especially in the harsh and difficult daily grind.
That's why I am grateful to the Cs for reminding me of what Love is and does. Also to St. Paul for the same reason, and to all of you for walking together.
And thank you again for sharing the session, just a few days after it took place. :flowers:

Translated with DeepL.com (free version)
 
Thank you so much for the session and thank you for asking for details on the moon landing. I was 50/50 on whether: we didn't go, or if we went and found something controversial. That explains the post-mission press conference behaviour, the "loss" of the all the original footage and the nonsense claims that they've lost the technology to go back and their reluctance to do so.
 
Since you are advising men to join Freemasonry, I hope you’ll be equally open to receiving advice?

Knowledge protects, so I would recommend two things.

First, read the book, “Egregores” by Mark Stavish.

After you have read it, read this Cassiopaean session:
(Navigator) Do "egregores" exist as Stavish describes them? A being created from the thoughts of a group of people which then takes a consciousness of its own, and needs to be fed from time to time, and being either positive or negative.
(L) Okay. That's basically what Stavish's main egregore definition is...
(Andromeda) Basically like a group attachment.
A: He is close except it usually happens from the top down. That is, a being can influence a group of people to take certain actions and thereby establish a feeding pool for itself.
Thank you @T.C. and @LVX in Tenebris for share your experiences and recommend Mark Stavish's book, which you can find it here: Egregores The Occult Entities That Watch Over Human Destiny.

I was in the initiatory meetings of a Rosicrucian lodge branch of I.F.H. where Dario Salas Sommer (a.k.a. John Baines): Putin's counselor was the author of some remarkable books. In fact, I made a quickly advance in the preliminary courses (which are based on Gurdjieff books).

But as I recapitulate the events on 2012, my continuous questioning about Archons and the “gold-bearing broth of humanity” (Loosh) was not welcomed for an applicant, besides as I didn't attend to the rituals and ceremonies and only I was just heading towards their august library. Certainly, some events that I cannot explain, let's say a serious string of unfortunate events, accompanied by restless nights and a concentrated chaos in my poor third world economy made me give up on going forward.

Considering the response provided by C's, I'd like to recommend Kyle Griffith's War in Heaven and this post about another great book: Light-bearers Of Darkness.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Many thanks to the whole team, and also to everyone who attended via Zoom, for this wonderful new session. ❤️



What a great reminder!
Sometimes I realize, or at least feel, that I am not giving enough.
I feel a kind of imbalance in my daily life.
I feel that I receive more from others than I am actually giving.
And I am not saying this to sound good or anything like that.
Honestly, sometimes I don't know how to be of service to others, especially in the harsh and difficult daily grind.
That's why I am grateful to the Cs for reminding me of what Love is and does. Also to St. Paul for the same reason, and to all of you for walking together.
And thank you again for sharing the session, just a few days after it took place. :flowers:

Translated with DeepL.com (free version)


This doc says love has to balance 2 opposites: "Law" (structure/rigidity) and "Grace" (freedom/chaos)... if it goes 100% law, everything freezes. 100% grace = total chaos. both result in zero meaning but love is the sweet spot in the middle - the "optimising principle", basically saying love is the logic that stops the universe from crashing by balancing order and novelty so life evolves.
 

Attachments

But as I recapitulate the events on 2012, my continuous questioning about Archons and the “gold-bearing broth of humanity” (Loosh) was not welcomed for an applicant, besides as I didn't attend to the rituals and ceremonies and only I was just heading towards their august library.
🤣

(This smiley's name is "rolling on the floor laughing")

I am sorry that you underwent negative events at the time of leaving this lodge; it seems to me that Rosicrucians may be more polarized than Freemasonry, so that different concepts apply.

I believe that it's good that this is "behind", now, for you, so that you can focus on different things!

After all, if you were naturally more interested in their library than their main thing, this is telling. It's not something for everybody.
 
Not a typo, single men don’t seem to have the same responsibilities regarding retention as coupled men.

I don't get why all the "pity" for married (or in a relationship) man. Any man single or married should take care to not waste his vital energy. That's no impediment to enjoying sex and pleasure with his loved one.

From my perspective and observation the fastest way to destroy his magnetism, health and personal life is by abusing and wasting away his seed.

Don't fall for your doctors ill advise, maybe thats how you got to the doctors office in the first place.
 
I was in the initiatory meetings of a Rosicrucian lodge branch of I.F.H. where Dario Salas Sommer (a.k.a. John Baines): Putin's counselor was the author of some remarkable books.
I'm afraid I don't quite understand what you tried to say or indicate.

Dario Salas Sommer is well known in Russia and indeed, some of his thoughts got recognition from Putin, and his books are recommended by the education system. But it's far away from him being Putin's counselor. Why did you use that term? Furthermore, the embedded link, meant to provide explanation, I'd guess, goes to "The Clinic" article titled The Chilean philosopher who inspires Putin's speeches, where one can read, in machine translation:

Ameríca Economía indicates that Salas' books are present in the libraries of Russia's most important universities and are included in the list of scientific and literary works recommended by the Russian Writers' Union.

Last year, the website esceptica.org dedicated an article to him titled Charlatan of the Month: Darío Salas Sommer, alias John Baines

Today we have dedicated this post to a low-profile but quite prolific charlatan with decades of practice," they write, citing that Darío Salas Sommer (alias John Baines) was born in Santiago, Chile, in 1935. In 1970, he founded the Institute of Hermetic Philosophy, a shady operation with all the hallmarks of a cult where, for a monthly fee plus other services, the unsuspecting are instructed for several, many years in this gentleman's method for becoming a “stellar being,” a kind of superman who achieves a higher consciousness, frees himself from his imperfect mortal condition, and other nonsense that serves to exploit the narcissist in all of us.
[bolding, mine]

following is a link to esceptica which is unavailable at least for my location. But it looks to me that "The Clinic" was expanding on Ameríca Economía article (of 2015), already a bit exaggerating in saying that "The influence of Salas Sommer in Russia is such that he was invited to speak at the Summit of the BRICS countries (...)", linking to somewhat more accusatory text at esceptica.

So the logical conclusion regarding the quote above would be something along the lines: Sommer is a charlatan running a cult, and look, he is Putin's counselor. Is that what you meant to say? Or, perhaps, something was "lost in translation", literally and/or metaphorically?
 
I don't get why all the "pity" for married (or in a relationship) man. Any man single or married should take care to not waste his vital energy. That's no impediment to enjoying sex and pleasure with his loved one.

From my perspective and observation the fastest way to destroy his magnetism, health and personal life is by abusing and wasting away his seed.

Don't fall for your doctors ill advise, maybe thats how you got to the doctors office in the first place.
I personally think none of the rules people think of apply to me really. I was still a virgin at 35 after my wedding night because we couldn't figure out how to work it. Eventually it became apparent she had to work on it and get it in before I lost it hardness-wise
and I had to even then rely on her to tell me if I lost it. To orgasm I had to play a fantasy in my mind essentially like I was still going solo like I had to until 35. Just looking at girls was better really.
 
Back
Top Bottom